• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4623447)   Today's Articles (421)   Subscriber (49408)
For: Elschot M, de Wit TC, de Jong HWAM. The influence of self-absorption on PET and PET/CT shielding requirements. Med Phys 2010;37:2999-3007. [PMID: 20632612 DOI: 10.1118/1.3432618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Griffiths GL, Vasquez C, Escorcia F, Clanton J, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Choyke PL. Translating a radiolabeled imaging agent to the clinic. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022;181:114086. [PMID: 34942275 PMCID: PMC8889912 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
2
Alfuraih AA, Alzimami K, Ma AK. Investigation of 18F and 89Zr Isotopes Self-Absorption and Dose Rate Parameters for PET Imaging. Dose Response 2021;19:15593258211028467. [PMID: 34290574 PMCID: PMC8274111 DOI: 10.1177/15593258211028467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]  Open
3
Hermansen JS, Fonslet J, Søndergaard LR. Technical Note: DoseMapper: A validated GUI-based exact numerical modeling method of shielding in PET/CT facilities. Med Phys 2017;44:6053-6060. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]  Open
4
Tulik P, Kowalska M, Golnik N, Budzynska A, Dziuk M. MEASUREMENTS OF THE IONISING RADIATION LEVEL AT A NUCLEAR MEDICINE FACILITY PERFORMING PET/CT EXAMINATIONS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2017;174:501-509. [PMID: 27542812 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
5
Nagamine S, Fujibuchi T, Umezu Y, Himuro K, Awamoto S, Tsutsui Y, Nakamura Y. Estimation of ambient dose equivalent distribution in the 18F-FDG administration room using Monte Carlo simulation. Radiol Phys Technol 2016;10:121-128. [PMID: 27531215 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0371-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2016] [Revised: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
6
Perez ME, Verde JM, Montes C, Ramos JA, García S, Hernandez J. Optimization of radiation doses received by personnel in PET uptake rooms. HEALTH PHYSICS 2014;107:S198-S201. [PMID: 25272030 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
7
Lo Meo S, Cicoria G, Campanella F, Mattozzi M, Panebianco AS, Marengo M. Radiation dose around a PET scanner installation: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations, analytical calculations and experimental results. Phys Med 2014;30:448-53. [PMID: 24440536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2013] [Revised: 12/19/2013] [Accepted: 12/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]  Open
8
Alzimami KS, Ma AK. Effective dose to staff members in a positron emission tomography/CT facility using zirconium-89. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20130318. [PMID: 23934963 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
9
Quinn B, Holahan B, Aime J, Humm J, St Germain J, Dauer LT. Measured dose rate constant from oncology patients administered 18F for positron emission tomography. Med Phys 2012;39:6071-9. [PMID: 23039646 DOI: 10.1118/1.4749966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
10
Pasciak AS, Jones AK. PShield: An exact three-dimensional numerical solution for determining optimal shielding designs for PET/CT facilities. Med Phys 2012;39:3060-9. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4711758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA