Effect of jaw size in megavoltage CT on image quality and dose

The effects of mega-voltage CT scan parameters on offline adaptive radiation therapy

TomoTherapy involves image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using Mega-voltage CT (MVCT) for each treatment session. The acquired MVCT images can be utilized for the retrospective assessment of dose distribution. The TomoTherapy provides 18 distinct imaging conditions that can be selected based on a combination of algorithms, acquisition pitch, and slice interval. We investigated the accuracy of dose calculation and deformable image registration (DIR) depending on MVCT scan parameters and their effects on adaptive radiation therapy (ART). We acquired image values for density calibration tables (IVDTs) under 18 different MVCT conditions and compared them. The planning CT (pCT) was performed using a thoracic phantom, and an esophageal intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan was created. MVCT images of the thoracic phantom were acquired under each of the 18 conditions, and dose recalculation was performed. DIR was performed on the MVCT images acquired under each condition. The accuracy of DIR, depending on the MVCT scan parameters, was compared using the mean distance to agreement (MDA) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The dose distribution calculated on the MVCT images was deformed using deformed vector fields (DVF). No significant differences were observed in the results of the 18 IVDTs. The esophageal IMRT plan also showed a small dose difference. Regarding verifying the DIR accuracy, the MDA increased, and the DSC decreased as the acquisition pitch and slice interval increased. The difference between the dose distributions after dose mapping was comparable to that before DIR. The MVCT scan parameters had little effect on ART.

Image quality and dose evaluation of MVCT TomoTherapy acquisitions: A phantom study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the dose delivered and the image quality of pre-treatment MVCT images with Hi-Art TomoTherapy system, varying acquisition and reconstruction parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Catphan 500 MVCT images were acquired with all acquisition pitch and reconstruction intervals; image quality was evaluated in terms of noise, uniformity, contrast linearity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution with the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). Dose was evaluated as Multi Slice Average Dose (MSAD_w) and measurements were performed with the Standard TomoTherapy® Quality Assurance Kit composed by the TomoTherapy Phantom, the Exradin A1SL ion chamber and TomoElectrometer. For each pitch-reconstruction interval, acquisitions were repeated 5 times.

RESULTS

Differences in noise and uniformity, though statistically significant in some cases, were very small: noise ranged from 2.3% for Coarse - 3 mm to 2.4% for Coarse - 6 mm, while uniformity passed from 99.5% for Coarse - 6 mm to 99.8% for Normal - 4 mm. No differences at all were found for CNR for high and low density inserts, while MTF was higher for pitch Coarse, even if no differences in spatial resolution were observed visually (spatial resolution was up to 4 lp/cm for all combinations of pitch and reconstruction interval). Dose was dependent on pitch, being 1.0 cGy for Coarse, 1.5 cGy for Normal and 2.85 cGy for Fine.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed negligible differences in image quality among different pitch and reconstruction interval, thus, considerations regarding pre-treatment imaging modalities should be based only on dose delivered and on the desired resolution along the cranio-caudal axis for image-guided radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy purposes.

Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the dose on megavoltage CT (MVCT) images required for tomotherapy. As imaging possibilities are often used before each treatment and usually used several times before the session, we tried to evaluate the dose delivered during the procedure. For each scanning mode (fine, normal, and coarse), we first established the relative variation of these doses according to different technical parameters (explored length, patient setup). These dose variations measured with the TomoPhant, also known as Cheese phantom, showed the expected variations (due to the variation of scattered radiation) of 15% according to the explored length and ± 5% according to the phantom setup (due to the variation of the point of measurement in the bore). In order to estimate patient doses, an anthropomorphic phantom was used for thermoluminescent and film dosimetry. The degree of agreement between the two methods was very satisfactory (the differences correspond to 5 mGy per imaging session) for the three sites studied (head & neck, thorax, and abdomen). These measurements allowed us to estimate the delivered dose of between 1 cGy and 4 cGy according to the site and imaging mode. Finally, we attempted to investigate a way to calculate this delivered dose in our patients from the study conducted on a cylindrical phantom and by taking into account data from the initial kV-CT scan. The results we obtained were close to our measurements, with discrepancies below 5 mGy per MVCT.

Quantitative characterization of tomotherapy MVCT dosimetry

Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) is used as image guidance for patient setup in almost every tomotherapy treatment. Frequent use of ionizing radiation for image guidance has raised concern of imaging dose. The purpose of this work is to quantify and characterize tomotherapy MVCT dosimetry. Our dose calculation was based on a commissioned dose engine, and the calculation result was compared with film measurement. We studied dose profiles, center dose, maximal dose, surface dose, and mean dose on homogeneous cylindrical water phantoms of various diameters for various scanning parameters, including 3 different jaw openings (of nominal value J4, J1, and J0.1) and couch speeds (fine, normal, and coarse). The comparison between calculation and film measurement showed good agreement. In particular, the thread pattern on the film of the helical delivery matched very well with calculation. For the J1 jaw and coarse imaging mode, the maximum difference between calculation and measurement was about 6% of the center dose. Calculation on various sizes of synthesized phantoms showed that the center dose decreases almost linearly as the phantom diameter increases, and that the fine mode (couch speed of 4mm/rotation) received twice the dose of the normal mode (couch speed of 8mm/rotation) and 3 times that of the coarse mode (couch speed of 12mm/rotation) as expected. The maximal dose ranged from 100% to ∼200% of the center dose, with increasing ratios for larger phantoms, smaller jaws, and faster couch speed. For all jaw settings and couch speeds, the mean dose and average surface dose vary from 95% to 125% of the center dose with increasing ratios for larger phantoms. We present a quantitative dosimetric characterization of the tomotherapy MVCT in terms of scanning parameters, phantom size, center dose, maximal dose, surface dose, and mean dose. The results can provide an overall picture of dose distribution and a reference data set that enables estimation of CT dose index for the tomotherapy MVCT.