• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4634165)   Today's Articles (8)   Subscriber (49985)
For: Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: Dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation. Med Phys 2006;33:4221-35. [PMID: 17153401 DOI: 10.1118/1.2362874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Santoro-Fernandes V, Santos JC, Mariano L, Vanin VR, Costa PR. Uncertainty estimation and statistical comparative methodology for mammography x-ray energy spectra. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2020;6:035018. [PMID: 33438663 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab817d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
2
Rodriguez-Ibarra JL, Hernandez-Adame PL, Vega-Carrillo HR, Rivera T. X-ray spectra and doses. Appl Radiat Isot 2016;117:32-35. [PMID: 27085838 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
3
Abbene L, Gerardi G, Principato F, Sordo SD, Raso G. Direct measurement of mammographic X-ray spectra with a digital CdTe detection system. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2012;12:8390-404. [PMID: 22969406 PMCID: PMC3436035 DOI: 10.3390/s120608390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2012] [Revised: 06/11/2012] [Accepted: 06/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
4
Fitousi NT, Delis H, Panayiotakis G. Monte Carlo simulation of breast imaging using synchrotron radiation. Med Phys 2012;39:2069-77. [PMID: 22482628 DOI: 10.1118/1.3694670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]  Open
5
Cunha DM, Tomal A, Poletti ME. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:1919-35. [PMID: 22421418 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
6
Bontempi M, Andreani L, Rossi PL, Visani A. Monte Carlo simulator of realistic x-ray beam for diagnostic applications. Med Phys 2010;37:4201-9. [PMID: 20879581 DOI: 10.1118/1.3453578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]  Open
7
Abbene L, Gerardi G, Principato F, Del Sordo S, Ienzi R, Raso G. High-rate x-ray spectroscopy in mammography with a CdTe detector: A digital pulse processing approach. Med Phys 2010;37:6147-56. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3512804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]  Open
8
Koutalonis M, Delis H, Pascoal A, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G. Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study. Br J Radiol 2010;83:569-77. [PMID: 20603409 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21753020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
9
Ranger NT, Lo JY, Samei E. A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography. Med Phys 2010;37:962-9. [PMID: 20384232 DOI: 10.1118/1.3276732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]  Open
10
Tomal A, Poletti M, Caldas L. Evaluation of subject contrast and normalized average glandular dose by semi-analytical models. Appl Radiat Isot 2010;68:755-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
11
Saunders RS, Samei E, Lo JY, Baker JA. Can Compression Be Reduced for Breast Tomosynthesis? Monte Carlo Study on Mass and Microcalcification Conspicuity in Tomosynthesis. Radiology 2009;251:673-82. [PMID: 19474373 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2521081278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
12
A novel method for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluation of digital mammography detectors. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2275-85. [PMID: 19424702 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1409-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2008] [Revised: 03/03/2009] [Accepted: 03/23/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
13
Huda W, Nickoloff EL, Boone JM. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years. Med Phys 2009;35:5713-28. [PMID: 19175129 DOI: 10.1118/1.3013604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]  Open
14
Saunders RS, Samei E. The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography. Med Phys 2008;35:4464-73. [PMID: 18975694 DOI: 10.1118/1.2977600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
15
Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:1369-84. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/5/013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
16
Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:3185-99. [PMID: 17505097 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/11/017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA