Investigation of the use of external aluminium targets for portal imaging in a medical accelerator using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation

OBJECTIVE

To install a low-Z target on the wedge tray mount of a medical linear accelerator to create a new image beam and to confirm image contrast enhancement.

METHODS

Experimental low-energy photon beams were produced with the linac running in the 6 MeV electron mode and with a low-Z target installed on the wedge tray mount [denoted 6 MeV (low-Z target)]. Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation was performed to analyse the energy spectrum and image contrast of a 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam. This study modelled the 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam and the 6 MV (megavoltage) radiotherapy photon beam and verified model validity by measurement. In addition, a contrast phantom was modelled to quantitatively compare the image contrasts of the 6 MeV (low-Z target) beam and the 6 MV radiotherapy photon beam. A low-Z target was fabricated to generate low-energy photons (25-150 keV) from incident electrons, and a portal image of the Alderson RANDO phantom was acquired using a clinical linear accelerator for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

The measured and calculated percentage depth dose of the 6 MV photon and 6 MeV (Al) beams were consistent within 1.5 and 1.6%, respectively, and calculated lateral profiles of the 6 MV photon beam and the 6 MeV (Al) beam were consistent with the measured results within 1.5 and 1.9%, respectively. Although low-energy photons (25-150 keV) of the 6 MV photon beam were only 0.3%, the Be, C, and Al low-Z targets, but not the Ti target, generated 34.4 to 38.5% low-energy photons. In 5 to 20 cm water phantoms, contrast of the 6 MeV (Al) beam was approximately 1.16 times greater than that of the 6 MV beam. The contrasts of 6 MeV (Al) and 6 MV photon beams in the 20 cm water phantom were ~34% lower than those in the 5 cm water phantom. 6 MeV (Al)/CR (computed radiography) images of the human body phantom were more vivid and detailed than 6 MV/EPID (electronic portal imaging device) and 6 MeV (Al)/EPID images.

CONCLUSION

The experimental beam with a low-Z target, which was simply installed on the wedge tray mount of the radiotherapy linear accelerator, generated significantly more low-energy photons than the 6 MV radiotherapy photon beam, and provided better quality portal images. Advances in knowledge: This study shows that, unlike the existing low-Z beam studies, a low-Z target can be installed outside the head of a linear accelerator to improve portal image quality.

A Monte Carlo investigation of low-Z target image quality generated in a linear accelerator using Varian's VirtuaLinac

PURPOSE

The focus of this work was the demonstration and validation of VirtuaLinac with clinical photon beams and to investigate the implementation of low-Z targets in a TrueBeam linear accelerator (Linac) using Monte Carlo modeling.

METHODS

VirtuaLinac, a cloud based web application utilizing Geant4 Monte Carlo code, was used to model the Linac treatment head components. Particles were propagated through the lower portion of the treatment head using BEAMnrc. Dose distributions and spectral distributions were calculated using DOSXYZnrc and BEAMdp, respectively. For validation, 6 MV flattened and flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams were generated and compared to measurement for square fields, 10 and 40 cm wide and at dmax for diagonal profiles. Two low-Z targets were investigated: a 2.35 MeV carbon target and the proposed 2.50 MeV commercial imaging target for the TrueBeam platform. A 2.35 MeV carbon target was also simulated in a 2100EX Clinac using BEAMnrc. Contrast simulations were made by scoring the dose in the phosphor layer of an IDU20 aSi detector after propagating through a 4 or 20 cm thick phantom composed of water and ICRP bone.

RESULTS

Measured and modeled depth dose curves for 6 MV flattened and FFF beams agree within 1% for 98.3% of points at depths greater than 0.85 cm. Ninety three percent or greater of points analyzed for the diagonal profiles had a gamma value less than one for the criteria of 1.5 mm and 1.5%. The two low-Z target photon spectra produced in TrueBeam are harder than that from the carbon target in the Clinac. Percent dose at depth 10 cm is greater by 3.6% and 8.9%; the fraction of photons in the diagnostic energy range (25-150 keV) is lower by 10% and 28%; and contrasts are lower by factors of 1.1 and 1.4 (4 cm thick phantom) and 1.03 and 1.4 (20 cm thick phantom), for the TrueBeam 2.35 MV/carbon and commercial imaging beams, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VirtuaLinac is a promising new tool for Monte Carlo modeling of novel target designs. A significant spectral difference is observed between the low-Z target beam on the Clinac platform and the proposed imaging beam line on TrueBeam, with the former providing greater diagnostic energy content.