Accuracy of Acuros[Formula: see text] BV as determined from GATE monte-carlo simulation

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Task Group No.43 has provided a standardised dose calculation methodology that is now the international benchmark for all brachytherapy dosimetry publications and treatment planning systems. However, limitations in this methodology has seen the development of Model-Based Dose Calculation Algorithms (MBDCA). In 2009, Varian (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) released Acuros[Formula: see text] BrachyVision (ABV) which calculates dose by explicitly solving the Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation. In this study we have assessed the accuracy of ABV dose calculations within a range of materials relevant to high dose rate brachytherapy with an iridium-192 ([Formula: see text]Ir) source. Accuracy assessment has been achieved by implementing a modelled GamaMed Plus [Formula: see text]Ir source within a series of phantoms using the GEANT4 Application for Emission Tomography (GATE) to calculate dose for comparison with dose as determined by ABV. Comparisons between GATE and ABV were made using point-to-point profile comparisons and 1D gamma analysis. Source validation results yielded good agreement with published data. Spectrum and TG43U1 comparisons showed no major differences, with TG43U1 comparisons agreeing within ± 1%. Point-to-point comparisons showed large differences between GATE and ABV near the source and in low density materials. 1D gamma analysis pass criteria of 2%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm yielded passing rates ranging between 51.72-100% and 62.07-100% respectively. A critical analysis of this study's results suggest that ABV is unable to accurately calculate doses in low density materials. Furthermore, spatial accuracy of dose near the source is within 2 mm.

Monte Carlo dose calculations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using GPU-accelerated processing

PURPOSE

Current clinical brachytherapy dose calculations are typically based on the Association of American Physicists in Medicine Task Group report 43 (TG-43) guidelines, which approximate patient geometry as an infinitely large water phantom. This ignores patient and applicator geometries and heterogeneities, causing dosimetric errors. Although Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is commonly recognized as the most accurate method, its associated long computational time is a major bottleneck for routine clinical applications. This article presents our recent developments of a fast MC dose calculation package for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, gBMC, built on a graphics processing unit (GPU) platform.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

gBMC-simulated photon transport in voxelized geometry with physics in (192)Ir HDR brachytherapy energy range considered. A phase-space file was used as a source model. GPU-based parallel computation was used to simultaneously transport multiple photons, one on a GPU thread. We validated gBMC by comparing the dose calculation results in water with that computed TG-43. We also studied heterogeneous phantom cases and a patient case and compared gBMC results with Acuros BV results.

RESULTS

Radial dose function in water calculated by gBMC showed <0.6% relative difference from that of the TG-43 data. Difference in anisotropy function was <1%. In two heterogeneous slab phantoms and one shielded cylinder applicator case, average dose discrepancy between gBMC and Acuros BV was <0.87%. For a tandem and ovoid patient case, good agreement between gBMC and Acruos BV results was observed in both isodose lines and dose-volume histograms. In terms of the efficiency, it took ∼47.5 seconds for gBMC to reach 0.15% statistical uncertainty within the 5% isodose line for the patient case.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy and efficiency of a new GPU-based MC dose calculation package, gBMC, for HDR brachytherapy make it attractive for clinical applications.

Validation of the Oncentra Brachy Advanced Collapsed cone Engine for a commercial (192)Ir source using heterogeneous geometries

PURPOSE

To validate the Advanced Collapsed cone Engine (ACE) dose calculation engine of Oncentra Brachy (OcB) treatment planning system using an (192)Ir source.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two levels of validation were performed, conformant to the model-based dose calculation algorithm commissioning guidelines of American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-186 report. Level 1 uses all-water phantoms, and the validation is against TG-43 methodology. Level 2 uses real-patient cases, and the validation is against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. For each case, the ACE and TG-43 calculations were performed in the OcB treatment planning system. ALGEBRA MC system was used to perform MC simulations.

RESULTS

In Level 1, the ray effect depends on both accuracy mode and the number of dwell positions. The volume fraction with dose error ≥2% quickly reduces from 23% (13%) for a single dwell to 3% (2%) for eight dwell positions in the standard (high) accuracy mode. In Level 2, the 10% and higher isodose lines were observed overlapping between ACE (both standard and high-resolution modes) and MC. Major clinical indices (V100, V150, V200, D90, D50, and D2cc) were investigated and validated by MC. For example, among the Level 2 cases, the maximum deviation in V100 of ACE from MC is 2.75% but up to ~10% for TG-43. Similarly, the maximum deviation in D90 is 0.14 Gy between ACE and MC but up to 0.24 Gy for TG-43.

CONCLUSION

ACE demonstrated good agreement with MC in most clinically relevant regions in the cases tested. Departure from MC is significant for specific situations but limited to low-dose (<10% isodose) regions.