A Synergy-Based Motor Control Framework for the Fast Feedback Control of Musculoskeletal Systems

Utilising redundancy in musculoskeletal systems for adaptive stiffness and muscle failure compensation: a model-free inverse statics approach

Vertebrates possess a biomechanical structure with redundant muscles, enabling adaptability in uncertain and complex environments. Harnessing this inspiration, musculoskeletal systems offer advantages like variable stiffness and resilience to actuator failure and fatigue. Despite their potential, the complex structure presents modelling challenges that are difficult to explicitly formulate and control. This difficulty arises from the need for comprehensive knowledge of the musculoskeletal system, including details such as muscle arrangement, and fully accessible muscle and joint states. Whilst existing model-free methods do not need explicit formulations, they also underutilise the benefits of muscle redundancy. Consequently, they necessitate retraining in the event of muscle failure and require manual tuning of parameters to control joint stiffness limiting their applications under unknown payloads. Presented here is a model-free local inverse statics controller for musculoskeletal systems, employing a feedforward neural network trained on motor babbling data. Experiments with a musculoskeletal leg model showcase the controller's adaptability to complex structures, including mono and bi-articulate muscles. The controller can compensate for changes such as weight variations, muscle failures, and environmental interactions, retaining reasonable accuracy without the need for any additional retraining.

A Conceptual Blueprint for Making Neuromusculoskeletal Models Clinically Useful

The ultimate goal of most neuromusculoskeletal modeling research is to improve the treatment of movement impairments. However, even though neuromusculoskeletal models have become more realistic anatomically, physiologically, and neurologically over the past 25 years, they have yet to make a positive impact on the design of clinical treatments for movement impairments. Such impairments are caused by common conditions such as stroke, osteoarthritis, Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, limb amputation, and even cancer. The lack of clinical impact is somewhat surprising given that comparable computational technology has transformed the design of airplanes, automobiles, and other commercial products over the same time period. This paper provides the author’s personal perspective for how neuromusculoskeletal models can become clinically useful. First, the paper motivates the potential value of neuromusculoskeletal models for clinical treatment design. Next, it highlights five challenges to achieving clinical utility and provides suggestions for how to overcome them. After that, it describes clinical, technical, collaboration, and practical needs that must be addressed for neuromusculoskeletal models to fulfill their clinical potential, along with recommendations for meeting them. Finally, it discusses how more complex modeling and experimental methods could enhance neuromusculoskeletal model fidelity, personalization, and utilization. The author hopes that these ideas will provide a conceptual blueprint that will help the neuromusculoskeletal modeling research community work toward clinical utility.

Muscle Synergies Modify Optimization Estimates of Joint Stiffness During Walking

Because of its simplicity, static optimization (SO) is frequently used to resolve the muscle redundancy problem (i.e., more muscles than degrees-of-freedom (DOF) in the human musculoskeletal system). However, SO minimizes antagonistic co-activation and likely joint stiffness as well, which may not be physiologically realistic since the body modulates joint stiffness during movements such as walking. Knowledge of joint stiffness is limited due to the difficulty of measuring it experimentally, leading researchers to estimate it using computational models. This study explores how imposing a synergy structure on the muscle activations estimated by optimization (termed "synergy optimization," or SynO) affects calculated lower body joint stiffnesses during walking. By limiting the achievable muscle activations and coupling all time frames together, a synergy structure provides a potential mechanism for reducing indeterminacy and improving physiological co-activation but at the cost of a larger optimization problem. To compare joint stiffnesses produced by SynO (2-6 synergies) and SO, we used both approaches to estimate lower body muscle activations and forces for sample experimental overground walking data obtained from the first knee grand challenge competition. Both optimizations used a custom Hill-type muscle model that permitted analytic calculation of individual muscle contributions to the stiffness of spanned joints. Both approaches reproduced inverse dynamic joint moments well over the entire gait cycle, though SynO with only two synergies exhibited the largest errors. Maximum and mean joint stiffnesses for hip and knee flexion in particular decreased as the number of synergies increased from 2 to 6, with SO producing the lowest joint stiffness values. Our results suggest that SynO increases joint stiffness by increasing muscle co-activation, and furthermore, that walking with a reduced number of synergies may result in increased joint stiffness and perhaps stability.

On the Relationship Between Muscle Synergies and Redundant Degrees of Freedom in Musculoskeletal Systems

It has been suggested that the human nervous system controls motions in the task (or operational) space. However, little attention has been given to the separation of the control of the task-related and task-irrelevant degrees of freedom. Aim: We investigate how muscle synergies may be used to separately control the task-related and redundant degrees of freedom in a computational model. Approach: We generalize an existing motor control model, and assume that the task and redundant spaces have orthogonal basis vectors. This assumption originates from observations that the human nervous system tightly controls the task-related variables, and leaves the rest uncontrolled. In other words, controlling the variables in one space does not affect the other space; thus, the actuations must be orthogonal in the two spaces. We implemented this assumption in the model by selecting muscle synergies that produce force vectors with orthogonal directions in the task and redundant spaces. Findings: Our experimental results show that the orthogonality assumption performs well in reconstructing the muscle activities from the measured kinematics/dynamics in the task and redundant spaces. Specifically, we found that approximately 70% of the variation in the measured muscle activity can be captured with the orthogonality assumption, while allowing efficient separation of the control in the two spaces. Implications: The developed motor control model is a viable tool in real-time simulations of musculoskeletal systems, as well as model-based control of bio-mechatronic systems, where a computationally efficient representation of the human motion controller is needed.