Validation of the Fabricated Cast Nylon Head Phantom for Stereotactic Radiosurgery End-to-End Test using Alanine Dosimeter

Background

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative to surgery as it precisely delivers single-large doses to small tumors. Cast nylon is used in phantom due to its computed tomography (CT) number of about 56-95 HU, which is close to that of the soft tissue. Moreover, cast nylon is also more budget-friendly than the commercial phantoms.

Aims

The aim of this study is to design and validate the fabricated cast nylon head phantom for SRS end-to-end test using an alanine dosimeter.

Materials and Methods

The phantom was designed using cast nylon. It was initially created by a computer numerical control three-axis vertical machining center. Then, the cast nylon phantom was scanned using a CT simulator. Finally, the validation of the fabricated phantom using alanine dosimeter proficiency with four Varian LINAC machines was performed.

Results

The fabricated phantom presented a CT number of 85-90 HU. The outcomes of VMAT SRS plans showed percentage dose differences from 0.24 to 1.55, whereas the percentage dose differences in organ at risk (OAR) were 0.09-10.80 due to the low-dose region. The distance between the target (position 2) and the brainstem (position 3) was 0.88 cm.

Conclusions

Variation in dose for OAR is higher, which might be due to a high-dose gradient in the area where measurement was being conducted. The fabricated cast nylon end-to-end test head phantom had been suitably designed to image and irradiate during an end-to-end test for SRS using an alanine dosimeter.

Systematic end-to-end testing of multiple target treatments using the modular RUBY phantom

The RUBY head phantom in combination with the System QA insert MultiMet can be used for simultaneous point dose measurements at an isocentric and two off-axis positions. This study investigates the suitability of the system for systematic integral end-to-end testing of single-isocenter multiple target stereotactic treatments. Several volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were optimized on a planning CT of the phantom positioned in a stereotactic mask on the stereotactic treatment board. The plans were created for three artificial spherical target volumes centred around the measurement positions in the MultiMet insert. Target diameters between 5 and 40 mm were investigated. Coplanar and non-coplanar plans were optimized using the collapsed cone algorithm of the Oncentra Masterplan treatment planning system and recalculated with the Monte Carlo algorithm of the Monaco treatment planning system. Measurements were performed at an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator. The head phantom was positioned according to clinical workflow comprising immobilization and CBCT imaging. Simultaneous point dose measurements at all target positions were performed with three PinPoint 3D chambers (type 31022) as well as three microDiamond detectors (type 60019) and compared to the treatment planning system calculations. Furthermore, the angular dependence of the detector response was investigated to estimate the associated impact on the measured point dose values. Considering all investigated plans, PTV diameters and positions, the point doses calculated with the Monaco treatment planning system and the microDiamond measurements differed within 3.5%, whereas the PinPoint 3D showed differences of up to 6.9%. Point dose differences determined in comparison to the Oncentra Masterplan dose calculations were larger. The RUBY system was shown to be suitable for end-to-end testing of complex treatment scenarios such as single-isocenter multiple target plans.

Development of a dedicated phantom for multi-target single-isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing

PURPOSE

The aim of this project was to design and manufacture a cost-effective end-to-end (E2E) phantom for quantifying the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a linear accelerator based, multi-target single-isocenter (MTSI) frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique.

METHOD

A perspex Multi-Plug device from a Sun Nuclear ArcCheck phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) was enhanced to make it more applicable for MTSI SRS E2E testing. The following steps in the SRS chain were then analysed using the phantom: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortion, planning computed tomography (CT) scan and MRI image registration accuracy, phantom setup accuracy using CBCT, dosimetric accuracy using ion chamber, planar film dose measurements and coincidence of linear accelerator mega-voltage (MV), and kilo-voltage (kV) isocenters using Winston-Lutz testing (WLT).

RESULTS

The dedicated E2E phantom was able to successfully quantify the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the MTSI SRS technique. MRI distortions were less than 0.5 mm, or half a voxel size. The average MRI-CT registration accuracy was 0.15 mm (±0.31 mm), 0.20 mm (±0.16 mm), and 0.39 mm (±0.11 mm) in the superior/inferior, left/right and, anterior/posterior directions, respectively. The phantom setup accuracy using CBCT was better than 0.2 mm and 0.1°. Point dose measurements were within 5% of the treatment planning system predicted dose. The comparison of planar film doses to the planning system dose distributions, performed using gamma analysis, resulted in pass rates greater than 97% for 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Finally, off-axis WLT showed MV/kV coincidence to be within 1 mm for off-axis distances up to 60 mm.

CONCLUSION

A novel, versatile and cost-effective phantom for comprehensive E2E testing of MTSI SRS treatments was developed, incorporating multiple detector types and fiducial markers. The phantom is capable of quantifying the accuracy of each step in the MTSI SRS planning and treatment process.

Clinical Evaluation of the Accuracy of an Invasive Frame Designed for Stereotactic Intracranial Radiosurgery Treatment with Helical Tomotherapy

Aims and background

The study focused on the evaluation of the accuracy of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy by means of the InterFix™ Radiosurgery kit.

Methods and study design

Twenty-two patients received stereotactic radiosurgery treatments with single fraction dose ranging from 13 to 20 Gy depending on diagnosis. Megavoltage computed tomography scans performed prior the treatments were analyzed in order to determine the position accuracy. For 8 selected cases, they were also performed at the end of the treatment to evaluate the intra-fraction motion.

Results

Mean setup errors and standard deviations were −1.6 ± 2.2 mm, −0.2 ± 1.2 mm, 0.4 ± 1.3 mm, 0.2 ± 0.5° for the lateral (IEC-x), longitudinal (IEC-y), vertical (IEC-z) directions and rotational variation (roll), respectively. Setup error was found to be greater than 3 mm-PTV expansion in 36% of the cases. Mean intra-fraction motion was 0.5 ± 0.7 mm, −0.3 ± 0.4 mm, 0.1 ± 0.5 mm and 0.1 ± 0.2° for the IEC-x, IEC-y, IEC-z and roll, respectively.

Conclusions

Observed intra-fraction movements of less than 1 mm suggested the use of the tested fixation device for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment on helical tomotherapy providing that the image-guidance procedure is always performed prior to treatment.

Calibration of EBT2 film using a red-channel PDD method in combination with a modified three-channel technique

PURPOSE

Ashland Inc. EBT2 and EBT3 films are widely used in quality assurance for radiation therapy; however, there remains a relatively high degree of uncertainty [B. Hartmann, M. Martisikova, and O. Jakel, "Homogeneity of Gafchromic EBT2 film," Med. Phys. 37, 1753-1756 (2010)]. Micke et al. (2011) recently improved the spatial homogeneity using all color channels of a flatbed scanner; however, van Hoof et al. (2012) pointed out that the corrected nonuniformity still requires further investigation for larger fields. To reduce the calibration errors and the uncertainty, the authors propose a new red-channel percentage-depth-dose method in combination with a modified three-channel technique.

METHODS

For the ease of comparison, the EBT2 film image used in the authors' previous study (2012) was reanalyzed using different approaches. Photon beams of 6-MV were delivered to two different films at two different beam on times, resulting in the absorption doses of ranging from approximately 30 to 300 cGy at the vertical midline of the film, which was set to be coincident with the central axis of the beam. The film was tightly sandwiched in a 30(3)-cm(3) polystyrene phantom, and the pixel values for red, green, and blue channels were extracted from 234 points on the central axis of the beam and compared with the corresponding depth doses. The film was first calibrated using the multichannel method proposed by Micke et al. (2010), accounting for nonuniformities in the scanner. After eliminating the scanner and dose-independent nonuniformities, the film was recalibrated via the dose-dependent optical density of the red channel and fitted to a power function. This calibration was verified via comparisons of the dose profiles extracted from the films, where three were exposed to a 60° physical wedge field and three were exposed to composite fields, and all of which were measured in a water phantom. A correction for optical attenuation was implemented, and treatment plans of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy were evaluated.

RESULTS

The method described here demonstrated improved accuracy with reduced uncertainty. The relative error compared with the measurements of a water phantom was less than 1%, and the overall calibration uncertainty was less than 2%. Verification tests revealed that the results were close to those of the authors' previous study, and all differences were within 3%, except those with a high-dose gradient. The gamma pass rates (2%/2 mm) of the treatment plan evaluated using the method described here were greater than 99%, and no obvious stripe patterns were observed in the dose-difference maps.

CONCLUSIONS

Spatial homogeneity was significantly improved via the calibration method described here. This technique is both convenient and time-efficient because it does not require cutting the film, and only two exposures are necessary.

A comprehensive evaluation of treatment accuracy, including end-to-end tests and clinical data, applied to intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A methodology is presented to quantify the uncertainty associated with linear accelerator-based frameless intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combining end-to-end phantom tests and clinical data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The following steps of the SRT chain were analysed: planning computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans registration, target volume delineation, CT and cone beam CT (CBCT) registration and intrafraction-patient displacement. The overall accuracy was established with an end-to-end test. The measured uncertainties were combined, deriving the total systematic (ΣT) and random (σT) error components, to estimate the GTV-PTV margin.

RESULTS

The uncertainty in the MR-CT registration was on average 0.40mm (averaged over AP, CC and LR directions). Rotational variations were smaller than 0.5° in all directions. Interobser variation in GTV delineation was on average 0.29mm. The uncertainty in the CBCT-CT registration was on average 0.15mm. Again, rotational variations were smaller than 0.5° in all directions. The systematic and random intrafraction displacement errors were on average 0.55mm and 0.45mm, respectively. The systematic and random positional errors from the end-to-end test were on average 0.49mm and 0.53mm, respectively. Combining these uncertainties resulted in an average ΣT=0.9mm and σT=0.7mm and an average GTV-PTV margin of 2.8mm.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive methodology including end-to-end tests enabled a GTV-PTV margin calculation considering all sources of uncertainties. This generic method can also be used for other treatment sites.

Dependency of EBT2 film calibration curve on postirradiation time

PURPOSE

The Ashland Inc. product EBT2 film model is a widely used quality assurance tool, especially for verification of 2-dimensional dose distributions. In general, the calibration film and the dose measurement film are irradiated, scanned, and calibrated at the same postirradiation time (PIT), 1-2 days after the films are irradiated. However, for a busy clinic or in some special situations, the PIT for the dose measurement film may be different from that of the calibration film. In this case, the measured dose will be incorrect. This paper proposed a film calibration method that includes the effect of PIT.

METHODS

The dose versus film optical density was fitted to a power function with three parameters. One of these parameters was PIT dependent, while the other two were found to be almost constant with a standard deviation of the mean less than 4%. The PIT-dependent parameter was fitted to another power function of PIT. The EBT2 film model was calibrated using the PDD method with 14 different PITs ranging from 1 h to 2 months. Ten of the fourteen PITs were used for finding the fitting parameters, and the other four were used for testing the model.

RESULTS

The verification test shows that the differences between the delivered doses and the film doses calculated with this modeling were mainly within 2% for delivered doses above 60 cGy, and the total uncertainties were generally under 5%. The errors and total uncertainties of film dose calculation were independent of the PIT using the proposed calibration procedure. However, the fitting uncertainty increased with decreasing dose or PIT, but stayed below 1.3% for this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The EBT2 film dose can be modeled as a function of PIT. For the ease of routine calibration, five PITs were suggested to be used. It is recommended that two PITs be located in the fast developing period (1 ∼ 6 h), one in 1 ∼ 2 days, one around a week, and one around a month.

Calibration of EBT2 film by the PDD method with scanner non-uniformity correction

The EBT2 film together with a flatbed scanner is a convenient dosimetry QA tool for verification of clinical radiotherapy treatments. However, it suffers from a relatively high degree of uncertainty and a tedious film calibration process for every new lot of films, including cutting the films into several small pieces, exposing with different doses, restoring them back and selecting the proper region of interest (ROI) for each piece for curve fitting. In this work, we present a percentage depth dose (PDD) method that can accurately calibrate the EBT2 film together with the scanner non-uniformity correction and provide an easy way to perform film dosimetry. All films were scanned before and after the irradiation in one of the two homemade 2 mm thick acrylic frames (one portrait and the other landscape), which was located at a fixed position on the scan bed of an Epson 10 000XL scanner. After the pre-irradiated scan, the film was placed parallel to the beam central axis and sandwiched between six polystyrene plates (5 cm thick each), followed by irradiation of a 20 × 20 cm² 6 MV photon beam. Two different beams on times were used on two different films to deliver a dose to the film ranging from 32 to 320 cGy. After the post-irradiated scan, the net optical densities for a total of 235 points on the beam central axis on the films were auto-extracted and compared with the corresponding depth doses that were calculated through the measurement of a 0.6 cc farmer chamber and the related PDD table to perform the curve fitting. The portrait film location was selected for routine calibration, since the central beam axis on the film is parallel to the scanning direction, where non-uniformity correction is not needed (Ferreira et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 1073-85). To perform the scanner non-uniformity calibration, the cross-beam profiles of the film were analysed by referencing the measured profiles from a Profiler™. Finally, to verify our method, the films were exposed to 60° physical wedge fields and the compositive fields, and their relative dose profiles were compared with those from the water phantom measurement. The fitting uncertainty was less than 0.5% due to the many calibration points, and the overall calibration uncertainty was within 3% for doses above 50 cGy, when the average of four films were used for the calibration. According to our study, the non-uniformity calibration factor was found to be independent of the given dose for the EBT2 film and the relative dose differences between the profiles measured by the film and the Profiler were within 1.5% after applying the non-uniformity correction. For the verification tests, the relative dose differences between the measurements by films and in the water phantom, when the average of three films were used, were generally within 3% for the 60° wedge fields and compositive fields, respectively. In conclusion, our method is convenient, time-saving and cost-effective, since no film cutting is needed and only two films with two exposures are needed.

[Ballistic quality assurance]

This review describes the ballistic quality assurance for stereotactic intracranial irradiation treatments delivered with Gamma Knife® either dedicated or adapted medical linear accelerators. Specific and periodic controls should be performed in order to check the mechanical stability for both irradiation and collimation systems. If this step remains under the responsibility of the medical physicist, it should be done in agreement with the manufacturer's technical support. At this time, there are no recent published guidelines. With technological developments, both frequency and accuracy should be assessed in each institution according to the treatment mode: single versus hypofractionnated dose, circular collimator versus micro-multileaf collimators. In addition, "end-to-end" techniques are mandatory to find the origin of potential discrepancies and to estimate the global ballistic accuracy of the delivered treatment. Indeed, they include frames, non-invasive immobilization devices, localizers, multimodal imaging for delineation and in-room positioning imaging systems. The final precision that could be reasonably achieved is more or less 1mm.

Characterisation of dose distribution in linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with the dynamic conformal arc technique: consideration of the optimal method for dose prescription and evaluation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterise dose distribution in linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery using the dynamic conformal arc technique, and to validate the pertinence of dose prescription to the specific percentage isodose surface (IDS).

METHODS

73 plans for brain metastases were reviewed and replanned with a uniform method for target definition and treatment planning.

RESULTS

In all cases except 1 the dose prescription to the 80% IDS satisfied the criteria of the standardised prescription IDS as previously proposed. However, both of the planning target volume (PTV) coverage values for the 80% and 90% IDSs and the PTV D99 and D95 (IDS receiving at least 99% or 95% of the PTV) were inconsistent and significantly increased as a function of the PTV size. The 80% IDS for a PTV of more than 5 cm(3) achieved adequate PTV coverage without a leaf margin. The dose conformity for 80% IDS gradually worsened as the PTV increased, whereas that for the PTV D99 or D95 improved as a function of the PTV size. The addition of a leaf margin attained 100% PTV coverage for 80% IDS, while leading to a poorer dose conformity.

CONCLUSION

The dose prescription to the specific percentage IDS does not necessarily guarantee consistent target coverage, D99 and D95, and desirable dose conformity in proportion to the target volume. The dose prescription and evaluation at the specific target coverage would therefore be preferable as an objective method in order to report the "marginal dose" and to clearly compare the planning parameters with those from other modalities.

γ-H2AX and phosphorylated ATM focus formation in cancer cells after laser plasma X irradiation

The usefulness of laser plasma X-ray pulses for medical and radiation biological studies was investigated, and the effects of laser plasma X rays were compared with those of conventional sources such as a linear accelerator. A cell irradiation system was developed that used copper-Kα (8 keV) lines from an ultrashort high-intensity laser to produce plasma. The absorbed dose of the 8 keV laser plasma X-ray pulse was estimated accurately with Gafchromic® EBT film. When the cells were irradiated with approximately 2 Gy of laser plasma X rays, the circular regions on γ-H2AX-positive cells could be clearly identified. Moreover, the numbers of γ-H2AX and phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) foci induced by 8 keV laser plasma X rays were comparable to those induced by 4 MV X rays. These results indicate that the laser plasma X ray source may be useful for radiation biology studies.

Local heterogeneities in early batches of EBT2 film: a suggested solution

To enhance the utility of radiochromic films for high-resolution dosimetry of small and modulated radiotherapy fields, we propose a means to negate the effects of heterogeneities in EBT2 (and other) films. The results of using our simple procedure for evaluating radiation dose in EBT2 film are compared with the results of using the manufacturer's recommended procedure as well as a procedure previously established for evaluating dose in older EBT film. It is shown that Newton's ring-like scanning artefacts can be avoided through the use of a plastic frame, to elevate the film above the scanner's surface. The effects of film heterogeneity can be minimized by evaluating net optical density, pixelwise, as the logarithm of the ratio of the red-channel pixel value in each pixel of each irradiated film to the red-channel pixel value in the same pixel in the same film prior to irradiation. The application of a blue-channel correction was found to result in increased noise. It is recommended that, when using EBT2 film for radiotherapy quality assurance, the films should be scanned before and after irradiation and analysed using the method proposed herein, without the use of the blue-channel correction, in order to produce dose images with minimal film heterogeneity effects.