Surface dose and build-up region depth dose measurements in non-standard beams of Cyberknife and tomotherapy systems

The purpose of this study was to measure the surface dose and build-up region depth dose characteristics of 6 MV photon beams in Cyberknife and helical tomotherapy (HT) systems for non-standard small fields using parallel plate chambers (Roos and Markus), Gafchromic EBT3 films, and nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), as well as to investigate the effect of oblique incidence on the surface dose of the beam. All measurements were conducted in a virtual water phantom under machine-specific reference conditions. The Roos and OSLDs overestimated the surface dose when compared with the Markus chamber and EBT3 films by 20%. We applied water equivalent thickness (WET) correction to account for the intrinsic build-up thickness of the detectors from their effective point of measurement (EPOM). With WET correction, a reasonably close surface dose estimate was obtained for all detectors, within 1.9% agreement for the 60 mm collimator of Cyberknife and 3.1% agreement for the HT system, with a 5 × 10 cm² field size. The surface dose increased from the normally incident Cyberknife and HT fields with increasing angle of incidence. The surface dose increased to twice its value at normal incidence for highly oblique angles of incidence above 55°. For the tested fields, a reasonable surface dose estimate could be measured with the detectors if the correction for intrinsic buildup thickness was applied. Nevertheless, the use of Roos chambers with large dimensions and nanoDot OSLDs is not recommended for estimating the surface dose for small fields.

Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields

PURPOSE

Dose accuracy in the buildup region for radiotherapy treatment planning suffers from challenges in both measurement and calculation. This study investigates the dosimetry in the buildup region at normal and oblique incidences for open and IMRT fields and assesses the quality of the treatment planning calculations.

METHODS

This study was divided into three parts. First, percent depth doses and profiles (for 5 x 5, 10 x 10, 20 x 20, and 30 x 30 cm2 field sizes at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 70 degrees incidences) were measured in the buildup region in Solid Water using an Attix parallel plate chamber and Kodak XV film, respectively. Second, the parameters in the empirical contamination (EC) term of the convolution/ superposition (CVSP) calculation algorithm were fitted based on open field measurements. Finally, seven segmental head-and-neck IMRT fields were measured on a flat phantom geometry and compared to calculations using gamma and dose-gradient compensation (C) indices to evaluate the impact of residual discrepancies and to assess the adequacy of the contamination term for IMRT fields.

RESULTS

Local deviations between measurements and calculations for open fields were within 1% and 4% in the buildup region for normal and oblique incidences, respectively. The C index with 5%/1 mm criteria for IMRT fields ranged from 89% to 99% and from 96% to 98% at 2 mm and 10 cm depths, respectively. The quality of agreement in the buildup region for open and IMRT fields is comparable to that in nonbuildup regions.

CONCLUSIONS

The added EC term in CVSP was determined to be adequate for both open and IMRT fields. Due to the dependence of calculation accuracy on (1) EC modeling, (2) internal convolution and density grid sizes, (3) implementation details in the algorithm, and (4) the accuracy of measurements used for treatment planning system commissioning, the authors recommend an evaluation of the accuracy of near-surface dose calculations as a part of treatment planning commissioning.