Tolerance to a haemorrhagic challenge during heat stress is improved with inspiratory resistance breathing

Physiology of Human Hemorrhage and Compensation

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of death following traumatic injuries in the United States. Much of the previous work in assessing the physiology and pathophysiology underlying blood loss has focused on descriptive measures of hemodynamic responses such as blood pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume, heart rate, and vascular resistance as indicators of changes in organ perfusion. More recent work has shifted the focus toward understanding mechanisms of compensation for reduced systemic delivery and cellular utilization of oxygen as a more comprehensive approach to understanding the complex physiologic changes that occur following and during blood loss. In this article, we begin with applying dimensional analysis for comparison of animal models, and progress to descriptions of various physiological consequences of hemorrhage. We then introduce the complementary side of compensation by detailing the complexity and integration of various compensatory mechanisms that are activated from the initiation of hemorrhage and serve to maintain adequate vital organ perfusion and hemodynamic stability in the scenario of reduced systemic delivery of oxygen until the onset of hemodynamic decompensation. New data are introduced that challenge legacy concepts related to mechanisms that underlie baroreflex functions and provide novel insights into the measurement of the integrated response of compensation to central hypovolemia known as the compensatory reserve. The impact of demographic and environmental factors on tolerance to hemorrhage is also reviewed. Finally, we describe how understanding the physiology of compensation can be translated to applications for early assessment of the clinical status and accurate triage of hypovolemic and hypotensive patients. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 11:1531-1574, 2021.

A comparison of protocols for simulating hemorrhage in humans: step versus ramp lower body negative pressure

Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) elicits central hypovolemia, and it has been used to simulate the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to hemorrhage in humans. LBNP protocols commonly use progressive stepwise reductions in chamber pressure for specific time periods. However, continuous ramp LBNP protocols have also been utilized to simulate the continuous nature of most bleeding injuries. The aim of this study was to compare tolerance and hemodynamic responses between these two LBNP profiles. Healthy human subjects (N = 19; age, 27 ± 4 y; 7 female/12 male) completed a 1) step LBNP protocol (5-min steps) and 2) continuous ramp LBNP protocol (3 mmHg/min), both to presyncope. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), stroke volume (SV), middle and posterior cerebral artery velocity (MCAv and PCAv), cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO₂), and end-tidal CO₂ (etCO₂) were measured. LBNP tolerance, via the cumulative stress index (CSI, summation of chamber pressure × time at each pressure), and hemodynamic responses were compared between the two protocols. The CSI (step: 911 ± 97 mmHg/min vs. ramp: 823 ± 83 mmHg/min; P = 0.12) and the magnitude of central hypovolemia (%Δ SV, step: -54.6% ± 2.6% vs. ramp: -52.1% ± 2.8%; P = 0.32) were similar between protocols. Although there were no differences between protocols for the maximal %Δ HR (P = 0.88), the %Δ MAP during the step protocol was attenuated (P = 0.05), and the reductions in MCAv, PCAv, ScO₂, and etCO₂ were greater (P ≤ 0.08) when compared with the ramp protocol at presyncope. These results indicate that when comparing cardiovascular responses to LBNP across different laboratories, the specific pressure profile must be considered as a potential confounding factor.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Ramp lower body negative pressure (LBNP) protocols have been utilized to simulate the continuous nature of bleeding injuries. However, it unknown if tolerance or the physiological responses to ramp LBNP are similar to the more common stepwise LBNP protocol. We report similar tolerance between the two protocols, but the step protocol elicited a greater increase in cerebral oxygen extraction in the presence of reduced blood flow, presumably facilitating the matching of metabolic supply and demand.