Integrating Human and Non-Human Primate Data to Estimate Human Tolerances for Traumatic Brain Injury

Evaluation of DAMAGE Algorithm in Frontal Crashes

With the current trend of including the evaluation of the risk of brain injuries in vehicle crashes due to rotational kinematics of the head, two injury criteria have been introduced since 2013 - BrIC and DAMAGE. BrIC was developed by NHTSA in 2013 and was suggested for inclusion in the US NCAP for frontal and side crashes. DAMAGE has been developed by UVa under the sponsorship of JAMA and JARI and has been accepted tentatively by the EuroNCAP. Although BrIC in US crash testing is known and reported, DAMAGE in tests of the US fleet is relatively unknown. The current paper will report on DAMAGE in NCAP-like tests and potential future frontal crash tests involving substantial rotation about the three axes of occupant heads. Distribution of DAMAGE of three-point belted occupants without airbags will also be discussed. Prediction of brain injury risks from the tests have been compared to the risks in the real world. Although DAMAGE correlates well with MPS in the human brain model across several test scenarios, the predicted risk of AIS2+ brain injuries are too high compared to real-world experience. The prediction of AIS4+ brain injury risk in lower velocity crashes is good, but too high in NCAP-like and high speed angular frontal crashes.

Head Kinematics, Blood Biomarkers, and Histology in Large Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury and Hemorrhagic Shock

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and severe blood loss resulting in hemorrhagic shock (HS) are each leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and present additional treatment considerations when they are comorbid (TBI+HS) as a result of competing pathophysiological responses. The current study rigorously quantified injury biomechanics with high precision sensors and examined whether blood-based surrogate markers were altered in general trauma as well as post-neurotrauma. Eighty-nine sexually mature male and female Yucatan swine were subjected to a closed-head TBI+HS (40% of circulating blood volume; n = 68), HS only (n = 9), or sham trauma (n = 12). Markers of systemic (e.g., glucose, lactate) and neural functioning were obtained at baseline, and at 35 and 295 min post-trauma. Opposite and approximately twofold differences existed for both magnitude (device > head) and duration (head > device) of quantified injury biomechanics. Circulating levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) demonstrated differential sensitivity for both general trauma (HS) and neurotrauma (TBI+HS) relative to shams in a temporally dynamic fashion. GFAP and NfL were both strongly associated with changes in systemic markers during general trauma and exhibited consistent time-dependent changes in individual sham animals. Finally, circulating GFAP was associated with histopathological markers of diffuse axonal injury and blood-brain barrier breach, as well as variations in device kinematics following TBI+HS. Current findings therefore highlight the need to directly quantify injury biomechanics with head mounted sensors and suggest that GFAP, NfL, and UCH-L1 are sensitive to multiple forms of trauma rather than having a single pathological indication (e.g., GFAP = astrogliosis).

Evaluation of Brain Rotational Injury Criteria (BrIC) in vehicle frontal crashes

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to estimate strains in the human brain in regulatory, research, and due care frontal crashes by simulating those impacts. In addition, brain strain simulations were estimated for belted human volunteer tests and in impacts between two players in National Football League (NFL), some with no injury and some with mild Traumatic Brain Injuries (mTBI).

METHODS

The brain strain responses were determined using version 5 of the Global Human Body Modeling Consortium (GHBMC) 50th percentile human brain model. One hundred and sixty simulations with the brain model were conducted using rotational velocities and accelerations of Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATD's) or those of human volunteers in sled or crash tests, as inputs to the model and strain related responses like Maximum Principal Strains (MPS) and Cumulative Strain Damage Measure (CSDM) in various regions of the brain were monitored. The simulated vehicle tests ranged from sled tests at 24 and 32 kph delta-V with three-point belts without airbags to full scale crash and sled tests at 56 kph and a series of Research Mobile Deformable Barrier (RMDB) tests described in Prasad et al.

RESULTS

The severity of rotational input into the model as represented by BrIC, averaged between 0.5 and 1.2 for the various test conditions, and as high as 1.5 for an individual case. The MPS responses for the various test conditions averaged between 0.28 and 0.86 and as high as 1.3 in one test condition. The MPS responses in the brain for volunteers, low velocity sled, and NCAP tests were similar to those in the no-mTBI group in the NFL cases and consistent with real world accident data. The MPS responses of the brain in angular crash and sled tests were similar to those in the mTBI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The brain strain estimations do not indicate the likelihood of severe-to-fatal brain injuries in the crash environments studied in this paper. However, using the risk functions associated with BrIC, severe-to-fatal brain injuries (AIS4+) are predicted in several environments in which they are not observed or expected.

Machine-learning-based head impact subtyping based on the spectral densities of the measurable head kinematics

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury can be caused by head impacts, but many brain injury risk estimation models are not equally accurate across the variety of impacts that patients may undergo, and the characteristics of different types of impacts are not well studied. We investigated the spectral characteristics of different head impact types with kinematics classification.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 3262 head impacts from lab reconstruction, American football, mixed martial arts, and publicly available car crash data. A random forest classifier with spectral densities of linear acceleration and angular velocity was built to classify head impact types (e.g., football, car crash, mixed martial arts). To test the classifier robustness, another 271 lab-reconstructed impacts were obtained from 5 other instrumented mouthguards. Finally, with the classifier, type-specific, nearest-neighbor regression models were built for brain strain.

RESULTS

The classifier reached a median accuracy of 96% over 1000 random partitions of training and test sets. The most important features in the classification included both low- and high-frequency features, both linear acceleration features and angular velocity features. Different head impact types had different distributions of spectral densities in low- and high-frequency ranges (e.g., the spectral densities of mixed martial arts impacts were higher in the high-frequency range than in the low-frequency range). The type-specific regression showed a generally higher R2 value than baseline models without classification.

CONCLUSION

The machine-learning-based classifier enables a better understanding of the impact kinematics spectral density in different sports, and it can be applied to evaluate the quality of impact-simulation systems and on-field data augmentation.

Holistic pedestrian safety assessment for average males and females

Objective

An integrated assessment framework that enables holistic safety evaluations addressing vulnerable road users (VRU) is introduced and applied in the current study. The developed method enables consideration of both active and passive safety measures and distributions of real-world crash scenario parameters.

Methods

The likelihood of a specific virtual testing scenario occurring in real life has been derived from accident databases scaled to European level. Based on pre-crash simulations, it is determined how likely it is that scenarios could be avoided by a specific Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system. For the unavoidable cases, probabilities for specific collision scenarios are determined, and the injury risk for these is determined, subsequently, from in-crash simulations with the VIVA+ Human Body Models combined with the created metamodel for an average male and female model. The integrated assessment framework was applied for the holistic assessment of car-related pedestrian protection using a generic car model to assess the safety benefits of a generic AEB system combined with current passive safety structures.

Results

In total, 61,914 virtual testing scenarios have been derived from the different car-pedestrian cases based on real-world crash scenario parameters. Considering the occurrence probability of the virtual testing scenarios, by implementing an AEB, a total crash risk reduction of 81.70% was achieved based on pre-crash simulations. It was shown that 50 in-crash simulations per load case are sufficient to create a metamodel for injury prediction. For the in-crash simulations with the generic vehicle, it was also shown that the injury risk can be reduced by implementing an AEB, as compared to the baseline scenarios. Moreover, as seen in the unavoidable cases, the injury risk for the average male and female is the same for brain injuries and femoral shaft fractures. The average male has a higher risk of skull fractures and fractures of more than three ribs compared to the average female. The average female has a higher risk of proximal femoral fractures than the average male.

Conclusions

A novel methodology was developed which allows for movement away from the exclusive use of standard-load case assessments, thus helping to bridge the gap between active and passive safety evaluations.

Finite element evaluation of an American football helmet featuring liquid shock absorbers for protecting against concussive and subconcussive head impacts

Introduction: Concern has grown over the potential long-term effects of repeated head impacts and concussions in American football. Recent advances in impact engineering have yielded the development of soft, collapsible, liquid shock absorbers, which have demonstrated the ability to dramatically attenuate impact forces relative to existing helmet shock absorbers. Methods: To further explore how liquid shock absorbers can improve the efficacy of an American football helmet, we developed and optimized a finite element (FE) helmet model including 21 liquid shock absorbers spread out throughout the helmet. Using FE models of an anthropomorphic test headform and linear impactor, a previously published impact test protocol representative of concussive National Football League impacts (six impact locations, three velocities) was performed on the liquid FE helmet model and four existing FE helmet models. We also evaluated the helmets at three lower impact velocities representative of subconcussive football impacts. Head kinematics were recorded for each impact and used to compute the Head Acceleration Response Metric (HARM), a metric factoring in both linear and angular head kinematics and used to evaluate helmet performance. The head kinematics were also input to a FE model of the head and brain to calculate the resulting brain strain from each impact. Results: The liquid helmet model yielded the lowest value of HARM at 33 of the 36 impact conditions, offering an average 33.0% (range: -37.5% to 56.0%) and 32.0% (range: -2.2% to 50.5%) reduction over the existing helmet models at each impact condition in the subconcussive and concussive tests, respectively. The liquid helmet had a Helmet Performance Score (calculated using a summation of HARM values weighted based on injury incidence data) of 0.71, compared to scores ranging from 1.07 - 1.21 from the other four FE helmet models. Resulting brain strains were also lower in the liquid helmet. Discussion: The results of this study demonstrate the promising ability of liquid shock absorbers to improve helmet safety performance and encourage the development of physical prototypes of helmets featuring this technology. The implications of the observed reductions on brain injury risk are discussed.

A sensor-enabled cloud-based computing platform for computational brain biomechanics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Driven by the risk of repetitive head trauma, sensors have been integrated into mouthguards to measure head impacts in contact sports and military activities. These wearable devices, referred to as "instrumented" or "smart" mouthguards are being actively developed by various research groups and organizations. These instrumented mouthguards provide an opportunity to further study and understand the brain biomechanics due to impact. In this study, we present a brain modeling service that can use information from these sensors to predict brain injury metrics in an automated fashion.

METHODS

We have built a brain modeling platform using several of Amazon's Web Services (AWS) to enable cloud computing and scalability. We use a custom-built cloud-based finite element modeling code to compute the physics-based nonlinear response of the intracranial brain tissue and provide a frontend web application and an application programming interface for groups working on head impact sensor technology to include simulated injury predictions into their research pipeline.

RESULTS

The platform results have been validated against experimental data available in literature for brain-skull relative displacements, brain strains and intracranial pressure. The parallel processing capability of the platform has also been tested and verified. We also studied the accuracy of the custom head surfaces generated by Avatar 3D.

CONCLUSION

We present a validated cloud-based computational brain modeling platform that uses sensor data as input for numerical brain models and outputs a quantitative description of brain tissue strains and injury metrics. The platform is expected to generate transparent, reproducible, and traceable brain computing results.

Head injury criteria assessment using head kinematics from crash tests and accident reconstructions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess head injury criteria based on their correlation to brain strain in a Finite Element (FE) head model (the KTH Royal Institute of Technology model), by simulation of head kinematics data from frontal and side crash tests with Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs), and from Human Body Model (HBM) accident reconstructions.

METHODS

Six Degrees of Freedom (DoF) head kinematic data was extracted from 221 crash tests, consisting of frontal impacts with the THOR-50M ATD, near-side and far-side impacts with the WorldSID-50M ATD, and from 19 FE HBM accident reconstructions. The head injury criteria HIC₁₅, HIP, BrIC, UBrIC, DAMAGE and CIBIC were calculated, and FE head model simulations were conducted using the six DoF kinematics data. The 100th, 99th, and 95th percentile Maximum Principal Strains (MPS) of the brain were extracted and linear regression models with respect to the injury criteria were created. The injury criteria were then evaluated based on the coefficient of determination, R², and the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) of each regression model.

RESULTS

For all the data sets combined and for the WorldSID far-side data, CIBIC had the best goodness of fit, with R² of 0.76 and 0.85. For frontal impacts with THOR and the combined ATD data set, DAMAGE had highest R², 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. Injury criteria including translational accelerations were ranked lower, and BrIC were among the three lowest ranked for most data sets evaluated. UBrIC generally ranked after DAMAGE and CIBIC with respect to the goodness of fit but had the lowest NRMSE for all data sets.

CONCLUSIONS

The two mass-spring-damper brain surrogate model criteria, DAMAGE and CIBIC, were best in capturing the head model MPS response for both the THOR and WorldSID data sets. BrIC had lower correlation to the head model MPS and performed marginally better than the linear acceleration only criteria for all the data sets combined. This study supports the suitability of DAMAGE and CIBIC as brain injury criteria to be used with THOR-50M and WorldSID-50M in vehicle crash test conditions, as they outperform BrIC.

Concussion Prone Scenarios: A Multi-Dimensional Exploration in Impact Directions, Brain Morphology, and Network Architectures Using Computational Models

While individual susceptibility to traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been speculated, past work does not provide an analysis considering how physical features of an individual's brain (e.g., brain size, shape), impact direction, and brain network features can holistically contribute to the risk of suffering a TBI from an impact. This work investigated each of these features simultaneously using computational modeling and analyses of simulated functional connectivity. Unlike the past studies that assess the severity of TBI based on the quantification of brain tissue damage (e.g., principal strain), we approached the brain as a complex network in which neuronal oscillations orchestrate to produce normal brain function (estimated by functional connectivity) and, to this end, both the anatomical damage location and its topological characteristics within the brain network contribute to the severity of brain function disruption and injury. To represent the variations in the population, we analyzed a publicly available database of brain imaging data and selected five distinct network architectures, seven different brain sizes, and three uniaxial head rotational conditions to study the consequences of 74 virtual impact scenarios. Results show impact direction produces the most significant change in connections across brain areas (structural connectome) and the functional coupling of activity across these brain areas (functional connectivity). Axial rotations were more injurious than those with sagittal and coronal rotations when the head kinematics were the same for each condition. When the impact direction was held constant, brain network architecture showed a significantly different vulnerability across axial and sagittal, but not coronal rotations. As expected, brain size significantly affected the expected change in structural and functional connectivity after impact. Together, these results provided groupings of predicted vulnerability to impact-a subgroup of male brain architectures exposed to axial impacts were most vulnerable, while a subgroup of female brain architectures was the most tolerant to the sagittal impacts studied. These findings lay essential groundwork for subject-specific analyses of concussion and provide invaluable guidance for designing personalized protection equipment.

Brain architecture-based vulnerability to traumatic injury

The white matter tracts forming the intricate wiring of the brain are subject-specific; this heterogeneity can complicate studies of brain function and disease. Here we collapse tractography data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) into structural connectivity (SC) matrices and identify groups of similarly wired brains from both sexes. To characterize the significance of these architectural groupings, we examined how similarly wired brains led to distinct groupings of neural activity dynamics estimated with Kuramoto oscillator models (KMs). We then lesioned our networks to simulate traumatic brain injury (TBI) and finally we tested whether these distinct architecture groups’ dynamics exhibited differing responses to simulated TBI. At each of these levels we found that brain structure, simulated dynamics, and injury susceptibility were all related to brain grouping. We found four primary brain architecture groupings (two male and two female), with similar architectures appearing across both sexes. Among these groupings of brain structure, two architecture types were significantly more vulnerable than the remaining two architecture types to lesions. These groups suggest that mesoscale brain architecture types exist, and these architectural differences may contribute to differential risks to TBI and clinical outcomes across the population.

Non-Linear Device Head Coupling and Temporal Delays in Large Animal Acceleration Models of Traumatic Brain Injury

Accurate characterization of head kinematics following an external blow represents a fundamental aspect of traumatic brain injury (TBI) research. The majority of previous large animal studies have assumed an equivalent relationship between the device delivering the impulsive load and subsequent head kinematics rather than performing direct measurement (sensors or videography). The current study therefore examined factors affecting device/head coupling kinematics in an acceleration TBI model. Experiment 1 indicated ~ 50% reduction in peak angular velocity for swine head relative to the device, with an approximate doubling in temporal duration. The peak angular velocity for the head was not significantly altered by variations in restraint device (straps vs. cables), animal positioning or body mass. In Experiment 2, reducing the impulsive load by 32% resulted in only a 14% reduction in angular velocity of the head (approximately 69% head/device coupling ratio), with more pronounced differences qualitatively observed for angular momentum. A temporal delay was identified in initial device/head coupling, potentially a result of soft tissue deformation. Finally, similar head kinematics were obtained regardless of mounting the sensor directly to the skull or through the scalp (Experiment 3). Current findings highlight the importance of direct measurement of head kinematics for future studies.