Respiratory alkalinization and posterior cerebral artery dilatation predict acute mountain sickness severity during 10 h normobaric hypoxia

Appetite, Hypoxia, and Acute Mountain Sickness: A 10-Hour Normobaric Hypoxic Chamber Study

Barclay, Holly, Saptarshi Mukerji, Bengt Kayser, and Jui-Lin Fan. Appetite, hypoxia and acute mountain sickness: A 10-hour normobaric hypoxic chamber study. High Alt Med Biol. 24:329-335, 2023. Background: The effects of hypoxia and acute mountain sickness (AMS) on appetite and food preferences are moot, especially during the early phase of hypoxic exposure. We examined the effects of a 10-hour hypoxic exposure on appetite and food preference. Methods: We assessed appetite (hunger, satisfaction, fullness, perceived appetite, and lost appetite), food preferences (sweet, salty, savory, and fatty), and AMS (Lake Louise score) with questionnaires in 27 healthy individuals (13 women) across 10-hour exposures to normobaric normoxia (fraction of inspired O2 [FiO2]: 0.21) and normobaric hypoxia (FiO2: 0.12, equivalent of 5,000 m) in a randomized, single-blinded manner. Results and Conclusions: Compared with normoxia, hypoxia decreased hunger and appetite (p = 0.040 and <0.001, respectively), which was mediated by a decreased desire for sweet, salty, and fatty foods (p < 0.05 for all). AMS was associated with a decreased desire for sweet (R = -0.438, p = 0.032) and salty foods (R = -0.460, p = 0.024) and greater loss of appetite (R = -0.619, p = 0.018). Our findings suggest that acute hypoxia rapidly suppresses appetite and that AMS development further amplifies anorexia. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12618000548235.

The Impact of Nocebo and Placebo Effects on Reported Incidence of Acute Mountain Sickness

Bärtsch Peter. The impact of nocebo and placebo effects on reported incidence of acute mountain sickness. High Alt Med Biol 00:000-000, 2021. Well comparable studies reporting acute mountain sickness (AMS) in nonacclimatized, acutely exposed individuals performed at 3,450-3,650 m (9 studies) and 4,559-4,675 m (18 studies) at real altitude or in hypobaric or in normobaric hypoxic chambers were analyzed with the hypothesis that the study design impacts occurrence of AMS. Individual symptoms and overall scores of AMS were not different between the three modalities of exposure to a comparable degree of hypoxia, indicating that hypobaria has, if at all, minimal influence on AMS. Studies not focusing versus those focusing on AMS report lower scores and prevalence of AMS at 3,500 m, but not at 4,559 m, while frequent assessment may be associated with more severe AMS. These data suggest that focusing on AMS creates expectations of getting AMS (nocebo effects) and increases its prevalence, while not paying attention reduces negative expectations and thus AMS. On the other hand, interventions promising improvement may cause positive expectations (placebo effect). Information about purpose and dangers of a study, repeated assessments for AMS, previous experiences of AMS, and observation of illness in other study participants are major factors contributing to negative expectations and thus nocebo effects increasing AMS. They should be considered when designing studies and subject information and be reported in detail in publications of studies on AMS.