169Yb-based high dose rate intensity modulated brachytherapy for focal treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study compares conventional 192Ir-based high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 169Yb-based HDR intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for focal prostate cancer treatment. Additionally, the study explores the potential to generate less invasive treatment plans with IMBT by reducing the number of catheters needed to achieve acceptable outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective dosimetric study of ten prostate cancer patients initially treated with conventional 192Ir-based HDR-BT and 5-14 catheters was employed. RapidBrachyMCTPS, a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system was used to calculate and optimize dose distributions. For 169Yb-based HDR IMBT, a custom 169Yb source combined with 0.8 mm thick platinum shields placed inside 6F catheters was used. Furthermore, dose distributions were investigated when iteratively removing catheters for less invasive treatments.

RESULTS

With IMBT, the urethra D10 and D0.1cc decreased on average by 15.89 and 15.65 percentage points (pp) and the rectum V75 and D2cc by 1.53 and 11.54 pp, respectively, compared to the conventional clinical plans. Similar trends were observed when the number of catheters decreased. On average, there was an observed increase in PTV V150 from 2.84 pp with IMBT when utilizing all catheters to 8.83 pp when four catheters were removed. PTV V200 increased from 0.42 to 2.96 pp on average. Hotspots in the body were however lower with IMBT compared to conventional clinical plans.

CONCLUSIONS

169Yb-based HDR IMBT for focal treatment of prostate cancer has the potential to successfully deliver clinically acceptable, less invasive treatment with reduced dose to organs at risk.

Evaluating dose distributions of high dose rate 60Co brachytherapy in an asymmetric tumor: A comparison of different designs of vaginal cylindrical applicators

The aim of this study is to evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses obtained from different designs of intracavitary cylinder applicators during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of an asymmetric vaginal tumor. Dose distributions around five cylinder applicators were obtained using the Geant4 toolkit. Three of these applicators are commercially available: single-channel, multi-channel, and shielded. Additionally, two proposed sub-configurations were evaluated: (I) a combination of the multichannel applicator with a central shield and (II) a dynamically modulated cylinder (DMC). The dose distributions of the proposed applicators were compared to those of the single-channel cylinder applicator. The results showed that using a cylindrical applicator with a higher degree of freedom in plan optimization can improve OAR, sparing up to 60% for the rectum and 20% for the bladder. In conclusion, this work suggests using a new design of a cylindrical applicator to enhance the therapeutic ratio of brachytherapy for asymmetric and irregularly shaped vaginal tumors.

The population percentile allowance method for determining systematic spatial error tolerances for temporary intensity modulated brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Multiple approaches are under development for delivering temporary intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) using partially shielded applicators wherein the delivered dose distributions are sensitive to spatial uncertainties in both the applicator position and shield orientation, rather than only applicator position as with conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Sensitivity analyses to spatial uncertainties have been reported as components of publications on these emerging technologies, however, a generalized framework for the rigorous determination of the spatial uncertainty tolerances of dose-volume parameters is needed.

PURPOSE

To derive and present the population percentile allowance (PPA) method, a generalized mathematical and statistical framework to evaluate the tolerance of temporary IMBT approaches to spatial uncertainties in applicator position and shield orientation.

METHODS

A mathematical formalism describing geometric applicator position and shield orientation shifts was derived that supports straight and curved applicators and applies to serial and helical rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT) and direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT). The PPA method entails defining the percentage of a patient population receiving a given therapy that is, allowed to receive dose-volume errors in the target volume and specified organs at risk of a defined percentage or less, then determining what combinations of applicator position and shield orientation systematic errors would be expected to produce that outcome in the population. The PPA method was applied to the use case of multi-shield helical 169 Yb-based RSBT for cervical cancer, with 45° and 180° shield emission angles. A total of 37 cervical cancer patients were considered in the population, with average (± 1 standard deviation) HR-CTV volumes of 79 cm3  ± 37 cm3 and optimized baseline treatment plans (no spatial uncertainties applied) created for each patient to meet dose-volume requirements of 85 GyEQD2 (equivalent uniform dose in 2 Gy fraction), with D2cc tolerance doses of 90 GyEQD2 , 75 GyEQD2 , and 75 GyEQD2 for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon, respectively.

RESULTS

For the PPA requirement that 90% of cervical cancer patients receiving multi-shield helical RSBT could have a maximum dose-volume uncertainty of 10% for high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 (minimum dose to hottest 90%) and bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon D2cc (minimum dose to hottest 2 cm3 ), the tolerance systematic applicator position and shield orientation uncertainties were approximately ± 1.0 mm and ± 4.25°, respectively. For ± 1.5 mm and ± 5° systematic applicator position and shield orientation tolerances, 90% of the patients considered would have a maximum dose-volume uncertainty of 12.8% or less.

CONCLUSION

The PPA method was formalized to determine the temporary IMBT spatial uncertainty tolerances that would be expected to result in an allowed percentage of a population of patients receiving relative dose-volume errors above a defined percentage. Multi-shield, helical 169 Yb-based RSBT for cervical cancer was evaluated and tolerances determined, which, if applied on each treatment fraction, would represent an extreme situation. The PPA method is applicable to a variety of temporary IMBT approaches and can be used to rigorously determine the design parameters for the delivery systems such as mechanical driver motor accuracy, shield angle backlash, applicator rotation, and applicator fixation stability.

AAPM WGDCAB Report 372: A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report on commissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy

The introduction of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) in brachytherapy provides an opportunity for a more accurate dose calculation and opens the possibility for novel, innovative treatment modalities. The joint AAPM, ESTRO, and ABG Task Group 186 (TG-186) report provided guidance to early adopters. However, the commissioning aspect of these algorithms was described only in general terms with no quantitative goals. This report, from the Working Group on Model-Based Dose Calculation Algorithms in Brachytherapy, introduced a field-tested approach to MBDCA commissioning. It is based on a set of well-characterized test cases for which reference Monte Carlo (MC) and vendor-specific MBDCA dose distributions are available in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiotherapy (DICOM-RT) format to the clinical users. The key elements of the TG-186 commissioning workflow are now described in detail, and quantitative goals are provided. This approach leverages the well-known Brachytherapy Source Registry jointly managed by the AAPM and the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston Quality Assurance Center (with associated links at ESTRO) to provide open access to test cases as well as step-by-step user guides. While the current report is limited to the two most widely commercially available MBDCAs and only for 192 Ir-based afterloading brachytherapy at this time, this report establishes a general framework that can easily be extended to other brachytherapy MBDCAs and brachytherapy sources. The AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS recommend that clinical medical physicists implement the workflow presented in this report to validate both the basic and the advanced dose calculation features of their commercial MBDCAs. Recommendations are also given to vendors to integrate advanced analysis tools into their brachytherapy treatment planning system to facilitate extensive dose comparisons. The use of the test cases for research and educational purposes is further encouraged.

Applying the column generation method to the intensity modulated high dose rate brachytherapy inverse planning problem

Objective.Intensity modulated high dose rate brachytherapy (IMBT) is a rapidly developing application of brachytherapy where anisotropic dose distributions can be produced at each source dwell position. This technique is made possible by placing rotating metallic shields inside brachytherapy needles or catheters. By dynamically directing the radiation towards the tumours and away from the healthy tissues, a more conformal dose distribution can be obtained. The resulting treatment planning involves optimizing dwell position and shield angle (DPSA). The aim of this study was to investigate the column generation method for IMBT treatment plan optimization.Approach.A column generation optimization algorithm was developed to optimize the dwell times and shield angles. A retrospective study was performed on 10 prostate cases using RapidBrachyMCTPS. At every iteration, the plan was optimized with the chosen DPSA which would best improve the cost function that was added to the plan. The optimization process was stopped when the remaining DPSAs would not add value to the plan to limit the plan complexity.Main results.The average number of DPSAs and voxels were 2270 and 7997, respectively. The column generation approach yielded near-optimal treatment plans by using only 11% of available DPSAs on average in ten prostate cases. The coverage and organs at risk constraints passed in all ten cases.Significance.The column generation method produced high-quality deliverable prostate IMBT plans. The treatment plan quality reached a plateau, where adding more DPSAs had a minimal effect on dose volume histogram parameters. The iterative nature of the column generation method allows early termination of the treatment plan creation process as soon as the dosimetric indices from dose volume histogram satisfy the clinical requirements or if their values stabilize.

Dosimetric impact of a robust optimization approach to mitigate effects from rotational uncertainty in prostate intensity-modulated brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is an emerging technology for cancer treatment, in which radiation sources are shielded to shape the dose distribution. The rotatable shields provide an additional degree of freedom, but also introduce an additional, directional, type of uncertainty, compared to conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT).

PURPOSE

We propose and evaluate a robust optimization approach to mitigate the effects of rotational uncertainty in the shields with respect to planning criteria.

METHODS

A previously suggested prototype for platinum-shielded prostate ¹⁶⁹ Yb-based dynamic IMBT is considered. We study a retrospective patient data set (anatomical contours and catheter placement) from two clinics, consisting of six patients that had previously undergone conventional ¹⁹² Ir HDR BT treatment. The Monte Carlo-based treatment planning software RapidBrachyMCTPS is used for dose calculations. In our computational experiments, we investigate systematic rotational shield errors of ±10° and ±20°, and the same systematic error is applied to all dwell positions in each scenario. This gives us three scenarios, one nominal and two with errors. The robust optimization approach finds a compromise between the average and worst-case scenario outcomes.

RESULTS

We compare dose plans obtained from standard models and their robust counterparts. With dwell times obtained from a linear penalty model (LPM), for 10° errors, the dose to urethra ( D 0.1 c c $D_{0.1cc}$ ) and rectum ( D 0.1 c c $D_{0.1cc}$ and D 1 c c $D_{1cc}$ ) increase with up to 5% and 7%, respectively, in the worst-case scenario, while with the robust counterpart, the corresponding increases were 3% and 3%. For all patients and all evaluated criteria, the worst-case scenario outcome with the robust approach had lower deviation compared to the standard model, without compromising target coverage. We also evaluated shield errors up to 20° and while the deviations increased to a large extent with the standard models, the robust models were capable of handling even such large errors.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that robust optimization can be used to mitigate the effects from rotational uncertainty and to ensure the treatment plan quality of IMBT.

Learning from the past: a century of accuracy, aspirations, and aspersions in brachytherapy

The oldest form of radiation therapy, brachytherapy, has been investigated and reported in the scientific and medical literature for well over a century. Known by many names over the years, radium-based, empirical practices evolved over decades to contemporary practice. This includes treatment at various dose rates using multiple radionuclides or even electrically generated photon sources. Predictions or prognostications of what may happen in the future enjoy a history that spans centuries, e.g. those by Nostradamus in the 1500s. In this review article, publications from several eras of past practice between the early 1900s and the late 2010s where the authors address the "future of brachytherapy" are presented, and for many of these publications, one can use the benefit of the intervening years to comment on the accuracy or the inaccuracies inherent in those publications. Finally, recently published papers are reviewed to examine current expectations for the future practice of brachytherapy.

A Novel Workflow with a Customizable 3D Printed Vaginal Template and a Direction Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) Tandem Applicator for Adaptive Interstitial Brachytherapy of the Cervix

A novel clinical workflow utilizing a direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator in combination with a patient-specific, 3D printed vaginal needle-track template for an advanced image-guided adaptive interstitial brachytherapy of the cervix. The proposed workflow has three main steps: (1) pre-treatment MRI, (2) an initial optimization of the needle positions based on the DMBT tandem positioning and patient anatomy, and a subsequent inverse optimization using the combined DMBT tandem and needles, and (3) rapid 3D printing. We retrospectively re-planned five patient cases for two scenarios; one plan with the DMBT tandem (T) and ovoids (O) with the original needle (ND) positions (DMBT + O + ND) and another with the DMBT T&O and spatially reoptimized needles (OptN) positions (DMBT + O + OptN). All retrospectively reoptimized plans have been compared to the original plan (OP) as well. The accuracy of 3D printing was verified through the image registration between the planning CT and the CT of the 3D-printed template. The average difference in D_2cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid between the OPs and DMBT + O + OptNs were -8.03 ± 4.04%, -18.67 ± 5.07%, and -26.53 ± 4.85%, respectively. In addition, these average differences between the DMBT + O + ND and DMBT + O + OptNs were -2.55 ± 1.87%, -10.70 ± 3.45%, and -22.03 ± 6.01%, respectively. The benefits could be significant for the patients in terms of target coverage and normal tissue sparing and increase the optimality over free-hand needle positioning.

Intensity-modulated brachytherapy for vaginal cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the dose modulation potential of static and dynamic steel-shielded applicators using the Geant4 Application for Emission Tomography (GATE) Monte Carlo code for the treatment of vaginal cancer. The GATE TOOLKIT (version 9.0) was used to simulate vaginal cancer intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) in a pelvic water-equivalent phantom. IMBT performance of a multichannel static and single-channel dynamic steel-shielded applicator was compared to that of a conventional multichannel Plexiglas applicator. DoseActors were defined to calculate the absorbed dose and attached to the voxelized target and organs at risk (OARs). ⁶⁰Co and ¹⁹²Ir high-dose-rate seeds were used as irradiation sources. Dynamic IMBT decreased the D_2cc of the rectum and bladder by 28.67 and 28.11% using the ⁶⁰Co source and by 40.00 and 36.34% using the ¹⁹²Ir source, respectively. Static IMBT decreased the D_2cc for the rectum and bladder by 11.69 and 9.29% using the ⁶⁰Co source and by 22.21 and 17.71% using the ¹⁹²Ir source, respectively. In contrast, absorbed dose parameters (D₅, D₉₀, and D₁₀₀) for the target in the three techniques showed a mean relative variation of 0.96% (0.00-7.49%) for both sources. Static and dynamic IMBT using steel-shielded applicators provided relatively better OAR protection while maintaining similar target coverage in the treatment of vaginal cancer.

Integration of rotatable tandem applicator to conventional ovoid applicator toward complete framework of intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for cervical cancer

A new tandem applicator with tungsten shield for Ir-192 radiation source used in intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) enabled intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) in cervical cancer treatment through fluence-modulation by rotating shield. Our previous work employed group-wise and element-wise sparsity constraints for plan optimization of tandem applicator to minimizes the number of activated angles and source dwell points for delivery efficiency. It, however, did not incorporate the ovoid applicators into the optimizing process, which is generally used to prevent cancer recurrence. To integrate ovoid applicators to the new tandem applicator, this work proposed a comprehensive framework that modifies 1) dose deposition matrix for inverse planning, and 2) plan optimizing algorithm. The dose deposition matrix was newly formulated by the Monte-Carlo simulated dose distribution for 10 positions of ovoid applicators, followed by combining those with tandem-associated dose deposition matrix. The plan optimizing algorithm decomposed entire elements into tandem and ovoid applicators, which were governed by different constraints adaptive to specified plan objectives. The integrated framework was compared against conventional ICBT, and IMBT with tandem only for three patients with asymmetric dose distributions. Integrated IMBT framework resulted in the most optimal plans. Including fluence-modulation by rotating-shield outperformed conventional ICBT in dose sparing to critical organs. Adopting ovoid applicators to the optimization yielded more conformal dose distribution around inferior, laterally expanded region of target volume. The resulting plans reduced D_5cc and D_2cc by 30.9% and 27.8% for critical organs over conventional ICBT, and by 20.6% and 21.5% for target volume over IMBT with tandem only.

Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy

Monte Carlo (MC) simulations play an important role in radiotherapy, especially as a method to evaluate physical properties that are either impossible or difficult to measure. For example, MC simulations (MCSs) are used to aid in the design of radiotherapy devices or to understand their properties. The aim of this article is to review the MC method for device simulations in radiation therapy. After a brief history of the MC method and popular codes in medical physics, we review applications of the MC method to model treatment heads for neutral and charged particle radiation therapy as well as specific in-room devices for imaging and therapy purposes. We conclude by discussing the impact that MCSs had in this field and the role of MC in future device design.

Optimization in treatment planning of high dose-rate brachytherapy - Review and analysis of mathematical models

Treatment planning in high dose-rate brachytherapy has traditionally been conducted with manual forward planning, but inverse planning is today increasingly used in clinical practice. There is a large variety of proposed optimization models and algorithms to model and solve the treatment planning problem. Two major parts of inverse treatment planning for which mathematical optimization can be used are the decisions about catheter placement and dwell time distributions. Both these problems as well as integrated approaches are included in this review. The proposed models include linear penalty models, dose-volume models, mean-tail dose models, quadratic penalty models, radiobiological models, and multiobjective models. The aim of this survey is twofold: (i) to give a broad overview over mathematical optimization models used for treatment planning of brachytherapy and (ii) to provide mathematical analyses and comparisons between models. New technologies for brachytherapy treatments and methods for treatment planning are also discussed. Of particular interest for future research is a thorough comparison between optimization models and algorithms on the same dataset, and clinical validation of proposed optimization approaches with respect to patient outcome.

A novel minimally invasive dynamic-shield, intensity-modulated brachytherapy system for the treatment of cervical cancer

PURPOSE

To present a novel, MRI-compatible dynamicshield intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) applicator and delivery system using ¹⁹² Ir, ⁷⁵ Se, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb radioisotopes for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Needle-free IMBT is a promising technique for improving target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The IMBT delivery system dynamically controls the rotation of a novel tungsten shield placed inside an MRI-compatible, 6-mm wide intrauterine tandem. Using 36 cervical cancer cases, conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (IC-BT) and intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT) (10Ci ¹⁹² Ir) plans were compared to IMBT (10Ci ¹⁹² Ir; 11.5Ci ⁷⁵ Se; 44Ci ¹⁶⁹ Yb). All plans were generated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, RapidBrachyMC. Treatment plans were optimized then normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D₉₀ and the D_2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in the research brachytherapy planning system, RapidBrachyMCTPS. Plans were renormalized until either of the three OAR reached dose limits to calculate the maximum achievable HR-CTV D₉₀ and D₉₈ .

RESULTS

Compared to IC-BT, IMBT with either of the three radionuclides significantly improves the HR-CTV D₉₀ and D₉₈ by up to 5.2% ± 0.3% (P < 0.001) and 6.7% ± 0.5% (P < 0.001), respectively, with the largest dosimetric enhancement when using ¹⁶⁹ Yb followed by ⁷⁵ Se and then ¹⁹² Ir. Similarly, D_2cc for all OAR improved with IMBT by up to 7.7% ± 0.6% (P < 0.001). For IC/IS-BT cases, needle-free IMBT achieved clinically acceptable plans with ¹⁶⁹ Yb-based IMBT further improving HR-CTV D₉₈ by 1.5% ± 0.2% (P = 0.034) and decreasing sigmoid D_2cc by 1.9% ± 0.4% (P = 0.048). Delivery times for IMBT are increased by a factor of 1.7, 3.3, and 2.3 for ¹⁹² Ir, ⁷⁵ Se, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb, respectively, relative to conventional ¹⁹² Ir BT.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic shield IMBT provides a promising alternative to conventional IC- and IC/IS-BT techniques with significant dosimetric enhancements and even greater improvements with intermediate energy radionuclides. The ability to deliver a highly conformal, OAR-sparing dose without IS needles provides a simplified method for improving the therapeutic ratio less invasively and in a less resource intensive manner.

Intensity modulated Ir-192 brachytherapy using high-Z 3D printed applicators

Gynecologic cancers are often asymmetric, yet current Ir-192 brachytherapy techniques provide only limited radial modulation of the dose. The shielded solutions investigated here solve this by providing the ability to modulate between highly asymmetric and radially symmetric dose distributions at a given location. To find applicator designs that can modulate between full dose and less than 50% dose, at the dimensions of the urethra, a 2D calculation algorithm was developed to narrow down the search space. Two shielding design types were then further investigated using Monte Carlo and Boltzmann-solver dose calculation algorithms. 3D printing techniques using ISO 10993 certified biocompatible plastics and 3D printable tungsten-loaded plastics were tested. It was also found that shadowing effects set by the shape of the shielding cannot be easily modulated out, hence careful design is required. The shielded applicator designs investigated here, allow for reduction of the dose by over 50% at 5 mm from the applicator surface in desired regions, while also allowing radially symmetric dose with isodose line deviations less than 0.5 mm from circular. The shielding designs were also chosen with treatment delivery time in mind. Treatment times for these shielded designs were found to be less than 1.4 times longer than a 6-channel unshielded cylinder for the equivalent fully symmetric dose distribution. The 2D calculation methods developed here provide a simple way to rapidly evaluate shielding designs, while the 3D printing techniques also allow for devices with novel shapes to be rapidly prototyped. Both TOPAS Monte Carlo and Acuros BV calculations show that significant dose shaping and organ at risk sparing can be achieved without significantly compromising the plan in regions that require the full dose.

Plan optimization with L0-norm and group sparsity constraints for a new rotational, intensity-modulated brachytherapy for cervical cancer

The aim of this work is to build a framework that comprehends inverse planning procedure and plan optimization algorithm tailored to a novel directional beam intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) of cervical cancer using a rotatable, single-channel radiation shield. Inverse planning is required for finding optimal beam emitting direction, source dwell position and dwell time, which begin with creating a kernel matrix for each structure based on Monte-Carlo simulated dose distribution in the rotatable shield. For efficient beam delivery and less transit dose, the number of source dwell positions and angles needs to be minimized. It can be solved by L0-norm regularization for fewest possible dwell points, and by group sparsity constraint in L2,p-norm (0≤p<1) besides L0-norm for fewest active applicator rotating angles. The dose distributions from our proposed algorithms were compared to those of conventional tandem-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICR) plans for six cervical cancer patients. The algorithmic performance was evaluated in delivery efficiency and plan quality relative to the unconstrained algorithm. The proposed framework yielded substantially enhanced plan quality over the conventional ICR plans. The L0-norm and (group sparsity+L0-norm) constrained algorithms reduced the number of source dwell points by 60 and 70% and saved 5 and 8 rotational angles on average (7 and 11 angles for highly modulated cases), relative to the unconstrained algorithm, respectively. Though both algorithms reduced the optimal source dwell positions and angles, the group sparsity constrained optimization with L0-norm was more effective than the L0-norm constraint only, mainly because of considering physical constraints of the new IMBT applicator. With much fewer dwell points compared to the unconstrained, the proposed algorithms led to statistically similar plan quality in dose volume histograms and iso-dose lines. It also demonstrated that the plan optimized by rotating the applicator resulted in much better plan quality than that of conventional applicator-based plans.

Dynamic Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) Balloon Applicator for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

PURPOSE

To propose a novel high-dose-rate brachytherapy applicator for balloon-based dynamic modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and to demonstrate its dosimetric advantage compared to the widely used Contura applicator.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The DMBT balloon device consists of a fixed central channel enabling real-time, in vivo dosimetry and an outer motion-dynamic, adjustable-radius channel capable of moving to any angular position within the balloon. This design allows placement of dwell positions anywhere within the balloon volume, guaranteeing optimal placement and generation of the applicator and treatment plan, respectively. Thirteen clinical treatment plans for patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving APBI after lumpectomy using Contura were retrospectively obtained under institutional review board approval. New treatment plans were created by replacing the Contura with the DMBT device. DMBT plans were limited to 4 angular positions and an outer channel radius of 1.5 cm. The new plans were optimized to limit dose to ribs and skin while maintaining target coverage similar to that of the clinical plan.

RESULTS

Similar target coverage was obtained for the DMBT plans compared with clinical Contura plans. Across all patients the mean (standard deviation) reductions in D0.1 cc to the ribs and skin were 6.70% (6.28%) and 5.13% (6.54%), respectively. A threshold separation distance between the balloon surface and the organ at risk (OAR), below which dosimetric changes of greater than 5% were obtained, was observed to be 12 mm for ribs and skin. When both OARs were far from the balloon, DMBT plans were of similar quality to Contura plans, as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the superior ability of the APBI DMBT applicator to spare OARs while achieving target coverage comparable to current treatment plans, especially when in close proximity. The DMBT balloon may enable new modes of dynamic high-dose-rate treatment delivery and allow for ultrahypofractionated dose regimens to be safely used.

Efficient 169 Yb high-dose-rate brachytherapy source production using reactivation

PURPOSE

To present and quantify the effectiveness of a method for the efficient production of ¹⁶⁹ Yb high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources with 27 Ci activity upon clinical delivery, which have about the same dose rate in water at 1 cm from the source center as 10 Ci ¹⁹² Ir sources.

MATERIALS

A theoretical framework for ¹⁶⁹ Yb source activation and reactivation using thermal neutrons in a research reactor and ¹⁶⁸ Yb-Yb₂ O₃ precursor is derived and benchmarked against published data. The model is dependent primarily on precursor ¹⁶⁸ Yb enrichment percentage, active source volume of the active element, and average thermal neutron flux within the active source.

RESULTS

Efficiency gains in ¹⁶⁹ Yb source production are achievable through reactivation, and the gains increase with active source volume. For an average thermal neutron flux within the active source of 1 × 10¹⁴  n cm^-2  s^-1 , increasing the active source volume from 1 to 3 mm³ decreased reactor-days needed to generate one clinic-year of ¹⁶⁹ Yb from 256 days yr^-1 to 59 days yr^-1 , and 82%-enriched precursor dropped from 80 mg yr^-1 to 21 mg yr^-1 . A resource reduction of 74%-77% is predicted for an active source volume increase from 1 to 3 mm³ .

CONCLUSIONS

Dramatic cost savings are achievable in ¹⁶⁹ Yb source production costs through reactivation if active sources larger than 1 mm³ are used.

Modeling of the direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator using the Oncentra Brachy advanced collapsed cone engine

PURPOSE

The direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) magnetic resonance-compatible tandem applicator, made from a tungsten alloy rod, has six symmetric peripheral grooves, designed specifically to enhance intensity modulation capacity through achieving directional radiation dose profiles. In this work, the directional dose distributions of the DMBT tandem were modeled and calculated with the Oncentra Brachy advanced collapsed cone engine (ACE), which was validated against Monte Carlo (MC) calculations.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

The prototype 3D tandem applicator model was created for use in the Oncentra Brachy treatment planning system. The ¹⁹²Ir source was placed inside a DMBT tandem in one and six channels as a single dwell position (DP) per channel with the same index length, as well as 1 DP in a standard tandem. Dose distributions were calculated in a water medium by both ACE and MC and compared.

RESULTS

For 1DP/6DP inside the DMBT and 1DP inside the standard tandem, respectively, the mean dose differences were 3.5/3.3% and <2.8% with the range of 0.1%-6.5%/0.2%-5% and 0.1%-5%, between ACE and MC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The DMBT tandem is successfully modeled in a commercial treatment planning system. The ACE algorithm is capable of accurately calculating highly directional dose distributions generated by a dense tungsten alloy contained within the DMBT tandem, with agreements achieved within <3.5%.

Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator for cervical cancer treatment: Choosing the optimal shielding material

PURPOSE

To investigate the dose modulation capability of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator design with various high-density shielding materials for brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer. The shield materials that have been evaluated are tantalum (Ta), pure tungsten (W), gold (Au), rhenium (Re), osmium (Os), platinum (Pt), iridium (Ir), and W' tungsten alloy (95%W, 3.5%Ni, 1.5%Cu).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recently proposed six-channel DMBT tandem is composed of nonmagnetic tungsten alloy (W') rod with diameter of 5.4 mm and coated with 0.3-mm thick bio-safe plastic sheath. The tandem shielding material can, however, be individually replaced with various other shields to create directional radiation. Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code was used to calculate the three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions in a water phantom for an HDR 192 Ir (mHDR-v2) source inside each DMBT tandem with various shields and a plastic conventional tandem (Con.T). Then, the 3D dose distributions were imported into an in-house-coded inverse planning optimization algorithm to obtain optimal plans for 12 clinical cases chosen at random from the international RetroEMBRACE dataset involving conventional tandem and ring (Con.T&R) applicators. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem and ring (DMBT&R) with the tungsten alloy [DMBT(W')&R] were compared with the corresponding Con.T&R plans, to generate benchmark results. These benchmark results were then considered as reference plans for other shields performances. Plans were normalized to receive the same high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR ) D90 . The D100 , D10 , and V100 for CTVHR , and D2cm3 for organs at risk (OARs) of bladder, sigmoid, and rectum were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Transmission factor (TF), that is, the dose in the backside of the DMBT shield over that in the front opening, at a 5 cm distance, were 36.6%, 34.8%, 31.9%, 28.9%, 27.9%, 26.2%, 26.2%, and 25.5%, for Ta, W', W, Re, Au, Os, Pt, and Ir shields, respectively. On average, the CTVHR values for D100 , V100 , D10 were not significantly different across all DMBT&R shields and the Con.T&R plans (P > 0.219). For the D2cm3 , the benchmark results showed significant reductions (P < 0.03), that is, on average, -8.3% for bladder, -10.7% for rectum, and -10.1% for sigmoid, compared to the Con.T&R plans. However, the various shields showed little improvement from the tungsten alloy (W'), where on average, rectum (bladder) [sigmoid] D2cm3 were reduced by -1.32% (-0.85%) [-1.01%], -1.25% (-0.78%) [-0.91%], -1.22% (-0.75%) [-0.86%], -0.94% (-0.60%) [-0.70%], -0.84% (-0.51%) [-0.59%], and -0.38% (-0.24%) [-0.23%] for Ir, Pt, Os, Au, Re, and W shields, relative to the benchmark W' DMBT plans, respectively. These corresponding values for Ta increased by +0.28% (+0.08%) [+0.25%], respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Ir, Pt, Os, Au, Re, and W shielding materials, respectively, in descending order, lead to better OAR sparing than the DMBT(W')&R plans. However, the amount of improvement is limited and clinically insignificant. This finding suggests that the initial W' shield remains a suitable choice given the proven MR compatibility, for use in MR-guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Quantitative CT assessment of a novel direction-modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the CT metal-induced artifacts from a novel direction-modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator prototype, recently designed for cervical cancer treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A water-based pelvic phantom was constructed for CT scanning. The DMBT applicator was imaged using our institutional protocol, one with higher kVp and mAs settings, and repetition of these protocols using 3-mm slices. A conventional stainless steel applicator was also scanned. In addition to the standard reconstructed images, applicator images were reconstructed using a commercial metal artifact-reduction (MAR) algorithm and an in-house-developed research algorithm. Subsequently, image quality and artifact severity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Artifact severity, measured in terms of SDs in CT numbers, decreased asymptotically to background water levels with the distance away from the applicator. Artifact-reduction algorithms lead to significant and visible improvements in image quality, with >50% and >20% decrease in artifact severity achieved at a 10-mm distance for the DMBT and stainless steel applicators, respectively. Differences in artifact severity were minimal between the four imaging protocols. DMBT dimensions were the same on images with and without the commercial MAR algorithm, within <1 mm of the theoretical value. Both the commercial and in-house algorithms restored the CT numbers outside the applicator, albeit a better performance was achieved by the in-house algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

The artifacts produced by both applicators were minimized with the use of MAR algorithms. Adoption of the DMBT and stainless steel applicators for CT-guided brachytherapy is anticipated as MAR algorithms are widely available on CT scanners.

Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) for treatment of cervical cancer: A planning study with 192 Ir, 60 Co, and 169 Yb HDR sources

PURPOSE

To evaluate plan quality of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator using ¹⁹² Ir, ⁶⁰ Co, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb HDR brachytherapy sources, for various cervical cancer high-risk clinical target volumes (CTV_HR ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The novel DMBT tandem applicator has six peripheral grooves of 1.3-mm diameter along a 5.4-mm thick nonmagnetic tungsten alloy rod. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to benchmark the dosimetric parameters of the ¹⁹² Ir, ⁶⁰ Co, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb HDR sources in a water phantom against the literature data. 45 clinical cases that were treated using conventional tandem-and-ring applicators with ¹⁹² Ir source (¹⁹² Ir-T&R) were selected consecutively from intErnational MRI-guided BRAchytherapy in CErvical cancer (EMBRACE) trial. Then, for each clinical case, 3D dose distribution of each source inside the DMBT and conventional applicators were calculated and imported onto an in-house developed inverse planning optimization code to generate optimal plans. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem-and-ring (DMBT T&R) from all three sources were compared to the respective ¹⁹² Ir-T&R plans. For consistency, all plans were normalized to the same CTV_HR D90 achieved in clinical plans. The D_2 cm3 for organs at risk (OAR) such as bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, and D90, D98, D10, V100, and V200 for CTV_HR were calculated.

RESULTS

In general, plan quality significantly improved when a conventional tandem (Con.T) is replaced with the DMBT tandem. The target coverage metrics were similar across ¹⁹² Ir-T&R and DMBT T&R plans with all three sources (P > 0.093). ⁶⁰ Co-DMBT T&R generated greater hot spots and less dose homogeneity in the target volumes compared with the ¹⁹² Ir- and ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R plans. Mean OAR doses in the DMBT T&R plans were significantly smaller (P < 0.0084) than the ¹⁹² Ir-T&R plans. Mean bladder D_2 cm3 was reduced by 4.07%, 4.15%, and 5.13%, for the ¹⁹² Ir-, ⁶⁰ Co-, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. Mean rectum (sigmoid) D_2 cm3 was reduced by 3.17% (3.63%), 2.57% (3.96%), and 4.65% (4.34%) for the ¹⁹² Ir-, ⁶⁰ Co-, and ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. The DMBT T&R plans with the ¹⁶⁹ Yb source generally resulted in the greatest OAR sparing when the CTV_HR were larger and irregular in shape, while for smaller and regularly shaped CTV_HR (<30 cm³ ), OAR sparing between the sources were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The DMBT tandem provides a promising alternative to the Con.T design with significant improvement in the plan quality for various target volumes. The DMBT T&R plans generated with the three sources of varying energies generated superior plans compared to the conventional T&R applicators. Plans generated with the ¹⁶⁹ Yb-DMBT T&R produced best results for larger and irregularly shaped CTV_HR in terms of OAR sparing. Thus, this study suggests that the combination of the DMBT tandem applicator with varying energy sources can work synergistically to generate improved plans for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To provide a fast computational method, based on the proximal graph solver (POGS) - A convex optimization solver using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), for calculating an optimal treatment plan in rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). RSBT treatment planning has more degrees of freedom than conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy due to the addition of emission direction, and this necessitates a fast optimization technique to enable clinical usage.

METHODS

The multi-helix RSBT (H-RSBT) delivery technique was investigated for five representative cervical cancer patients. Treatment plans were generated for all patients using the POGS method and the commercially available solver IBM ILOG CPLEX. The rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and HR-CTV boundary were the structures included in our optimization, which applied an asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control. Dose calculation resolution was 1 × 1 × 3 mm³ for all cases. The H-RSBT applicator had 6 helices, with 33.3 mm of translation along the applicator per helical rotation and 1.7 mm spacing between dwell positions, yielding 17.5° emission angle spacing per 5 mm along the applicator.

RESULTS

For each patient, HR-CTV D₉₀ , HR-CTV D₁₀₀ , rectum D_2cc , sigmoid D_2cc , and bladder D_2cc matched within 1% for CPLEX and POGS methods. Also, similar EQD2 values between CPLEX and POGS methods were obtained. POGS was around 18 times faster than CPLEX. For all patients, total optimization times were 32.1-65.4 s for CPLEX and 2.1-3.9 s for POGS.

CONCLUSIONS

POGS reduced treatment plan optimization time approximately 18 times for RSBT with similar HR-CTV D₉₀ , organ at risk (OAR) D_2cc values, and EQD2 values compared to CPLEX, which is significant progress toward clinical translation of RSBT.

Guidelines by the AAPM and GEC-ESTRO on the use of innovative brachytherapy devices and applications: Report of Task Group 167

Although a multicenter, Phase III, prospective, randomized trial is the gold standard for evidence-based medicine, it is rarely used in the evaluation of innovative devices because of many practical and ethical reasons. It is usually sufficient to compare the dose distributions and dose rates for determining the equivalence of the innovative treatment modality to an existing one. Thus, quantitative evaluation of the dosimetric characteristics of innovative radiotherapy devices or applications is a critical part in which physicists should be actively involved. The physicist's role, along with physician colleagues, in this process is highlighted for innovative brachytherapy devices and applications and includes evaluation of (1) dosimetric considerations for clinical implementation (including calibrations, dose calculations, and radiobiological aspects) to comply with existing societal dosimetric prerequisites for sources in routine clinical use, (2) risks and benefits from a regulatory and safety perspective, and (3) resource assessment and preparedness. Further, it is suggested that any developed calibration methods be traceable to a primary standards dosimetry laboratory (PSDL) such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the U.S. or to other PSDLs located elsewhere such as in Europe. Clinical users should follow standards as approved by their country's regulatory agencies that approved such a brachytherapy device. Integration of this system into the medical source calibration infrastructure of secondary standard dosimetry laboratories such as the Accredited Dosimetry Calibration Laboratories in the U.S. is encouraged before a source is introduced into widespread routine clinical use. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine and the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) have developed guidelines for the safe and consistent application of brachytherapy using innovative devices and applications. The current report covers regulatory approvals, calibration, dose calculations, radiobiological issues, and overall safety concerns that should be addressed during the commissioning stage preceding clinical use. These guidelines are based on review of requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Transportation, International Electrotechnical Commission Medical Electrical Equipment Standard 60601, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Commission for CE Marking (Conformité Européenne), and institutional review boards and radiation safety committees.

Metal artefacts in MRI-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer

The importance of assessing the metal-induced artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided brachytherapy is growing along with the increasing interest of integrating MRI into the treatment procedure of cervical cancer. Examples of metal objects in use include intracavitary cervical applicators and interstitial needles. The induced artefacts increase the uncertainties in the clinical workflow and can be a potential obstacle for the accurate delivery of the treatment. Overcoming this problem necessitates a good understanding of its originating sources. Several efforts are recorded in the literature to quantify the extent of such artefacts, in phantoms and in clinical practice. Here, we elaborate on the origin of metal-induced artefacts in the light of brachytherapy applications, while summarizing recent efforts that have been made to assess and overcome the induced distortions.

Quantitative MRI assessment of a novel direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator for cervical cancer at 1.5T

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this work is to quantitatively investigate the artifacts and image distortions induced in the MR images by a recently proposed direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator prototype. This new MRI-compatible applicator allows better sparing of organs-at-risk (OAR) for cervical cancer patients, while providing conformal dose distributions to target volumes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specific phantom and tools were designed and manufactured for this study. The phantom was filled with a tissue-like solution and MR images were acquired with clinical protocols as per GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Images were obtained at 6 different orientations that mimic possible clinical settings and full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) was recorded at multiple locations/angles. The accuracy of detecting the centerline of the tandem was assessed using a novel radial-fiducials mount.

RESULTS

FWHM from all line profiles at all angles and all orientations was 6.14±0.7mm (compared to 6mm of the actual DMBT tandem diameter). The in-plane spatial-shift observed at para-axial and para-sagittal views was less than 0.5mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrated that the novel DMBT tandem applicator prototype has minimal artifact in T₂-weighted images employed in clinical practice, suggesting the applicator might be a good candidate for MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Paddle-based rotating-shield brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The authors present a novel paddle-based rotating-shield brachytherapy (P-RSBT) method, whose radiation-attenuating shields are formed with a multileaf collimator (MLC), consisting of retractable paddles, to achieve intensity modulation in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

METHODS

Five cervical cancer patients using an intrauterine tandem applicator were considered to assess the potential benefit of the P-RSBT method. The P-RSBT source used was a 50 kV electronic brachytherapy source (Xoft Axxent™). The paddles can be retracted independently to form multiple emission windows around the source for radiation delivery. The MLC was assumed to be rotatable. P-RSBT treatment plans were generated using the asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control method [Liu et al., Med. Phys. 41(11), 111709 (11pp.) (2014)] with a delivery time constraint, different paddle sizes, and different rotation strides. The number of treatment fractions (fx) was assumed to be five. As brachytherapy is delivered as a boost for cervical cancer, the dose distribution for each case includes the dose from external beam radiotherapy as well, which is 45 Gy in 25 fx. The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) doses were escalated until the minimum dose to the hottest 2 cm(3) (D(2cm(3)) of either the rectum, sigmoid colon, or bladder reached their tolerance doses of 75, 75, and 90 Gy3, respectively, expressed as equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2 with α/β = 3 Gy).

RESULTS

P-RSBT outperformed the two other RSBT delivery techniques, single-shield RSBT (S-RSBT) and dynamic-shield RSBT (D-RSBT), with a properly selected paddle size. If the paddle size was angled at 60°, the average D90 increases for the delivery plans by P-RSBT on the five cases, compared to S-RSBT, were 2.2, 8.3, 12.6, 11.9, and 9.1 Gy10, respectively, with delivery times of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min/fx. The increases in HR-CTV D90, compared to D-RSBT, were 16.6, 12.9, 7.2, 3.7, and 1.7 Gy10, respectively. P-RSBT HR-CTV D90-values were insensitive to the paddle size for paddles angled at less than 60°. Increasing the paddle angle from 5° to 60° resulted in only a 0.6 Gy10 decrease in HR-CTV D90 on average for five cases when the delivery times were set to 15 min/fx. The HR-CTV D90 decreased to 2.5 and 11.9 Gy10 with paddle angles of 90° and 120°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

P-RSBT produces treatment plans that are dosimetrically and temporally superior to those of S-RSBT and D-RSBT, although P-RSBT systems may be more mechanically challenging to develop than S-RSBT or D-RSBT. A P-RSBT implementation with 4-6 shield paddles would be sufficient to outperform S-RSBT and D-RSBT if delivery times are constrained to less than 15 min/fx.

Direction Modulated Brachytherapy for Treatment of Cervical Cancer. II: Comparative Planning Study With Intracavitary and Intracavitary-Interstitial Techniques

PURPOSE

To perform a comprehensive comparative planning study evaluating the utility of the proposed direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator against standard applicators, in the setting of image guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed conceptual article was published in 2014. The proposed DMBT tandem applicator has 6 peripheral grooves of 1.3-mm width, along a 5.4-mm-thick nonmagnetic tungsten alloy rod of density 18.0 g/cm(3), capable of generating directional dose profiles. We performed a comparative planning study with 45 cervical cancer patients enrolled consecutively in the prospective observational EMBRACE study. In all patients, MRI-based planning was performed while utilizing various tandem-ring (27 patients) and tandem-ring-needles (18 patients) applicators, in accordance with the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology recommendations. For unbiased comparisons, all cases were replanned with an in-house-developed inverse optimization code while enforcing a uniform set of constraints that are reflective of the clinical practice. All plans were normalized to the same high-risk clinical target volume D90 values achieved in the original clinical plans.

RESULTS

In general, if the standard tandem was replaced with the DMBT tandem while maintaining all other planning conditions the same, there was consistent improvement in the plan quality. For example, among the 18 tandem-ring-needles cases, the average D2cm(3) reductions achieved were -2.48% ± 11.03%, -4.45% ± 5.24%, and -5.66% ± 6.43% for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, respectively. An opportunity may also exist in avoiding use of needles altogether for when the total number of needles required is small (approximately 2 to 3 needles or less), if DMBT tandem is used.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating the novel DMBT tandem onto both intracavitary and intracavitary-interstitial applicator assembly enabled consistent improvement in the sparing of the OARs, over a standard "single-channel" tandem, though individual variations in benefit were considerable. Although at an early stage of development, the DMBT concept design is demonstrated to be useful and pragmatic for potential clinical translation.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy as a Boost to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Phase-II Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Despite advances in rectal cancer treatment over the last decade, local control and risk of late side effects due to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remain as concerns. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and the safety of low-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (LDRBT) as a boost to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for use in treating locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

This phase-II clinical trial included 34 patients (as the study arm) with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3-T4 and/or N1/N2, M0) lower rectal cancer. For comparative analysis, 102 matched patients (as the historical control arm) with rectal cancer were also selected. All the patients were treated with LDRBT (15 Gy in 3 fractions) and concurrent chemoradiation (45-50.4 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily during LDRBT and EBRT.

RESULTS

The study results revealed a significant differences between the study arm and the control arm in terms in the pathologic tumor size (2.1 cm vs. 3.6 cm, P = 0.001), the pathologic tumor stage (35% T3-4 vs. 65% T3-4, P = 0.003), and the pathologic complete response (29.4% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.028). Moreover, a significantly higher dose of EBRT (P = 0.041) was found in the control arm, and a longer time to surgery was observed in the study arm (P < 0.001). The higher rate of treatment-related toxicities, such as mild proctitis and anemia, in the study arm was tolerable and easily manageable.

CONCLUSION

A boost of LDRBT can optimize the pathologic complete response, with acceptable toxicities, in patients with distal rectal cancer.

Direction-modulated brachytherapy for high-dose-rate treatment of cervical cancer. I: theoretical design

PURPOSE

To demonstrate that utilization of the direction-modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) concept can significantly improve treatment plan quality in the setting of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The new, MRI-compatible, tandem design has 6 peripheral holes of 1.3-mm diameter, grooved along a nonmagnetic tungsten-alloy rod (ρ = 18.0 g/cm(3)), enclosed in Delrin tubing (polyoxymethylene, ρ = 1.41 g/cm(3)), with a total thickness of 6.4 mm. The Monte Carlo N-Particle code was used to calculate the anisotropic (192)Ir dose distributions. An in-house-developed inverse planning platform, geared with simulated annealing and constrained-gradient optimization algorithms, was used to replan 15 patient cases (total 75 plans) treated with a conventional tandem and ovoids (T&O) applicator. Prescription dose was 6 Gy. For replanning, we replaced the conventional tandem with that of the new DMBT tandem for optimization but left the ovoids in place and kept the dwell positions as originally planned. All DMBT plans were normalized to match the high-risk clinical target volume V100 coverage of the T&O plans.

RESULTS

In general there were marked improvements in plan quality for the DMBT plans. On average, D2cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were reduced by 0.59 ± 0.87 Gy (8.5% ± 28.7%), 0.48 ± 0.55 Gy (21.1% ± 27.2%), and 0.10 ± 0.38 Gy (40.6% ± 214.9%) among the 75 plans, with best single-plan reductions of 3.20 Gy (40.8%), 2.38 Gy (40.07%), and 1.26 Gy (27.5%), respectively. The high-risk clinical target volume D90 was similar, with 6.55 ± 0.96 Gy and 6.59 ± 1.06 Gy for T&O and DMBT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the DMBT concept to cervical cancer allowed for improved organ at risk sparing while achieving similar target coverage on a sizeable patient population, as intended, by maximally utilizing the anatomic information contained in 3-dimensional imaging. A series of mechanical and clinical validations are to be followed.

Rapid emission angle selection for rotating-shield brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The authors present a rapid emission angle selection (REAS) method that enables the efficient selection of the azimuthal shield angle for rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). The REAS method produces a Pareto curve from which a potential RSBT user can select a treatment plan that balances the tradeoff between delivery time and tumor dose conformity.

METHODS

Two cervical cancer patients were considered as test cases for the REAS method. The RSBT source considered was a Xoft Axxent(TM) electronic brachytherapy source, partially shielded with 0.5 mm of tungsten, which traveled inside a tandem intrauterine applicator. Three anchor RSBT plans were generated for each case using dose-volume optimization, with azimuthal shield emission angles of 90°, 180°, and 270°. The REAS method converts the anchor plans to treatment plans for all possible emission angles by combining neighboring beamlets to form beamlets for larger emission angles. Treatment plans based on exhaustive dose-volume optimization (ERVO) and exhaustive surface optimization (ERSO) were also generated for both cases. Uniform dwell-time scaling was applied to all plans such that that high-risk clinical target volume D90 was maximized without violating the D2cc tolerances of the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon.

RESULTS

By choosing three azimuthal emission angles out of 32 potential angles, the REAS method performs about 10 times faster than the ERVO method. By setting D90 to 85-100 Gy10, the delivery times used by REAS generated plans are 21.0% and 19.5% less than exhaustive surface optimized plans used by the two clinical cases. By setting the delivery time budget to 5-25 and 10-30 min∕fx, respectively, for two the cases, the D90 contributions for REAS are improved by 5.8% and 5.1% compared to the ERSO plans. The ranges used in this comparison were selected in order to keep both D90 and the delivery time within acceptable limits.

CONCLUSIONS

The REAS method enables efficient RSBT treatment planning and delivery and provides treatment plans with comparable quality to those generated by exhaustive replanning with dose-volume optimization.