Results of meniscectomy and meniscal repair in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Incomplete meniscal healing in early second-look arthroscopy does not indicate failure of repair: a case series

PURPOSE

To assess if incomplete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy at six to eight weeks after all-inside suture hook meniscus repair results in longer-term failure of repair in patients with restored knee stability.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2013, 41 patients with post-traumatic, longitudinal, vertical, complete meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury were treated via a two-stage surgical procedure and prospectively evaluated. In the first stage, all-inside meniscus repair was performed using suture hook passers and non-absorbable sutures. In total, there were 26 medial and 16 lateral meniscus tears. A second-stage ACL reconstruction, performed six to eight weeks later, served as an early second-look arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal healing. Clinical follow-up was performed at a minimum of 24 months.

RESULTS

Second-look arthroscopy revealed 31 cases (75.6%) of complete and ten cases (24.4%) of incomplete meniscal healing. Two patients were lost prior to follow-up, and three were excluded due to recurrent instability. Therefore, 36 patients were assessed at the final follow-up. All patients with complete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy achieved clinical success at follow-up. Six out of nine (66.7%) of patients with incomplete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy achieved clinical success at follow-up (p = 0.012). One saphenous neuropathy occurred (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

Incomplete meniscal healing during early second-look arthroscopy after all-inside meniscal repair using suture hook passers and non-absorbable sutures did not necessarily result in longer-term failure in patients with restored knee stability. The described method of meniscal repair was associated with a low rate of symptomatic re-tears and complications.

The Development of a Return to Performance Pathway Involving A Professional Soccer Player Returning From A Multi-Structural Knee Injury: A Case Report

This case report describes a male professional soccer player returning to match play (English Championship League) following a medial meniscectomy that occurred during the course of rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The player underwent a medial meniscectomy eight months into an ACL rehabilitation program and following 10 weeks of rehabilitation successfully returned to competitive first team match play. This report outlines description of the pathology, the rehabilitation progressions, and the sports specific performance requirements of the player as they progressed through the return to performance pathway (RTP). The RTP pathway included nine distinct phases with evidenced based criteria required to exit each phase. The first five phases were indoor as the player progressed from the medial meniscectomy, through the rehabilitation pathways to the "gym exit Phase". The gym exit Phase was assessed with multiple criteria: a) capacity; b) strength; c) isokinetic dynamometry (IKD); d) hop test battery; e) force plate jumps; and f) supine isometric hamstring rate of force (RFD) development qualities to evaluate the players readiness to start sport specific rehabilitation. The last four phases of the RTP pathway are designed to regain the maximal physical capabilities (plyometric and explosive qualities) in the gym and included the retraining of on-field sport specific qualities utilizing the 'control-chaos continuum.' The player successfully returned to team play in the ninth and final phase of the RTP pathway. The purpose of this case report was to outline a RTP for a professional soccer player who successfully restored specific injury criteria (strength, capacity and movement quality), physical capabilities (plyometric and explosive qualities). and on-field sport specific criteria utilizing the 'control-chaos continuum.'

Level of Evidence

Level 4.

Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Meniscal Repair: A Retrospective Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic meniscal repair performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair.

Methods

This study presents a case series of 34 patients who underwent repair of meniscal tears along with ACL reconstruction from 2014 to 2016. Cases of discoid meniscal lesions and combined or ligament injuries other than ACL injuries were excluded. Patients were followed up periodically, at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months. Preoperative and postoperative functional evaluations were performed using visual analog scale, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Lysholm knee scores.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 29.1 years (range, 17-44 years). The mean follow-up period was 18 ± 7.8 months (range, 6-24 months). Among the 34 individual knees, 1 patient (3%) underwent both medial and lateral meniscal repairs. Medial meniscal repair was performed in 20 knees (59%), whereas the lateral meniscus was repaired in 13 knees (38%). A longitudinal tear was the most common type of tear pattern, followed by radial (6 patients) and complex (3 patients) tear patterns. The radial and complex tears were treated with an additional partial meniscectomy. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 38.46 preoperatively and improved to 80.30 at final postoperative follow-up (statistically significant difference, P < .01). The mean Lysholm score was 50.30 preoperatively and improved to 91.40 at final postoperative follow-up (statistically significant difference, P < .01). According to the Lysholm knee score, 31 patients (89%) had excellent or good results. The mean visual analog scale score decreased from 7.3 preoperatively to 2 postoperatively. The clinical success rate of the repairs was 89%. Of 35 repairs, 4 (11%) had retears.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic meniscal repair along with ACL reconstruction provided predictable high rates of meniscal healing and yielded favorable functional and clinical results. Patient selection remains one of the most important prognostic factors.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either meniscal repair or meniscectomy for concomitant meniscal injury. The primary hypothesis was that short-term clinical outcomes (≤ 2-year follow-up) for ACLR concomitant with either meniscal repair or resection would be similar. The secondary hypothesis was that ACLR with meniscal repair would result in better longer term outcomes compared with meniscal resection.

METHODS

The authors searched two online databases (EMBASE and MEDLINE) from inception until March 2018 for the literature on ACLR and concurrent meniscal surgery. Two reviewers systematically screened studies in duplicate, independently, and based on a priori criteria. Quality assessment was also performed in duplicate. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sub-scale scores at 2 years post-operatively were combined in a meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of 2566 initial studies, 25 studies satisfied full-text inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 2.09 years, with a total sample of 37,087 subjects including controls. The meta-analysis demonstrated equivocal results at 2 years, except for KOOS symptom scores which favoured meniscal resection over repair. Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference (SSD) scores were 1.51 ± 0.60 mm for meniscal repair, 1.96 ± 0.36 mm for meniscal resection, and 1.58 ± 0.20 for control patients (isolated ACLR). Medial meniscal repair showed decreased anterior knee joint laxity compared to medial meniscal resection (P < 0.001). Patients with meniscal repair had higher rates of re-operation (13.3% vs 0.8% for meniscal resection, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ACLR combined with meniscal resection demonstrate better symptoms at 2-year follow-up compared to patients with ACLR combined with meniscal repair. ACLR combined with meniscal repair results in decreased anterior knee joint laxity with evidence of improved patient-reported outcomes in the long term, but also higher re-operation rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The role of meniscal tears and meniscectomy in the mechanical stability of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee

BACKGROUND

The role of an intact meniscus in providing mechanical stability to the knee of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient and ACL reconstructed patients has not been well studied.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 205 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were enrolled, of which 61 had normal menisci, 49 had a tear in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) (tear <40% of width = 19; >40% of width = 30), 35 had a tear in the lateral meniscus (<40% of width = 15; >40% = 20), 13 had a tear in the body and/or anterior horn of the medial meniscus (<40% of width = 6; >40% = 7) and 47 patients had a tear in both menisci. Patients with a tear in both menisci were excluded. The anterior translation of the tibia (ATT) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at three months and six months using KT-1000. Partial meniscectomy was performed in all unstable meniscal tears.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of surgery was 25.2 ± 5.1 years. Patients with a normal meniscus showed side to side difference in KT-1000 of 4.8 ± 2.5 mm whereas those with a <40% tear and >40% tear in PHMM had a difference of 5.36 ± 3.07 mm (P = 0.46) and 7.08 ± 2.78 mm (P = 0.0002), respectively. Patients with a lateral meniscus <40% and >40% tear had a mean difference of 5.68 ± 2.96 mm (P = 0.22) and 5.95 ± 2.39 mm (P = 0.09), respectively. Patients with body and/or anterior horn of medial meniscus <40% and >40% had a difference of 5.41 ± 1.11 mm (P = 0.59) and 5.78 ± 2.38 mm (P = 0.35), respectively. At three months and six months KT-1000 differences of 2.3 ± 1.2 mm and 2.1 ± 1.2 mm were seen in patients with normal meniscus; 2.26 ± 1.51 mm and 2.16 ± 0.9 mm with partial meniscectomy of the PHMM <40%; 2.65 ± 1.53 mm and 2.4 ± 1.35 mm with partial meniscectomy of the PHMM >40%; 2.27 ± 1.19 mm and 2.07 ± 1.52 mm with partial meniscectomy of the lateral meniscus <40%; and 2.27 ± 1.44 mm and 2.07 ± 1.14 mm with partial meniscectomy of the lateral meniscus >40%; 2.55 ± 1.56 mm and 1.91 ± 1.09 mm with partial meniscectomy in body and/or anterior horn of medial meniscus <40% and 2.07 ± 1.81 and 2.14 ± 1.10 mm with partial meniscectomy in body and/or anterior horn of medial meniscus >40% (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PHMM acts as a secondary stabilizer of the knee joint in the absence of functional ACL. There is no effect of partial meniscectomy on mechanical stability of the knee in ACL reconstructed patients. Medial or lateral partial meniscectomy performed at the time of ACL reconstruction does not affect the stability of ACL reconstructed knee. However, the presence of a concomitant tear in PHMM is associated with increased instability in ACL deficient knee.

Knee Osteoarthritis after Reconstruction of Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Literature Review

Purpose  The aim of this review was to analyze the current literature on osteoarthritic evolution of knees without any combined meniscal or ligament lesions undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods  A PubMed/MEDLINE research was performed using the following keywords: “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction” [Mesh] AND “Osteoarthritis, Knee” [Mesh]. Only English language literature and articles published after 2005 were included. Studies including concomitant meniscal tears, posterior cruciate or collateral ligament injuries, previous surgery in the affected knees, infections, osteochondral defects, loose bodies, synovial plica syndrome, and posteromedial or posterolateral corner injuries were not considered in this review.

Results  Twelve studies were selected. These papers included 892 patients (mean age at the time of surgery was 22.3 years), with an average follow-up of 11 years. Imaging at follow-up was obtained with standard radiographs in nine studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in one study, and both X-rays and MRI in two studies. Eight studies reported osteoarthritic evolution, with different prevalence.

Conclusion  Only few high-quality studies focused on these specific patients have been published. When reconstructed, isolated ACL-deficient knees have a low risk of osteoarthritic evolution, but mild signs of joint degeneration are reported by the current literature.

Level of Evidence  Level IV, systematic review of level I to level IV studies.

Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not result in an increased rate of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis

PURPOSE

The role of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) as an augment to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. However, concerns exist regarding the risk of development of osteoarthritis due to over constraint of the knee. To systematically review the literature to analyse the long-term incidence of osteoarthritis in patients who had an LEAT performed in isolation or in combination with intra-articular ACLR for the treatment of ACL deficiency.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently searched five databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative, and retrospective cohort studies (CS) with long-term radiological follow-up of patients with ACL deficiency treated with ACLR combined with LEAT or LEAT in isolation. Risk of bias was performed using a modified Downs & Black's checklist. The primary outcome was the development of osteoarthritis. The studies were divided into those with moderate/severe osteoarthritis at between 5 to 10 years and >10-year follow-up. The rate of meniscal pathology at the time of the index surgery was recorded. A best evidence synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Eight studies reported on 421 patients in which an LEAT procedure was carried out. There were two high-quality RCTs and six low-quality CS. The follow-up was between 5- and 10-years in 5 studies and >10-years in 3. The presence of moderate/severe osteoarthritis was not detected in three studies and was found in 4/44 (9%) and 13/70 (18.6%) patients in the other two. At 11 year follow-up, one study demonstrated no osteoarthritis, while the other two studies reported rates of 54/100 (54%) and 17/24 (71%) respectively at >24 years. In the latter two cases, the rate of meniscal pathology was >50%. A best evidence synthesis revealed that there was insufficient evidence that the addition of a LEAT to an ACLR resulted in an increased rate of osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

The best available evidence would suggest that the addition of a LEAT to ACLR does not result in an increase rate of osteoarthritis of the knee. In knees that have undergone a combined ACLR and LEAT, the incidence of osteoarthritis was low up to 11 years but increased thereafter. The presence of meniscal injury at the index surgery was reported to be greater predictor of the development of osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Factors associated with the status of meniscal tears following meniscal repair concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are often accompanied by meniscal tears. Meniscal repair is typically performed during ACL reconstruction. However, retear of the meniscus after repair is frequent. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors associated with meniscal healing after meniscal repair concomitant with ACL reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven meniscal repairs in 87 patients who received meniscal repair combined with ACL reconstruction and received second-look arthroscopy at a mean of postoperatively 15.7 months were examined retrospectively. The menisci were divided into three groups (complete heal, incomplete heal, and retear), and factors thought to affect the healing status of repaired menisci were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Meniscal healing was judged to be complete in 49 knees (56%), incomplete in 19 knees, (22%), and retear in 19 knees (22%). There were no significant differences among the three groups in age, sex, time from injury to operation, mean Tegner activity scale, tear location, or mean postoperative anteroposterior tibial translation on KT-1000. The mean length of the tear was significantly higher in the retear group. Additionally, the proportion patients with complete tear and the proportion with postoperative positive pivot shift test were significantly higher in the retear group than in the other groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that complete tear and positive pivot shift test were associated with retear.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that complete tears and residual instability are associated with retears after meniscal repair concomitant with ACL reconstruction.