Concurrent electrical cervicomedullary stimulation and cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation result in a stimulus interaction

Novel approaches to motoneuron disease/ALS treatment using non-invasive brain and spinal stimulation: IFCN handbook chapter

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been exploited in motor neuron disease (MND) with multifold objectives: to support the diagnosis, to get insights in the pathophysiology of these disorders and, more recently, to slow down disease progression. In this review, we consider how neuromodulation can now be employed to treat MND, with specific attention to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the most common form with upper motoneuron (UMN) involvement, taking into account electrophysiological abnormalities revealed by human and animal studies that can be targeted by neuromodulation techniques. This review article encompasses repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation methods (including low-frequency, high-frequency, and pattern stimulation paradigms), transcranial direct current stimulation as well as experimental findings with the newer approach of trans-spinal direct current stimulation. We also survey and discuss the trials that have been performed, and future perspectives.

The plasticity of nerve fibers: the prolonged effects of polarization of afferent fibers

The review surveys various aspects of the plasticity of nerve fibers, in particular the prolonged increase in their excitability evoked by polarization, focusing on a long-lasting increase in the excitability of myelinated afferent fibers traversing the dorsal columns of the spinal cord. We review the evidence that increased axonal excitability 1) follows epidurally applied direct current (DC) as well as relatively short (5 or 10 ms) current pulses and synaptically evoked intrinsic field potentials; 2) critically depends on the polarization of branching regions of afferent fibers at the sites where they bifurcate and give off axon collaterals entering the spinal gray matter in conjunction with actions of extrasynaptic GABA_A membrane receptors; and 3) shares the feature of being activity-independent with the short-lasting effects of polarization of peripheral nerve fibers. A comparison between the polarization evoked sustained increase in the excitability of dorsal column fibers and spinal motoneurons (plateau potentials) indicates the possibility that they are mediated by partly similar membrane channels (including noninactivating type L Cav⁺⁺ 1.3 but not Na⁺ channels) and partly different mechanisms. We finally consider under which conditions transspinally applied DC (tsDCS) might reproduce the effects of epidural polarization on dorsal column fibers and the possible advantages of increased excitability of afferent fibers for the rehabilitation of motor and sensory functions after spinal cord injuries.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This review supplements previous reviews of properties of nerve fibers by surveying recent experimental evidence for their long-term plasticity. It also extends recent descriptions of spinal effects of DC by reviewing effects of polarization of afferent nerve fibers within the dorsal columns, the mechanisms most likely underlying the long-lasting increase in their excitability and possible clinical implications.

Sham-derived effects and the minimal reliability of theta burst stimulation

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a patterned form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that has been used to induce long-term modulation (plasticity) of corticospinal excitability in a drastically shorter duration protocol than conventional rTMS protocols. In this study we tested the reliability of the effects of two well defined TBS protocols, continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS), especially in relation to sham TBS, within and across the same 24 participants. All TBS protocols were repeated after approximately 1 month to assess the magnitude and reliability of the modulatory effects of each TBS protocol. Baseline and post-TBS changes in motor evoked potentials (MEP—measure of corticospinal excitability) amplitudes were compared across the cTBS, iTBS and sham TBS protocols and between the initial and retest visits. Overall, across participants, at the initial visit, iTBS facilitated MEPs as compared to baseline excitability, with sham eliciting the same effect. cTBS did not show a significant suppression of excitability compared to baseline MEPs at either visit, and even facilitated MEPs above baseline excitability at a single time point during the repeat visit. Otherwise, effects of TBS were generally diminished in the repeat visit, with iTBS and sham TBS replicating facilitation of MEPs above baseline excitability at similar time points. However, no protocol demonstrated consistent intra-individual modulation of corticospinal excitability upon retest. As the first study to test both iTBS and cTBS against sham TBS across repeat visits, our findings challenge the efficacy and reliability of TBS protocols and emphasize the importance of accounting for sham effects of TBS. Furthermore, given that therapeutic effects of TBS are hypothetically derived from consistent and repeated modulation of brain activity, the non-replicability of plasticity and sham effects call into question these basic mechanisms.

The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans

Spinal DC stimulation (tsDCS) shows promise as a technique for the facilitation of functional recovery of motor function following central nervous system (CNS) lesion. However, the network mechanisms that are responsible for the effects of tsDCS are still uncertain. Here, in a series of experiments, we tested the hypothesis that tsDCS increases the excitability of the long-latency stretch reflex, leading to increased excitability of corticospinal neurons in the primary motor cortex. Experiments were performed in 33 adult human subjects (mean age 28 ± 7 years/14 females). Subjects were seated in a reclining armchair with the right leg attached to a footplate, which could be quickly plantarflexed (100 deg/s; 6 deg amplitude) to induce stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle at short (45 ms) and longer latencies (90-95 ms). This setup also enabled measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary evoked potentials (cMEPs) from TA evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation at the cervical junction, respectively. Cathodal tsDCS at 2.5 and 4 mA was found to increase the long-latency reflex without any significant effect on the short-latency reflex. Furthermore, TA MEPs, but not cMEPs, were increased following tsDCS. We conclude that cathodal tsDCS over lumbar segments may facilitate proprioceptive transcortical reflexes in the TA muscle, and we suggest that the most likely explanation of this facilitation is an effect on ascending fibers in the dorsal columns.

Cervical trans-spinal direct current stimulation: a modelling-experimental approach

Background

Trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a non-invasive technique with promising neuromodulatory effects on spinal cord (SC) circuitry. Computational studies are essential to guide effective tsDCS protocols for specific clinical applications. This study aims to combine modelling and experimental studies to determine the electrode montage that maximizes electric field (E-field) delivery during cervical tsDCS.

Methods

Current and E-field distributions in the cervical SC were predicted for four electrode montages in a human realistic model using computational methods. A double-blind crossover and randomized exploratory study was conducted using the montage that maximized E-field delivery. tsDCS was applied for 15 min in 10 healthy subjects (anodal, cathodal, sham, with polarity assigned to the cervical electrode), with a current intensity of 2.5 mA, resulting in a total current charge density delivery of 90 mC/cm². Upper limb motor (transcranial magnetic stimulation) and sensory evoked potentials (MEP, SEP), M-waves, H-reflex and F-wave responses were analysed. Central and peripheral conduction times were determined using MEP. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman test were used for statistical analysis (significance level α = 0.05).

Results

All montages presented higher current density and E-field magnitudes in the cervical SC region between the electrodes. However, electrodes at C3 and T3 spinous processes (C3-T3) originated the highest E-field magnitude (0.50 V/m). Using C3-T3 montage we observed significant changes in N9 SEP latency (p = 0.006), but significance did not persist in pairwise comparisons (sham-anodal: p = 0.022; sham-cathodal: p = 0.619; anodal-cathodal: p = 0.018; α = 0.017, Bonferroni corrected). MEP latency and central motor conduction time (CMCT) modified significantly on stimulation (p = 0.007 and p = 0.015, respectively). In addition, pairwise comparisons confirmed significant differences between sham and cathodal conditions after Bonferroni correction for MEP latency (sham-anodal: p = 0.868; sham-cathodal: p = 0.011; anodal-cathodal: p = 0.023) and CMCT (sham-anodal: p = 0.929; sham-cathodal: p = 0.010; anodal-cathodal: p = 0.034).

Conclusions

Computational models predicted higher E-field delivery in the cervical SC for the C3-T3 montage. Polarity-dependent effects in motor responses were reported using this montage consistent with spinal motor modulation. tsDCS experimental protocol designs should be guided by modelling studies to improve effectiveness.

Neuromodulation of lower limb motor responses with transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord direct current stimulation

OBJECTIVE

Trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a promising technique to modulate spinal circuits. Combining clinical with modelling studies can improve effectiveness of tsDCS protocols. The aim of this study is to measure the effects of lumbar tsDCS on motor spinal responses and observe if these are consistent with the electric field (E-field) predicted from a computational model.

METHODS

The exploratory study design was double-blind crossover and randomized. tsDCS was delivered for 15 min (anodal, cathodal, sham) at L2 vertebra level (2.5 mA, 90 C/cm²) in 14 healthy subjects. F-wave, H-reflex, cortical silent period, motor evoked potential and sympathetic skin response were analyzed. Statistical methods were applied with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, a p < 0.05 was set as significant. A human volume conductor model was obtained from available databases. E-field distributions in the spinal grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) were calculated.

RESULTS

No tsDCS effects were observed. E-field magnitude predicted in the lumbosacral spinal GM and WM was <0.15 V/m, insufficient to ensure neuromodulation, which is consistent with the absence of effects.

CONCLUSION

The tsDCS protocol applied did not change motor response to delivered stimulus, thus we observed no effect on motor spinal circuits.

SIGNIFICANCE

Future tsDCS protocols should be supported by computational models.