Intraoperative Angle Measurement of Anatomical Structures: A Systematic Review

Ensuring precise angle measurement during surgical correction of orientation-related deformities is crucial for optimal postoperative outcomes, yet there is a lack of an ideal commercial solution. Current measurement sensors and instrumentation have limitations that make their use context-specific, demanding a methodical evaluation of the field. A systematic review was carried out in March 2023. Studies reporting technologies and validation methods for intraoperative angular measurement of anatomical structures were analyzed. A total of 32 studies were included, 17 focused on image-based technologies (6 fluoroscopy, 4 camera-based tracking, and 7 CT-based), while 15 explored non-image-based technologies (6 manual instruments and 9 inertial sensor-based instruments). Image-based technologies offer better accuracy and 3D capabilities but pose challenges like additional equipment, increased radiation exposure, time, and cost. Non-image-based technologies are cost-effective but may be influenced by the surgeon's perception and require careful calibration. Nevertheless, the choice of the proper technology should take into consideration the influence of the expected error in the surgery, surgery type, and radiation dose limit. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable guide for surgeons seeking precise angle measurements intraoperatively. It not only explores the performance and application of existing technologies but also aids in the future development of innovative solutions.

Generic Implant Positioning Technology Based on Hole Projections in X-Ray Images

Implant placement plays a key role in trauma and orthopedics. In this paper, a generic technological concept for implant positioning assistance is outlined. The system utilizes conventional radiographic devices for imaging and tracking and embeds into surgical workflows without the need for complex navigation equipment. It is based on feature extraction from cylindrical hole-projections in X-ray images for determining spatial alignment of implant and anatomy. Basic performance of a prototype system was experimentally verified in terms of tracking accuracy and robustness under varying conditions. In a second step, the system was developed into a set of application modules, each serving a pressing clinical need: Plating of the proximal humerus, cephalic nail and dynamic hip-screw placement, general anatomic plating, distal nail interlocking with adjustment of femoral anteversion and corrective osteotomies. Module prototypes were tested according to their degree of maturity from feasibility assessment in wet-labs to clinical handling tests. Orientation tracking of reference objects yielded an accuracy and precision of 0.1±0.71 deg (mean±standard deviation) with a maximum error of 4.68 deg at unfavorable conditions. This base-performance translated, e.g., into a precision of ±1.2 mm (standard deviation) screw-tip to joint distance at proximal humerus plating, or into a precision of lag screw positioning in the femoral head of ±0.6 mm in craniocaudal and ±1.6 mm in anterioposterior direction. The concept revealed strong potential to improve surgical outcomes in a broad range of orthopedic applications due to its generic and simplistic nature. Comprehensive validation activities must follow for clinical introduction.