On the measurement of scaling factors in the RW3 plastic phantom during high energy electron beam dosimetry

Ionometric electron dosimetry inside water-equivalent plastic phantoms demands special considerations including determination of depth scaling and fluence scaling factors (c_pl and h_pl) to shift from in-phantom measurements to those relevant to water. This study evaluates these scaling factors for RW3 slab phantom and also introduces a new coefficient, k(RW3), for direct conversion from RW3 measurements to water without involving scaling factors. The RW3 solid phantom developed by the PTW Company was used and the corresponding scaling factors including c_pl, h_pl, and k(RW3) were measured for conventional electron energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, and 16 MeV. Separate measurements were performed in water and the RW3 slab phantom using the Advanced Markus chamber. The validity of the reported scaling factors was confirmed by comparing the direct and indirect percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements in water and in the RW3 phantom. The c_pl values for the RW3 phantom were respectively equal to 0.915, 0.927, 0.934, 0.937, and 0.937 for 4, 6, 9, 12, and 16 MeV electron energies. The h_pl and k(RW3) values were dependent on the depth of investigation and electron energy. Application of the c_pl-h_pl factors and k(RW3) coefficients to measured data inside the RW3 can reliably reproduce the measured PDD curves in water. The mean difference between the PDDs measured directly and indirectly in water and in the RW3 phantom was less than 1.2% in both approaches for PDD conversion (c_pl-h_pl coupling and the use of k(RW3)). The measured scaling factors and k(RW3) coefficients are sufficiently relevant to mimic water-based dosimetry results through indirect measurements inside the RW3 slab phantom. Nevertheless, employing k(RW3) is more straightforward than the c_pl-h_pl approach because it does not involve scaling and it is also less time-consuming.

Total skin electron beam therapy using an inclinable couch on motorized table and a compensating filter

Total skin electron beam is a specialized technique that involves irradiating the entire skin from the skin surface to only a few millimetres in depth. In the Stanford technique, the patient is in a standing position and six different directional positions are used during treatment. Our technique uses large electron beams in six directions with an inclinable couch on motorized table and a compensating filter was also used to spread the electron beam and move its intensity peak. Dose uniformity measurements were performed using Gafchromic films which indicated that the surface dose was 2.04 ± 0.05 Gy. This technique can ensure the dose reproducibility because the patient is fixed in place using an inclinable couch on a motorized table.

Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plastic phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry

The purpose of this study is to calculate correction factors for plastic water (PW) and plastic water diagnostic-therapy (PWDT) phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. A water-to-plastic ionization conversion factor k(pl) for PW and PWDT was computed for several commonly used Farmer-type ionization chambers with different wall materials in the range of 4-18 MV photon beams. For electron beams, a depth-scaling factor c(pl) and a chamber-dependent fluence correction factor h(pl) for both phantoms were also calculated in combination with NACP-02 and Roos plane-parallel ionization chambers in the range of 4-18 MeV. The h(pl) values for the plane-parallel chambers were evaluated from the electron fluence correction factor phi(pl)w and wall correction factors P(wall,w) and P(wall,pl) for a combination of water or plastic materials. The calculated k(pl) and h(pl) values were verified by comparison with the measured values. A set of k(pl) values computed for the Farmer-type chambers was equal to unity within 0.5% for PW and PWDT in photon beams. The k(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. For electron beams, the c(pl) values computed for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.000 and from 0.992 to 0.997, respectively, in the range of 4-18 MeV. The phi(pl)w values for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.001 and from 1.004 to 1.001, respectively, at a reference depth in the range of 4-18 MeV. The difference in P(wall) between water and plastic materials for the plane-parallel chambers was 0.8% at a maximum. Finally, h(pl) values evaluated for plastic materials were equal to unity within 0.6% for NACP-02 and Roos chambers. The h(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. The absorbed dose to water from ionization chamber measurements in PW and PWDT plastic materials corresponds to that in water within 1%. Both phantoms can thus be used as a substitute for water for photon and electron dosimetry.