Apparatus for In Vivo Knee Laxity Assessment Using High-Speed Stereo Radiography

Impact of Structural Compliance of a Six Degree of Freedom Joint Simulator on Virtual Ligament Force Calculation in Total Knee Endoprosthesis Testing

The AMTI VIVO™ six degree of freedom joint simulator allows reproducible preclinical testing of joint endoprostheses under specific kinematic and loading conditions. When testing total knee endoprosthesis, the articulating femoral and tibial components are each mounted on an actuator with two and four degrees of freedom, respectively. To approximate realistic physiological conditions with respect to soft tissues, the joint simulator features an integrated virtual ligament model that calculates the restoring forces of the ligament apparatus to be applied by the actuators. During joint motion, the locations of the ligament insertion points are calculated depending on both actuators' coordinates. In the present study, we demonstrate that unintended elastic deformations of the actuators due to the specifically high contact forces in the artificial knee joint have a considerable impact on the calculated ligament forces. This study aims to investigate the effect of this structural compliance on experimental results. While the built-in algorithm for calculating the ligament forces cannot be altered by the user, a reduction of the ligament force deviations due to the elastic deformations could be achieved by preloading the articulating implant components in the reference configuration. As a proof of concept, a knee flexion motion with varying ligament conditions was simulated on the VIVO simulator and compared to data derived from a musculoskeletal multibody model of a total knee endoprosthesis.

Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Assessing Model Calibration Workflows and Outcomes

Model reproducibility is a point of emphasis for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and in science, broadly. As the use of computational modeling in biomechanics and orthopedics grows, so does the need to assess the reproducibility of modeling workflows and simulation predictions. The long-term goal of the KneeHub project is to understand the influence of potentially subjective decisions, thus the modeler's "art", on the reproducibility and predictive uncertainty of computational knee joint models. In this paper, we report on the model calibration phase of this project, during which five teams calibrated computational knee joint models of the same specimens from the same specimen-specific joint mechanics dataset. We investigated model calibration approaches and decisions, and compared calibration workflows and model outcomes among the teams. The selection of the calibration targets used in the calibration workflow differed greatly between the teams and was influenced by modeling decisions related to the representation of structures, and considerations for computational cost and implementation of optimization. While calibration improved model performance, differences in the postcalibration ligament properties and predicted kinematics were quantified and discussed in the context of modeling decisions. Even for teams with demonstrated expertise, model calibration is difficult to foresee and plan in detail, and the results of this study underscore the importance of identification and standardization of best practices for data sharing and calibration.

Bayesian Calibration of Computational Knee Models to Estimate Subject-Specific Ligament Properties, Tibiofemoral Kinematics, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force With Uncertainty Quantification

High-grade knee laxity is associated with early anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure, poor function, and compromised clinical outcome. Yet, the specific ligaments and ligament properties driving knee laxity remain poorly understood. We described a Bayesian calibration methodology for predicting unknown ligament properties in a computational knee model. Then, we applied the method to estimate unknown ligament properties with uncertainty bounds using tibiofemoral kinematics and ACL force measurements from two cadaver knees that spanned a range of laxities; these knees were tested using a robotic manipulator. The unknown ligament properties were from the Bayesian set of plausible ligament properties, as specified by their posterior distribution. Finally, we developed a calibrated predictor of tibiofemoral kinematics and ACL force with their own uncertainty bounds. The calibrated predictor was developed by first collecting the posterior draws of the kinematics and ACL force that are induced by the posterior draws of the ligament properties and model parameters. Bayesian calibration identified unique ligament slack lengths for the two knee models and produced ACL force and kinematic predictions that were closer to the corresponding in vitro measurement than those from a standard optimization technique. This Bayesian framework quantifies uncertainty in both ligament properties and model outputs; an important step towards developing subject-specific computational models to improve treatment for ACL injury.

Positional MR imaging of normal and injured knees

OBJECTIVES

This study uses a practical positional MRI protocol to evaluate tibiofemoral translation and rotation in normal and injured knees.

METHODS

Following ethics approval, positional knee MRI of both knees was performed at 35° flexion, extension, and hyperextension in 34 normal subjects (mean age 31.1 ± 10 years) and 51 knee injury patients (mean age 36.4 ± 11.5 years, ACL tear n = 23, non-ACL injury n = 28). At each position, tibiofemoral translation and rotation were measured.

RESULTS

Normal knees showed 8.1 ± 3.3° external tibial rotation (i.e., compatible with physiological screw home mechanism) in hyperextension. The unaffected knee of ACL tear patients showed increased tibial anterior translation laterally (p = 0.005) and decreased external rotation (p = 0.002) in hyperextension compared to normal knees. ACL-tear knees had increased tibial anterior translation laterally (p < 0.001) and decreased external rotation (p < 0.001) compared to normal knees. Applying normal thresholds, fifteen (65%) of 23 ACL knees had excessive tibial anterior translation laterally while 17 (74%) had limited external rotation. None (0%) of 28 non-ACL-injured knees had excessive tibial anterior translation laterally while 13 (46%) had limited external rotation. Multidirectional malalignment was much more common in ACL-tear knees.

CONCLUSIONS

Positional MRI shows (a) physiological tibiofemoral movement in normal knees, (b) aberrant tibiofemoral alignment in the unaffected knee of ACL tear patients, and (c) a high frequency of abnormal tibiofemoral malalignment in injured knees which was more frequent, more pronounced, more multidirectional, and of a different pattern in ACL-tear knees than non-ACL-injured knees.

KEY POINTS

• Positional MRI shows physiological tibiofemoral translation and rotation in normal knees. • Positional MRI shows a different pattern of tibiofemoral alignment in the unaffected knee of ACL tear patients compared to normal control knees. • Positional MRI shows a high prevalence of abnormal tibiofemoral alignment in injured knees, which is more frequent and pronounced in ACL-tear knees than in ACL-intact injured knees.

Novel Arthrometer for Quantifying In Vivo Knee Laxity in Three Planes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Knee instability is a leading cause of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Instability can involve abnormal laxity in multiple directions including varus-valgus (VV) angulation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and internal-external rotation (IER). No existing arthrometer objectively quantifies knee laxity in all three of these directions. The study objectives were to verify the safety and assess reliability of a novel multiplanar arthrometer.

METHODS

The arthrometer utilized a five degree-of-freedom instrumented linkage. Two examiners each conducted two tests on the leg that had received a TKA of 20 patients (mean age 65 years (range, 53-75); 9 men, 11 women), with nine and eleven distinct patients tested at 3-month and 1-year postoperative time points, respectively. AP forces from -10 to 30 Newtons, VV moments of ±3 Newton-meters, and IER moments of ±2.5 Newton-meters were applied to each subject's replaced knee. Severity and location of knee pain during testing were assessed using a visual analog scale. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities were characterized using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

All subjects successfully completed testing. Pain during testing averaged 0.7 (out of possible 10; range, 0-2.5). Intraexaminer reliability was >0.77 for all loading directions and examiners. Interexaminer reliability and 95% confidence intervals were 0.85 (0.66-0.94), 0.67 (0.35-0.85), and 0.54 (0.16-0.79) in the VV, IER, and AP directions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The novel arthrometer was safe for evaluating AP, VV, and IER laxities in subjects who had received TKA. This device could be used to examine relationships between laxity and patient perceptions of knee instability.