Pacilio M, Aragno D, Rauco R, D'Onofrio S, Pressello MC, Bianciardi L, Santini E. Monte Carlo dose calculations using MCNP4C and EGSnrc/BEAMnrc codes to study the energy dependence of the radiochromic film response to beta-emitting sources.
Phys Med Biol 2007;
52:3931-48. [PMID:
17664586 DOI:
10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/018]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The energy dependence of the radiochromic film (RCF) response to beta-emitting sources was studied by dose theoretical calculations, employing the MCNP4C and EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo codes. Irradiations with virtual monochromatic electron sources, electron and photon clinical beams, a (32)P intravascular brachytherapy (IVB) source and other beta-emitting radioisotopes ((188)Re, (90)Y, (90)Sr/(90)Y,(32)P) were simulated. The MD-55-2 and HS radiochromic films (RCFs) were considered, in a planar or cylindrical irradiation geometry, with water or polystyrene as the surrounding medium. For virtual monochromatic sources, a monotonic decrease with energy of the dose absorbed to the film, with respect to that absorbed to the surrounding medium, was evidenced. Considering the IVB (32)P source and the MD-55-2 in a cylindrical geometry, the calibration with a 6 MeV electron beam would yield dose underestimations from 14 to 23%, increasing the source-to-film radial distance from 1 to 6 mm. For the planar beta-emitting sources in water, calibrations with photon or electron clinical beams would yield dose underestimations between 5 and 12%. Calibrating the RCF with (90)Sr/(90)Y, the MD-55-2 would yield dose underestimations between 3 and 5% for (32)P and discrepancies within +/-2% for (188)Re and (90)Y, whereas for the HS the dose underestimation would reach 4% with (188)Re and 6% with (32)P.
Collapse