Cardiac contraction and intramyocardial venous pressure generation in the anaesthetized dog

Cross-Talk Between Cardiac Muscle and Coronary Vasculature

The cardiac muscle and the coronary vasculature are in close proximity to each other, and a two-way interaction, called cross-talk, exists. Here we focus on the mechanical aspects of cross-talk including the role of the extracellular matrix. Cardiac muscle affects the coronary vasculature. In diastole, the effect of the cardiac muscle on the coronary vasculature depends on the (changes in) muscle length but appears to be small. In systole, coronary artery inflow is impeded, or even reversed, and venous outflow is augmented. These systolic effects are explained by two mechanisms. The waterfall model and the intramyocardial pump model are based on an intramyocardial pressure, assumed to be proportional to ventricular pressure. They explain the global effects of contraction on coronary flow and the effects of contraction in the layers of the heart wall. The varying elastance model, the muscle shortening and thickening model, and the vascular deformation model are based on direct contact between muscles and vessels. They predict global effects as well as differences on flow in layers and flow heterogeneity due to contraction. The relative contributions of these two mechanisms depend on the wall layer (epi- or endocardial) and type of contraction (isovolumic or shortening). Intramyocardial pressure results from (local) muscle contraction and to what extent the interstitial cavity contracts isovolumically. This explains why small arterioles and venules do not collapse in systole. Coronary vasculature affects the cardiac muscle. In diastole, at physiological ventricular volumes, an increase in coronary perfusion pressure increases ventricular stiffness, but the effect is small. In systole, there are two mechanisms by which coronary perfusion affects cardiac contractility. Increased perfusion pressure increases microvascular volume, thereby opening stretch-activated ion channels, resulting in an increased intracellular Ca2+transient, which is followed by an increase in Ca2+sensitivity and higher muscle contractility (Gregg effect). Thickening of the shortening cardiac muscle takes place at the expense of the vascular volume, which causes build-up of intracellular pressure. The intracellular pressure counteracts the tension generated by the contractile apparatus, leading to lower net force. Therefore, cardiac muscle contraction is augmented when vascular emptying is facilitated. During autoregulation, the microvasculature is protected against volume changes, and the Gregg effect is negligible. However, the effect is present in the right ventricle, as well as in pathological conditions with ineffective autoregulation. The beneficial effect of vascular emptying may be reduced in the presence of a stenosis. Thus cardiac contraction affects vascular diameters thereby reducing coronary inflow and enhancing venous outflow. Emptying of the vasculature, however, enhances muscle contraction. The extracellular matrix exerts its effect mainly on cardiac properties rather than on the cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary circulation.

Coronary sinus occlusion enhances coronary collateral flow and reduces subendocardial ischemia

On the hypothesis that coronary sinus occlusion (CSO) may reduce myocardial ischemia, we examined the effects of CSO on coronary collateral blood flow and on the distribution of regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) in dogs. Thirty-eight anesthetized dogs underwent occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery with or without CSO and intact vasomotor tone. We measured RMBF and intramyocardial pressure (IMP) in the subendocardium (Endo) and subepicardium (Epi) separately. With intact vasomotor tone, CSO during ischemia significantly increased RMBF in the ischemic region (IR), particularly in Endo from 0.17 +/- 0.03 to 0.33 +/- 0.05 ml x min(-1) x g(-1) (P < 0.05), and increased the Endo/Epi from 0.59 +/- 0.10 to 1.15 +/- 0.15 (P < 0.01). These effects of CSO were partially abolished by adenosine. However, the Endo/Epi was still increased from 0.90 +/- 0.13 to 2.09 +/- 0.30 (P < 0.01). The changes in RMBF in IR were significantly correlated with the peak CS pressure during CSO. The Endo/Epi of IMP in IR was significantly decreased during CSO. In conclusion, CSO potentially enhances coronary collateral flow, and preserves the ischemic myocardium, especially in Endo.