A method for simulating forward falls and controlling impact velocity

Assessment of protective arm reactions associated with forward falls are typically performed by dropping research participants from a height onto a landing surface. The impact velocity is generally modulated by controlling the total height of the fall. This contrasts with an actual fall where the fall velocity is dependent on several factors in addition to fall height and not likely predictable at the onset of the fall. A counterweight and pulley system can be used to modulate the fall velocity in simulated forward falls in a manner that is not predictable to study participants, enhancing experimental validity. However, predicting the fall velocity based on participant height and weight and counterweight mass is not straightforward. In this article, the design of the FALL simulator For Injury prevention Training and assessment (FALL FIT) system is described. A dynamic model of the FALL FIT and counterweight system is developed and model parameters are fit using nonlinear optimization and experimental data. The fitted model enables prediction of fall velocity as a function of participant height and weight and counterweight load. The method can be used to provide controllable perturbations thereby elucidating the control strategy used when protecting the body from injury in a forward fall, how the control strategy changes because of aging or dysfunction or as a method for progressive protective arm reaction training.•Construction of device to simulate forward falls with controllable impact velocity using material that are commercially available is described•A dynamic model of the FALL FIT is developed to estimate the impact velocity of a simulated forward fall using participant height and counterweight load•The dynamic model is validated using data from 3 previous studies.

Test-retest reliability of the FALL FIT system for assessing and training protective arm reactions in response to a forward fall

The use of the hands and arms is an important protective mechanism in avoiding fall-related injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of fall dynamics and evokd protective arm response kinematics and kinetics in forward falls simulated using the FALL simulator For Injury prevention Training and assessment system (FALL FIT). Fall FIT allows experimental control of the fall height and acceleration of the body during a forward fall. Two falls were simulated starting from 4 initial lean angles in Experiment 1 and with 4 different fall accelerations in Experiment 2. Fourteen younger adults (25.1±3.5 years) and 13 older adults (71.3±3.7 years) participated in Experiment 1 and 13 younger adults (31.8±5.7 years) participated in Experiment 2. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to the evaluate absolute agreement of single measures at each condition and averages across conditions. Average measures of fall dynamics and evoked kinematics and kinetics exhibited excellent reliability (ICC(A,4)>0.86). The reliability of single measures (ICC(A,1) > 0.59) was good to excellent, although 18% of single measures had a reliability (ICC(A,1)) between 0.00 and 0.57. The FALL FIT was shown to have good to excellent reliability for most measures. FALL FIT can produce a wide range of fall dynamics through modulation of initial lean angle and body acceleration. Additionally, the range of fall velocities and evoked kinematics and kinetics are consistent with previous fall research.•

The FALL FIT can be used to gain further insight into the control of protective arm reactions and may provide a therapeutic tool to assess and train protective arm reactions.

The effect of asymmetrical body orientation during simulated forward falls on the distal upper extremity impact response of healthy people

The occurrence of distal upper extremity injuries resulting from forward falls (approximately 165,000 per year) has remained relatively constant for over 20years. Previous work has provided valuable insight into fall arrest strategies, but only symmetric falls in body postures that do not represent actual fall scenarios closely have been evaluated. This study quantified the effect of asymmetric loading and body postures on distal upper extremity response to simulated forward falls. Twenty participants were suspended from the Propelled Upper Limb fall ARest Impact System (PULARIS) in different torso and leg postures relative to the ground and to the sagittal plane (0°, 30° and 45°). When released from PULARIS (hands 10cm above surface, velocity 1m/s), participants landed on two force platforms, one for each hand. Right forearm impact response was measured with distal (radial styloid) and proximal (olecranon) tri-axial accelerometers and bipolar EMG from seven muscles. Overall, the relative height of the torso and legs had little effect on the forces, or forearm response variables. Muscle activation patterns consistently increased from the start to the peak activation levels after impact for all muscles, followed by a rapid decline after peak. The impact forces and accelerations suggest that the distal upper extremity is loaded more medial-laterally during asymmetric falls than symmetric falls. Altering the direction of the impact force in this way (volar-dorsal to medial-lateral) may help reduce distal extremity injuries caused when landing occurs symmetrically in the sagittal plane as it has been shown that volar-dorsal forces increase the risk of injury.

The effect of static muscle forces on the fracture strength of the intact distal radius in vitro in response to simulated forward fall impacts

The distal radius fracture (DRF) is a particularly dominant injury of the wrist, commonly resulting from a forward fall on an outstretched hand. In an attempt to reduce the prevalence, costs, and potential long-term pain/deformities associated with this injury, in vivo and in vitro investigations have sought to classify the kinematics and kinetics of DRFs. In vivo forward fall work has identified a preparatory muscle contraction that occurs in the upper extremity prior to peak impact force. The present investigation constitutes the first attempt to systematically determine the effect of static muscle forces on the fracture threshold of the distal radius in vitro. Paired human cadaveric forearm specimens were divided into two groups, one that had no muscle forces applied (i.e., right arms) and the other that had muscle forces applied to ECU, ECRL, FCU and FCR (i.e., left arms), with magnitudes based on peak muscle forces and in vivo lower bound forward fall activation patterns. The specimens were secured in a custom-built pneumatic impact loading device and subjected to incremental impacts at pre-fracture (25 J) and fracture (150 J) levels. Similar fracture forces (6565 (866)N and 8665 (5133)N), impulses (47 (6)Ns and 57 (30)Ns), and energies (152 (38)J and 144 (45)J) were observed for both groups of specimens (p>0.05). Accordingly, it is suggested that, at the magnitudes presently simulated, muscle forces have little effect on the way the distal radius responds to forward fall initiated impact loading.