Reference dosimetry of modulated and dynamic photon beams

In the late 1980s, a new technique was proposed that would revolutionize radiotherapy. Now referred to as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, it is at the core of state-of-the-art photon beam delivery techniques, such as helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy. Despite over two decades of clinical application, there are still no established guidelines on the calibration of dynamic modulated photon beams. In 2008, the IAEA-AAPM work group on nonstandard photon beam dosimetry published a formalism to support the development of a new generation of protocols applicable to nonstandard beam reference dosimetry (Alfonso et al 2008 Med. Phys. 35 5179-86). The recent IAEA Code of Practice TRS-483 was published as a result of this initiative and addresses exclusively small static beams. But the plan-class specific reference calibration route proposed by Alfonso et al (2008 Med. Phys. 35 5179-86) is a change of paradigm that is yet to be implemented in radiotherapy clinics. The main goals of this paper are to provide a literature review on the dosimetry of nonstandard photon beams, including dynamic deliveries, and to discuss anticipated benefits and challenges in a future implementation of the IAEA-AAPM formalism on dynamic photon beams.

Monte Carlo and experimental determination of correction factors for gamma knife perfexion small field dosimetry measurements

Detector-, field size- and machine-specific correction factors are required for precise dosimetry measurements in small and non-standard photon fields. In this work, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation techniques were used to calculate the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] correction factors for a series of ionization chambers, a synthetic microDiamond and diode dosimeters, used for reference and/or output factor (OF) measurements in the Gamma Knife Perfexion photon fields. Calculations were performed for the solid water (SW) and ABS plastic phantoms, as well as for a water phantom of the same geometry. MC calculations for the [Formula: see text] correction factors in SW were compared against corresponding experimental results for a subset of ionization chambers and diode detectors. Reference experimental OF data were obtained through the weighted average of corresponding measurements using TLDs, EBT-2 films and alanine pellets. [Formula: see text] values close to unity (within 1%) were calculated for most of ionization chambers in water. Greater corrections of up to 6.0% were observed for chambers with relatively large air-cavity dimensions and steel central electrode. A phantom correction of 1.006 and 1.024 (breaking down to 1.014 from the ABS sphere and 1.010 from the accompanying ABS phantom adapter) were calculated for the SW and ABS phantoms, respectively, adding up to [Formula: see text] corrections in water. Both measurements and MC calculations for the diode and microDiamond detectors resulted in lower than unit [Formula: see text] correction factors, due to their denser sensitive volume and encapsulation materials. In comparison, higher than unit [Formula: see text] results for the ionization chambers suggested field size depended dose underestimations (being significant for the 4 mm field), with magnitude depending on the combination of contradicting phenomena associated with volume averaging and electron fluence perturbations. Finally, the presence of 0.5 mm air-gap between the diodes' frontal surface and their phantom-inserts may considerably influence OF measurements, reaching 4.6% for the Razor diode.

Helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer: a European single-center experience

BACKGROUND

We report on a retrospective analysis of 147 patients with early and locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (SCCHN) treated with helical tomotherapy (HT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Included were patients with SCCHN of the oral cavity (OC), oropharynx (OP), hypopharynx (HP), or larynx (L) consecutively treated in one radiotherapy center in 2008 and 2009. The prescribed HT dose was 60-66 Gy in the postoperative setting (group A) and 66-70 Gy when given as primary treatment (group B). HT was given alone, concurrent with systemic therapy (ST), that is, chemotherapy, biotherapy, or both, and with or without induction therapy (IT). Acute and late toxicities are reported using standard criteria; locoregional failure/progression (LRF), distant metastases (DM), and second primary tumors (SPT) were documented, and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of HT.

RESULTS

Group A patients received HT alone in 22 cases and HT + ST in 20 cases; group B patients received HT alone in 17 cases and HT + ST in 88 cases. Severe (grade ≥ 3) acute mucosal toxicity and swallowing problems increased with more additional ST. After a median follow-up of 44 months, grade ≥2 late toxicity after HT + ST was approximately twice that of HT alone for skin, subcutis, pharynx, and larynx. Forty percent had grade ≥2 late xerostomia, and 29% had mucosal toxicity. At 3 years, LRF/DM/SPT occurred in 7%/7%/17% and 25%/13%/5% in groups A and B, respectively, leading to a 3-year EFS/OS of 64%/74% and 56%/63% in groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of HT alone or in combination with ST is feasible and promising and has a low late fatality rate. However, late toxicity is nearly twice as high when ST is added to HT.

Review on the characteristics of radiation detectors for dosimetry and imaging

The enormous advances in the understanding of human anatomy, physiology and pathology in recent decades have led to ever-improving methods of disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Many of these achievements have been enabled, at least in part, by advances in ionizing radiation detectors. Radiology has been transformed by the implementation of multi-slice CT and digital x-ray imaging systems, with silver halide films now largely obsolete for many applications. Nuclear medicine has benefited from more sensitive, faster and higher-resolution detectors delivering ever-higher SPECT and PET image quality. PET/MR systems have been enabled by the development of gamma ray detectors that can operate in high magnetic fields. These huge advances in imaging have enabled equally impressive steps forward in radiotherapy delivery accuracy, with 4DCT, PET and MRI routinely used in treatment planning and online image guidance provided by cone-beam CT. The challenge of ensuring safe, accurate and precise delivery of highly complex radiation fields has also both driven and benefited from advances in radiation detectors. Detector systems have been developed for the measurement of electron, intensity-modulated and modulated arc x-ray, proton and ion beams, and around brachytherapy sources based on a very wide range of technologies. The types of measurement performed are equally wide, encompassing commissioning and quality assurance, reference dosimetry, in vivo dosimetry and personal and environmental monitoring. In this article, we briefly introduce the general physical characteristics and properties that are commonly used to describe the behaviour and performance of both discrete and imaging detectors. The physical principles of operation of calorimeters; ionization and charge detectors; semiconductor, luminescent, scintillating and chemical detectors; and radiochromic and radiographic films are then reviewed and their principle applications discussed. Finally, a general discussion of the application of detectors for x-ray nuclear medicine and ion beam imaging and dosimetry is presented.

Impact of the number of discrete angles used during dose computation for TomoTherapy treatments

PURPOSE

To quantify systematically the effect on accuracy of discretizing gantry rotation during the dose calculation process of TomoTherapy treatments.

METHODS

Up to version 4.0.x included, TomoTherapy treatment planning system (TPS) approximates gantry rotation by computing dose from 51 discrete angles corresponding to the center of the projections used to control the binary multileaf collimator. Potential effects on dose computation accuracy for off-axis targets and low modulation factors have been shown previously for a few treatment configurations. In versions 4.1.x and later, TomoTherapy oversamples the projections to better account for gantry rotation, but only during full scatter optimization and final calculation (i.e., not during optimization in "beamlet" mode). The effect on accuracy of changing the number of angles was quantified with the following framework: (1) predict the impact of the discretization of gantry rotation for various modulation factors, target sizes, and off-axis positions using a simplified analytical algorithm; (2) perform regular quality assurance using measurements with EDR2 radiographic films; (3) isolating the effect of changing the number of discretized angles only (51, 153, and 459) using a previously validated Monte Carlo model (TomoPen). The diameters of the targets were 2, 3, and 5 cm; off-axis central positions of target volumes were 5, 10 and 15, and 17 cm (when accepted by the treatment unit); planned modulation factors were 1.3 and 2.0.

RESULTS

For extreme configurations (3 cm tumor, 1.3 modulation factor, 15 cm off-axis position), effects on dose distributions were significant with 89.3% and 95.4% of the points passing gamma tests with 2%∕2 mm and 3%∕3 mm criteria, respectively, for TPS software version 4.0.x (51 gantry angles). The passing rate was 100% for both gamma criteria for the 4.1.x version (153 gantry angles). Those differences could be attributed almost completely to gantry motion discretization using TomoPen. Using 51 gantry angles for dose computation, TomoPen reproduced within statistical uncertainties (<1% standard deviation) dose distributions computed with version 4.0.x. Using 153 and 459 gantry angles, TomoPen reproduced within statistical uncertainties measurements and dose distributions computed with version 4.1.x.

CONCLUSIONS

When low modulation factors and significant off-axis positions are used, accounting for gantry rotation during dose computation using at least 153 gantry angles is required to ensure optimal accuracy.