1
|
Suhaimi NS, Sellyei B, Udvari Z, Székely C, Cech G. Characterization of four novel actinospore types of fish parasitic myxozoans and the occurrence of Branchiodrilus hortensis and Ophidonais serpentina from fish farms of Hungary. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2024; 25:100994. [PMID: 39445088 PMCID: PMC11497487 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.100994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Six distinct actinospore types were identified in the intestinal epithelium of oligochaetes collected from the Szigetbecse and Makád fish farms of Ráckeve Danube Arm Fishing Association, in Hungary. Four new types: triactinomyxon type, raabeia type, aurantiactinomyxon type 1, and aurantiactinomyxon type 2, were described morphologically and molecularly from three invertebrate host species: Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, Ophidonais serpentina, and Tubifex tubifex. The 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) analysis revealed that these new types of actinospores did not match any myxospore sequences available in GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis placed the triactinomyxon type within the Myxobolus clade that parasitizes cyprinid fish, while the raabeia type and aurantiactinomyxon type 2 were both placed within the Myxobolus clade associated with Perciformes fish. Aurantiactinomyxon type 1 was clustered in a clade containing gill-infecting Henneguya spp. from Esociformes fish. However, no myxospores have been found yet to link to the newly sequenced actinospores reported in this survey. This study also reports the first occurrence of two oligochaetes species, Branchiodrilus hortensis and Ophidonais serpentina in Hungary, specifically in fish farms of Ráckeve Danube Arm Fishing Association. Moreover, this is the first report on the involvement of Ophidonais serpentina in the life cycle of myxozoans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadhirah Syafiqah Suhaimi
- HUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Animal Biotechnology and Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
| | - Boglárka Sellyei
- HUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Udvari
- Doctoral School of Biological Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
- Ráckeve Danube Arm Fishing Association, Ráckeve, Hungary
| | - Csaba Székely
- HUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Cech
- HUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinsson S, Klinth M, Erséus C. Testing species hypotheses for Fridericia magna, an enchytraeid worm (Annelida: Clitellata) with great mitochondrial variation. BMC Evol Biol 2020; 20:116. [PMID: 32928097 PMCID: PMC7488859 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-01678-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep mitochondrial divergences were observed in Scandinavian populations of the terrestrial to semi-aquatic annelid Fridericia magna (Clitellata: Enchytraeidae). This raised the need for testing whether the taxon is a single species or a complex of cryptic species. RESULTS A total of 62 specimens from 38 localities were included in the study, 44 of which were used for species delimitation. First, the 44 specimens were divided into clusters using ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery) on two datasets, consisting of sequences of the mitochondrial markers COI and 16S. For each dataset, the worms were divided into six not completely congruent clusters. When they were combined, a maximum of seven clusters, or species hypotheses, were obtained, and the seven clusters were used as input in downstream analyses. We tested these hypotheses by constructing haplowebs for two nuclear markers, H3 and ITS, and in both haplowebs the specimens appeared as a single species. Multi-locus species delimitation analyses performed with the Bayesian BPP program also mainly supported a single species. Furthermore, no apparent morphological differences were found between the clusters. Two of the clusters were partially separated from each other and the other clusters, but not strongly enough to consider them as separate species. All 62 specimens were used to visualise the Scandinavian distribution, of the species, and to compare with published COI data from other Fridericia species. CONCLUSION We show that the morphospecies Fridericia magna is a single species, harbouring several distinct mitochondrial clusters. There is partial genetic separation between some of them, which may be interpreted as incipient speciation. The study shows the importance of rigorous species delimitation using several independent markers when deep mitochondrial divergences might give the false impression of cryptic speciation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svante Martinsson
- Systematics and Biodiversity, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 463, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
| | - Mårten Klinth
- Systematics and Biodiversity, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 463, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Christer Erséus
- Systematics and Biodiversity, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 463, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weigand H, Beermann AJ, Čiampor F, Costa FO, Csabai Z, Duarte S, Geiger MF, Grabowski M, Rimet F, Rulik B, Strand M, Szucsich N, Weigand AM, Willassen E, Wyler SA, Bouchez A, Borja A, Čiamporová-Zaťovičová Z, Ferreira S, Dijkstra KDB, Eisendle U, Freyhof J, Gadawski P, Graf W, Haegerbaeumer A, van der Hoorn BB, Japoshvili B, Keresztes L, Keskin E, Leese F, Macher JN, Mamos T, Paz G, Pešić V, Pfannkuchen DM, Pfannkuchen MA, Price BW, Rinkevich B, Teixeira MAL, Várbíró G, Ekrem T. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 678:499-524. [PMID: 31077928 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Effective identification of species using short DNA fragments (DNA barcoding and DNA metabarcoding) requires reliable sequence reference libraries of known taxa. Both taxonomically comprehensive coverage and content quality are important for sufficient accuracy. For aquatic ecosystems in Europe, reliable barcode reference libraries are particularly important if molecular identification tools are to be implemented in biomonitoring and reports in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). We analysed gaps in the two most important reference databases, Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) and NCBI GenBank, with a focus on the taxa most frequently used in WFD and MSFD. Our analyses show that coverage varies strongly among taxonomic groups, and among geographic regions. In general, groups that were actively targeted in barcode projects (e.g. fish, true bugs, caddisflies and vascular plants) are well represented in the barcode libraries, while others have fewer records (e.g. marine molluscs, ascidians, and freshwater diatoms). We also found that species monitored in several countries often are represented by barcodes in reference libraries, while species monitored in a single country frequently lack sequence records. A large proportion of species (up to 50%) in several taxonomic groups are only represented by private data in BOLD. Our results have implications for the future strategy to fill existing gaps in barcode libraries, especially if DNA metabarcoding is to be used in the monitoring of European aquatic biota under the WFD and MSFD. For example, missing species relevant to monitoring in multiple countries should be prioritized for future collaborative programs. We also discuss why a strategy for quality control and quality assurance of barcode reference libraries is needed and recommend future steps to ensure full utilisation of metabarcoding in aquatic biomonitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Weigand
- Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 Rue Münster, 2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
| | - Arne J Beermann
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitaetsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| | - Fedor Čiampor
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Zoology Lab, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84523 Bratislava, Slovakia.
| | - Filipe O Costa
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710--057 Braga, Portugal.
| | - Zoltán Csabai
- University of Pécs, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Hydrobiology, Ifjúság útja 6, H7624 Pécs, Hungary.
| | - Sofia Duarte
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710--057 Braga, Portugal.
| | - Matthias F Geiger
- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Michał Grabowski
- University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.
| | - Frédéric Rimet
- INRA, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, UMR Carrtel, FR-74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France.
| | - Björn Rulik
- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Malin Strand
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Swedish Species Information Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | - Alexander M Weigand
- Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 Rue Münster, 2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg; University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitaetsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| | - Endre Willassen
- University of Bergen, University Museum of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
| | - Sofia A Wyler
- info fauna - Centre Suisse de Cartographie de la Faune (CSCF), Avenue de Bellevaux 51, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
| | - Agnès Bouchez
- INRA, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, UMR Carrtel, FR-74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France.
| | - Angel Borja
- AZTI - Marine Research Division, Herrera Kaia, Portualdea z/g, 20110 Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
| | - Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Zoology Lab, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84523 Bratislava, Slovakia.
| | - Sónia Ferreira
- CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
| | | | - Ursula Eisendle
- University of Salzburg, Department of Biosciences, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Jörg Freyhof
- Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), 12587 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Piotr Gadawski
- University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.
| | - Wolfram Graf
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management (IHG), Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33/DG, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Arne Haegerbaeumer
- Bielefeld University, Department of Animal Ecology, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| | | | - Bella Japoshvili
- Ilia State University, Institute of Zoology, ⅗ Cholokashvili ave, 0179 Tbilisi, Georgia.
| | - Lujza Keresztes
- Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Center of Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Cliniclor 5-7, 400006 Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Emre Keskin
- Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Evolutionary Genetics Laboratory (eGL), Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Florian Leese
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitaetsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| | - Jan N Macher
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Tomasz Mamos
- University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.
| | - Guy Paz
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa 31080, Israel.
| | - Vladimir Pešić
- University of Montenegro, Department of Biology, Cetinjski put bb., 20000 Podgorica, Montenegro
| | | | | | | | - Buki Rinkevich
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa 31080, Israel.
| | - Marcos A L Teixeira
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710--057 Braga, Portugal
| | - Gábor Várbíró
- MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, Department of Tisza River Research, Bem square 18/C, H4026 Debrecen, Hungary.
| | - Torbjørn Ekrem
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU University Museum, Department of Natural History, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|