Response evaluation of two commercial thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) against different parameters

Objectives

It is essential to study the dosimetric performance and reliability of personal dosimeters. This study examines and compares the responses of two commercial thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs), the TLD-100 and the MTS-N.

Methods

We compared the two TLDs to various parameters such as energy dependence, linearity, homogeneity, reproducibility, light sensitivity (zero point), angular dependence, and temperature effects using the IEC 61066 standard.

Results

The results acquired showed that both TLD materials show linear behavior as indicated by the quality of the fit. In addition, the angular dependence results for both detectors show that all dose responses are within the range of acceptable values. However, the TLD-100 outperformed the MTS-N in terms of light sensitivity reproducibility for all detectors together, while the MTS-N outperforms the TLD-100 for each detector independently and that showed TLD-100 has more stability than MTS-N. The MTS-N shows better batch homogeneity (10.84%) than TLD-100 (13.65%). The effect of temperature in signal loss was clearer at higher temperature 65°C and it was however below ±30%.

Conclusions

The overall results for dosimetric properties determined in terms of dose equivalents for all combinations of detectors are satisfactory. The MTS-N cards have better results in the energy dependence, angular dependency, batch homogeneity and less signal fading, whereas the TLD-100 cards are less sensitive to light and more reproducible.

Advances in knowledge

Although previous studies showed several types of comparisons between TLDs, they have used limited parameters and different data analysis. This study has dealt with more comprehensive characterization methods and examinations combining TLD-100 and MTS-N cards.

A thermoluminescent method for the evaluation of the 131I effective half-life in the thyroid when treating Graves' disease

When planning treatment for Graves' disease with ¹³¹I, the effective half-life (T_eff) should be estimated individually as it depends on biological characteristics such as iodine uptake and excretion, which differ from an individual to another (Berg et al. 1996). All the methods to quantify T_eff described in the literature are quite complex and are difficult to be used in clinical routine. With the aim of optimizing this process, a simplified method is proposed here to evaluate T_eff of ¹³¹I during treatment of Graves' disease. The present study suggests improving the method of determining T_eff based on thermoluminescence dosimetry. This involves implementing a new method and includes reduction of TLD (Thermoluminescent Dosimeter) measurements. The proposed method was validated on patients with Graves' disease. The radiation dose delivered to the patients was determined using the MIRD (Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry) formalism. The relative difference between T_eff obtained based on seven measurement intervals at [0-24 h, 24-48 h, 48-72 h, 72-96 h, 96-120 h, 120-144 h, 144-168 h] and based on three measurement intervals at [0-24 h, 72-96 h, 144-168 h] and [0-24 h, 120-144 h, 144-168 h] was 1.9% and 3.81%, respectively. Comparison of doses obtained based on a general T_eff and on a personalized T_eff gave a statistically significant difference with a correlation coefficient R²of 0.44. The T_eff obtained from just three measurements was found to be sufficiently accurate and easily applicable. The results obtained demonstrate the need to determine and use personalized T_eff values instead of using a fixed value of 7 days.

Design, fabrication and modeling of an AmBe neutron irradiator for TLD screening for neutron dose measurement in mixed radiation fields

TLDs dosimeters are frequently presented as a viable choice for dosimetric studies when dealing with mixed neutron-gamma radiation fields. However, this choice is not without some drawbacks, because not only TLD response is highly dependent on particle type but also on neutron energy spectrum. Therefore, a correct screening and calibration of the dosimeter are required, and a simple shift from gamma screening methodology for mixed field is not suitable. This paper presents the design, fabrication and tests of an irradiator for TLD screening for neutron dose measurement using an AmBe source and polyethylene as moderator material. The design of the irradiator was conducted through Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNP5 code. The experimental validation and tests were performed using Indium activation foils and TLD 600 dosimeters. The manufactured irradiator demonstrated to be suitable for TLD screening under neutron source radiation field, offering very good homogeneity conditions in the radiation field so to guarantee same radiation dose delivered to the TLDs.

Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the present work was to investigate thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) response to intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) beams. In an IOERT treatment, a large single radiation dose is delivered with a high dose-per-pulse electron beam (2-12 cGy/pulse) during surgery. To verify and to record the delivered dose, in vivo dosimetry is a mandatory procedure for quality assurance. The TLDs feature many advantages such as a small detector size and close tissue equivalence that make them attractive for IOERT as in vivo dosimeters.

METHODS

LiF:Mg,Ti dosimeters (TLD-100) were irradiated with different IOERT electron beam energies (5, 7 and 9 MeV) and with a 6 MV conventional photon beam. For each energy, the TLDs were irradiated in the dose range of 0-10 Gy in step of 2 Gy. Regression analysis was performed to establish the response variation of thermoluminescent signals with dose and energy.

RESULTS

The TLD-100 dose-response curves were obtained. In the dose range of 0-10 Gy, the calibration curve was confirmed to be linear for the conventional photon beam. In the same dose region, the quadratic model performs better than the linear model when high dose-per-pulse electron beams were used (F test; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the TLD dose response, for doses ≤10 Gy, has a parabolic behavior in high dose-per-pulse electron beams. TLD-100 can be useful detectors for IOERT patient dosimetry if a proper calibration is provided.