Reducing radiation dose to selected organs by selecting the tube start angle in MDCT helical scans: a Monte Carlo based study

Effects of organ dose modulation applied to a part of the scan range on radiation dose in computed tomography of the body

In computed tomography (CT), organ dose modulation (ODM) reduces radiation exposure from the anterior side to reduce radiation dose received by the radiosensitive organs located anteriorly. We investigated the effects of ODM applied to a part of the scan range on radiation dose in body CT. The thorax and thoraco-abdominopelvic region of an anthropomorphic whole-body phantom were imaged with and without ODM. ODM was applied to various regions, and the tube current modulation curves were compared. Additionally, the dose indices were compared with and without ODM in thoracic and thoraco-abdominopelvic CTs in 800 patients. ODM was applied to the thyroid in male patients and to the thyroid and breast in female patients. In phantom imaging of the thorax, the application of ODM below the scan range decreased the tube current, and that to the breast showed a further decrease. Decreased tube current was also observed in phantom imaging of the thoraco-abdominopelvic regions with ODM below the scan range, and the application of ODM to the whole scan range, thyroid, breast, and both thyroid and breast further reduced the tube current in the region to which ODM was applied. In patient imaging, the dose indices were significantly lower with ODM than without ODM, regardless of the scan range or sex. The absolute reduction in dose-length product was larger for thoraco-abdominopelvic CT (male, 43.2 mGy cm; female, 59.7 mGy cm) than for thoracic CT (male, 30.8 mGy cm; female, 37.6 mGy cm) in both sexes, indicating dose reduction in the abdominopelvic region to which ODM was not applied. In conclusion, The application of ODM in body CT reduces radiation dose not only in the region to which ODM is applied but also outside the region. In radiation dose management, it should be considered that even ODM applied to a limited region affects the dose indices.

Patient radiation risk reduction by controlling the tube start angle in single and dual source spiral CT scans: A simulation study

BACKGROUND

Organ doses in spiral CT scans depend on the tube start angle.

PURPOSE

To determine the effective dose in single source CT (SSCT) and dual source CT (DSCT) scans as a function of tube start angle and spiral pitch value to identify the dose reduction potential by selecting the optimal start angle.

METHODS

Using Monte Carlo simulations, dose values for different tube positions with an angular increment of10 ∘ $10^\circ$ and a longitudinal increment of4.5 m m $4.5 \,\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ were simulated over a range of31.5 c m $31.5 \,\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}$ with collimations of40 mm $40\, \mathrm{mm}$ ,60 mm $60\, \mathrm{mm}$ , and80 m m $80 \,\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ . The simulations were performed for the thorax region of six adult patients based on clinical CT data. From the resulting dose distributions, organ doses and effective dose were determined as a function of tube angle and longitudinal position. Using these per-view dose data, the individual organ doses, as well as the total effective dose, were determined for spiral scans with and without tube current modulation (TCM) with pitch values ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 for SSCT and up to 3.0 for DSCT. The dose of the best and worst tube start angle in terms of dose was determined and compared to the mean dose over all tube start angles.

RESULTS

With increasing pitch and collimation, the dose variations from the effective dose averaged over all start angles increase. While for a collimation of40 m m $40 \,\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ , the variations from the mean dose value stay below5 % $5 \%$ for SSCT, we find that for a spiral scan with a pitch of 3.0 for DSCT with TCM and collimation of80 m m $80 \,\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}$ , the dose for the best starting angle is on average16 % $16 \%$ lower than the mean value and28 % $28 \%$ lower than the maximum value.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation of the tube start angle in spiral scans exhibits substantial differences in radiation dose especially for high pitch values and for high collimations. Therefore, we suggest to control the tube start angle to minimize patient risk.

Head CT dose reduction with organ-based tube current modulation

BACKGROUND

A helical head CT examination uses a pitch factor (PF) of < 1.0, resulting in a part of the slice being directly irradiated twice. This raises the possibility of double irradiation, which may increase the amount of radiation to the lens. Organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) is an effective method for reducing lens exposure because it reduces the dose to the anterior aspect of the patient. However, it is challenging to visualize the complex dose distribution when factoring in double irradiation.

PURPOSE

To visualize twice-irradiated areas in helical head CT in three dimensions and to clarify the exposure reduction effect of OBTCM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A leuco crystal violet (LCV) dosimeter was placed into an empty polyethylene terephthalate bottle 16.5 cm in diameter. Helical scans were performed without and with OBTCM using the following parameters: tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 600 mA, pitch factor 0.637, rotation time 0.5 s, 80 (detector rows) × 0.5 mm (detector collimation), and ten scans. Exposed areas were visualized using an optical computed tomography (OCT) system designed by our group. The dose reduction rate of OBTCM was defined as the ratio of the average values of the histogram with the dose value on the x-axis and the frequency on the y-axis without and with OBTCM at 90° to the anterior midline.

RESULTS

The LCV dosimeter visualized the spiral-shaped twice-irradiated areas. Double irradiation resulted in a dose of 2.19/1.90 Gy and 1.38/1.19 Gy (15.0% and 15.9% increase) without and with OBTCM, respectively. The dose reduction using OBTCM was 29.6% at 90° anterolateral.

CONCLUSION

The LCV dosimeter visualized the complex three-dimensional irradiated areas and enabled dose measurement in twice-irradiated areas. Increased exposure from double irradiation was attenuated by OBTCM. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Validation of a deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for rapid CT dose computation using physical dose measurements in pediatric phantoms

PURPOSE

The risk of inducing cancer to patients undergoing CT examinations has motivated efforts for CT dose estimation, monitoring, and reduction, especially among pediatric population. The method investigated in this study is Acuros CTD (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE) solver aimed at generating rapid and reliable dose maps of CT exams. By applying organ contours, organ doses can also be obtained, thus patient-specific organ dose estimates can be provided. This study experimentally validated Acuros against measurements performed on a clinical CT system using a range of physical pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms and acquisition protocols.

METHODS

The study consisted of (1) the acquisition of dose measurements on a clinical CT scanner through thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), and (2) the modeling in the Acuros platform of the measurement set up, which includes the modeling of the CT scanner and of the anthropomorphic phantoms. For the measurements, 1-year-old, 5-year-old, and 10-year-old anthropomorphic phantoms of the CIRS ATOM family were used. TLDs were placed in selected organ locations such as stomach, liver, lungs, and heart. The pediatric phantoms were scanned helically with the GE Discovery 750 HD clinical scanner for several examination protocols. For the simulations in Acuros, scanner-specific input, such as bowtie filters, overrange collimation, and tube current modulation schemes, were modeled. These scanner complexities were implemented by defining discretized X-ray beams whose spectral distribution, defined in Acuros by only six energy bins, varied across fan angle, cone angle, and slice position. The images generated during the CT acquisitions were used to create the geometrical models, by applying thresholding algorithms and assigning materials to the HU values. The TLDs were contoured in the phantom models as sensitive cylindrical volumes at the locations selected for dosimeters placement, to provide dose estimates, in terms of dose per unit photon. To compare measured doses with dose estimates, a calibration factor was derived from the CTDI_vol displayed by the scanner, to account for the number of photons emitted by the X-ray tube during the procedure.

RESULTS

The differences of the measured and estimated doses, in terms of absolute % errors, were within 13% for 153 TLD locations, with an error of 17% at the stomach for one study with the 10-year-old phantom. Root-mean-squared-errors (RMSE) across all TLD locations for all configurations were in the range of 3%-8%, with Acuros providing dose estimates in a time range of a few seconds up to 2 min.

CONCLUSIONS

An overall good agreement between measurements and simulations was achieved, with average RMSE of 6% across all cases. The results demonstrate that Acuros can model a specific clinical scanner despite the required discretization in spatial and energy domains. The proposed deterministic tool has the potential to be part of a near real-time individualized dosimetry monitoring system for CT applications, providing patient-specific organ dose estimates.

A database of 40 patient-based computational models for benchmarking organ dose estimates in CT

PURPOSE

Patient radiation burden in computed tomography (CT) can best be characterized through risk estimates derived from organ doses. Organ doses can be estimated by Monte Carlo simulations of the CT procedures on computational phantoms assumed to emulate the patients. However, the results are subject to uncertainties related to how accurately the patient and CT procedure are modeled. Different methods can lead to different results. This paper, based on decades of organ dosimetry research, offers a database of CT scans, scan specifics, and organ doses computed using a validated Monte Carlo simulation of each patient and acquisition. It is aimed that the database can serve as means to benchmark different organ dose estimation methods against a benchmark dataset.

ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS

Organ doses were estimated for 40 adult patients (22 male, 18 female) who underwent chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Patient-based computational models were created for each patient including 26 organs for female and 25 organs for male cases. A Monte Carlo code, previously validated experimentally, was applied to calculate organ doses under constant and two modulated tube current conditions.

DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES

The generated database reports organ dose values for chest and abdominopelvic examinations per patient and imaging condition. Patient information and images and scan specifications (energy spectrum, bowtie filter specification, and tube current profiles) are provided. The database is available at publicly accessible digital repositories.

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS

Consistency in patient risk estimation, and associated justification and optimization requires accuracy and consistency in organ dose estimation. The database provided in this paper is a helpful tool to benchmark different organ dose estimation methodologies to facilitate comparisons, assess uncertainties, and improve risk assessment of CT scans based on organ dose.

[Influence of Absorbed Dose by Difference of Scanning Starting Angle in Multiphasic CT Imaging]

Presently, the scanning start angle of the X-ray tube of X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanners cannot be controlled. As a result, there is room for reducing patient dose because the peaks of the dose distributions may overlap during multiphasic CT imaging. This study investigated methods of dose reduction by performing a Monte Carlo simulation of the X-ray tube scanning start angle and locally absorbed dose in multiphasic CT imaging. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the largest decrease in the absorbed dose was seen, when the scanning start angle between the phases was±180°. Even though with present X-ray CT scanners, the scanning start angle cannot be controlled, it is possible to decrease the absorbed dose by taking the orbital synchronized scanning and scanning range into consideration. In future we hope that, we will be able to easily reduce the dose by controlling the scanning start angle.

A real-time Monte Carlo tool for individualized dose estimations in clinical CT

The increasing awareness of the adverse effects associated with radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) has necessesitated the quantification of dose delivered to patients for better risk assessment in the clinic. The current methods for dose quantification used in the clinic are approximations, lacking realistic models for the irradiation conditions utilized in the scan and the anatomy of the patient being imaged, which limits their relevance for a particular patient. The established gold-standard technique for individualized dose quantification uses Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to obtain patient-specific estimates of organ dose in anatomically realistic computational phantoms to provide patient-specific estimates of organ dose. Although accurate, MC simulations are computationally expensive, which limits their utility for time-constrained applications in the clinic. To overcome these shortcomings, a real-time GPU-based MC tool based on FDA's MC-GPU framework was developed for patient and scanner-specific dosimetry in the clinic. The tool was validated against (1) AAPM's TG-195 reference datasets and (2) physical measurements of dose acquired using TLD chips in adult and pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms. To demonstrate its utility towards providing individualized dose estimates, it was integrated with an automatic segmentation method for generating patient-specific models, which were then used to estimate patient- and scanner-specific organ doses for a select population of 50 adult patients using a clinically relevant CT protocol. The organ dose estimates were compared to corresponding dose estimates from a previously validated MC method based on Penelope. The dose estimates from our MC tool agreed within 5% for all organs (except thyroid) tabulated by TG-195 and within 10% for all TLD locations in the adult and pediactric phantoms, across all validation cases. Compared against Penelope, the organ dose estimates agreed within 3% on average for all organs in the patient population study. The average run duration for each patient was estimated at 23.79 s, representing a significant speedup (~700×) over existing non-parallelized MC methods. The accuracy of dose estimates combined with a significant improvement in execution times suggests a feasible solution utilizing the proposed MC tool for real-time individualized dosimetry in the clinic.

A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography dose calculation (Acuros CTD)

PURPOSE

To improve dose reporting of CT scans, patient-specific organ doses are highly desired. However, estimating the dose distribution in a fast and accurate manner remains challenging, despite advances in Monte Carlo methods. In this work, we present an alternative method that deterministically solves the linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE), which governs the behavior of x-ray photon transport through an object.

METHODS

Our deterministic solver for CT dose (Acuros CTD) is based on the same approach used to estimate scatter in projection images of a CT scan (Acuros CTS). A deterministic method is used to compute photon fluence within the object, which is then converted to deposited energy by multiplying by known, material-specific conversion factors. To benchmark Acuros CTD, we used the AAPM Task Group 195 test for CT dose, which models an axial, fan beam scan (10 mm thick beam) and calculates energy deposited in each organ of an anthropomorphic phantom. We also validated our own Monte Carlo implementation of Geant4 to use as a reference to compare Acuros against for other common geometries like an axial, cone beam scan (160 mm thick beam) and a helical scan (40 mm thick beam with table motion for a pitch of 1).

RESULTS

For the fan beam scan, Acuros CTD accurately estimated organ dose, with a maximum error of 2.7% and RMSE of 1.4% when excluding organs with <0.1% of the total energy deposited. The cone beam and helical scans yielded similar levels of accuracy compared to Geant4. Increasing the number of source positions beyond 18 or decreasing the voxel size below 5 × 5 × 5 mm³ provided marginal improvement to the accuracy for the cone beam scan but came at the expense of increased run time. Across the different scan geometries, run time of Acuros CTD ranged from 8 to 23 s.

CONCLUSIONS

In this digital phantom study, a deterministic LBTE solver was capable of fast and accurate organ dose estimates.

Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation

Purpose To calculate the effect of localizer radiography projections to the total radiation dose, including both the dose from localizer radiography and that from subsequent chest computed tomography (CT) with tube current modulation (TCM). Materials and Methods An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with 192-section CT without and with differently sized breast attachments. Chest CT with TCM was performed after one localizer radiographic examination with anteroposterior (AP) or posteroanterior (PA) projections. Dose distributions were obtained by means of Monte Carlo simulations based on acquired CT data. For Monte Carlo simulations of localizer radiography, the tube position was fixed at 0° and 180°; for chest CT, a spiral trajectory with TCM was used. The effect of tube start angles on dose distribution was investigated with Monte Carlo simulations by using TCM curves with fixed start angles (0°, 90°, and 180°). Total doses for lungs, heart, and breast were calculated as the sum of the dose from localizer radiography and CT. Image noise was defined as the standard deviation of attenuation measured in 14 circular regions of interest. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, paired t test, and Friedman analysis of variance were conducted to evaluate differences in noise, TCM curves, and organ doses, respectively. Results Organ doses from localizer radiography were lower when using a PA instead of an AP projection (P = .005). The use of a PA projection resulted in higher TCM values for chest CT (P < .001) owing to the higher attenuation (P < .001) and thus resulted in higher total organ doses for all investigated phantoms and protocols (P < .001). Noise in CT images was lower with PA localizer radiography than with AP localizer radiography (P = .03). The use of an AP projection allowed for total dose reductions of 16%, 15%, and 12% for lungs, breast, and heart, respectively. Differences in organ doses were not related to tube start angles (P = .17). Conclusion The total organ doses are higher when using PA projection localizer radiography owing to higher TCM values, whereas the organ doses from PA localizer radiography alone are lower. Thus, PA localizer radiography should be used in combination with reduced reference tube current at subsequent chest CT. ^© RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique

PURPOSE

This technical note quantifies the dose and image quality performance of a clinically available organ-dose-based tube current modulation (ODM) technique, using experimental and simulation phantom studies. The investigated ODM implementation reduces the tube current for the anterior source positions, without increasing current for posterior positions, although such an approach was also evaluated for comparison.

METHODS

Axial CT scans at 120 kV were performed on head and chest phantoms on an ODM-equipped scanner (Optima CT660, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, England). Dosimeters quantified dose to breast, lung, heart, spine, eye lens, and brain regions for ODM and 3D-modulation (SmartmA) settings. Monte Carlo simulations, validated with experimental data, were performed on 28 voxelized head phantoms and 10 chest phantoms to quantify organ dose and noise standard deviation. The dose and noise effects of increasing the posterior tube current were also investigated.

RESULTS

ODM reduced the dose for all experimental dosimeters with respect to SmartmA, with average dose reductions across dosimeters of 31% (breast), 21% (lung), 24% (heart), 6% (spine), 19% (eye lens), and 11% (brain), with similar results for the simulation validation study. In the phantom library study, the average dose reduction across all phantoms was 34% (breast), 20% (lung), 8% (spine), 20% (eye lens), and 8% (brain). ODM increased the noise standard deviation in reconstructed images by 6%-20%, with generally greater noise increases in anterior regions. Increasing the posterior tube current provided similar dose reduction as ODM for breast and eye lens, increased dose to the spine, with noise effects ranging from 2% noise reduction to 16% noise increase. At noise equal to SmartmA, ODM increased the estimated effective dose by 4% and 8% for chest and head scans, respectively. Increasing the posterior tube current further increased the effective dose by 15% (chest) and 18% (head) relative to SmartmA.

CONCLUSIONS

ODM reduced dose in all experimental and simulation studies over a range of phantoms, while increasing noise. The results suggest a net dose/noise benefit for breast and eye lens for all studied phantoms, negligible lung dose effects for two phantoms, increased lung dose and/or noise for eight phantoms, and increased dose and/or noise for brain and spine for all studied phantoms compared to the reference protocol.

IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Automatic exposure control (AEC) in computed tomography (CT) facilitates optimisation of dose absorbed by the patient. The use of AEC requires appropriate 'patient centring' within the gantry, since positioning the patient off-centre may affect both image quality and absorbed dose. The aim of this experimental study was to measure the variation in organ and abdominal surface dose during CT examinations of the head, neck/thorax and abdomen. The dose was compared at the isocenter with two off-centre positions-ventral and dorsal to the isocenter. Measurements were made with an anthropomorphic adult phantom and thermoluminescent dosemeters. Organs and surfaces for ventral regions received lesser dose (5.6-39.0 %) than the isocenter when the phantom was positioned +3 cm off-centre. Similarly, organ and surface doses for dorsal regions were reduced by 5.0-21.0 % at -5 cm off-centre. Therefore, correct vertical positioning of the patient at the gantry isocenter is important to maintain optimal imaging conditions.

Effect of tube current modulation for dose estimation using a simulation tool on body CT examination

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of tube current modulation for dose estimation of a body computed tomography (CT) examination using a simulation tool. The authors also compared longitudinal variations in tube current values between iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction algorithms. One hundred patients underwent body CT examinations. The tube current values around 10 organ regions were recorded longitudinally from tube current information. The organ and effective doses were simulated by average tube current values and longitudinal modulated tube current values. The organ doses for the bladder and breast estimated by longitudinal modulated tube current values were 20 % higher and 25 % lower than those estimated using the average tube current values, respectively. The differences in effective doses were small (mean, 0.7 mSv). The longitudinal variations in tube current values were almost the same for the IR and FBP algorithms.

A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function

PURPOSE

Most methods to estimate patient dose from computed tomography (CT) exams have been developed based on fixed tube current scans. However, in current clinical practice, many CT exams are performed using tube current modulation (TCM). Detailed information about the TCM function is difficult to obtain and therefore not easily integrated into patient dose estimate methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of organ dose estimates obtained using methods that approximate the TCM function using more readily available data compared to estimates obtained using the detailed description of the TCM function.

METHODS

Twenty adult female models generated from actual patient thoracic CT exams and 20 pediatric female models generated from whole body PET∕CT exams were obtained with IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval. Detailed TCM function for each patient was obtained from projection data. Monte Carlo based models of each scanner and patient model were developed that incorporated the detailed TCM function for each patient model. Lungs and glandular breast tissue were identified in each patient model so that organ doses could be estimated from simulations. Three sets of simulations were performed: one using the original detailed TCM function (x, y, and z modulations), one using an approximation to the TCM function (only the z-axis or longitudinal modulation extracted from the image data), and the third was a fixed tube current simulation using a single tube current value which was equal to the average tube current over the entire exam. Differences from the reference (detailed TCM) method were calculated based on organ dose estimates. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between methods after testing for normality. Equivalence test was performed to compare the equivalence limit between each method (longitudinal approximated TCM and fixed tube current method) and the detailed TCM method. Minimum equivalence limit was reported for each organ.

RESULTS

Doses estimated using the longitudinal approximated TCM resulted in small differences from doses obtained using the detailed TCM function. The calculated root-mean-square errors (RMSE) for adult female chest simulations were 9% and 3% for breasts and lungs, respectively; for pediatric female chest and whole body simulations RMSE were 9% and 7% for breasts and 3% and 1% for lungs, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients were consistently high for the longitudinal approximated TCM method, ranging from 0.947 to 0.999, compared to the fixed tube current value ranging from 0.8099 to 0.9916. In addition, an equivalence test illustrated that across all models the longitudinal approximated TCM is equivalent to the detailed TCM function within up to 3% for lungs and breasts.

CONCLUSIONS

While the best estimate of organ dose requires the detailed description of the TCM function for each patient, extracting these values can be difficult. The presented results show that an approximation using available data extracted from the DICOM header provides organ dose estimates with RMSE of less than 10%. On the other hand, the use of the overall average tube current as a single tube current value was shown to result in poor and inconsistent estimates of organ doses.

Organ dose calculation in CT based on scout image data and automatic image registration

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) has become the main contributor of the cumulative radiation exposure in radiology. Information on cumulative exposure history of the patient should be available for efficient management of radiation exposures and for radiological justification.

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate automatic image registration for organ dose calculation in CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Planning radiograph (scout) image data describing CT scan ranges from 15 thoracic CT examinations (9 men and 6 women) and 10 abdominal CT examinations (6 men and 4 women) were co-registered with the reference trunk CT scout image. 2-D affine transformation and normalized correlation metric was used for image registration. Longitudinal (z-axis) scan range coordinates on the reference scout image were converted into slice locations on the CT-Expo anthropomorphic male and female models, following organ and effective dose calculations.

RESULTS

The average deviation of z-location of studied patient images from the corresponding location in the reference scout image was 6.2 mm. The ranges of organ and effective doses with constant exposure parameters were from 0 to 28.0 mGy and from 7.3 to 14.5 mSv, respectively. The mean deviation of the doses for fully irradiated organs (inside the scan range), partially irradiated organs and non-irradiated organs (outside the scan range) was 1%, 5%, and 22%, respectively, due to image registration.

CONCLUSION

The automated image processing method to registrate individual chest and abdominal CT scout radiograph with the reference scout radiograph is feasible. It can be used to determine the individual scan range coordinates in z-direction to calculate the organ dose values. The presented method could be utilized in automatic organ dose calculation in CT for radiation exposure tracking of the patients.

Dose conversion coefficients for paediatric CT examinations with automatic tube current modulation

A common dose-saving technique used in modern CT devices is automatic tube current modulation (TCM), which was originally designed to also reduce the dose in paediatric CT patients. In order to be able to deduce detailed organ doses of paediatric models, dose conversion coefficients normalized to CTDI(vol) for an eight-week-old baby and seven- and eight-year-old children have been computed accounting for TCM. The relative difference in organ dose conversion coefficients with and without TCM is for many organs and examinations less than 10%, but can in some cases amount up to 30%, e.g., for the thyroid in the chest CT of the seven-year-old child. Overall, the impact of TCM on the conversion coefficients increases with increasing age. Besides TCM, also the effect of collimation and tube voltage on organ dose conversion coefficients has been investigated. It could be shown that the normalization to CTDI(vol) leads to conversion coefficients that can in most cases be considered to be independent of collimation and tube voltage.

Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program

PURPOSE

Radiation-dose awareness and optimization in CT can greatly benefit from a dose-reporting system that provides dose and risk estimates specific to each patient and each CT examination. As the first step toward patient-specific dose and risk estimation, this article aimed to develop a method for accurately assessing radiation dose from CT examinations.

METHODS

A Monte Carlo program was developed to model a CT system (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare). The geometry of the system, the energy spectra of the x-ray source, the three-dimensional geometry of the bowtie filters, and the trajectories of source motions during axial and helical scans were explicitly modeled. To validate the accuracy of the program, a cylindrical phantom was built to enable dose measurements at seven different radial distances from its central axis. Simulated radial dose distributions in the cylindrical phantom were validated against ion chamber measurements for single axial scans at all combinations of tube potential and bowtie filter settings. The accuracy of the program was further validated using two anthropomorphic phantoms (a pediatric one-year-old phantom and an adult female phantom). Computer models of the two phantoms were created based on their CT data and were voxelized for input into the Monte Carlo program. Simulated dose at various organ locations was compared against measurements made with thermoluminescent dosimetry chips for both single axial and helical scans.

RESULTS

For the cylindrical phantom, simulations differed from measurements by -4.8% to 2.2%. For the two anthropomorphic phantoms, the discrepancies between simulations and measurements ranged between (-8.1%, 8.1%) and (-17.2%, 13.0%) for the single axial scans and the helical scans, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors developed an accurate Monte Carlo program for assessing radiation dose from CT examinations. When combined with computer models of actual patients, the program can provide accurate dose estimates for specific patients.

Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients

PURPOSE

Current methods for estimating and reporting radiation dose from CT examinations are largely patient-generic; the body size and hence dose variation from patient to patient is not reflected. Furthermore, the current protocol designs rely on dose as a surrogate for the risk of cancer incidence, neglecting the strong dependence of risk on age and gender. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for estimating patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk from CT examinations.

METHODS

The study included two patients (a 5-week-old female patient and a 12-year-old male patient), who underwent 64-slice CT examinations (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis at our institution in 2006. For each patient, a nonuniform rational B-spine (NURBS) based full-body computer model was created based on the patient's clinical CT data. Large organs and structures inside the image volume were individually segmented and modeled. Other organs were created by transforming an existing adult male or female full-body computer model (developed from visible human data) to match the framework defined by the segmented organs, referencing the organ volume and anthropometry data in ICRP Publication 89. A Monte Carlo program previously developed and validated for dose simulation on the LightSpeed VCT scanner was used to estimate patient-specific organ dose, from which effective dose and risks of cancer incidence were derived. Patient-specific organ dose and effective dose were compared with patient-generic CT dose quantities in current clinical use: the volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and the effective dose derived from the dose-length product (DLP).

RESULTS

The effective dose for the CT examination of the newborn patient (5.7 mSv) was higher but comparable to that for the CT examination of the teenager patient (4.9 mSv) due to the size-based clinical CT protocols at our institution, which employ lower scan techniques for smaller patients. However, the overall risk of cancer incidence attributable to the CT examination was much higher for the newborn (2.4 in 1000) than for the teenager (0.7 in 1000). For the two pediatric-aged patients in our study, CTDIvol underestimated dose to large organs in the scan coverage by 30%-48%. The effective dose derived from DLP using published conversion coefficients differed from that calculated using patient-specific organ dose values by -57% to 13%, when the tissue weighting factors of ICRP 60 were used, and by -63% to 28%, when the tissue weighting factors of ICRP 103 were used.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to estimate patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk from CT examinations by combining a validated Monte Carlo program with patient-specific anatomical models that are derived from the patients' clinical CT data and supplemented by transformed models of reference adults. With the construction of a large library of patient-specific computer models encompassing patients of all ages and weight percentiles, dose and risk can be estimated for any patient prior to or after a CT examination. Such information may aid in decisions for image utilization and can further guide the design and optimization of CT technologies and scan protocols.