1
|
Esplen N, Mendonca MS, Bazalova-Carter M. Physics and biology of ultrahigh dose-rate (FLASH) radiotherapy: a topical review. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:23TR03. [PMID: 32721941 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abaa28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Ultrahigh dose-rate radiotherapy (RT), or 'FLASH' therapy, has gained significant momentum following various in vivo studies published since 2014 which have demonstrated a reduction in normal tissue toxicity and similar tumor control for FLASH-RT when compared with conventional dose-rate RT. Subsequent studies have sought to investigate the potential for FLASH normal tissue protection and the literature has been since been inundated with publications on FLASH therapies. Today, FLASH-RT is considered by some as having the potential to 'revolutionize radiotherapy'. FLASH-RT is considered by some as having the potential to 'revolutionize radiotherapy'. The goal of this review article is to present the current state of this intriguing RT technique and to review existing publications on FLASH-RT in terms of its physical and biological aspects. In the physics section, the current landscape of ultrahigh dose-rate radiation delivery and dosimetry is presented. Specifically, electron, photon and proton radiation sources capable of delivering ultrahigh dose-rates along with their beam delivery parameters are thoroughly discussed. Additionally, the benefits and drawbacks of radiation detectors suitable for dosimetry in FLASH-RT are presented. The biology section comprises a summary of pioneering in vitro ultrahigh dose-rate studies performed in the 1960s and early 1970s and continues with a summary of the recent literature investigating normal and tumor tissue responses in electron, photon and proton beams. The section is concluded with possible mechanistic explanations of the FLASH normal-tissue protection effect (FLASH effect). Finally, challenges associated with clinical translation of FLASH-RT and its future prospects are critically discussed; specifically, proposed treatment machines and publications on treatment planning for FLASH-RT are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nolan Esplen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niroomand‐Rad A, Chiu‐Tsao S, Grams MP, Lewis DF, Soares CG, Van Battum LJ, Das IJ, Trichter S, Kissick MW, Massillon‐JL G, Alvarez PE, Chan MF. Report of AAPM Task Group 235 Radiochromic Film Dosimetry: An Update to TG‐55. Med Phys 2020; 47:5986-6025. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Indra J. Das
- Radiation Oncology Northwestern University Memorial Hospital Chicago IL USA
| | - Samuel Trichter
- New York‐Presbyterian HospitalWeill Cornell Medical Center New York NY USA
| | | | - Guerda Massillon‐JL
- Instituto de Fisica Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Mexico City Mexico
| | - Paola E. Alvarez
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | - Maria F. Chan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Basking Ridge NJ USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bräuer-Krisch E, Adam JF, Alagoz E, Bartzsch S, Crosbie J, DeWagter C, Dipuglia A, Donzelli M, Doran S, Fournier P, Kalef-Ezra J, Kock A, Lerch M, McErlean C, Oelfke U, Olko P, Petasecca M, Povoli M, Rosenfeld A, Siegbahn EA, Sporea D, Stugu B. Medical physics aspects of the synchrotron radiation therapies: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) and synchrotron stereotactic radiotherapy (SSRT). Phys Med 2015; 31:568-83. [PMID: 26043881 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Revised: 04/27/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic Synchrotron Radiotherapy (SSRT) and Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) are both novel approaches to treat brain tumor and potentially other tumors using synchrotron radiation. Although the techniques differ by their principles, SSRT and MRT share certain common aspects with the possibility of combining their advantages in the future. For MRT, the technique uses highly collimated, quasi-parallel arrays of X-ray microbeams between 50 and 600 keV. Important features of highly brilliant Synchrotron sources are a very small beam divergence and an extremely high dose rate. The minimal beam divergence allows the insertion of so called Multi Slit Collimators (MSC) to produce spatially fractionated beams of typically ∼25-75 micron-wide microplanar beams separated by wider (100-400 microns center-to-center(ctc)) spaces with a very sharp penumbra. Peak entrance doses of several hundreds of Gy are extremely well tolerated by normal tissues and at the same time provide a higher therapeutic index for various tumor models in rodents. The hypothesis of a selective radio-vulnerability of the tumor vasculature versus normal blood vessels by MRT was recently more solidified. SSRT (Synchrotron Stereotactic Radiotherapy) is based on a local drug uptake of high-Z elements in tumors followed by stereotactic irradiation with 80 keV photons to enhance the dose deposition only within the tumor. With SSRT already in its clinical trial stage at the ESRF, most medical physics problems are already solved and the implemented solutions are briefly described, while the medical physics aspects in MRT will be discussed in more detail in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Bräuer-Krisch
- ESRF-The European Synchrotron, 71, Avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble, France.
| | | | - Enver Alagoz
- University of Bergen Department of Physics and Technology, PB 7803 5020, Norway
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd, Sutton SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - Jeff Crosbie
- RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Dipuglia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW, Australia
| | - Mattia Donzelli
- ESRF-The European Synchrotron, 71, Avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble, France
| | - Simon Doran
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd, Sutton Surrey, UK
| | - Pauline Fournier
- ESRF-The European Synchrotron, 71, Avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble, France; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW, Australia
| | - John Kalef-Ezra
- Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina, 451.10, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Angela Kock
- Sintef Minalab, Gaustadalléen 23C, 0373, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Lerch
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW, Australia
| | - Ciara McErlean
- CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd, Sutton Surrey, UK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Rd, Sutton SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - Pawel Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342, Krawkow, Poland
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Povoli
- University of Oslo, Department of Physics, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, NSW, Australia
| | - Erik A Siegbahn
- Department of Oncolgy-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, S-177176, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dan Sporea
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Magurele, RO-077125, Romania
| | - Bjarne Stugu
- University of Bergen, Department of Physics and Technology, PB 7803, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|