A Web-Based Software Platform for Efficient and Quantitative CT Image Quality Assessment and Protocol Optimization

Channelized hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom: Part II. Repeatability study

BACKGROUND

Objective and quantitative evaluation for low-contrast detectability that correlates with human observer performance is lacking for routine CT quality control testing. Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) is considered a strong candidate to fill the need but has long been deemed impractical to implement due to its requirement of a large number of repeated scans in order to provide accurate and precise estimates of index of detectability (d'). In our previous work, we optimized a CHO model observer on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom and achieved accurate measurement of d' with only 1-3 repeat scans.

PURPOSE

In this work, we aim to validate the repeatability of the proposed CHO-based low-contrast evaluation on four scanner models using the ACR CT accreditation phantom.

METHODS

The repeatability test was performed on four different scanners from two major CT manufacturers: Siemens Force and Alpha; Canon Prism and Prime SP. An ACR CT phantom was scanned 10 times, each time after repositioning of the phantom. For each repositioning, 3 repeated scans were acquired at 24, 12, and 6 mGy on all four scanner models. CHO was applied at the measured dose levels for different low-contrast object sizes (4-6 mm). The CHO was also applied to images created using deep learning-based reconstructions on Canon Prism and to four different scan/reconstruction modes on the Siemens Alpha, a photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT. The repeatability was evaluated by the probability that a measurement would fall within the ±15% tolerance (P<15% ).

RESULTS

With the CHO setting optimized for the ACR phantom and the use of 3 repeated scans and 9 non-overlapping slices per scan, the CHO measurement could provide high repeatability with P<15% of 98.8%-99.9% at 12 mGy with IR reconstruction on all four scanners. On scanner A, P<15% were 91.5%-99.9% at the three dose levels and for all three object sizes while the numbers were 93.6%-99.998% on scanner B. P<15% were 96.5%-97.2% for the two deep learning reconstructions and 97.0%-99.97% for the four scan/reconstruction modes on the PCD-CT.

CONCLUSION

The CHO provided highly repeatable measurements with over 95% probability that a CHO measurement would lie within the ±15% tolerance for most of the dose levels and object sizes on the ACR phantom. The repeatability was maintained when the CHO was applied to images created with a commercial deep learning-based reconstruction and various scan/reconstruction modes on a PCD-CT. This study demonstrates that practical implementation of CHO for routine quality control and performance evaluation is feasible.

First Clinical Photon-counting Detector CT System: Technical Evaluation

Background The first clinical CT system to use photon-counting detector (PCD) technology has become available for patient care. Purpose To assess the technical performance of the PCD CT system with use of phantoms and representative participant examinations. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent from four participants were obtained. Technical performance of a dual-source PCD CT system was measured for standard and high-spatial-resolution (HR) collimations. Noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function, section sensitivity profile, iodine CT number accuracy in virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), and iodine concentration accuracy were measured. Four participants were enrolled (between May 2021 and August 2021) in this prospective study and scanned using similar or lower radiation doses as their respective clinical examinations performed on the same day using energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Image quality and findings from the participants' PCD CT and EID CT examinations were compared. Results All standard technical performance measures met accreditation and regulatory requirements. Relative to filtered back-projection reconstructions, images from iterative reconstruction had lower noise magnitude but preserved noise power spectrum shape and peak frequency. Maximum in-plane spatial resolutions of 125 and 208 µm were measured for HR and standard PCD CT scans, respectively. Minimum values for section sensitivity profile full width at half maximum measurements were 0.34 mm (0.2-mm nominal section thickness) and 0.64 mm (0.4-mm nominal section thickness) for HR and standard PCD CT scans, respectively. In a 120-kV standard PCD CT scan of a 40-cm phantom, VMI iodine CT numbers had a mean percentage error of 5.7%, and iodine concentration had root mean squared error of 0.5 mg/cm³, similar to previously reported values for EID CT. VMIs, iodine maps, and virtual noncontrast images were created for a coronary CT angiogram acquired with 66-msec temporal resolution. Participant PCD CT images showed up to 47% lower noise and/or improved spatial resolution compared with EID CT. Conclusion Technical performance of clinical photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is improved relative to that of a current state-of-the-art CT system. The dual-source PCD geometry facilitated 66-msec temporal resolution multienergy cardiac imaging. Study participant images illustrated the effect of the improved technical performance. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Willemink and Grist in this issue.