1
|
Chang E, Wong FCL, Chasen BA, Erwin WD, Das P, Holliday EB, Koong AC, Ludmir EB, Minsky BD, Noticewala SS, Smith GL, Taniguchi CM, Rodriguez MJ, Beddar S, Martin-Paulpeter RM, Niedzielski JS, Sawakuchi GO, Schueler E, Perles LA, Xiao L, Szklaruk J, Park PC, Dasari AN, Kaseb AO, Kee BK, Lee SS, Overman MJ, Willis JA, Wolff RA, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Koay EJ. Phase I trial of single-photon emission computed tomography-guided liver-directed radiotherapy for patients with low functional liver volume. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae037. [PMID: 38730548 PMCID: PMC11164414 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional constraints specify that 700 cc of liver should be spared a hepatotoxic dose when delivering liver-directed radiotherapy to reduce the risk of inducing liver failure. We investigated the role of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to identify and preferentially avoid functional liver during liver-directed radiation treatment planning in patients with preserved liver function but limited functional liver volume after receiving prior hepatotoxic chemotherapy or surgical resection. METHODS This phase I trial with a 3 + 3 design evaluated the safety of liver-directed radiotherapy using escalating functional liver radiation dose constraints in patients with liver metastases. Dose-limiting toxicities were assessed 6-8 weeks and 6 months after completing radiotherapy. RESULTS All 12 patients had colorectal liver metastases and received prior hepatotoxic chemotherapy; 8 patients underwent prior liver resection. Median computed tomography anatomical nontumor liver volume was 1584 cc (range = 764-2699 cc). Median SPECT functional liver volume was 1117 cc (range = 570-1928 cc). Median nontarget computed tomography and SPECT liver volumes below the volumetric dose constraint were 997 cc (range = 544-1576 cc) and 684 cc (range = 429-1244 cc), respectively. The prescription dose was 67.5-75 Gy in 15 fractions or 75-100 Gy in 25 fractions. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during follow-up. One-year in-field control was 57%. One-year overall survival was 73%. CONCLUSION Liver-directed radiotherapy can be safely delivered to high doses when incorporating functional SPECT into the radiation treatment planning process, which may enable sparing of lower volumes of liver than traditionally accepted in patients with preserved liver function. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02626312.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enoch Chang
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Franklin C L Wong
- Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth A Chasen
- Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William D Erwin
- Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C Koong
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sonal S Noticewala
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria J Rodriguez
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Joshua S Niedzielski
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel O Sawakuchi
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emil Schueler
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luis A Perles
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janio Szklaruk
- Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter C Park
- Radiology Physics, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Arvind N Dasari
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan K Kee
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sunyoung S Lee
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Overman
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason A Willis
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shurin MR, Kirichenko VA, Shurin GV, Lee D, Crane C, Kirichenko AV. Radiomodulating Properties of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle (SPION) Agent Ferumoxytol on Human Monocytes: Implications for MRI-Guided Liver Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1318. [PMID: 38610996 PMCID: PMC11011128 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) have attracted great attention not only for therapeutic applications but also as an alternative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent that helps visualize liver tumors during MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). SPION can provide functional imaging of liver parenchyma based upon its uptake by the hepatic resident macrophages or Kupffer cells with a relative enhancement of malignant tumors that lack Kupffer cells. However, the radiomodulating properties of SPION on liver macrophages are not known. Utilizing human monocytic THP-1 undifferentiated and differentiated cells, we characterized the effect of ferumoxytol (Feraheme®), a carbohydrate-coated ultrasmall SPION agent at clinically relevant concentration and therapeutically relevant doses of gamma radiation on cultured cells in vitro. We showed that ferumoxytol affected both monocytes and macrophages, increased the resistance of monocytes to radiation-induced cell death and inhibition of cell activity, and supported the anti-inflammatory phenotype of human macrophages under radiation. Its effect on human cells depended on the duration of SPION uptake and was radiation dose-dependent. The results of this pilot study support a strong mechanism-based optimization of SPION-enhanced MRI-guided liver SBRT for primary and metastatic liver tumors, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis awaiting a liver transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R. Shurin
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA;
| | - Vladimir A. Kirichenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; (V.A.K.); (D.L.)
| | - Galina V. Shurin
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA;
| | - Danny Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; (V.A.K.); (D.L.)
| | - Christopher Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Alexander V. Kirichenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; (V.A.K.); (D.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirichenko A, Uemura T, Liang Y, Hasan S, Abel S, Renz P, Shamsesfandabadi P, Carpenter J, Yin Y, Thai N. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Functional Treatment Planning in Patients With Advanced Hepatic Cirrhosis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101367. [PMID: 38405302 PMCID: PMC10885583 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose We report on the feasibility and outcomes of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) functional treatment planning in patients with Child-Pugh (CP) B/C cirrhosis. Methods and Materials Liver SPECT with 99mTc-sulfur colloid was coregistered to treatment planning computed tomography (CT) for the guided avoidance of functional hepatic parenchyma during SBRT. Functional liver volumes (FLVs) obtained from SPECT were compared with anatomic liver volumes defined on the planning CT. Radiation dose constraints were adapted exclusively to FLV. Local control, toxicity, and survival were reported with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up. Pre- and posttransplant outcomes were analyzed in a subset of patients who completed SBRT as a bridge to liver transplant. Model of End-Stage Liver Disease was used to score hepatic function before and after SBRT completion. Results With a median follow-up of 32 months, 45 patients (58 lesions) with HCC and CP-B/C cirrhosis received SBRT to a median dose of 45 Gy (3-5 fractions). FLV loss (34%, P < .001) was observed in all patients, and the functional and anatomic liver volumes matched well in a control group of noncirrhotic/non-HCC patients. Despite marked functional parenchyma retraction, the amount of FLV on SPECT exposed to the threshold irradiation was significantly less than the CT liver volumes (P < .001) because of the optimized beam placement during dosimetry planning. Twenty-three patients (51%) successfully completed orthotopic liver transplant, with a median time to transplant of 9.2 months. With 91% in-field local control, the overall 2-year survival was 65% (90% after the orthotopic liver transplant), with no incidence of radiation-induced liver disease observed within 3 to 4 months or accelerated CP class migration from B to C within the first 6 months post-SBRT. Mean Model of End-Stage Liver Disease-Na score was not significantly elevated at 3-month intervals after SBRT completion. Conclusions Functional treatment planning with 99mTc sulfur colloid SPECT/CT allows identification and avoidance of functional hepatic parenchyma in patients with CP-B/C cirrhosis, leading to low toxicity and satisfactory transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kirichenko
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tadahiro Uemura
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yun Liang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Steven Abel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul Renz
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Parisa Shamsesfandabadi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer Carpenter
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yue Yin
- Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Biostatistics, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ngoc Thai
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Uemura T, Kirichenko A, Bunker M, Vincent M, Machado L, Thai N. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A New Strategy for Loco-Regional Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma While Awaiting Liver Transplantation. World J Surg 2019; 43:886-893. [PMID: 30361748 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4829-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trans-arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation are commonly used for control of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on liver transplant (LTx) waiting list. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was introduced to our institution for HCC as a bridging or downsizing therapy to LTx. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five HCC lesions in 22 patients were treated with SBRT while waiting for LTx from January 2010 to December 2015. Nineteen of these patients received deceased donor LTx. SBRT was defined as 40-50 Gy delivered in 4-6 fractions. Pre- and post-liver transplant outcome were analyzed in addition to the dropout rate and tumor response to SBRT. RESULTS Median size of original tumors was 3.2 cm (2.0-8.9), and median size of tumor after SBRT was significantly smaller at 0.9 cm (0-3.2) in the explanted livers (p < 0.01). The dropout rate was 9%, and they were only downsized patients outside of Milan criteria. Liver disease did not progress between pre- and post-SBRT except one patient. Twenty-eight percent of treated HCCs showed complete pathologic response, and 22% had extensive partial response with some residual tumor. No HCC recurrence was experienced after LTx. CONCLUSION SBRT is indicated to be safe, effective treatment for HCC on LTx waiting list, and it leads to satisfactory post-liver transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadahiro Uemura
- Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA.
| | | | - Mark Bunker
- Pathology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Molly Vincent
- Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | - Lorenzo Machado
- Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | - Ngoc Thai
- Department of Surgery, Abdominal Transplantation and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hasan S, Renz P, Packard M, Horrigan S, Gresswell S, Kirichenko AV. Effect of Daily and Every Other Day Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Schedules on Treatment-Related Fatigue in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:e38-e45. [PMID: 30612721 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared the rate and severity of fatigue in patients who completed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the liver daily (QD) compared with every other day (QOD). METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2010 to 2017, 91 patients with Child Pugh (CP) A (n = 57) or CP-B (n = 34) cirrhosis who completed 100 SBRT sessions to 110 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions were analyzed in this study. Confounding variables with fatigue such as CP-C cirrhosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score >2, or a history of ascites or encephalopathy were excluded. Fatigue was assessed against several treatment- and patient-related variables with univariate and propensity score-matched multivariate analysis. The median follow-up time was 18 months. RESULTS Patients with HCC and Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stages 0 (n = 10), A (n = 32), and B (n = 58), and a median age of 62 years were analyzed. The median tumor diameter was 3 cm (1.1-11 cm). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was 0 (n = 44), 1 (n = 43), or 2 (n = 13). The median dose was 45 Gy in 5 fractions, and 65 treatments were QD and 45 QOD. Grades 1 and 2 fatigue developed in 49% and 14% of treatments, respectively. Among the patients who were treated daily, 78% developed Grade 1 or 2 fatigue compared with 44% who were treated QOD (odds ratio: 4.52; P = .001). Grade 2 fatigue occurred in 22% of patients compared with 7.3% for QD and QOD treatment, respectively (odds ratio: 3.83; P = .048). There was no difference in fatigue rate for time of treatment (morning or afternoon), dose, treated volume, CP score, Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stage, or performance status, which were not associated with any level of fatigue. There was no difference in local control between QD and QOD treatments. CONCLUSIONS Compared with traditional daily treatment fractions, SBRT that is delivered QOD to cirrhotic patients with HCC may reduce the risk of fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaakir Hasan
- Allegheny Health Network, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Paul Renz
- Allegheny Health Network, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew Packard
- Allegheny Health Network, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sean Horrigan
- Allegheny Health Network, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven Gresswell
- Allegheny Health Network, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Modern radiotherapy techniques have enabled high focal doses of radiation to be delivered to patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the liver. The current clinical practice of radiation oncology has benefitted from decades of research that have informed how to achieve excellent local control and survival outcomes with minimal toxicities. Still, one of the most devastating consequences of radiation to the liver remains a challenge: radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). Here, we will review the current understanding of classic and nonclassic RILD from a clinical perspective, the evaluation and management of patients who are at risk of developing RILD, methods to reduce the likelihood of RILD using modern radiation techniques, and the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-related liver toxicities.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gresswell S, Tobillo R, Hasan S, Uemura T, Machado L, Thai N, Kirichenko A. Stereotactic body radiotherapy used as a bridge to liver transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh score ≥8 cirrhosis. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2018; 5:261-267. [PMID: 30538886 PMCID: PMC6255717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To report on SBRT as a bridge to OLT for patients with HCC and Child-Pugh ≥8 cirrhosis. METHODS Retrospective review of 15 patients, treated from 2010-2017. Three patients excluded secondary to delisting from prohibitive substance. Twelve patients (17 lesions) included for final analysis. Hepatic SPECT functional treatment planning utilized. RESULTS The median age of 60 years with a median CP 9 and MELD 14. The median SBRT dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions, and median tumor size was 2.3cm (1.2-5.3cm). Median follow-up and survival was 40-months and 46-months, respectively. One patient succumbed to renal/hepatic failure before OLT. Radiographic response was 80%. pCR at explant was 46%. No grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Median time to progression of CP ≥ 2 was 9.7-months and MELD progression was not met before OLT. CONCLUSION SBRT with functional treatment planning can be used safely as a bridge to OLT in select patients with CP ≥8 cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Gresswell
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Rachel Tobillo
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Tadahiro Uemura
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Lorenzo Machado
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Ngoc Thai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Alexander Kirichenko
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hasan S, Thai N, Uemura T, Kudithipudi V, Renz P, Abel S, Kirichenko AV. Hepatocellular carcinoma with child Pugh-A Cirrhosis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 9:256-263. [PMID: 29359031 PMCID: PMC5752960 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the control, survival, and hepatic function for Child Pugh (CP)-A patients after Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS From 2009 to 2016, 40 patients with Barcelona Liver Clinic (BCLC) stages 0-B HCC and CP-A cirrhosis completed liver SBRT. The mean prescription dose was 45 Gy (40 to 50 Gy in 4-5 fractions). Local relapse, defined as recurrence within the planning target volume was assessed with intravenous multiphase contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 4-6 mo after completion of SBRT. Progression of cirrhosis was evaluated by CP and Model for End Stage Liver Disease scores every 3-4 mo. Toxicities were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03). Median follow-up was 24 mo.
RESULTS Forty-nine HCC lesions among 40 patients were analyzed in this IRB approved retrospective study. Median tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (1.5-8.9 cm). Six patients with tumors ≥ 5 cm completed planned selected transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with SBRT. Eight patients underwent orthotropic live transplant (OLT) with SBRT as a bridging treatment (median time to transplant was 12 mo, range 5 to 23 mo). The Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in this group was 62.5%. The 2-year in-field local control was 98% (1 failure). Intrahepatic control was 82% and 62% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was 92% and 60% at 1 and 2 years, with a median survival of 41 mo per Kaplan Meier analysis. At 1 and 2 years, 71% and 61% of patients retained CPA status. Of the patients with intrahepatic failures, 58% developed progressive cirrhosis, compared to 27% with controlled disease (P = 0.06). Survival specific to hepatic failure was 92%, 81%, and 69% at 12, 18, and 24 mo. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity. On univariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV) < 23 cc was associated with freedom from CP progression (P = 0.05), hepatic failure-specific survival (P = 0.02), and trended with OS (P = 0.10).
CONCLUSION SBRT is safe and effective in HCC with early cirrhosis and may extend waiting time for transplant in patients who may not otherwise be immediate candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaakir Hasan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Ngoc Thai
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Tadahiro Uemura
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Vijay Kudithipudi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Paul Renz
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Stephen Abel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| | - Alexander V Kirichenko
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Crane CH, Koay EJ. Solutions that enable ablative radiotherapy for large liver tumors: Fractionated dose painting, simultaneous integrated protection, motion management, and computed tomography image guidance. Cancer 2016; 122:1974-86. [PMID: 26950735 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Revised: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The emergence and success of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of lung cancer have led to its rapid adoption for liver cancers. SBRT can achieve excellent results for small liver tumors. However, the vast majority of physicians interpret SBRT as meaning doses of radiation (range, 4-20 Gray [Gy]) that may not be ablative but are delivered within about 1 week (ie, in 3-6 fractions). Adherence to this approach has limited the effectiveness of SBRT for large liver tumors (>7 cm) because of the need to reduce doses to meet organ constraints. The prognosis for patients who present with large liver tumors is poor, with a median survival ≤12 months, and most of these patients die from tumor-related liver failure. Herein, the authors present a comprehensive solution to achieve ablative SBRT doses for patients with large liver tumors by using a combination of classic, modern, and novel concepts of radiotherapy: fractionation, dose painting, motion management, image guidance, and simultaneous integrated protection. The authors discuss these concepts in the context of large, inoperable liver tumors and review how this approach can substantially prolong survival for patients, most of whom otherwise have a very poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Cancer 2016;122:1974-86. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kirichenko A, Gayou O, Parda D, Kudithipudi V, Tom K, Khan A, Abrams P, Szramowski M, Oliva J, Monga D, Raj M, Thai N. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without surgery for primary and metastatic liver tumors. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:88-97. [PMID: 26776856 PMCID: PMC4750234 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Revised: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We report single center experience on the outcome and toxicity of SBRT alone or in combination with surgery for inoperable primary and metastatic liver tumors between 2007 and 2014. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with 1-4 hepatic lesions and tumor diameter ≤9 cm received SBRT at 46.8Gy ± 3.7 in 4-6 fractions. The primary end point was local control with at least 6 months of radiographic followup, and secondary end points were toxicity and survival. RESULTS Eighty-seven assessable patients (114 lesions) completed liver SBRT for hepatoma (39) or isolated metastases (48) with a median followup of 20.3 months (range 1.9-64.1). Fourteen patients underwent liver transplant with SBRT as a bridging treatment or for tumor downsizing. Eight patients completed hepatic resections in combination with planned SBRT for unresectable tumors. Two-year local control was 96% for hepatoma and 93.8% for metastases; it was 100% for lesions ≤4 cm. Two-year overall survival was 82.3% (hepatoma) and 64.3% (metastases). No incidence of grade >2 treatment toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION In this retrospective analysis we demonstrate that liver SBRT alone or in combination with surgery is safe and effective for the treatment of isolated inoperable hepatic malignancies and provides excellent local control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kirichenko
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Correspondence Alexander V. Kirichenko, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772, USA. Tel: +1 412 359 3408. Fax: +1 412 359 3171.
| | - Olivier Gayou
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Parda
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vijay Kudithipudi
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kusum Tom
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Akhtar Khan
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Peter Abrams
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Molly Szramowski
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jose Oliva
- Division of Gastroenterology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dulabh Monga
- Division of Medical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Moses Raj
- Division of Medical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ngoc Thai
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Velo P, Zakaria A. Influence of Background Activity on Volume Estimation Using Iterative Thresholding Method in Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography with Technetium-99m: A Phantom Study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2015; 46:S31-S36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2015] [Revised: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
12
|
Rivest-Hénault D, Dowson N, Greer PB, Fripp J, Dowling JA. Robust inverse-consistent affine CT-MR registration in MRI-assisted and MRI-alone prostate radiation therapy. Med Image Anal 2015; 23:56-69. [PMID: 25966468 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT-MR registration is a critical component of many radiation oncology protocols. In prostate external beam radiation therapy, it allows the propagation of MR-derived contours to reference CT images at the planning stage, and it enables dose mapping during dosimetry studies. The use of carefully registered CT-MR atlases allows the estimation of patient specific electron density maps from MRI scans, enabling MRI-alone radiation therapy planning and treatment adaptation. In all cases, the precision and accuracy achieved by registration influences the quality of the entire process. PROBLEM Most current registration algorithms do not robustly generalize and lack inverse-consistency, increasing the risk of human error and acting as a source of bias in studies where information is propagated in a particular direction, e.g. CT to MR or vice versa. In MRI-based treatment planning where both CT and MR scans serve as spatial references, inverse-consistency is critical, if under-acknowledged. PURPOSE A robust, inverse-consistent, rigid/affine registration algorithm that is well suited to CT-MR alignment in prostate radiation therapy is presented. METHOD The presented method is based on a robust block-matching optimization process that utilises a half-way space definition to maintain inverse-consistency. Inverse-consistency substantially reduces the influence of the order of input images, simplifying analysis, and increasing robustness. An open source implementation is available online at http://aehrc.github.io/Mirorr/. RESULTS Experimental results on a challenging 35 CT-MR pelvis dataset demonstrate that the proposed method is more accurate than other popular registration packages and is at least as accurate as the state of the art, while being more robust and having an order of magnitude higher inverse-consistency than competing approaches. CONCLUSION The presented results demonstrate that the proposed registration algorithm is readily applicable to prostate radiation therapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rivest-Hénault
- CSIRO, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia.
| | - Nicholas Dowson
- CSIRO, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia.
| | - Peter B Greer
- Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales 2298, Australia; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales 2308, Australia
| | - Jurgen Fripp
- CSIRO, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia
| | - Jason A Dowling
- CSIRO, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales 2308, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|