• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4634165)   Today's Articles (6)   Subscriber (49982)
For: Lai CJ, Shaw CC, Whitman GJ, Johnston DA, Yang WT, Selinko V, Arribas E, Dogan B, Kappadath SC. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications-A hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systemsa). Med Phys 2004;32:182-94. [PMID: 15719969 DOI: 10.1118/1.1833011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Schopphoven S, Cavael P, Bock K, Fiebich M, Mäder U. Breast phantoms for 2D digital mammography with realistic anatomical structures and attenuation characteristics based on clinical images using 3D printing. Phys Med Biol 2019;64:215005. [PMID: 31469105 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab3f6a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
2
Baheza RA, Welch EB, Gochberg DF, Sanders M, Harvey S, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE. Detection of microcalcifications by characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects using MR phase image cross-correlation analysis. Med Phys 2016;42:1436-52. [PMID: 25735297 DOI: 10.1118/1.4908009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
3
Liaparinos P, Bliznakova K. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models. Med Phys 2012;39:6638-51. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4757919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
4
Pagliari CM, Hoang T, Reddy M, Wilkinson LS, Poloniecki JD, Given-Wilson RM. Diagnostic quality of 50 and 100 μm computed radiography compared with screen-film mammography in operative breast specimens. Br J Radiol 2011;85:910-6. [PMID: 22096218 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/74825285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
5
Zanca F, Van Ongeval C, Marshall N, Meylaers T, Michielsen K, Marchal G, Bosmans H. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:1057-68. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
6
Kappadath SC, Shaw CC. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:5421-43. [PMID: 18765887 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
7
Fischmann A. Full-field Digital Mammography versus Film-screen Mammography. Cancer Imaging 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-012374212-4.50038-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
8
Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: Dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation. Med Phys 2006;33:4221-35. [PMID: 17153401 DOI: 10.1118/1.2362874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]  Open
9
Lai CJ, Shaw CC, Whitman GJ, Yang WT, Dempsey PJ, Nguyen V, Ice MF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of simulated microcalcifications on mammograms using hardcopy images. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:3901-19. [PMID: 16885614 PMCID: PMC1913688 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/16/002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
10
Meng Y, Shaw CC, Liu X, Altunbas MC, Wang T, Chen L, Tu SJ, Kappadath SC, Lai CJ. Comparison of two detector systems for cone beam CT small animal imaging - a preliminary study. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2006;6142:6142451. [PMID: 18160972 DOI: 10.1117/12.656690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
11
Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2005;117:120-30. [PMID: 16461531 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA