Evaluation of HyperArc™ using film and portal dosimetry quality assurance

HyperArc™ is a stereotactic radiotherapy modality designed for targeting multiple brain metastases using a single isocenter with multiple non-coplanar arcs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of two patient-specific quality assurance methods, film and the Varian Portal Dosimetry System with Varian's HyperArc™ technique and raise important considerations in the customisation of patient-specific quality assurance to accommodate HyperArc™ delivery. Assessment criteria included gamma analysis and mean dose at full width half maximum. The minimum metastasis size, maximum off-axis distance and suitable energy were identified and validated. Patient-specific quality assurance procedures were applied to a range of clinically relevant brain metastasis plans. Initial investigation into energy selection showed no significant differences in gamma pass rates using 6MV, 6MV FFF, or 10MV FFF for metastasis sizes greater than 15 mm diameter at the isocenter. Gamma pass rates (2%/2mm) for 15 mm metastases at the isocenter for all energies were greater than 96.0% for portal dosimetry and greater than 98.7% for film. Fields of size 15 mm placed at various distances (10-70 mm) from the isocenter resulted in a maximum mean dose difference of 1.5% between film and planned. Clinically relevant plans resulted in a maximum mean dose difference for selected metastases of 1.0% between film and plan and a maximum point dose difference of 2.9% between portal dose and plan. Portal dose image prediction was a quick and convenient quality assurance tool for metastases larger than 15 mm near the isocenter but provided diminished geometrical relevance for off-axis metastases. Film QA required exacting procedures but offered the ability to assess the accuracy of geometrical targeting for off-axis metastases and provided dosimetric accuracy for metastases to well below 15 mm diameter.

High resolution radiochromic film dosimetry: Comparison of a microdensitometer and an optical microscope

PURPOSE

Microbeam radiation therapy is a developing technique that promises superior tumour control and better normal tissue tolerance using spatially fractionated X-ray beams only tens of micrometres wide. Radiochromic film dosimetry at micrometric scale was performed using a microdensitometer, but this instrument presents limitations in accuracy and precision, therefore the use of a microscope is suggested as alternative. The detailed procedures developed to use the two devices are reported allowing a comparison.

METHODS

Films were irradiated with single microbeams and with arrays of 50 µm wide microbeams spaced by a 400 µm pitch, using a polychromatic beam with mean energy of 100 keV. The film dose measurements were performed using two independent instruments: a microdensitometer (MDM) and an optical microscope (OM).

RESULTS

The mean values of the absolute dose measured with the two instruments differ by less than 5% but the OM provides reproducibility with a standard deviation of 1.2% compared to up to 7% for the MDM. The resolution of the OM was determined to be ~ 1 to 2 µm in both planar directions able to resolve pencil beams irradiation, while the MDM reaches at the best 20 µm resolution along scanning direction. The uncertainties related to the data acquisition are 2.5-3% for the OM and 9-15% for the MDM.

CONCLUSION

The comparison between the two devices validates that the OM provides equivalent results to the MDM with better precision, reproducibility and resolution. In addition, the possibility to study dose distributions in two-dimensions over wider areas definitely sanctions the OM as substitute of the MDM.

Commissioning a 50-100 kV X-ray unit for skin cancer treatment

This study provides the authors' experience along with dosimetric data from the commissioning of two Sensus SRT‐100 50‐100 kV X‐ray units. Data collected during the commissioning process included: a) HVL, b) output (dose rate), c) applicator cone factors, and d) percentage depth dose. A Farmer‐type chamber (PTW‐N23333), and a thin‐window parallel plate ion chamber (PTW‐N23342) were used for dose rate measurements and dose profiles were measured with EBT3 GafChromic film. The average HVL values for 50, 70, and 100 kV of the two treatment units were found to be 0.52, 1.15, and 2.20 mm Al, respectively. The HVL's were 5%–9% lower when measured with the Farmer chamber, as compared to measurements with the parallel plate chamber, for energies of 70 and 100 kV. Dose rates were also measured to be 3%–4% lower with the Farmer chamber. The dose rate variation between the two units was found to be 2%–9% for 50, 70, and 100 kV. The dose uniformity over a circle of 2 cm diameter was within 4% in four cardinal directions; however, the dose profiles for the 5 cm applicator were nonuniform, especially in the cathode–anode direction. Measurements indicated as much as 15% lower dose for the 50 kV beam at field edge on the anode side, when normalized to the center. The crossline profile was relatively more symmetric, with a maximum deviation of 10% at the field edge. All ion chamber readings agreed with film measurements within 3%. The nonuniform profile produced by these units may introduce uncertainty in dose rate measurements, especially for larger applicators. Since there is no intrinsic tool (crosshair or field light) for alignment with the beam axis, the user should take care when positioning the chamber for output measurements. The data obtained with a Farmer‐type chamber should be used cautiously and as a reference only for the SRT‐100 X‐ray treatment unit.

PACS number: 87.53.Bn