A New, Noninvasive Accelerometric Method for Diagnosing Acid andNon-Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux in Premature Infants: Proof of Concept

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in preterm infants: unmet needs

INTRODUCTION

Many preterm present somatic symptoms including aerodigestive and cardiorespiratory manifestations, in combination with irritability and/or distress, which are often attributed to gastroesophageal reflux (GER), albeit for unclear reasons.

AREAS COVERED

We searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE for guidelines, reviews, and randomized controlled trials up to March 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

The diagnosis of GER-disease (GERD) in preterm is challenging because manifestations are atypical and diagnostic investigations difficult and not devoid of risk for adverse events. In case of vomiting or regurgitation, GER as a consequence of anatomical or metabolic conditions should be considered. Although many preterm infants are treated with proton pump inhibitors, this is seldom needed. Low-quality evidence for alginates is available, but needs further evaluation. There is a need for an effective and safe prokinetic favoring esophageal clearance, increasing lower esophageal sphincter pressure and stimulating gastric emptying. Non-drug treatment such as feeding adaptations (volume, duration, and composition) and positional changes are insufficiently applied. Thickened formula is not indicated in preterm babies. In case none of the above recommendations did result in sufficient improvement, and if documentation of acid GER is not possible, a 2-4 week trial of a proton pump inhibitor is acceptable.

Use of a non-invasive accelerometric method for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux in premature infants

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of a non-invasive accelerometric device to diagnose GER in preterm babies.

STUDY DESIGN

An accelerometer was taped over the sub-xiphoid process in 110 preterm (GA 29.6 ± 3.3 wk) infants (133 studies). Low frequency, sub-audible signals were captured via digital recording (sampling rate 200 Hz), then re-sampled (rate = 60 Hz) to create a spectrogram (focused range 0-30 Hz). Mean amplitude in the focused range was calculated.

RESULTS

Of 85 studies with simultaneous pH-metry and accelerometry, 18 had concurrent positive and 23 had concurrent negative scores, 42 had negative pH scores when accelerometry was positive (≥1 µV), consistent with non-acid reflux. Eleven infants at high risk of aspiration received surgical interventions. All but 1 had negative pH scores while 10/11 had positive accelerometry.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-invasiveness of this accelerometric technique allows for GER screening and for repeated testing to assess efficacy of interventions.