Chromaticity and correlated color temperature of the white point in medical liquid-crystal display

Luminescence and Energy Transfer Properties of Color-Tunable Dy3+, Eu3+ co-Activated NaGdSiO4 Phosphor for WLED with Great Thermo-Stability

A series of NaGd1-x-ySiO4: y Dy3+-x Eu3+ phosphors were synthesized by a high-temperature solid-phase method. The optimal doping ion concentration of Dy3+ ions for this phosphor was determined to be 1 % from the emission spectra. The energy transfer between Dy3+ and Eu3+ ions at 351 nm was investigated by photoluminescence spectra and fluorescence decay curves. At the excitation wavelengths of 275 nm, 351 nm, 366 nm, and 394 nm, a change from yellow to white to red light can be realized by adjusting the doping concentration of Eu/Dy ions. Particularly, by testing the temperature-dependent fluorescence spectrum of the phosphor, it can be found that the luminous intensity of the phosphor is as high as 96 % when 394 nm excitation is employed at 413 K. It was the maximum at this temperature comparing with other phosphors as far as we know. The color coordinate values show that the NaGd1-x-ySiO4:×Dy3+-y Eu3+ phosphors are very close to the white light color coordinates (x=0.33, y=0.33) under 351 nm excitation. Meanwhile, the correlated color temperature is between 5062-7104 K. These results indicate that this phosphor is a promising candidate for high-quality WLED.

[Effect of Color Temperature on Color Scale Test Patterns in Medical Liquid-crystal Display Monitor]

In Japan, medical liquid-crystal display (LCD) and general LCD monitors have color temperatures of 7500 and 6500 K, respectively. The differences in color temperature make it difficult for radiologists to judge whether the same color is being displayed on the monitor. Therefore, the radiologist may overlook lesions. We examined chromaticity on a color scale test pattern to determine the relationships between color temperature (6500-12,500 K) of the medical color LCD monitors, there are three types of fluorescent light and three types of illuminance LCD monitors. As the color temperature of the monitor increased, the variation in chromaticity for grayscale test patterns increased and those variations for the blue scale test patterns decreased in a dark room and at 600 lux. In addition, even if the color temperature of the monitor was changed, the variation in chromaticity showed no change under fluorescent lighting with light bulb color and daylight color. The results of this study will be useful for quality control and quality assurance of medical LCD monitors in terms of illuminance and color temperature of the monitor.

A method for evaluating luminance non-uniformity of displays by use of a commercially available digital camera

The luminance uniformity of liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) deteriorates with their prolonged use. In this paper, we present a method for evaluating the degree of luminance non-uniformity of LCDs with the use of a commercially available digital camera. In this study, seven monochrome LCDs, which were used during various operating times ranging from 5000 to 25,000 h, were evaluated with use of a camera. The maximum luminance deviation (MLD) was measured on the two-dimensional (2D) images obtained with the camera. In addition, an index of the luminance non-uniformity was calculated as the ratio of the area exhibiting luminance non-uniformity to the area of the entire LCD screen. We determined the area with the luminance non-uniformity by setting the allowable luminance deviation as the judgment criterion to evaluate the degree of luminance non-uniformity. The MLD values were less than 20% for all conditions, and they varied depending on the locations of the luminance measurement. The area ratios of the luminance non-uniformity based on 2D luminance distributions tended to increase with the duration of use of LCDs, and they indicated the degree of luminance non-uniformity of the LCDs regardless of the measurement locations. Our approach of using a commercially available digital camera showed its potential usefulness for providing more detailed and consistent evaluations of the degree of luminance non-uniformity of LCDs based on the 2D luminance distributions.

A method for evaluating image quality of monochrome and color displays based on luminance by use of a commercially available color digital camera

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to propose a method for the quantitative evaluation of image quality of both monochrome and color liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) using a commercially available color digital camera.

METHODS

The intensities of the unprocessed red (R), green (G), and blue (B) signals of a camera vary depending on the spectral sensitivity of the image sensor used in the camera. For consistent evaluation of image quality for both monochrome and color LCDs, the unprocessed RGB signals of the camera were converted into gray scale signals that corresponded to the luminance of the LCD. Gray scale signals for the monochrome LCD were evaluated by using only the green channel signals of the camera. For the color LCD, the RGB signals of the camera were converted into gray scale signals by employing weighting factors (WFs) for each RGB channel. A line image displayed on the color LCD was simulated on the monochrome LCD by using a software application for subpixel driving in order to verify the WF-based conversion method. Furthermore, the results obtained by different types of commercially available color cameras and a photometric camera were compared to examine the consistency of the authors' method. Finally, image quality for both the monochrome and color LCDs was assessed by measuring modulation transfer functions (MTFs) and Wiener spectra (WS).

RESULTS

The authors' results demonstrated that the proposed method for calibrating the spectral sensitivity of the camera resulted in a consistent and reliable evaluation of the luminance of monochrome and color LCDs. The MTFs and WS showed different characteristics for the two LCD types owing to difference in the subpixel structure. The MTF in the vertical direction of the color LCD was superior to that of the monochrome LCD, although the WS in the vertical direction of the color LCD was inferior to that of the monochrome LCD as a result of luminance fluctuations in RGB subpixels.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' method based on the use of a commercially available color camera is useful to evaluate and understand the display performances of both monochrome and color LCDs in radiology departments.

[Diagnostic detection performance of a simulated nodule in chest computed tomography images and gray and color nuclear medicine images: comparison between a medical liquid crystal display monitor and an ordinary liquid crystal display monitor]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detection performance of simulated nodules in chest computed tomography (CT) images and nuclear medicine images with an ordinary liquid crystal display (LCD) and a medical LCD (grayscale standard display function: GSDF) and gamma 2.2. We collected 72 chest CT image slices obtained from an LSCT phantom with simulated signals composed of various sizes and CT values and 78 slices of monochrome and color nuclear medicine images obtained from a digital phantom with a simulated signal composed of various sizes and radiation levels. Six observers performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using a continuous scale. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for each monitor. The average AUC values for detection of chest CT images on a medical LCD (GSDF), medical LCD (gamma 2.2), and ordinary LCD were 0.71, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. The average AUC values for detection of monochrome nuclear medicine images using a medical LCD (GSDF), medical LCD (gamma 2.2), and ordinary LCD were 0.81, 0.75, and 0.72, respectively. The average AUC values for detection of color nuclear medicine images on a medical LCD (GSDF), medical LCD (gamma 2.2), and ordinary LCD were 0.88, 0.86, and 0.90, respectively. Observer performance for detection of simulated nodules in chest CT images and nuclear medicine images was not significantly different between the three LCD monitors. We therefore conclude that an ordinary LCD monitor can be used to detect simulated nodules in chest CT images and nuclear medicine images.

An evaluation of organic light emitting diode monitors for medical applications: great timing, but luminance artifacts

PURPOSE

In contrast to the dominant medical liquid crystal display (LCD) technology, organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitors control the display luminance via separate light-emitting diodes for each pixel and are therefore supposed to overcome many previously documented temporal artifacts of medical LCDs. We assessed the temporal and luminance characteristics of the only currently available OLED monitor designed for use in the medical treatment field (SONY PVM2551MD) and checked the authors' main findings with another SONY OLED device (PVM2541).

METHODS

Temporal properties of the photometric output were measured with an optical transient recorder. Luminances of the three color primaries and white for all 256 digital driving levels (DDLs) were measured with a spectroradiometer. Between the luminances of neighboring DDLs, just noticeable differences were calculated according to a perceptual model developed for medical displays. Luminances of full screen (FS) stimuli were compared to luminances of smaller stimuli with identical DDLs.

RESULTS

All measured luminance transition times were below 300 μs. Luminances were independent of the luminance in the preceding frame. However, for the single color primaries, up to 50.5% of the luminances of neighboring DDLs were not perceptually distinguishable. If two color primaries were active simultaneously, between 36.7% and 55.1% of neighboring luminances for increasing DDLs of the third primary were even decreasing. Moreover, luminance saturation effects were observed when too many pixels were active simultaneously. This effect was strongest for white; a small white patch was close to 400 cd/m(2), but in FS the luminance of white saturated at 162 cd/m(2). Due to different saturation levels, the luminance of FS green and FS yellow could exceed the luminance of FS white for identical DDLs.

CONCLUSIONS

The OLED temporal characteristics are excellent and superior to those of LCDs. However, the OLEDs revealed severe perceptually relevant artifacts with implications for applicability to medical imaging.