Effective optimization strategy for large optimization volume object, remaining volume at risk (RVR):α-value selection and usage from generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) curve deviation perspective

Objective.A large optimization volume for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), such as the remaining volume at risk (RVR), is traditionally unsuitable for dose-volume constraint control and requires planner-specific empirical considerations owing to the patient-specific shape. To enable less empirical optimization, the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) optimization is effective; however, the utilization of parametera-values remains elusive. Our study clarifies thea-value characteristics for optimization and to enable effectivea-value use.Approach.The gEUD can be obtained as a function of itsa-value, which is the weighted generalized mean; its curve has a continuous, differentiable, and sigmoid shape, deforming in its optimization state with retained curve characteristics. Using differential geometry, the gEUD curve changes in optimization is considered a geodesic deviation intervened by the forces between deforming and retaining the curve. The curvature and gradient of the curve are radically related to optimization. The vertex point (a=a_k) was set and thea-value roles were classified into the following three parts of the curve with respect to thea-value: (i) high gradient and middle curvature, (ii) middle gradient and high curvature, and (iii) low gradient and low curvature. Then, a strategy for multiplea-values was then identified using RVR optimization.Main results.Eleven head and neck patients who underwent static seven-field IMRT were used to verify thea-value characteristics and curvature effect for optimization. The lowera-value (i) (a= 1-3) optimization was effective for the whole dose-volume range; in contrast, the effect of highera-value (iii) (a= 12-20) optimization addressed strongly the high-dose range of the dose volume. The middlea-value (ii) (arounda=a_k) showed intermediate but effective high-to-low dose reduction. Thesea-value characteristics were observed as superimpositions in the optimization. Thus, multiple gEUD-based optimization was significantly superior to the exponential constraints normally applied to the RVR that surrounds the PTV, normal tissue objective (NTO), resulting in up to 25.9% and 8.1% improvement in dose-volume indices D2% and V10Gy, respectively.Significance.This study revealed an appropriatea-value for gEUD optimization, leading to favorable dose-volume optimization for the RVR region using fixed multiplea-value conditions, despite the very large and patient-specific shape of the region.

Split Common Coincidence Point Problem: A Formulation Applicable to (Bio)Physically-Based Inverse Planning Optimization

Inverse planning is a method of radiotherapy treatment planning where the care team begins with the desired dose distribution satisfying prescribed clinical objectives, and then determines the treatment parameters that will achieve it. The variety in symmetry, form, and characteristics of the objective functions describing clinical criteria requires a flexible optimization approach in order to obtain optimized treatment plans. Therefore, we introduce and discuss a nonlinear optimization formulation called the split common coincidence point problem (SCCPP). We show that the SCCPP is a suitable formulation for the inverse planning optimization problem with the flexibility of accommodating several biological and/or physical clinical objectives. Also, we propose an iterative algorithm for approximating the solution of the SCCPP, and using Bregman techniques, we establish that the proposed algorithm converges to a solution of the SCCPP and to an extremum of the inverse planning optimization problem. We end with a note on useful insights on implementing the algorithm in a clinical setting.

Prescription Value-Based Automatic Optimization of Importance Factors in Inverse Planning

Objective:

An automatic method for the optimization of importance factors was proposed to improve the efficiency of inverse planning.

Methods:

The automatic method consists of 3 steps: (1) First, the importance factors are automatically and iteratively adjusted based on our proposed penalty strategies. (2) Then, plan evaluation is performed to determine whether the obtained plan is acceptable. (3) If not, a higher penalty is assigned to the unsatisfied objective by multiplying it by a compensation coefficient. The optimization processes are performed alternately until an acceptable plan is obtained or the maximum iteration N_max of step (3) is reached.

Results:

Tested on 2 kinds of clinical cases and compared with manual method, the results showed that the quality of the proposed automatic plan was comparable to, or even better than, the manual plan in terms of the dose–volume histogram and dose distributions.

Conclusions:

The proposed algorithm has potential to significantly improve the efficiency of the existing manual adjustment methods for importance factors and contributes to the development of fully automated planning. Especially, the more the subobjective functions, the more obvious the advantage of our algorithm.

Direct use of multivariable normal tissue complication probability models in treatment plan optimisation for individualised head and neck cancer radiotherapy produces clinically acceptable treatment plans

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recently, clinically validated multivariable normal tissue complication probability models (NTCP) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients have become available. We test the feasibility of using multivariable NTCP-models directly in the optimiser for inverse treatment planning of radiotherapy to improve the dose distributions and corresponding NTCP-estimates in HNC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 10 HNC cases, intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were optimised either using objective functions based on the 'generalised equivalent uniform dose' (OFgEUD) or based on multivariable NTCP-models (OFNTCP). NTCP-models for patient-rated xerostomia, physician-rated RTOG grade II-IV dysphagia, and various patient-rated aspects of swallowing dysfunction were incorporated. The NTCP-models included dose-volume parameters as well as clinical factors contributing to a personalised optimisation process. Both optimisation techniques were compared by means of 'pseudo Pareto fronts' (target dose conformity vs. the sum of the NTCPs).

RESULTS

Both optimisation techniques resulted in clinically realistic treatment plans with only small differences. For nine patients the sum-NTCP was lower for the OFNTCP optimised plans (on average 5.7% (95%CI 1.7-9.9%, p<0.006)). Furthermore, the OFNTCP provided the advantages of fewer unknown optimisation parameters and an intrinsic mechanism of individualisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment plan optimisation using multivariable NTCP-models directly in the OF is feasible as has been demonstrated for HNC radiotherapy.