Cortical screw pullout strength and effective shear stress in synthetic third generation composite femurs

Biomechanical comparison of composite and cadaveric humeri models in experiments on operated humeral shaft fractures

A study was undertaken to determine how well contacting fracture fragments of composite bone replicated the behavior of fracture fragments in real bone. Ten composite and ten real humeral diaphyses were transected and reconstructed with limited-contact dynamic-compression plates. Two screws were placed on each side of the transection site and a calibrated electronic sensor sheet was placed between the imitated fracture fragments. After insertion of the distal screws, pressure measurements were made during insertion of the first proximal screw in compression mode, during insertion of the second screw in compression mode after loosening the first screw, and finally after retightening the first screw. The process was repeated after bending the plate. The contact area, the net compression force and the average compressive stress were computed and statistically compared. The composite bone and cadaveric bone differed in contact area and compressive stress but not in net compressive force. Plate bending did not produce a significant difference between composite and cadaveric bone. The results indicate that composite bone does not reproduce all the local fracture fragment conditions so that hardware testing in composite bone should proceed carefully. A gap between fracture fragments as is often used in comminuted fracture tests may remain as the most appropriate situation for fracture hardware testing.

Biomechanical performance of talon cannulated compression device in pauwels type III fractures: a comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Pauwels Type III fractures are unstable and frequently treated with cannulated screws (CS) or dynamic hip screws (DHS). The newly developed talon-cannulated compression devices (TCCD) have the potential to provide rotational stability, mainly through their talon. The study investigates whether TCCD has mechanical advantages over conventional screws or can be as stable as DHS in a reverse triangle configuration for an unstable femoral neck fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After creating a standard Pauwels Type III unstable femoral neck fracture in 36 synthetic femur bones in cortical/hard cancellous bone density, 18 were reserved for dynamic-static tests, and 18 were used for torsional tests. Each group containing 18 synthetic bones was divided into three groups to apply three different fixation materials (CS, DHS, and TCCD), with six models in each group. The displacement amounts after dynamic-static tests were measured using the AutoCAD program according to the reference measurement criteria. During the dynamic tests, a series of photographs were taken. During the static tests, the beginning and post-test photographs were taken. Finally, torsional tests were performed until implant failure occurred in the synthetic femur.

RESULTS

In static axial loading tests, TCDD was found to be statistically superior to conventional CS in AL-BL distance (p = 0,014) and CL distance (p = 0,013) measurements, and there was no significant difference between the other groups. There was no significant difference between all groups in dynamic axial compression tests in any points of interest. In torsional tests, TCCD outperformed cannulated screws in stiffness (p = 0,001) and maximum torque (p = 0,001) categories, and they provided statistically significant superiority to DHS in yield torque (p<0,001) category.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanically, TCCD predominates conventional cannulated screws in femoral neck fractures. TCCD also has superior torsional properties than DHS in the yield torque category. Therefore, TCCD could be the implant of choice for unstable femoral neck fractures.

Subcortical Backup Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Has Similar Maximal Strength to Current Techniques

Purpose

To evaluate the biomechanical profile of subcortical backup fixation (subcortical button [SB]) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as compared with a bicortical post and washer (BP) and suture anchor (SA) when used with interference screw (IS) primary fixation and to evaluate the utility of backup fixation for tibial fixation with extramedullary cortical button primary fixation.

Methods

Fifty composite tibias with polyester webbing-simulated graft were used to test constructs across 10 methods. Specimens were separated into the following groups (n = 5): 9-mm IS only, BP (with and without graft and IS), SB (with and without graft and IS), SA (with and without graft and IS), extramedullary suture button (with and without graft and IS), and extramedullary suture button with BP as backup fixation. Specimens were tested under cyclic loading and then loaded to failure. Maximal load at failure, displacement, and stiffness were compared.

Results

Without a graft, the SB and BP had similar maximal loads (802.46 ± 185.18 N vs 785.67 ± 100.96 N, P = .560), and both were stronger than the SA (368.13 ± 77.26 N, P < .001). With graft and an IS, there was no significant difference in maximal load between the BP (1,461.27 ± 173.75 N), SB (1,362.46 ± 80.47 N), and SA (1,334.52 ± 195.80 N). All backup fixation groups were stronger than the control group with IS fixation only (932.91 ± 99.86 N, P < .001). There was no significant difference in outcome measures between the extramedullary suture button groups with and without the BP (failure loads of 721.39 ± 103.32 N and 718.15 ± 108.61 N, respectively).

Conclusions

Subcortical backup fixation in ACL reconstruction has similar biomechanical properties to current methods and is a viable backup fixation alternative. Backup fixation methods work synergistically with IS primary fixation to strengthen the construct. There is no advantage to adding backup fixation to extramedullary button (all-inside) primary fixation when all suture strands are secured to the extramedullary button.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides evidence that subcortical backup fixation is a viable alternative for surgeons during ACL reconstruction.

Guidelines for cortical screw versus pedicle screw selection from a fatigued decompressive lumbar laminectomy model show similar stability and less bone mineral density dependency

BACKGROUND

Traditional pedicle screws are the gold standard for lumbar spine fixation; however, cortical screws along the midline cortical bone trajectory may be advantageous when lumbar decompression is required. While biomechanic investigation of both techniques exists, cortical screw performance in a multi-level lumbar laminectomy and fusion model is unknown. Furthermore, longer-term viability of cortical screws following cyclic fatigue has not been investigated.

METHODS

Fourteen human specimens (L1-S1) were divided into cortical and pedicle screw treatment groups. Motion was captured for the following conditions: intact, bilateral posterior fixation (L3-L5), fixation with laminectomy at L3-L5, fixation with laminectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L3-L5 both prior to, and following, simulated in vivo fatigue. Following fatigue, screw pullout force was collected and "effective shear stress" [pullout force/screw surface area] (N/mm²) was calculated; comparisons and correlations were performed.

FINDINGS

In flexion-extension and lateral bending, all operative constructs significantly reduced motion compared to intact (P < 0.05), regardless of pedicle or cortical screws; only posterior fixation with and without laminectomy significantly reduced motion in axial rotation (P < 0.05). Pedicle screws significantly increased average pullout strength (944.2 N vs. 690.2 N, P < 0.05), but not the "effective shear stress" (1.01 N/mm² vs. 1.1 N/mm², P > 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

In a posterior laminectomy and fusion model, cortical screws provided equivalent stability to pedicle screw fixation, yet had significantly lower screw pullout force. No differences in "effective shear stress" warrant further investigation of the effect of screw length/diameter in the aforementioned screw trajectories.

Biomechanical Comparison of Cadaveric and Commercially Available Synthetic Osteoporotic Bone Analogues in a Locked Plate Fracture Model Under Torsional Loading

OBJECTIVES

Biomechanical studies of osteoporotic bone have used synthetic models rather than cadaveric samples because of decreased variability, increased availability, and overall ease of the use of synthetic models. We compared the torsional mechanical properties of cadaveric osteoporotic bone with those of currently available synthetic osteoporotic bone analogues.

METHODS

We tested 12 osteoporotic cadaveric humeri and 6 specimens each of 6 types of synthetic analogues. A 5-mm fracture gap model and posterior plating technique with 4.5-mm narrow 10-hole locking compression plate were used. Torque was applied to a peak of ±10 N·m for 1000 cycles at 0.3 Hz. Data were continuously collected during cyclical and ramped loading with a servohydraulic materials testing system.

RESULTS

Cadaveric bone had a 17% failure rate before completing 1000 cycles. Three osteoporotic bone models had 100% failure (P < 0.05), 2 had 17% failure, and 1 had 0% failure before 1000 cycles. Significant differences in the stiffness of the 3 types of synthetic bone models that survived cyclic loading were noted compared with the cadaveric bone model (P < 0.05). Osteoporotic bone analogues had torsional mechanical properties different from those of osteoporotic cadaveric specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences between osteoporotic cadaveric humeri and synthetic osteoporotic bone analogues ranged from profound with complete catastrophic failure after a few cycles to subtler differences in stiffness and strain hardening. These findings suggest that different bone analogue models vary substantially in their torsional mechanical properties and might not be appropriate substitutes for cadaveric bone in biomechanical studies of osteoporotic bone.

Biomechanical arrangement of threaded and unthreaded portions providing holding power of transpedicular screw fixation

BACKGROUND

Failure of pedicle screw is a major concern in spinal surgery. The threaded and unthreaded portions of the pedicle screw provide the ability to anchor and squeeze the surrounding bone, respectively. This study aimed to investigate the anchoring and squeezing effects of different design of the threaded/unthreaded portions of a pedicle screw to vertebrae.

METHODS

Four variations (one fully and three partially threaded, with a 1/3, 1/2, and 2/3 unthreaded designs at the proximal portion) of screws were used to measure pullout strength and withdrawn energy using synthetic and porcine specimens. The tests were conducted in static and dynamic fashions, in that the screws were axially extracted directly and after 150,000cycles of lateral bending. The load-displacement curves were recorded to gain insight into the peak load (pullout strength) and cumulative work (withdrawn energy).

FINDINGS

The two testing results of the synthetic and porcine specimens consistently showed that the 1/3 unthreaded screw provides significantly higher pullout strength and withdrawn energy than the fully threaded screw. The withdrawn energy of the three unthreaded screws was significantly higher than that of the threaded counterpart.

INTERPRETATION

The holding power of a pedicle screw was the integration of the anchoring (cancellous core) and squeezing (compact pedicle) effects within the threaded and unthreaded portions. The current study recommends the 1/3 unthreaded screw as an optimal alternative for use as a shank-sliding mechanism to preserve the holding power within the pedicle isthmus.

A biomechanical study of standard posterior pelvic ring fixation versus a posterior pedicle screw construct

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to biomechanically test a percutaneous pedicle screw construct for posterior pelvic stabilisation and compare it to standard fixation modalities.

METHODS

Utilizing a sacral fracture and sacroiliac (SI) joint disruption model, we tested 4 constructs in single-leg stance: an S1 sacroiliac screw, S1 and S2 screws, the pedicle screw construct, and the pedicle screw construct+S1 screw. We recorded displacement at the pubic symphysis and SI joint using high-speed video. Axial stiffness was also calculated. Values were compared using a 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment (p<0.05).

RESULTS

In the sacral fracture model, the stiffness was greatest for the pedicle screw+S1 construct (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the pedicle screw construct and S1 sacroiliac screw (p=1). For the SI joint model, the S1+S2 SI screws had the largest overall load and stiffness (p<0.001). The S1 screw was significantly stronger than pedicle screw construct (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicle screw construct biomechanically compares to currently accepted methods of fixation for sacral fractures when the fracture is uncompressible. It should not be used for SI joint disruptions as one SI or an S1+S2 are significantly stiffer and cheaper.

Biomechanical analysis of operative methods in the treatment of extra-articular fracture of the proximal tibia

Background

To determine relative fixation strengths of a single lateral locking plate, a double construct of a locking plate, and a tibial nail used in treatment of proximal tibial extra-articular fractures.

Methods

Three groups of composite tibial synthetic bones consisting of 5 specimens per group were included: lateral plating (LP) using a locking compression plate-proximal lateral tibia (LCP-PLT), double plating (DP) using a LCP-PLT and a locking compression plate-medial proximal tibia, and intramedullary nailing (IN) using an expert tibial nail. To simulate a comminuted fracture model, a gap osteotomy measuring 1 cm was created 8 cm below the knee joint. For each tibia, a minimal preload of 100 N was applied before loading to failure. A vertical load was applied at 25 mm/min until tibial failure.

Results

Under axial loading, fixation strength of DP (14,387.3 N; standard deviation [SD], 1,852.1) was 17.5% greater than that of LP (12,249.3 N; SD, 1,371.6), and 60% less than that of IN (22,879.6 N; SD, 1,578.8; p < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). For ultimate displacement under axial loading, similar results were observed for LP (5.74 mm; SD, 1.01) and DP (4.45 mm; SD, 0.96), with a larger displacement for IN (5.84 mm; SD, 0.99). The median stiffness values were 2,308.7 N/mm (range, 2,147.5 to 2,521.4 N/mm; SD, 165.42) for the LP group, 4,128.2 N/mm (range, 3,028.1 to 4,831.0 N/mm; SD, 832.88) for the DP group, and 5,517.5 N/mm (range, 3,933.1 to 7,078.2 N/mm; SD, 1,296.19) for the IN group.

Conclusions

During biomechanical testing of a simulated comminuted proximal tibial fracture model, the DP proved to be stronger than the LP in terms of ultimate strength. IN proved to be the strongest; however, for minimally invasive osteosynthesis, which may be technically difficult to perform using a nail, the performance of the DP construct may lend credence to the additional use of a medial locking plate.

Modeling bicortical screws under a cantilever bending load

Cyclic loading of surgical plating constructs can precipitate bone screw failure. As the frictional contact between the plate and the bone is lost, cantilever bending loads are transferred from the plate to the head of the screw, which over time causes fatigue fracture from cyclic bending. In this research, analytical models using beam mechanics theory were developed to describe the elastic deflection of a bicortical screw under a statically applied load. Four analytical models were developed to simulate the various restraint conditions applicable to bicortical support of the screw. In three of the models, the cortical bone near the tip of the screw was simulated by classical beam constraints (1) simply supported, (2) cantilever, and (3) split distributed load. In the final analytical model, the cortices were treated as an elastic foundation, whereby the response of the constraint was proportional to screw deflection. To test the predictive ability of the new analytical models, 3.5 mm cortical bone screws were tested in a synthetic bone substitute. A novel instrument was developed to measure the bending deflection of screws under radial loads (225 N, 445 N, and 670 N) applied by a surrogate surgical plate at the head of the screw. Of the four cases considered, the analytical model utilizing an elastic foundation most accurately predicted deflection at the screw head, with an average difference of 19% between the measured and predicted results. Determination of the bending moments from the elastic foundation model revealed that a maximum moment of 2.3 N m occurred near the middle of the cortical wall closest to the plate. The location of the maximum bending moment along the screw axis was consistent with the fracture location commonly observed in clinical practice.

The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixation failures are still occurring. The effect of fracture stability and loading on PFF fixation has not been investigated and this is crucial for optimum management of PFF. Models of stable and unstable PPFs were developed and used to quantify the effect of fracture stability and loading in a single locking plate fixation. Stress on the plate was higher in the unstable compared to the stable fixation. In the case of unstable fractures, it is possible for a single locking plate fixation to provide the required mechanical environment for callus formation without significant risk of plate fracture, provided partial weight bearing is followed. In cases where partial weight bearing is unlikely, additional biological fixation could be considered.

The biomechanical effect of proximal tumor defect location on femur pathological fractures

OBJECTIVES

The femur is the most common long bone affected by cancerous metastasis. Femoral tumor defects are known to induce pain and functional impairment in patients. Although prior studies exist evaluating the clinical and biomechanical effect of tumor defect size, no biomechanical studies have experimentally examined the risk of pathological fracture with respect to the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral surfaces on which a proximal tumor defect is located on the femur.

METHODS

Circular tumor-like defects of 40-mm diameter were created proximally in the subtrochanteric region on the Anterior (n = 5), Posterior (n = 5), Medial (n = 5), and Lateral (n = 5) sides of 20 synthetic femurs. Intact femurs served as a control group (n = 4). Femurs were tested for lateral, "offset" torsional, and axial stiffness, as well as axial strength.

RESULTS

Lateral stiffnesses (range, 121-162 N/mm) yielded no differences between groups (P = 0.069). "Offset" torsional stiffnesses (range, 135-188 N/mm) demonstrated that the Medial group was less stiff than the Intact, Anterior, and Lateral groups (P ≤ 0.012). Axial stiffnesses (range, 1057-1993 N/mm) showed that the Medial group was less stiff than the Intact group (P = 0.006). Axial strengths (range, 3250-6590 N) for the Medial group were lower than Anterior (P = 0.001) and Posterior (P = 0.001) specimens, whereas the Lateral group had a lower strength than Anterior specimens (P = 0.019). No other statistical differences were noted. Axial failure of Medial and Lateral specimens involved the tumor-like defect in 100% of cases, whereas 100% of Intact femurs and 80% of Anterior and Posterior femur groups failed only through the neck.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2 of 3 test modes, the Medial tumor-like defect group resulted in statistically lower stiffness values compared with Intact femurs and had lower strength than Anterior and Posterior groups in axial failure.

Feasibility and fidelity of practising surgical fixation on a virtual ulna bone

BACKGROUND

Surgical simulators provide a safe environment to learn and practise psychomotor skills. A goal for these simulators is to achieve high levels of fidelity. The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable surgical simulator fidelity questionnaire and to assess whether a newly developed virtual haptic simulator for fixation of an ulna has comparable levels of fidelity as Sawbones.

METHODS

Simulator fidelity questionnaires were developed. We performed a stratified randomized study with surgical trainees. They performed fixation of the ulna using a virtual simulator and Sawbones. They completed the fidelity questionnaires after each procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty-two trainees participated in the study. The reliability of the fidelity questionnaire for each separate domain (environment, equipment, psychological) was Cronbach α greater than 0.70, except for virtual environment. The Sawbones had significantly higher levels of fidelity than the virtual simulator (p < 0.001) with a large effect size difference (Cohen d < 1.3).

CONCLUSION

The newly developed fidelity questionnaire is a reliable tool that can potentially be used to determine the fidelity of other surgical simulators. Increasing the fidelity of this virtual simulator is required before its use as a training tool for surgical fixation. The virtual simulator brings with it the added benefits of repeated, independent safe use with immediate, objective feedback and the potential to alter the complexity of the skill.

Biomechanical strength of two laparoscopic herniorrhaphy techniques in a cadaveric diaphragm and in a neoprene model

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to 1) Biomechanically compare two laparoscopic repair techniques; an automated suturing device and a stapling device to conventional open suturing, and 2) Evaluate a model for canine diaphragmatic tissue by comparisons to similar constructs in fresh diaphragms. We hypothesized that automated suturing is biomechanically superior to laparoscopic stapling in dogs, and that neoprene defect repair is an acceptable model for experimental cadaveric diaphragm herniorrhaphy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples of diaphragm pars costalis were prepared with defects mimicking radial muscular tears. Defects were repaired using conventional open suturing, laparoscopic automated suturing, and laparoscopic stapling techniques. Similar defects were created in 6.35 mm thick single-sided neoprene. Samples were biomechanically tested across a biaxial loading machine. Site and mode of failure were noted for all samples.

RESULTS

In both the diaphragm muscle and neoprene, the laparoscopic stapling technique was significantly weaker. The neoprene model showed a similar failure load as the diaphragm in both laparoscopic techniques, and a similar stiffness in an open-sutured and stapled diaphragm compared to the neoprene samples. Site and mode of failure in neoprene were similar to cadaveric diaphragmatic tissue, but the overall median load-to-failure was higher for the neoprene.

CONCLUSION

The strength of laparoscopically repaired simulated diaphragmatic hernias was higher with an automated suture technique than with a stapling technique. Neoprene defect repair is an acceptable model of canine diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy for biomechanical testing.

Evaluation of a new approach for modelling the screw–bone interface in a locking plate fixation: A corroboration study

Computational modelling of the screw–bone interface in fracture fixation constructs is challenging. While incorporating screw threads would be a more realistic representation of the physics, this approach can be computationally expensive. Several studies have instead suppressed the threads and modelled the screw shaft with fixed conditions assumed at the screw–bone interface. This study assessed the sensitivity of the computational results to modelling approaches at the screw–bone interface. A new approach for modelling this interface was proposed, and it was tested on two locking screw designs in a diaphyseal bridge plating configuration. Computational models of locked plating and far cortical locking constructs were generated and compared to in vitro models described in prior literature to corroborate the outcomes. The new approach led to closer agreement between the computational and the experimental stiffness data, while the fixed approach led to overestimation of the stiffness predictions. Using the new approach, the pattern of load distribution and the magnitude of the axial forces, experienced by each screw, were compared between the locked plating and far cortical locking constructs. The computational models suggested that under more severe loading conditions, far cortical locking screws might be under higher risk of screw pull-out than the locking screws. The proposed approach for modelling the screw–bone interface can be applied to any fixation involved application of screws.

Reduction of pullout strength caused by reinsertion of 3.5-mm cortical screws

INTRODUCTION

Osteosynthesis of the tibia, tibial plafond, and calcaneus is commonly performed with plates and 3.5-mm self-tapping cortical screws. Screw insertion and reinsertion within the same hole in the bone may occur during surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the pullout strength of 3.5-mm self-tapping screws with up to 5 re-insertions in the diaphysis of the tibia, metaphysis of the distal tibia, calcaneus, and a polyurethane synthetic bone model.

METHODS

Screws were inserted into a synthetic bone model and 5 pairs of human cadaveric diaphyseal tibiae, distal tibiae, and calcanei. The bone was predrilled, and then 3.5-mm cortical self-tapping 316 L stainless steel screws with a washer were inserted bicortically. Screws were inserted from 1 to 5 times at each location. The screws were grasped and subjected to 5-mm/min tensional force via the biaxial material testing systems machine. Statistical significance was determined using a paired 2-tailed t test.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the pullout strength of the tibial diaphysis (1710 ± 550 N), tibial metaphysis (471 ± 266 N), and calcaneus (238 ± 90 N; P < 0.01). The tibial diaphysis pullout strength was 1710 ± 550 N for one insertion differing significantly relative to the groups with 4 (average 1030 ± 543 N, P = 0.004) or 5 (average 364 ± 209 N, P < 0.001) insertions. The tibial metaphyseal pullout strength for the single insertion group was 471 ± 266 N and differed significantly relative to the 3 (P = 0.026), 4 (P = 0.044), and 5 (P = 0.042) insertion groups. The calcaneal pullout strength for the single insertion group was 238 ± 90 N with a significant difference of the 1, 3, and 4, versus the 5 insertion group (P = 0.027, 0.040, and 0.033, respectively). The synthetic bone model pullout strength decreased significantly from the one insertion group relative to all other insertion groups (group 1, 1167 ± 263 N; group 2, 768 ± 199 N; group 3, 694 ± 295 N; group 4, 662 ± 356 N; and group 5, 154 ± 183 N; P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant decrease in relative pullout strength of 3.5-mm self-tapping cortical screws when comparing the tibial diaphysis, tibial metaphysis, and calcaneus. There is also a significant decrease in 3.5-mm self-tapping screw pullout strength after repeated reinsertions in the synthetic bone model, mid-shaft tibia, metaphyseal tibia, and calcaneus. We recommend that during osteosynthesis, careful screw insertion, and minimal reinsertion be performed.

A biomechanical comparison of four different cementless press-fit stems used in revision surgery for total knee replacements

Few biomechanical studies exist on femoral cementless press-fit stems for revision total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical quality of the femur-stem interface for a series of commercially available press-fit stems, because this interface may be a 'weak link' which could fail earlier than the femur-TKR bond itself. Also, the femur-stem interface may become particularly critical if distal femur bone degeneration, which may necessitate or follow revision TKR, ever weakens the femur-TKR bond itself. The authors implanted five synthetic femurs each with a Sigma Short Stem (SSS), Sigma Long Stem (SLS), Genesis II Short Stem (GSS), or Genesis II Long Stem (GLS). Axial stiffness, lateral stiffness, 'offset load' torsional stiffness, and 'offset load' torsional strength were measured with a mechanical testing system using displacement control. Axial (range = 1047-1461 N/mm, p = 0.106), lateral (range = 415-462 N/mm, p = 0.297), and torsional (range = 115-139 N/mm, p > 0.055) stiffnesses were not different between groups. The SSS had higher torsional strength (863 N) than the other stems (range = 167-197 N, p < 0.001). Torsional failure occurred by femoral 'spin' around the stem's long axis. There was poor linear correlation between the femur-stem interface area versus axial stiffness (R = 0.38) and torsional stiffness (R = 0.38), and there was a moderate linear correlation versus torsional strength (R = 0.55). Yet, there was a high inverse linear correlation between interfacial surface area versus lateral stiffness (R = 0.79), although this did not result in a statistical difference between stem groups (p = 0.297). These press-fit stems provide equivalent stability, except that the SSS has greater torsional strength.

A preliminary biomechanical study of cyclic preconditioning effects on canine cadaveric whole femurs

Biomechanical preconditioning of biological specimens by cyclic loading is routinely done presumably to stabilize properties prior to the main phase of a study. However, no prior studies have actually measured these effects for whole bone of any kind. The aim of this study, therefore, was to quantify these effects for whole bones. Fourteen matched pairs of fresh-frozen intact cadaveric canine femurs were sinusoidally loaded in 4-point bending from 50 N to 300 N at 1 Hz for 25 cycles. All femurs were tested in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) bending planes. Bending stiffness (i.e., slope of the force-vs-displacement curve) and linearity R(2) (i.e., coefficient of determination) of each loading cycle were measured and compared statistically to determine the effect of limb side, cycle number, and bending plane. Stiffnesses rose from 809.7 to 867.7 N/mm (AP, left), 847.3 to 915.6 N/mm (AP, right), 829.2 to 892.5 N/mm (AP, combined), 538.7 to 580.4 N/mm (ML, left), 568.9 to 613.8 N/mm (ML, right), and 553.8 to 597.1 N/mm (ML, combined). Linearity R(2) rose from 0.96 to 0.99 (AP, left), 0.97 to 0.99 (AP, right), 0.96 to 0.99 (AP, combined), 0.95 to 0.98 (ML, left), 0.94 to 0.98 (ML, right), and 0.95 to 0.98 (ML, combined). Stiffness and linearity R(2) versus cycle number were well-described by exponential curves whose values leveled off, respectively, starting at 12 and 5 cycles. For stiffness, there were no statistical differences for left versus right femurs (p = 0.166), but there were effects due to cycle number (p < 0.0001) and AP versus ML bending plane (p < 0.0001). Similarly, for linearity, no statistical differences were noted due to limb side (p = 0.533), but there were effects due to cycle number (p < 0.0001) and AP versus ML bending plane (p = 0.006). A minimum of 12 preconditioning cycles was needed to fully stabilize both the stiffness and linearity of the canine femurs. This is the first study to measure the effects of mechanical preconditioning on whole bones, having some practical implications on research practices.

Bioresorbable screws reinforced with phosphate glass fibre: manufacturing and mechanical property characterisation

Use of bioresorbable screws could eliminate disadvantages associated with metals such as removal operations, corrosion, MRI interference and stress shielding. Mechanical properties of bioresorbable polymers alone are insufficient for load bearing applications application as screws. Thus, reinforcement is necessary to try and match or surpass the mechanical properties of cortical bone. Phosphate based glass fibres were used to reinforce polylactic acid (PLA) in order to produce unidirectionally aligned (UD) and unidirectionally plus randomly distributed (UD/RM) composite screws (P40 UD and P40 UD/RM). The maximum flexural and push-out properties for the composite screws (P40 UD and P40 UD/RM) increased by almost 100% in comparison with the PLA screws. While the pull-out strength and stiffness of the headless composite screws were ∼80% (strength) and ∼130% (stiffness) higher than for PLA, those with heads exhibited properties lower than those for PLA alone as a result of failure at the heads. An increase in the maximum shear load and stiffness for the composite screws (∼30% and ∼40%) in comparison to the PLA screws was also seen. Maximum torque for the PLA screws was ∼1000 mN m, while that for the composite screws were slightly lower. The SEM micrographs for P40 UD and P40 UD/RM screws revealed small gaps around the fibres, which were suggested to be due to buckling of the UD fibres during the manufacturing process.

Biomechanical measurements of cortical screw stripping torque in human versus artificial femurs

Femur fracture plates are applied using cortical bone screws. Surgeons do this manually by subjective ‘feel’ without monitoring torque. Few studies have quantified stripping torque in human bone. No studies have measured stripping torque in the artificial bones from Sawbones (Vashon, WA, USA) that are frequently used in biomechanical studies. The present aim was to measure stripping torque of cortical screws in human versus artificial femurs. Sixteen fresh-frozen human femurs and eight artificial femurs were used. Using a digital torque screwdriver, each femur had a 3.5-mm diameter unicortical screw manually inserted into the anterior midshaft until failure of the screw–bone interface. Results were normalized by cortical thickness and the screw–bone interfacial area. There were no statistical differences in human versus artificial data, respectively, for stripping torque (1741 ± 442 N.mm, 2012 ± 176 N.mm, p = 0.11), stripping torque/thickness (313 ± 59 N, 305 ± 30 N, p = 0.74), and stripping torque/area (28.5 ± 5.3 N/mm, 27.8 ± 2.8 N/mm, p = 0.74). Artificial unicortical thickness (6.6 ± 0.3 mm) was greater than human thickness (5.6 ± 1.1 mm) ( p = 0.02). For human specimens, there was a moderate linear correlation of absolute and normalized stripping torque versus standardized bone mineral density (R ≥ 0.32) and clinical T-score (R = 0.29), but not with age (R ≤ 0.29). Surgeons should be aware of the stripping torque limits for human femurs and potentially take steps to monitor these values during surgery. The artificial femurs being increasingly used in research accurately replicate human cortical properties during screw insertion. To date, this is the first series of human femurs evaluated for cortical screw stripping.

Pullout Performance of Self-Tapping Medical Screws

This study investigates the effect of the pilot hole size, implant depth, synthetic bone density, and screw size on the pullout strength of the self-tapping screw using analytical, finite element, and experimental methodologies. Stress distribution and failure propagation mode around the implant thread zone are also investigated. Based on the finite element analysis (FEA) results, an analytical model for the pullout strength of the self-tapping screw is constructed in terms of the (synthetic) bone mechanical properties, screw size, and the implant depth. The pullout performance of self-tapping screws is discussed. Results from the analytical and finite element models are experimentally validated.

A New System to Improve Screw Fixation to Bones

Plates and non-locked screws used in the treatment of osteoporotic bone fractures frequently become loose due to everyday mechanical demands. Currently, locking plates and screws are the gold standard treatment for these fractures. However, their use has several limitations and complications as they are technically demanding, and their cost is very expensive. To improve the fixation strength of traditional unlocked plate and screw constructs, we have developed a new fixation system based on a very old concept. The system consists of a screw locking element (SLE) manufactured from PEEK, which is attached to the end of the screw shaft once it has traversed both bone cortices. A specially designed tool is used to facilitate its attachment to the screw. This tool makes it possible for the screw to traverse an osteosynthesis plate or lockwasher as well as both bone cortices and to easily find the SLE, fixing it against the far cortex. We tested the pull-out strength of SLEs and compared the results with previously published data for human femoral cortex pull-out strength. Our laboratory tests demonstrate that the mean SLE pull-out strength was 3864 ± 47.61 N, while that observed for a human femoral diaphysis cortex was 4071.54 ± 1461.69 N. This difference was not significant (p > 0.05). This new system can easily be used with any type of osteosynthesis in osteoporotic or osteopenic bones, with the screws being placed on weakened areas of the bone (e.g., fissure lines, previous orifices, or thinned metaphyseal bone cortex), or to replace over-torqued screws. It is particularly suitable for veterinary trauma, where immediate weight-bearing protection after fracture treatment is nearly impossible.

Anterolateral and medial locking plate stiffness in distal tibial fracture model

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the axial and torsional stiffness between anterolateral and medial distal tibial locking plates in a pilon fracture model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The biomechanical stiffness of anterolateral or medial plated pilon fracture models was evaluated. Six Sawbones Composite Tibiae with a simulated pilon fracture representing varus or valgus comminution (OTA 43-A2.2) were plated with a Synthes 3.5-mm contoured LCP anterolateral or medial locking distal tibia plate. Load as a function of axial displacement and torque as a function of angular displacement were recorded. Each tibia was tested with a fracture wedge in place and removed with a medial and then anterolateral plate.

RESULTS

Loading the tibial plateau medial to the central axis, no significant difference in mean stiffness between the anterolateral and medial plates was demonstrated with the fracture wedge in place. A significant difference was demonstrated with the wedge removed. Loading the plateau posterior to the central axis, no significant difference in mean stiffness between plates was demonstrated with the wedge in place or removed. With the wedge in place, there was a significant difference in mean torsional stiffness for clockwise rotation, but not counterclockwise rotation. With the wedge removed, no significant difference appeared in mean stiffness for clockwise and counterclockwise rotation.

CONCLUSION

Distal tibia extra-articular fractures stabilized with anterolateral or medial locking plate constructs demonstrated no statistically significant difference in biomechanical stiffness in compression and torsion testing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We believe this study indicates the primary concern when treating a pilon fracture may be soft-tissue considerations. Further clinical studies are required before definitive changes can be recommended regarding pilon fracture fixation.

The comparative stability of screw versus plate versus screw and plate coronoid fixation

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical characteristics of screw versus plate versus both screw and plate fixation for large, type 3 O'Driscoll coronoid fractures.

METHODS

Synthetic ulnas had 70% of their coronoids cut. Fixation was performed with either a cannulated screw, a plate, or both a screw and a plate. Energy to failure, force at failure, first cycle stiffness, and stiffness at failure were measured on a servohydraulic testing machine under cyclic posterior axial loading.

RESULTS

The combination of a plate and screw had significantly greater energy to failure (83 Nm), force required to cause failure (634 N), and stiffness at failure (387 N/mm) compared to either an isolated plate (38 Nm, 474 N, 237 N/mm, respectively) or a screw (10 Nm, 279 N, 149 N/mm, respectively). For energy to failure and force required to cause failure, the plate group significantly outperformed the screw group. There was no significant difference in stiffness at the time of failure between the plate and screw groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For type 3 O'Driscoll coronoid fractures or nonunions when both a screw and a plate can be placed, the combination of these 2 fixation devices appears to produce significantly greater biomechanical stability than either fixation device alone.

The biomechanics of locked plating for repairing proximal humerus fractures with or without medial cortical support

BACKGROUND

Comminuted proximal humerus fracture fixation is controversial. Locked plate complications have been addressed by anatomic reduction or medial cortical support. The relative mechanical contributions of varus malalignment and lack of medial cortical support are presently assessed.

METHODS

Forty synthetic humeri divided into three subgroups were osteotomized and fixed at 0 degrees, 10 degrees, and 20 degrees of varus malreduction with a locking proximal humerus plate (AxSOS, Global model; Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) to simulate mechanical medial support with cortical contact retained. Axial, torsional, and shear stiffness were measured. Half of the specimens in each of the three subgroups underwent a second osteotomy to create a segmental defect simulating loss of medial support with cortex removed. Axial, torsional, and shear stiffness tests were repeated, followed by shear load to failure in 20 degrees of abduction.

RESULTS

For isolated malreduction with cortical contact, the construct at 0 degrees showed statistically equivalent or higher axial, torsional, and shear stiffness than other subgroups examined. Subsequent removal of cortical support in half the specimens showed a drastic effect on axial, torsional, and shear stiffness at all varus angulations. Constructs with cortical contact at 0 degrees and 10 degrees yielded mean shear failure forces of 12965.4 N and 9341.1 N, respectively, being statistically higher (p < 0.05) compared with most other subgroups tested. Specimens failed primarily by plate bending as the humeral head was pushed down medially and distally.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic reduction with the medial cortical contact was the stiffest construct after a simulated two-part fracture. This study affirms the concept of medial cortical support by fixing proximal humeral fractures in varus, if absolutely necessary. This may be preferable to fixing the fracture in anatomic alignment when there is a medial fracture gap.

The Biomechanics of a Validated Finite Element Model of Stress Shielding in a Novel Hybrid Total Knee Replacement

This study proposes a novel hybrid total knee replacement (TKR) design to improve stress transfer to bone in the distal femur and, thereby, reduce stress shielding and consequent bone loss. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models were developed for a standard and a hybrid TKR and validated experimentally. The Duracon knee system (Stryker Canada) was the standard TKR used for the FE models and for the experimental tests. The FE hybrid device was identical to the standard TKR, except that it had an interposing layer of carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide 12 lining the back of the metallic femoral component. A series of experimental surface strain measurements were then taken to validate the FE model of the standard TKR at 3000 N of axial compression and at 0° of knee flexion. Comparison of surface strain values from FE analysis with experiments demonstrated good agreement, yielding a high Pearson correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.94. Under a 3000 N axial load and knee flexion angles simulating full stance (0°), heel strike (20°), and toe off (60°) during normal walking gait, the FE model showed considerable changes in maximum Von Mises stress in the region most susceptible to stress shielding (i.e. the anterior region, just behind the flange of the femoral implant). Specifically, going from a standard to a hybrid TKR caused an increase in maximum stress of 87.4 per cent (0°; from 0.15 to 0.28 MPa), 68.3 per cent (20°; from 1.02 to 1.71 MPa), and 12.6 per cent (60°; from 2.96 to 3.33 MPa). This can potentially decrease stress shielding and subsequent bone loss and knee implant loosening. This is the first report to propose and biomechanically to assess a novel hybrid TKR design that uses a layer of carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide 12 to reduce stress shielding.

The effect of cortex thickness on intact femur biomechanics: A comparison of finite element analysis with synthetic femurs

Biomechanical studies on femur fracture fixation with orthopaedic implants are numerous in the literature. However, few studies have compared the mechanical stability of these repair constructs in osteoporotic versus normal bone. The present aim was to examine how changes in cortical wall thickness of intact femurs affect biomechanical characteristics. A three-dimensional, linear, isotropic finite element (FE) model of an intact femur was developed in order to predict the effect of bicortical wall thickness, t, relative to the femur's mid-diaphyseal outer diameter, D, over a cortex thickness ratio range of 0 ≤ t/ D ≤ 1. The FE model was subjected to loads to obtain axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness. Ten commercially available synthetic femurs were then used to mimic ‘osteoporotic’ bone with t/ D = 0.33, while ten synthetic left femurs were used to simulate ‘normal’ bone with t/ D = 0.66. Axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness were measured for all femurs. There was excellent agreement between FE analysis and experimental stiffness data for all loading modes with an aggregate average percentage difference of 8 per cent. The FE results for mechanical stiffness versus cortical thickness ratio (0 ≤ t/ D ≤ 1) demonstrated exponential trends with the following stiffness ranges: axial stiffness (0 to 2343 N/mm), lateral stiffness (0 to 62 N/mm), and torsional stiffness (0 to 198 N/mm). This is the first study to characterize mechanical stiffness over a wide range of cortical thickness values. These results may have some clinical implications with respect to appropriately differentiating between older and younger human long bones from a mechanical standpoint.

The effect of load application rate on the biomechanics of synthetic femurs

Biomechanical investigations are increasingly using commercially available synthetic femurs as surrogates for human cadaveric femurs. However, the rate of force application in testing these artificial femurs appears to be chosen arbitrarily without much consideration to their visco-elastic time-dependent nature. The aim of this study, therefore, was to examine the effect of loading rate on the mechanical behaviour of synthetic femurs. Ten left, medium, fourth-generation composite femurs (Model 3403, Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA) were fixed distally into cement-filled steel cubic chambers for mounting into a mechanical tester. In randomized order, each of the ten femurs was loaded at rates of 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mm/min to obtain axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness. Axial stiffness showed an aggregate average value of 1742.7 ± 174.7 N/mm with a high linear correlation with loading rate ( R2 = 0.80). Lateral stiffness yielded an aggregate average value of 56.9 ± 10.2 N/mm and was linearly correlated with loading rate ( R2 = 0.85). Torsional stiffness demonstrated an aggregate average value of 176.9 ± 14.5 N/mm with a strong linear correlation with loading rate ( R2 = 0.59). Despite the high correlations between stiffness and speed, practically this resulted in an overall average difference between the lowest and highest stiffness of only 4 per cent. Moreover, no statistical comparisons between loading rates for axial, lateral, or torsional test modes showed differences ( p ≤ 0.843). Future biomechanical investigators utilizing these synthetic femurs need not be concerned with loading rate effects over the range tested presently. This is the first study in the literature to perform such an assessment.

The effect of the screw pull-out rate on cortical screw purchase in unreamed and reamed synthetic long bones

Orthopaedic fracture fixation constructs are typically mounted on to human long bones using cortical screws. Biomechanical studies are increasingly employing commercially available synthetic bones. The aim of this investigation was to examine the effect of the screw pull-out rate and canal reaming on the cortical bone screw purchase strength in synthetic bone. Cylinders made of synthetic material were used to simulate unreamed (foam-filled) and reamed (hollow) human long bone with an outer diameter of 35 mm and a cortex wall thickness of 4 mm. The unreamed and reamed cylinders each had 56 sites along their lengths into which orthopaedic cortical bone screws (major diameter, 3.5 mm) were inserted to engage both cortices. The 16 test groups ( n = 7 screw sites per group) had screws extracted at rates of 1 mm/min, 5 mm/min, 10 mm/min, 20 mm/min, 30 mm/min, 40 mm/min, 50 mm/min, and 60 mm/min. The failure force and failure stress increased and were highly linearly correlated with pull-out rate for reamed ( R2 = 0.60 and 0.60), but not for unreamed ( R2 = 0.00 and 0.00) specimens. The failure displacement and failure energy were relatively unchanged with pull-out rate, yielding low coefficients for unreamed ( R2 = 0.25 and 0.00) and reamed ( R2 = 0.27 and 0.00) groups. Unreamed versus reamed specimens were statistically different for failure force ( p = 0.000) and stress ( p = 0.000), but not for failure displacement ( p = 0.297) and energy (0.054< p<1.000). This is the first study to perform an extensive investigation of the screw pull-out rate in unreamed and reamed synthetic long bone.

Reconstruction interlocking nails for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: biomechanical analysis of effect of supplementary cannulated screw on intracapsular femoral neck fracture

BACKGROUND

To stabilize the femoral head in ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures, one cannulated screw was supplemented in front of the reconstruction interlocking nail (recon nail).

METHODS

Twenty-eight left sawbone femurs were divided into two groups. The 14 femurs in each group were osteotomized with subcapital or transcervical fractures. The shafts of all femurs were also osteotomized, and 1cm of the distal segmental cortex was excised. Next, all the fractures were treated with static recon nails to concomitantly stabilize both femoral neck and shaft fractures. Additionally, seven subcapital fractures and seven transcervical fractures were supplemented with one cannulated screw in front of the recon nails. All specimens were tested with a Material Testing System machine to investigate the relative stability during uniaxial cyclic compression.

FINDINGS

The subcapital and transcervical fractures supplemented with one cannulated screw could bear more loads than those without screw supplementation (P<0.01 and P<0.01, respectively at any testing interval). Moreover, in the case of the subcapital fractures, the single supplemented cannulated screw could reduce the displacement at 500 N by 24% (P< 0.001). On the other hand, in the case of the transcervical fractures, one supplemented cannulated screw could reduce the displacement at 500 N by 4% (P=0.003).

INTERPRETATION

From the biomechanical viewpoint, the subcapital fractures in combined fractures are recommended to supplement with one cannulated screw in front of the recon nails to eliminate complications associated with stabilization.

Cortical Screw Purchase in Synthetic and Human Femurs

Biomechanical investigations of orthopedic fracture fixation constructs increasingly use analogs like the third and fourth generation composite femurs. However, no study has directly compared cortical screw purchase between these surrogates and human femurs, which was the present aim. Synthetic and human femurs had bicortical orthopedic screws (diameter=3.5 mm and length=50 mm) inserted in three locations along the anterior length. The screws were extracted to obtain pullout force, shear stress, and energy-to-pullout. The four study groups (n=6 femurs each) assessed were the fourth generation composite femur with both 16 mm and 20 mm diameter canals, the third generation composite femur with a 16 mm canal, and the human femur. For a given femur type, there was no statistical difference between the proximal, center, or distal screw sites for virtually all comparisons. The fourth generation composite femur with a 20 mm canal was closest to the human femur for the outcome measures considered. Synthetic femurs showed a range of average measures (2948.54–5286.30 N, 27.30–35.60 MPa, and 3.63–9.95 J) above that for human femurs (1645.92–3084.95 N, 17.86–24.64 MPa, and 1.82–3.27 J). Shear stress and energy-to-pullout were useful supplemental evaluators of screw purchase, since they account for material properties and screw motion. Although synthetic femurs approximated human femurs with respect to screw extraction behavior, ongoing research is required to definitively determine which type of synthetic femur most closely resembles normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic human bone at the screw-bone interface.

Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone

Background

This study was designed to derive the theoretical formulae to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screws with an inconstant outer and/or inner diameter distribution (conical screws). For the transpedicular fixation, one of the failure modes is the screw loosening from the vertebral bone. Hence, various kinds of pedicle screws have been evaluated to measure the pullout strength using synthetic and cadaveric bone as specimens. In the literature, the Chapman's formula has been widely proposed to predict the pullout strength of screws with constant outer and inner diameters (cylindrical screws).

Methods

This study formulated the pullout strength of the conical and cylindrical screws as the functions of material, screw, and surgery factors. The predicted pullout strength of each screw was compared to the experimentally measured data. Synthetic bones were used to standardize the material properties of the specimen and provide observation of the loosening mechanism of the bone/screw construct.

Results

The predicted data from the new formulae were better correlated with the mean pullout strength of both the cylindrical and conical screws within an average error of 5.0% and R² = 0.93. On the other hand, the average error and R² value of the literature formula were as high as -32.3% and -0.26, respectively.

Conclusion

The pullout strength of the pedicle screws was the functions of bone strength, screw design, and pilot hole. The close correlation between the measured and predicted pullout strength validated the value of the new formulae, so as avoid repeating experimental tests.

The biomechanics of the T2 femoral nailing system: A comparison of synthetic femurs with finite element analysis

Intramedullary nails are commonly used to repair femoral fractures. Fractures in normal healthy bone often occur in the young during motor vehicle accidents. Although clinically beneficial, bone refracture and implant failure persist. Large variations in human femur quality and geometry have motivated recent experimental use of synthetic femurs that mimic human tissue and the development of increasingly sophisticated theoretical models. Four synthetic femurs were fitted with a T2 femoral nailing system (Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA). The femurs were not fractured in order to simulate post-operative perfect union. Six configurations were created: retrograde nail with standard locking (RS), retrograde nail with advanced locking ‘off’ (RA-off), retrograde nail with advanced locking ‘on’ (RA-on), antegrade nail with standard locking (AS), antegrade nail with advanced locking ‘off’ (AA-off), and antegrade nail with advanced locking ‘on’ (AA-on). Strain gauges were placed on the medial side of femurs. A 580 N axial load was applied, and the stiffness was measured. Strains were recorded and compared with results from a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model. Experimental axial stiffnesses for RA-off (771.3 N/mm) and RA-on (681.7 N/mm) were similar to intact human cadaveric femurs from previous literature (757 ± 264 N/mm). Conversely, experimental axial stiffnesses for AS (1168.8 N/mm), AA-off (1135.3 N/mm), AA-on (1152.1 N/mm), and RS (1294.0 N/mm) were similar to intact synthetic femurs from previous literature (1290 ± 30 N/mm). There was better agreement between experimental and FE analysis strains for RS (average percentage difference, 11.6 per cent), RA-on (average percentage difference, 11.1 per cent), AA-off (average percentage difference, 13.4 per cent), and AA-on (average percentage difference, 16.0 per cent), than for RA-off (average percentage difference, 33.5 per cent) and AS (average percentage difference, 32.6 per cent). FE analysis was more predictive of strains in the proximal and middle sections of the femur—nail construct than the distal. The results mimicked post-operative clinical stability at low static axial loads once fracture healing begins to occur.

Cancellous bone screw purchase: A comparison of synthetic femurs, human femurs, and finite element analysis

Biomechanical assessments of orthopaedic fracture fixation constructs are increasingly using commercially available analogues such as the fourth-generation composite femur (4GCF). The aim of this study was to compare cancellous screw purchase directly between these surrogates and human femurs, which has not been done previously. Synthetic and human femurs each had one orthopaedic cancellous screw (major diameter, 6.5 mm) inserted along the femoral neck axis and into the spongy bone of the femoral head to a depth of 30 mm. Screws were removed to obtain pull-out force, shear stress, and energy values. The three experimental study groups ( n = 6 femurs each) were the 4GCF with a ‘solid’ cancellous matrix, the 4GCF with a ‘cellular’ cancellous matrix, and human femurs. Moreover, a finite element model was developed on the basis of the material properties and anatomical geometry of the two synthetic femurs in order to assess cancellous screw purchase. The results for force, shear stress, and energy respectively were as follows: 4GCF solid femurs, 926.47 ± 66.76 N, 2.84 ± 0.20 MPa, and 0.57 ± 0.04 J; 4GCF cellular femurs, 1409.64 ± 133.36 N, 4.31 ± 0.41 MPa, and 0.99 ± 0.13 J; human femurs, 1523.29 ± 1380.15 N, 4.66 ± 4.22 MPa, and 2.78 ± 3.61 J. No statistical differences were noted when comparing the three experimental groups for pull-out force ( p = 0.413), shear stress ( p = 0.412), or energy ( p = 0.185). The 4GCF with either a ‘solid’ or ‘cellular’ cancellous matrix is a good biomechanical analogue to the human femur at the screw thread—bone interface. This is the first study to perform a three-way investigation of cancellous screw purchase using 4GCFs, human femurs, and finite element analysis.

Retrograde bridging nail in periprosthetic femoral fracture treatment which allows direct weight bearing

The bridging nail is a retrograde intramedullary femoral nail designed to stabilize periprosthetic femoral fractures. It offers a minimal invasive surgical approach in combination with early mobilization. The goal of this study was to evaluate the osteosynthesis under full weight-bearing conditions. Three groups of five composite fibreglass femora were prepared with a cemented hip stem. Group 1 underwent cyclic axial loading with 1500 N during 150 000 cycles. After completion, linear loading to failure was conducted. Groups 2 and 3 were submitted to linear increased torsional loading with and without an axial load respectively. Failure was defined as rotational movement of the connection (slippage). In the axial cyclic loading configuration, one specimen failed after 122 000 cycles. Four specimens passed 150 000 cycles and failed after linearly increasing the axial loading of 1940–2600 N (mean, 2408 N ± 313 standard deviation (SD)). Slippage was first detected at a torque varying between 2.5 and 8.2 N m (mean, 5.1 N m ± 2.1 SD) in group 2 and between 10.0 and 15.4 N m (mean, 13.0 N m ± 2.3 SD) in group 3. In conclusion the bridging nail offers a stable connection with the stem of a hip arthroplasty which can resist high repetitive loads, representative of direct full axial weight bearing. The biomechanical results support the clinical experience of a stable osteosynthesis enabling early post-operative mobilization.

Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation

BACKGROUND

A variety of methods are available for the fixation of femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. However, few studies in the literature have quantified the performance of such repair constructs. The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically four different constructs for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Twenty synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending, and torsion to determine initial stiffness, as well as stiffness following fixation of a simulated femoral midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Four fracture fixation constructs (five specimens per group) were assessed: construct A was a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with locked screws; construct B, a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with cables and locked screws; construct C, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with cables and nonlocked screws; and construct D, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with allograft strut, cables, and nonlocked screws. Axial stiffness, lateral bending stiffness, and torsional stiffness were assessed with respect to baseline intact specimen values. Axial load to failure was also measured for the specimens.

RESULTS

Construct D demonstrated either equivalent or superior stiffness in all testing modes compared with the other constructs in femora with both a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. A comparison of constructs A, B, and C demonstrated equivalent stiffness in all test modes (with one exception) in femora with a midshaft fracture and a bone gap.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of a nonlocking plate with an allograft strut (construct D) resulted in the highest stiffness of the constructs examined for treating a periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral component of a total hip replacement.

Biomechanical evaluation of clavicle fracture plating techniques: does a locking plate provide improved stability?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the biomechanical properties of both plate location (superior versus anterior-inferior) and plate type Small Fragment Contourable Dual Compression Plate (CDCP) versus 3.5 mm Universal Locking System Contourable Dual Compression Plate (Locked CDCP) in a synthetic midshaft transverse clavicle fracture model.

METHODS

Twenty-four pre-osteomized synthetic clavicles were repaired with either CDCP or locked CDCP technology 3.5 mm plates in either the superior or anterior-inferior position to form 4 groups of 6 clavicles. These were subsequently tested to evaluate torsional and axial construct stiffness, as well as bending load to failure, bending failure stiffness, and method of failure.

RESULTS

In axial compression, locked CDCP constructs were significantly more stiff than CDCP constructs (p < 0.001), but no statistically significant effect of plate location was observed. Torsional tests demonstrated a significant 2-way interaction favoring locked CDCP plates in the superior position and standard CDCP plates in the anterior-inferior position (p < 0.001). Bending failure testing revealed that the superior plate location had higher load to failure and bending failure stiffness than the anterior-inferior location (p < 0.0001). In addition, the superior locked CDCP plates demonstrated significantly greater bending failure stiffness than superior CDCP plates (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanically, repairing a midshaft clavicle fracture with a superior plate was more favorable compared to anterior-inferior plating in terms of both load to failure and bending failure stiffness. Furthermore, superior locked CDCP plates show improved bending failure stiffness over superior CDCP plates.

Fixation of long bone segmental defects: a biomechanical study

OBJECTIVES

Obtaining stable fixation in cases of long bone non-union with segmental bone defects can be challenging. Bone quality is often sub-optimal. Locking plates and structural allografts have both been used clinically in these cases. The objective of this study was to determine the biomechanical characteristics of three constructs that have been employed in this context.

METHODS

A biomechanical study was performed using 3rd Generation Composite Femurs as specimens. A diaphyseal segmental defect was created and fixed with one of three constructs: (1) lateral locking plate (LP); (2) lateral non-locking plate and medial allograft strut (S); (3) lateral non-locking plate and intramedullary fibula allograft (F). The "allografts" were fashioned from 3rd generation composite bones. Axial, torsional and bending stiffness as well as load to failure were determined using a materials testing machine.

RESULTS

Overall, construct S was the stiffest and construct LP was the least stiff. Construct F had intermediate characteristics. Axial load to failure for construct S (6108N) and for construct F (5344N) was significantly greater than for construct LP (2855N).

CONCLUSION

When maximal stiffness is desired, a construct with a structural allograft should be chosen over a locking plate. However, biological and anatomic factors must also be taken into account when using these constructs clinically.