1
|
Kozyrev V, Daliri MR, Schwedhelm P, Treue S. Strategic deployment of feature-based attentional gain in primate visual cortex. PLoS Biol 2019; 17:e3000387. [PMID: 31386656 PMCID: PMC6684042 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Attending to visual stimuli enhances the gain of those neurons in primate visual cortex that preferentially respond to the matching locations and features (on-target gain). Although this is well suited to enhance the neuronal representation of attended stimuli, it is nonoptimal under difficult discrimination conditions, as in the presence of similar distractors. In such cases, directing attention to neighboring neuronal populations (off-target gain) has been shown to be the most efficient strategy, but although such a strategic deployment of attention has been shown behaviorally, its underlying neural mechanisms are unknown. Here, we investigated how attention affects the population responses of neurons in the middle temporal (MT) visual area of rhesus monkeys to bidirectional movement inside the neurons' receptive field (RF). The monkeys were trained to focus their attention onto the fixation spot or to detect a direction or speed change in one of the motion directions (the "target"), ignoring the distractor motion. Population activity profiles were determined by systematically varying the patterns' directions while maintaining a constant angle between them. As expected, the response profiles show a peak for each of the 2 motion directions. Switching spatial attention from the fixation spot into the RF enhanced the peak representing the attended stimulus and suppressed the distractor representation. Importantly, the population data show a direction-dependent attentional modulation that does not peak at the target feature but rather along the slopes of the activity profile representing the target direction. Our results show that attentional gains are strategically deployed to optimize the discriminability of target stimuli, in line with an optimal gain mechanism proposed by Navalpakkam and Itti.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladislav Kozyrev
- Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center-Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany.,Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Goettingen, Germany.,Laboratory of Systems Neuroscience and Imaging in Psychiatry (SNIP), University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany.,Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany
| | - Mohammad Reza Daliri
- Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center-Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany.,Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Goettingen, Germany.,Neuroscience and Neuroengineering Research Lab., Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, Iran.,Cognitive Neurobiology Lab., School of Cognitive Sciences (SCS), Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Niavaran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Philipp Schwedhelm
- Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center-Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany.,Center for Mind and Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy.,Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Switzerland.,Functional Imaging Laboratory, German Primate Center-Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Treue
- Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center-Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany.,Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Goettingen, Germany.,Leibniz ScienceCampus PrimateCognition, Goettingen, Germany.,Faculty of Biology and Psychology, University of Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McKendrick AM, Chan YM, Nguyen BN. Spatial vision in older adults: perceptual changes and neural bases. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018; 38:363-375. [PMID: 29774576 DOI: 10.1111/opo.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of older adults is rapidly increasing internationally, leading to a significant increase in research on how healthy ageing impacts vision. Most clinical assessments of spatial vision involve simple detection (letter acuity, grating contrast sensitivity, perimetry). However, most natural visual environments are more spatially complicated, requiring contrast discrimination, and the delineation of object boundaries and contours, which are typically present on non-uniform backgrounds. In this review we discuss recent research that reports on the effects of normal ageing on these more complex visual functions, specifically in the context of recent neurophysiological studies. RECENT FINDINGS Recent research has concentrated on understanding the effects of healthy ageing on neural responses within the visual pathway in animal models. Such neurophysiological research has led to numerous, subsequently tested, hypotheses regarding the likely impact of healthy human ageing on specific aspects of spatial vision. SUMMARY Healthy normal ageing impacts significantly on spatial visual information processing from the retina through to visual cortex. Some human data validates that obtained from studies of animal physiology, however some findings indicate that rethinking of presumed neural substrates is required. Notably, not all spatial visual processes are altered by age. Healthy normal ageing impacts significantly on some spatial visual processes (in particular centre-surround tasks), but leaves contrast discrimination, contrast adaptation, and orientation discrimination relatively intact. The study of older adult vision contributes to knowledge of the brain mechanisms altered by the ageing process, can provide practical information regarding visual environments that older adults may find challenging, and may lead to new methods of assessing visual performance in clinical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M McKendrick
- Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Yu Man Chan
- Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Bao N Nguyen
- Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elliott SL, Shevell SK. Perceived segmentation of center from surround by only illusory contours causes chromatic lateral inhibition. Vision Res 2013; 86:66-70. [PMID: 23624228 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2012] [Revised: 04/10/2013] [Accepted: 04/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
When a light and also its surrounding context slowly oscillate in chromaticity over time, the color appearance of the light depends on the relative phase of center and surround. The influence of the surround is generally accounted for by retinotopic center-surround organization, with the surround inhibiting signals from the center. The traditional neural account, however, cannot rule out lateral inhibition due to cortical mechanisms sensitive to object segmentation cues. Experiments here reveal that illusory contours are sufficient to separate a center from its surround. Observers adjusted the Michelson contrast of a matching disk to equal the perceived modulation depth of a central area within a surround. Both the central test and matching disk were maintained at constant luminance and modulated in-phase at 2Hz along one chromatic axis (L/(L+M) or S/(L+M)). The center was perceptually segmented from the surround by either a physical (retinotopic separation) or illusory (cortically represented) triangle contour. Segmentation of center from surround by the illusory contour strongly attenuated the perceived modulation depth for both chromatic axes. Further, the strength of attenuation was consistently greater with the illusory than the physically segmenting triangle. This cannot be accounted for by retinal center-surround antagonism; instead it points to a cortical neural representation of contours, with lateral inhibition following neural mechanisms sensitive to object segmentation cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Elliott
- Institute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
D'Antona AD, Kremers J, Shevell SK. Changes in perceived temporal variation due to context: contributions from two distinct neural mechanisms. Vision Res 2011; 51:1853-60. [PMID: 21745494 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2011] [Revised: 05/26/2011] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The percept of a time-varying light depends on the temporal properties of light within the surrounding area. The locus of the neural mechanism mediating this lateral interaction is controversial; neural mechanisms have been posited at the LGN (Kremers et al., 2004) or cortical level (D'Antona & Shevell, 2007). To determine the neural locus, changes in perceived temporal variation were compared with ipsilateral versus contralateral surrounding context. In both cases, a temporally varying central field was viewed within a temporally varying surround; relative phase between center and surround was varied. Perceived modulation depth in the central field depended strongly on the relative phase between center and surround, in both the ipsilateral and contralateral conditions. The results revealed lateral interactions arising from both a weak monocular (plausibly LGN) and a stronger central (cortical) mechanism. The monocular contribution was similar over the range of temporal frequencies tested (approx. 3-12Hz), while the central component showed low-pass temporal-frequency selectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony D D'Antona
- Psychology, The University of Chicago, 940 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Current world literature. Trauma and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2008; 21:762-4. [PMID: 18989123 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0b013e32831cbb85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
6
|
Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Demirel S, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Johnson CA. A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry. Vision Res 2008; 48:1859-69. [PMID: 18602414 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2007] [Revised: 03/07/2008] [Accepted: 06/10/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Perimetry is a commonly used clinical test for visual function, limited by high variability. The sources of this variability need to be better understood. In this paper, we investigate whether noise intrinsic to neural firing could explain the variability in normal subjects. We present the most physiologically accurate model to date for stimulus detection in perimetry combining knowledge of the physiology of components of the visual system with signal detection theory, and show that it requires that detection be mediated by multiple cortical cells in order to give predictions consistent with psychometric functions measured in human observers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Gardiner
- Discoveries In Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health System, Portland, OR 97208-3950, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|