The algorithm used for the calculation of gas exchange affects the estimation of O2 uptake kinetics at the onset of moderate-intensity exercise

Confidence intervals estimator of the kinetic parameters: do its reliability depend on the assembling method of the oxygen uptakes?

Gas exchange data acquired repeatedly under the same exercise conditions are assembled together to improve the kinetic parameters of breath-by-breath oxygen uptake. The latter are provided by the non-linear regression procedure, together with the corresponding estimators of the width of the Confidence Intervals (i.e., the Asymptotic Standard Errors; ASEs). We tested, for two different assembling procedures, whether the range of values identified by the ASE actually correspond to the 95% Confidence Interval. Ten O2 uptake responses were acquired on 10 healthy volunteers performing a square-wave moderate-intensity exercise. Kinetic parameters were estimated running the non-linear regression with a mono-exponential model on an increasingly greater number of responses (Nr, from 1 to 10), assembled together using the "stacking" and the "1-s-bins" procedures. Kinetic values obtained assembling together the 10 repetitions were assumed as "true" values. The time constant was not affected by Nr or by the assembling procedure (ANOVA; p>0.54 and p>0.16, respectively). The corresponding ASE decreased according to Nr (ANOVA; p=0.000), being significantly smaller for the "1-s-bins" procedure compared to the "stacking" one (ANOVA; p<0.001). Excluding 20s at the start of the fitting window, the range of values identified with the ASE provided by the "1-s-bins" and the "stacking" procedures included the "true" value in 85% and in 95% of cases, respectively. The "stacking" procedure should be preferred since it yielded ASEs for the time constant that provided a range of values satisfying the statistical meaning of the width of the Confidence Intervals, at the given degree of probability.

Move less, spend more: the metabolic demands of short walking bouts

The metabolic cost of steady-state walking is well known; however, across legged animals, most walking bouts are too short to reach steady state. Here, we investigate how bout duration affects the metabolic cost of human walking with varying mechanical power, metabolic intensity and duration. Ten participants walked for 10- to 240-s bouts on a stair climber at 0.20, 0.25 and 0.36 m s-1 and on a treadmill at 1.39 m s-1. Oxygen uptake was time-integrated and divided by bout duration to get bout average uptake (V̇O2(b)). Fitting of oxygen uptake kinetics allowed calculating non-metabolic oxygen exchange during phase-I transient and, hence, non-steady-state metabolic cost (C met(b)) and efficiency. For 240-s bouts, such variables were also calculated at steady state. Across all conditions, shorter bouts had higher V̇O2(b) and C met(b), with proportionally greater non-metabolic oxygen exchange. As the bout duration increased, V̇O2(b), C met(b) and efficiency approached steady-state values. Our findings show that the time-averaged oxygen uptake and metabolic cost are greater for shorter than longer bouts: 30-s bouts consume 20-60% more oxygen than steady-state extrapolations. This is partially explained by the proportionally greater non-metabolic oxygen uptake and leads to lower efficiency for shorter bouts. Inferring metabolic cost from steady state substantially underestimates energy expenditure for short bouts.