Health technology assessment in musculoskeletal radiology: the case study of EOSedge™

OBJECTIVES

Health technology assessment (HTA) is a systematic process used to evaluate the properties and effects of healthcare technologies within their intended use context. This paper describes the adoption of HTA process to assess the adoption of the EOSedge™ system in clinical practice.

METHODS

The EOSedge™ system is a digital radiography system that delivers whole-body, high-quality 2D/3D biplanar images covering the complete set of musculoskeletal and orthopedic exams. Full HTA model was chosen using the EUnetHTA Core Model® version 3.0. The HTA Core Model organizes the information into nine domains. Information was researched and obtained by consulting the manufacturers' user manuals, scientific literature, and institutional sites for regulatory aspects.

RESULTS

All nine domains of the EUnetHTA Core Model® helped conduct the HTA of the EOSedge, including (1) description and technical characteristics of the technology; (2) health problem and current clinical practice; (3) safety; (4) clinical effectiveness; (5) organizational aspects; (6) economic evaluation; (7) impact on the patient; (8) ethical aspects; and (9) legal aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

EOS technologies may be a viable alternative to conventional radiographs. EOSedge has the same intended use and similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and operation principles as the EOS System and provides significant dose reduction factors for whole spine imaging compared to the EOS System without compromising image quality. Regarding the impact of EOS imaging on patient outcomes, most studies aim to establish technical ability without evaluating their ability to improve patient outcomes; thus, more studies on this aspect are warranted.

Measurement of tibial slope using biplanar stereoradiography (EOS®)

OBJECTIVES

Posterior tibial slope (PTS) is an important anatomic parameter of the knee related to anteroposterior instability. Biplanar stereoradiography allows for simultaneous low-dose acquisition of anteroposterior and lateral views with 3D capability, enabling separate lateral and medial plateau analyses. We aimed to evaluate the possibility and compare the reproducibility of measuring medial and lateral PTS on EOS® images with two different patient positionings and compare it with CT of the knees as the gold standard.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including volunteers who underwent lower limb stereoradiography and knee CT from 01/08/2016 to 07/31/2019. Sixty legs from 30 patients were studied. PTS were measured using stereoradiography and CT by two radiologists. Intraclass correlation was used to calculate intrarater and interrater reproducibilities. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to calculate the correlation between stereoradiography and CT. We also compared the reproducibility of the stereoradiography of volunteers with 2 different positionings.

RESULTS

The mean stereoradiography PTS values for right and left knees were as follows: lateral, 12.2° (SD: 4.1) and 10.1° (SD: 3.5); medial,12.2° (SD: 4.4) and 11.6° (SD: 3.9). CT PTS mean values for right and left knee are as follows: lateral, 10.3° (SD:2.5) and 10.6° (SD: 2.8); medial: 8.7° (SD: 3.7) and 10.4° (SD: 3.5). Agreement between CT and EOS for angles between lateral and medial PTS was good (right, 0.874; left, 0.871). Regarding patient positioning on stereoradiography, interrater and intrarater reproducibilities were greater for patients with nonparallel feet (0.738-0.883 and 0.870-0.975).

CONCLUSIONS

Stereoradiography allows for appropriate delineation of tibial plateaus, especially in patients with nonparallel feet, for the purpose of measuring PTS. The main advantage is lower radiation doses compared to radiography and CT.

Breast Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Cost in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients and the Role of Low Dose Biplanar Radiography

INTRODUCTION

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are susceptible to high doses of radiation from radiographs. The purpose of this study was to examine the future cost of radiation-induced breast cancer in patients with AIS and its potential financial and mortality impact.

METHODS

A literature review identified articles relating radiation exposure in patients with AIS to increased risk for cancer. Based on population statistics and breast cancer treatment costs in the year 2020, the financial impact of radiation-induced breast cancer and the estimated number of additional deaths per year due to breast cancer for patients with AIS were calculated.

RESULTS

The US female population in 1970 was 205.1 million. Based on a prevalence of 3.0%, an estimated 3.1 million patients had AIS in 1970. With an incidence of breast cancer in the general population of 128.3/100,000 and a standardized incidence ratio of 1.82-2.4 for breast cancer in patients with scoliosis, there will be a 3,282 to 5,603 patient increase in radiation-induced breast cancer in patients with scoliosis over the general population. With a projected base cost of $34,979 per patient for the first year of breast cancer diagnosis in 2020, the cost of radiation-induced breast cancer will be 114.8 to 196.0 million dollars per year. Using a standardized mortality ratio of 1.68 for scoliosis radiation-induced breast cancer, there will be an expected increase in deaths of 420 patients due to breast cancer presumably secondary to radiation exposure in the evaluation and treatment of AIS.

CONCLUSION

The estimated radiation-induced breast cancer financial impact in 2020 will be between 114.8 and 196.0 million dollars per year, with an increase in deaths of 420 patients per year. Low-dose imaging systems reduce radiation exposure by up to 45 times while maintaining sufficient image quality. New low-dose radiography should be used whenever possible with patients with AIS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

ASSESSMENT OF PCXMC MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN SLOT-SCANNING-BASED EXAMINATIONS: COMPARISON WITH IN-PHANTOM THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY

Slot-scanning technology is nowadays a valid solution for the follow-up of chronic musculoskeletal disorders on children and adolescent patients, but there is no commercial software designed for simulating this X-ray beam geometry. PC Program for X-ray Monte Carlo (PCXMC) is a widespread Monte Carlo software developed for dose computation in projection radiography. In this study, experimental measurements were performed to evaluate its applicability in examinations with a slit-beam device. Physical phantoms corresponding to an adult and a 5-y-old child with calibrated thermoluminescent dosemeters were used for experiments. Different simulation approaches were investigated. Differences between measured and calculated organ doses ranged from -95 to 67% and were statistically significant for almost all organs. For both patients, PCXMC underestimated the effective dose of about 25%. This study suggests that PCXMC is not suited for organ dose evaluation in examinations with slot-scanning devices. It is still a useful tool for effective dose estimation when a proper correction factor is applied.

Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems

BACKGROUND

EOSedge™^* (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) is an X-ray imaging system using automatic exposure control (AEC) with tube current modulation, in order to optimize dose deposition in patients.

PURPOSE

This study aims at characterizing EOSedge organ dose deposition in comparison to a digital radiography (DR) system and the previous EOS system (EOS-1st generation), in relation to their respective image quality levels.

METHOD

Organ doses were measured in an anthropomorphic female adult phantom and a 5-year-old pediatric phantom using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters, which were carefully calibrated within the studied energy range. Organ doses were recorded on the EOSedge and the Fuji Visionary DRF (Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc, Lexington, MA). The resulting effective doses were compared to the EOS-1st-generation values present in the literature. Image quality assessment was carried out on end-user images. Quantitative image quality metrics were computed for all tested modalities on a quality assurance phantom. Qualitative assessment of EOSedge image quality was based on anthropomorphic phantom acquisitions against the EOS-1st-generation system, and on clinical images against the tested DR system.

RESULTS

For a full-spine exam, and on the female adult phantom (respectively, the pediatric phantom), an effective dose of 92 μSv (respectively, 32 μSv) was obtained on EOSedge, and 572 μSv (respectively, 179 μSv) on the DR system; these values were compared to effective dose values of 290 μSv (respectively, 200 μSv) from the literature on EOS-1st generation, leading to an effective dose reduction factor of 6 with respect to the DR system, and of 3-6 with respect to EOS-1st generation. EOSedge provides the best compromise between contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and dose, with more consistent CNR values than the other tested modalities, in a range of attenuation from 10 to 40 cm of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Within this range, EOSedge is also comparable to DR for 10 and 20 cm of PMMA, and better than DR for 30 and 40 cm of PMMA, both in terms of spatial resolution and low-contrast detection. The anatomical landmarks of interest in the follow-up of spinal deformities can be detected in all tested modalities.

CONCLUSION

Results showed that EOSedge provides significant dose reduction factors for full spine imaging in both adults and children compared to the other tested modalities, without compromising image quality. We believe that this work could help raise awareness on the capabilities of modern X-ray systems, when equipped with appropriate AEC strategies, to perform ultra-low-dose, long-axis images.

Reliability of Preoperative Supine Versus Bending Radiographs in Estimating the Structural Nature of Curves in EOS

BACKGROUND

The study sought to evaluate the utility of a single supine radiograph in determining curve flexibility in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients.

METHODS

EOS patients with upright (standing/seated), supine, and side-bending radiographs who underwent spinal deformity surgery were identified. Coronal parameters included: proximal thoracic (PT) curve, main thoracic (MT) curve, and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve. Each radiograph was measured twice by 2 different raters. Correlation coefficients were utilized to investigate associations between the different radiographs. Interrater Correlation Coefficient (ICC) assessed intrarater and interrater reliability.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven EOS patients were identified (age at diagnosis: 7.0±2.9 y, preoperative age: 13.0±2.9 y; 73% female; etiologies: 54% idiopathic, 30% syndromic, and 16% neuromuscular). Supine PT and MT curve measurements were highly associated with corresponding side-bending measurements (PT: r=0.75, P<0.001; MT: r=0.80, P<0.001), and TL/L curves were very highly associated (TL/L: r=0.92, P<0.001). The mean absolute differences between supine and side-bending measurements were PT: 11.3±7.8 degrees, MT: 14.8±8.3 degrees, and TL/L: 16.2±7.6 degrees, where the side-bending was on average smaller than the supine measurement. The intrarater reliabilities were excellent, with an ICC ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 for side-bending films and 0.94 to 0.97 for supine films. The interrater reliability was excellent with ICC value of 0.88 for side-bending films and 0.93 for supine films.

CONCLUSIONS

A single, preoperative supine radiograph was highly predictive of side-bending radiographs in patients with EOS. Supine curves measured an average of 15 degrees larger than bending curves in the MT and TL/L region. A single supine film may eliminate the need for effort-related, dual side-bending radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-retrospective study.

Accuracy of biplanar linear radiography versus conventional radiographs when used for lower limb and implant measurements

INTRODUCTION

The current standard of care for measuring lower extremity length and angular discrepancies is using a full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph. However, there has been increasing interest to use biplanar linear EOS imaging as an alternative. This study aims to compare lower extremity length and implant measurements between biplanar linear and conventional radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 5-year retrospective study, all patients who had a standing full-length anteroposterior and biplanar linear radiographs (EOS®) that include the lower extremities done within one year of each other were included. Patients who underwent surgery in between the imaging, underwent surgeries that could result in graduated length or angulated corrections and inadequate exposure of the lower extremity were excluded. Four radiographic segments were measured to assess lower limb alignment and length measurements. Height and width measurements of implants were performed for patients who had implants in both imaging.

RESULTS

When comparing imaging and actual implant dimensions, biplanar linear radiographs were accurate in measuring actual implant height (median difference = - 0.14 cm, p = 0.66), and width (median difference = - 0.13 cm, p = 0.71). However, conventional radiographs were inaccurate in measuring actual implant height (median difference = 0.19 cm, p = 0.01) and width (median difference = 0.61 cm, p < 0.01). When comparing conventional and biplanar linear radiographs, there was statistically significant difference in all measurements. This includes anatomical femoral length (median difference = 3.53 cm, p < 0.01), mechanical femoral length (median difference = 3.89 cm, p < 0.01), anatomical tibial length (median difference = 2.34 cm, p < 0.01) and mechanical tibial length (median difference = 2.20 cm, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

First, there is a significant difference in the lower extremity length when comparing conventional and biplanar linear radiographs. Second, biplanar linear radiographs are found to be accurate while conventional radiographs are not as accurate in implant measurements of length and width in the lower extremity.

Technical evaluation of a clinical, bi-planar, digital and upright X-ray imaging unit

We describe the technical evaluation of the commercially available, clinical, bi-planar, low dose, digital X-ray system (EOS System, EOS imaging, France). The unit is used for upright, weight-bearing musculoskeletal pathologies, in particular, in the spine and lower limbs. The evaluation incorporated tests on the X-ray generator performance, radiation/imaging field alignment, dose area product accuracy and image quality. The assessment methodology was based on objective parameters and required equipment readily available for technical evaluation of other radiological equipment. Results demonstrated that the system performs well within acceptable performance criteria with regard to X-ray generator performance, radiation/imaging field alignment and dose area product accuracy. In addition, results from the image-quality assessment were aligned with previously published work. The work presented in this article can be used for the technical evaluation of the EOS System at other clinical sites.

Reduction of radiation exposure in scoliosis monitoring using flat detector and pulsed fluoroscopy technology

A new flat detector and pulsed fluoroscopy technology is available to further reduce radiation exposure in radiological monitoring during scoliosis treatment in children and adolescents. The aim of this study is to compare different settings of the system (opening area(OA) and image quality settings (IQS)) in order to find the optimal parameters with high image quality and the lowest possible radiation exposure. Therefore, we examined four cadaver spines (T1 to sacrum) with the flat detector technique using digital pulsed fluoroscopy and simulated the abdominal soft tissues. The images were merged and evaluated by three different investigators using an established scoring system. For comparison, we used digital radiography images of the cadaver spines. The values for the DAP increased from the small OA (33% ; 0.56 µGy·m²) to the maximum OA (100% ; 0.82 µGy·m²) by 45% (p = .003) and from the low image quality setting (0.57 µGy·m²) to the high setting (0.84 µGy·m²) by 48% (p = .028). Despite the low DAP, the setting 33% OA achieved the best point values for image quality, therefore this setting is clearly preferred. Using a digital fluoroscopy system allows a significant reduction of radiation exposure by a factor of 7.5 (3.88µGy·m² to 0.5µGy·m²) compared to slot- scanning x-ray (EOS). Due to this success, the flat detector and pulsed fluoroscopy technology can be an alternative to established methods such as X-ray and EOS in clinical use.

Using Ultrasound to Screen for Scoliosis to Reduce Unnecessary Radiographic Radiation: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study on 442 Schoolchildren

Scoliosis screening is important for timely initiation of brace treatment to mitigate curve progression in skeletally immature children and adolescents. School scoliosis screening programs in Hong Kong follow the protocol of referring children screened positive with a scoliometer and Moiré topography for confirmatory standard radiography. Despite being highly sensitive (88%) in detecting those who require specialist referral, the screening program was found to have a false-positive rate >50%, which could lead to unnecessary X-ray radiation. Radiation-free ultrasound has been reported to be valid and reliable for quantitative assessment of curve severity in scoliosis patients. The aim of this prospective diagnostic accuracy study was to determine the accuracy of ultrasound in determining the threshold of referral that requires X-ray for children screened positive with the scoliometer and Moiré topography. Our study recruited 442 schoolchildren with a mean Cobb angle of 14.0 ± 6.6°. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in predicting the correct referral status, confirmed by X-ray, were 92.3% and 51.6%, with positive and negative predictive values of 29.0% and 96.9%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed area under the curve values of 0.735 for ultrasound alone and 0.832 for ultrasound in combination with measurement of angle of trunk rotation. The finding supports the accuracy of using ultrasound to determine referral status, which could result in a >50% reduction of unnecessary radiation for children undergoing scoliosis screening.

HOW MANY DOSEMETERS ARE NEEDED FOR CORRECT MEAN ORGAN DOSE ASSESSMENT WHEN PERFOMING PHANTOM DOSIMETRY? A PHANTOM STUDY EVALUATING LIVER ORGAN DOSE AND INVESTIGATING TLD NUMBERS AND WAYS OF DOSEMETER PLACEMENT

This study evaluated repeated mean organ dose measurements of the liver by phantom dosimetry and statistical modelling in order to find a way to reduce the number of dosemeters needed for precise organ dose measurements. Thermoluminescent dosemeters were used in an adult female phantom exposed to a biplanar x-ray source at three different axial phantom rotations. Generalised mixed linear effect modelling was used for statistical analysis. A subgroup of five to six organ-specific locations out of 28 yielded mean liver organ doses within 95% confidence intervals of measurements based on all 28 liver-specific dosemeter locations. No statistical difference of mean liver dose was observed with rotation of the phantom either 10° clockwise or counter-clockwise as opposed to the coronal plane. Phantom dosimetry handling time during organ dose measurements can be markedly reduced, in this case the liver, by 79% (22/28), while still providing precise mean organ dose measurements.

Experiences with a new biplanar low-dose X-ray device for imaging the facial skeleton: A feasibility study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a new biplanar low-dose X-ray device for facial skeletal imaging.

Methods

We evaluated 48 biplanar radiographs from 12 patients (posteroanterior/lateral), originally taken for a scoliosis examination with a biplanar low-dose X-ray device. For this study, the images were further evaluated for the perceptibility of 38 facial skeleton landmarks. To determine the reliability and reproducibility of perceptibility, two independent observers determined the landmarks twice, during a time interval of at least two weeks.

Results

Both interoperator and intraoperator reliability were excellent for all landmarks [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.92].

Conclusions

The biplanar low-dose X-ray device demonstrated good feasibility for precisely assessing the anatomical landmarks of the facial skeleton. Given its excellent precision, the biplanar low-dose X-ray device data sets should be forwarded from the treating orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon to the orthodontist or dentist for further assessment in their field.

BIPLANAR IMAGING WITH TRIDIMENSIONAL CAPABILITIES: APPLICABILITY OF THIS NEW EXAMINATION TO SPINAL DEFORMITIES

ABSTRACT This study presents details about the applicability of the new image acquisition system, called the biplanar imaging system, with three-dimensional capabilities (EOS®) to the treatment of spinal deformities. This system allows radiographic acquisition of the entire body, with a great reduction in the dose of radiation absorbed by the patient and three-dimensional (3D) stereoradiographic image reconstruction of bone structures, including the spine. In the case of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the analysis of the spinal deformity with 3D reconstruction allows better understanding of the deformity and surgical planning. In the case of adult spinal deformity, full-body analysis allows an evaluation of the spinopelvic deformity, including loss of sagittal alignment, in addition to an evaluation of compensatory mechanisms recruited by the individual in an attempt to maintain the sagittal balance. Level of evidence III; Descriptive Review.

COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the radiation dose and image quality of the low dose 2D/3D EOS slot scanner (LDSS) to conventional digital radiography (DR) X-ray imaging systems for chest and knee examination protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The effective doses (ED) to the patient in the chest and knee clinical examination protocols for LDSS and DR X-ray imaging systems were determined using the dose area product and PCXMC Monte Carlo simulation software. The CDRAD phantom was imaged with 19 cm, and 13 cm thick Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) blocks to simulate the chest and knees respectively of a patient of average adult size. The contrast detail resolution was calculated using image analysis software.

RESULTS

The EDs for the LDSS default setting were up to 69% and 51% lower than for the DR systems for the chest (speed 4) and knee (speed 6) protocols, respectively, while for the increased dose level setting then the EDs were up to 42% and 35% lower than for the DR systems for the chest (speed 6) and knee (speed 8) protocols respectively. At the default setting, the contrast detail was lowest for the default setting of the 2D/3D low dose slot scanner (LDSS) for both chest and knee examinations, but at the highest dose levels then the threshold were equal or higher than the contrast resolution of DR imaging systems.

CONCLUSION

The LDSS has the potential to be used for clinical diagnosis of chest and knee examinations using the higher dose level. For speed 6 in chest protocol and speed 8 in knee protocol, the measured contrast detail resolution was comparable with the DR systems but at a lower effective dose.

A Nano-Dose Protocol For Cobb Angle Assessment in Children With Scoliosis: Results of a Phantom-based and Clinically Validated Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective validation study with technical notes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate a new ultra-low-dose full-spine protocol for reproducible Cobb angle measurements-the "nano-dose" protocol.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Scoliosis is a 3-dimensional (3D) deformity of the spine characterized by 3D clinical parameters. Nevertheless, 2D Cobb angle remains an essential and widely used radiologic measure in clinical practice. Repeated imaging is required for the assessment and follow-up of scoliosis patients. The resultant high dose of absorbed radiation increases the potential risk of developing radiation-induced cancer in such patients. Micro-dose radiographic imaging is already available in clinical practice, but the radiation dose delivered to the patient could be further reduced.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic child phantom was used to establish an ultra-low-dose protocol in the EOS Imaging System still allowing Cobb angle measurements, defined as nano-dose. A group of 23 consecutive children presenting for scoliosis assessment, 12 years of age or younger, were assessed with standard-dose or micro-dose and additional nano-dose full-spine imaging modalities. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of determining the reliability of 2D Cobb angle measurements was performed. The dosimetry was performed in the anthropomorphic phantom to confirm theoretical radiation dose reduction.

RESULTS

A nano-dose protocol was established for reliable Cobb angle measurements. Dose area product with this new nano-dose protocol was reduced to 5 mGy×cm, corresponding to one sixth of the micro-dose protocol (30 mGy×cm) and <1/40th of the standard-dose protocol (222 mGy×cm). Theoretical dose reduction, for posteroanterolateral positioning was confirmed using phantom dosimetry. Our study showed good reliability and repeatability between the 2 groups. Cobb variability was <5 degrees from the mean using 95% confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a new clinically validated nano-dose protocol for routine follow-up of scoliosis patients before surgery, keeping the radiation dose at a bare minimum, while allowing for reproducible Cobb angle measurements.

EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology

STUDY DESIGN

A comparative study of radiation dose measured in anthropomorphic phantoms.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to first report the first organ dose and effective dose measurements in anthropomorphic phantoms using the new EOS imaging micro-dose protocol in full-spine examinations, and to compare these measurements of radiation dose to measurements in the EOS standard-dose protocol and conventional digital radiology (CR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies evaluating organ dose and effective dose for the EOS low-dose scanner exist, and mainly for the standard-dose protocol. To the best of our knowledge, no studies of effective dose based on anthropomorphic phantom measurements exist for the new micro-dose protocol.

METHODS

Two anthropomorphic phantoms, representing a 5-year-old (pediatric) and a 15-year-old (adolescent). The phantoms were exposed to EOS micro-dose and standard-dose protocols during full-spine imaging. Additionally, CR in scoliosis settings was performed. For all modalities, organ doses were measured and effective doses were calculated using thermoluminescent dosimeters.

RESULTS

We found a 17-fold reduction (94%) of effective dose in micro-dose protocol compared with our CR system in the adolescent phantom. Micro-dose versus standard-dose protocol, showed a 6-fold reduction (83%), and for standard-dose versus our CR system a 2.8-fold reduction (64%) reduction of effective dose was observed.For the pediatric phantom, a 5-fold reduction (81%) of effective dose in micro-dose protocol compared to our CR system was observed. Micro-dose versus standard-dose protocol, showed a seven-fold (86%) reduction. However, we observed an increase in absorbed dose of 38% when comparing the EOS standard-dose protocol with our CR system.

CONCLUSION

The EOS imaging micro-dose option exposes patients to lower radiation doses than any currently available modality for full-spine examination. Expected reduction of dose was established for the adolescent phantom when comparing CR and standard-dose protocol. However, no reduction of effective dose with EOS standard-dose protocol compared to our reference CR system was observed in the pediatric phantom.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability of pelvimetric measurements performed using stereoradiographic imaging (SRI), and to assess maternal and fetal radiation doses compared to low-dose computer tomography (CT) pelvimetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five pregnant women (mean age, 29.6±5.5 [SD] years; range: 20-41 years) were prospectively included. All women underwent simultaneous frontal and lateral low-dose SRI and low-dose CT examination of the pelvis. Pelvimetry measurements were obtained from both examinations and radiation doses obtained with the two techniques were compared.

RESULTS

SRI-CT correlation (Pearson coefficient correlation [r]; mean bias [mb]) was strong for transverse inlet diameter (r=0.92; mb=-0.09cm), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic inlet (r=0.92; mb = 0.47cm), maximal transverse diameter (r=0.9; mb=0.21cm), sacrum length (r=0.9; mb=0.09cm). Correlation was good. Correlation was good for the sacrum depth (r=0.75; mb=0.06cm) and Magnin's index (r=0.7; mb=0.5cm). Correlation was moderate for anteroposterior diameter of pelvic outlet (r=0.6; mb=0.52cm). The fetal dose was 13.1 times lower using SRI (87±26μGy) than CT (1140±220μGy, P<0.0001). The effective maternal dose was 3.1 times lower using SRI (97±21μSv) than CT (310±60μSv; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic inlet measurements using SRI are reliable. Compared to CT pelvimetry, SRI leads to a significant decrease in fetal and maternal radiation doses. These findings should prompt physicians to use SRI as the first-line approach for pelvimetry.

Imaging in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Children with Idiopathic Scoliosis

The paper reviews the current imaging methods in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Radiography is generally used in the initial diagnosis of the condition. Postero-anterior erect full spine radiograph is generally prescribed, and is supplemented by lateral full spine radiograph when indicated. To reduce the radiation hazard, only the area of interest should be exposed, and follow-up radiographs should be taken with as few projections as possible. When available, EOS® stereoradiography should be used. The radiation of the microdose protocol is 45 times less than that of the conventional radiography. Surface topography offers another approach to monitoring changes of curvatures in AIS patients. Recently, 3D ultrasound has been found to be able to measure the Cobb angle accurately. Yet, it is still in the early developmental stages. The inherent intrinsic and external limitations of the imaging system need to be resolved before it can be widely used clinically. For AIS patients with atypical presentation, computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be required to assess for any underlying pathology. As CT is associated with a high radiation dose, it is playing a diminishing role in the management of scoliosis, and is replaced by MRI, which is also used for pre-operative planning of scoliosis. The different imaging methods have their limitations. The EOS® stereoradiography is expensive and is not commonly available. The surface topography does not enable measurement of Cobb angle, particularly when the patient is in-brace. The 3D ultrasound scanning has inherent intrinsic technical limitation and cannot be used in all subjects. Radiography, however, enables diagnosis and monitoring of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It is thus the gold standard in the evaluation and management of scoliosis curves.

Organ doses and lifetime attributable risk evaluations for scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients with the EOS imaging system

PURPOSE

The goal of this work is to evaluate organ doses and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality in scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients performed with EOS imaging system, in order to optimize patient dose and protocols.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic phantom of a normal patient, with thermoluminescent dosimeters in correspondence with the main organs at risk, was imaged with both EOS and computed radiography (CR). For each modality, effective dose was calculated from the measured organ doses. Lifetime attributable risk was computed accordingly to the Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII) and Public Health England (HPA) publications.

RESULTS

Except for testes and eyes, which were excluded from the scan in CR protocol, for all the other organs the doses delivered with CR examination were higher than these delivered by EOS system. The effective dose in EOS examination (0.43 ± 0.04 mSv) is about two times less than the dose in computed radiography with anti-scatter grid examination (0.87 ± 0.09 mSv), and, consequently, also the cancer probability is lower (5.4 vs 9.7 number of any cancers induction cases per 100,000 person examined, for a 20-year-old male patient).

CONCLUSIONS

The EOS system is efficient in limiting patient dose. The shielding of testes and the exclusion of eyes from the scan could allow to further reduce the dose.

Non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance: a systematic review

Background

Global sagittal balance, describing the vertical alignment of the spine, is an important factor in the non-operative and operative management of back pain. However, the typical gold standard method of assessment, radiography, requires exposure to radiation and increased cost, making it unsuitable for repeated use. Non-radiologic methods of assessment are available, but their reliability and validity in the current literature have not been systematically assessed. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise and evaluate the reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of assessing global sagittal balance.

Methods

Five electronic databases were searched and methodology evaluated by two independent reviewers using the13-item, reliability and validity, Brink and Louw critical appraisal tool.

Results

Fourteen articles describing six methodologies were identified from 3940 records. The six non-radiographic methodologies were biophotogrammetry, plumbline, surface topography, infra-red motion analysis, spinal mouse and ultrasound. Construct validity was evaluated for surface topography (R = 0.49 and R = 0.68, p < 0.001), infra-red motion-analysis (ICC = 0.81) and plumbline testing (ICC = 0.83). Reliability ranged from moderate (ICC = 0.67) for spinal mouse to very high for surface topography (Cronbach α = 0.985). Measures of agreement ranged from 0.9 mm (plumbline) to 22.94 mm (infra-red motion-analysis). Variability in study populations, reporting parameters and statistics prevented a meta-analysis.

Conclusions

The reliability and validity of the non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance was reported within 14 identified articles. Based on this limited evidence, non-radiographic methods appear to have moderate to very high reliability and limited to three methodologies, moderate to high validity. The overall quality and methodological approaches of the included articles were highly variable. Further research should focus on the validity of non-radiographic methods with a greater adherence to reporting actual and clinically relevant measures of agreement.

The use of magnetically-controlled growing rods to treat children with early-onset scoliosis: early radiological results in 19 children

AIMS

We undertook a prospective non-randomised radiological study to evaluate the preliminary results of using magnetically-controlled growing rods (MAGEC System, Ellipse technology) to treat children with early-onset scoliosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2011 and January 2015, 19 children were treated with magnetically-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and underwent distraction at three-monthly intervals. The mean age of our cohort was 9.1 years (4 to 14) and the mean follow-up 22.4 months (5.1 to 35.2). Of the 19 children, eight underwent conversion from traditional growing rods. Whole spine radiographs were carried out pre- and post-operatively: image intensification was used during each lengthening in the outpatient department. The measurements evaluated were Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, proximal junctional kyphosis and spinal growth from T1 to S1.

RESULTS

The mean pre-, post-operative and latest follow-up Cobb angles were 62° (37.4 to 95.8), 45.1° (16.6 to 96.2) and 43.2° (11.9 to 90.5), respectively (p < 0.05). The mean pre-, post-operative and latest follow-up T1-S1 lengths were 288.1 mm (223.2 to 351.7), 298.8 mm (251 to 355.7) and 331.1 mm (275 to 391.9), respectively (p < 0.05). In all, three patients developed proximal pull-out of their fixation and required revision surgery: there were no subsequent complications. There were no complications of outpatient distraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that MCGRs provide stable correction of the deformity in early-onset scoliosis in both primary and revision procedures. They have the potential to reduce the need for multiple operations and thereby minimise the potential complications associated with traditional growing rod systems. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1240-47.

Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD "John Sevastic Award" Winner in Imaging Research

BACKGROUND

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) frequently receive x-ray imaging at diagnosis and subsequent follow monitoring. The ionizing radiation exposure has accumulated through their development stage and the effect of radiation to this young vulnerable group of patients is uncertain. To achieve the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept of radiation dose in medical imaging, a slot-scanning x-ray technique by the EOS system has been adopted and the radiation dose using micro-dose protocol was compared with the standard digital radiography on patients with AIS.

METHODS

Ninety-nine participants with AIS underwent micro-dose EOS and 33 underwent standard digital radiography (DR) for imaging of the whole spine. Entrance-skin dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) at three regions (i.e. dorsal sites at the level of sternal notch, nipple line, symphysis pubis). Effective dose and organ dose were calculated by simulation using PCXMC 2.0. Data from two x-ray systems were compared using independent-samples t-test and significance level at 0.05. All TLD measurements were conducted on PA projection only. Image quality was also assessed by two raters using Cobb angle measurement and a set of imaging parameters for optimization purposes.

RESULTS

Entrance-skin dose from micro-dose EOS system was 5.9-27.0 times lower at various regions compared with standard DR. The calculated effective dose was 2.6 ± 0.5 (μSv) and 67.5 ± 23.3 (μSv) from micro-dose and standard DR, respectively. The reduction in the micro-dose was approximately 26 times. Organ doses at thyroid, lung and gonad regions were significantly lower in micro-dose (p < 0.001). Data were further compared within the different gender groups. Females received significantly higher (p < 0.001) organ dose at ovaries compared to the testes in males. Patients with AIS received approximately 16-34 times lesser organ dose from micro-dose x-ray as compared with the standard DR. There was no significant difference in overall rating of imaging quality between EOS and DR. Micro-dose protocol provided enough quality to perform consistent measurement on Cobb angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Entrance-skin dose, effective dose and organ dose were significantly reduced in micro-dose x-ray. The effective dose of a single micro-dose x-ray (2.6 μSv) was less than a day of background radiation. As AIS patients require periodic x-ray follow up for surveillance of curve progression, clinical use of micro-dose x-ray system is beneficial for these young patients to reduce the intake of ionizing radiation.

Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry

PURPOSE

To estimate fetal absorbed doses for pregnant women pelvimetry, a comparative study between EOS imaging system and low-dose spiral CT-scanner was carried out. For this purpose three different studies were investigated: in vivo, in vitro and Monte Carlo calculations.

METHODS

In vivo dosimetry was performed, using OSL NanoDot dosimeters, to determine the dose to the skin of twenty pregnant women. In vitro studies were established by using a cubic phantom of water, in order to estimate the out of field doses. In the latter study, OSLDs were placed at depths corresponding to the lowest, average and highest position of the uterus. Monte Carlo calculations of effective doses to high radio-sensitive organs were established, using PCXMC and CTExpo software suites for EOS imaging system and CT-scanner, respectively.

RESULTS

The EOS imaging system reduces radiation exposure 4 to 8 times compared to the CT-scanner. The entrance skin doses were 74% (p-values <0.01) higher with the CT-scanner than with the EOS system. In the out of field region, the measured doses of the EOS system were reduced by 80% (p-values <0.02). Monte Carlo calculations confirmed that effective doses to organs are less accentuated for EOS than for CT pelvimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The EOS system is less irradiating than the CT exam. The out-of-field dose which is significant, is lower in the EOS than in the CT-scanner and could be reduced even further by optimizing the time used for image acquisition.

Decreased patient exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional rheumatology procedures after optimization of protection

OBJECTIVES

To decrease radiation exposure of patients undergoing interventional rheumatology procedures, without adversely affecting quality of care.

METHODS

The radiation dose received, assessed by the dose-area product (DAP), was measured during 283 intraarticular injections performed under fluoroscopic guidance between May and July 2013. Then, three steps were taken to decrease patients' radiation exposure: a copper filter was added, the anti-scatter grid was removed, and exposure cell sensitivity was set at the highest value. DAP was measured during 158 intraarticular injections performed in 2014 with these measures in place.

RESULTS

Mean DAP before optimization was 175μGray·m² during facet joint injections (n=4) and 43μGray·m² during hip injections but was less than 20μGray·m² for injections into the shoulders (15.7μGray·m²), ankles (7.7μGray·m²), wrists (3.7μGray·m²), and fingers (3.3μGray·m²). After optimization, DAP decreased markedly for all injection sites, by 52% (shoulders) to 87% (facet joints, 22.7μGray·m²). Decreases occurred at all three steps of the procedure, i.e., patient installation, injection, and last image hold. Exposure during facet joint injections varied from 84 (54.5-108.5) μGray·m² when body mass index (BMI) was <25kg/m² to 228.9 (161.3-340.4)μGray·m² when BMI was>30kg/m².

CONCLUSION

Simple technical changes translate into large decreases in patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopically-guided injections, particularly at the facet joints and in obese patients.

CHARACTERISING THE EOS SLOT-SCANNING SYSTEM WITH THE EFFECTIVE DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY

As opposed to the standard detective quantum efficiency (DQE), effective DQE (eDQE) is a figure of merit that allows comparing the performances of imaging systems in the presence of scatter rejection devices. The geometry of the EOS™ slot-scanning system is such that the detector is self-collimated and rejects scattered radiation. In this study, the EOS system was characterised using the eDQE in imaging conditions similar to those used in clinical practice: with phantoms of different widths placed in the X-ray beam, for various incident air kerma and tube voltages corresponding to the phantom thickness. Scatter fractions in EOS images were extremely low, around 2 % for all configurations. Maximum eDQE values spanned 9-14.8 % for a large range of air kerma at the detector plane from 0.01 to 1.34 µGy. These figures were obtained with non-optimised EOS setting but still over-performed most of the maximum eDQEs recently assessed for various computed radiology and digital radiology systems with antiscatter grids.

EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations

PURPOSE

In 1992, Georges Charpak invented a new type of X-ray detector, which in turn led to the development of the EOS(®) 2D/3D imaging system. This system takes simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral 2D images of the whole body and can be utilized to perform 3D reconstruction based on statistical models. The purpose of this review is to present the state of the art for this EOS(®) imaging technique, to report recent developments and advances in the technique, and to stress its benefits while also noting its limitations.

METHODS

The review was based on a thorough literature search on the subject as well as personal experience gained from many years of using the EOS(®) system.

RESULTS

While EOS(®) imaging could be proposed for many applications, it is most useful in relation to scoliosis and sagittal balance, due to its ability to take simultaneous orthogonal images while the patient is standing, to perform 3D reconstruction, and to determine various relationships among adjacent segments (cervical spine, pelvis, and lower limbs). The technique has also been validated for the study of pelvic and lower-limb deformity and pathology in adult and pediatric populations; in such a study it has the advantage of allowing the measurement of torsional deformity, which classically requires a CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

The major advantages of EOS(®) are the relatively low dose of radiation (50-80 % less than conventional X-rays) that the patient receives and the possibility of obtaining a 3D reconstruction of the bones. However, this 3D reconstruction is not created automatically; a well-trained operator is required to generate it. The EOS(®) imaging technique has proven itself to be a very useful research and diagnostic tool.

Radiography of scoliosis: Comparative dose levels and image quality between a dynamic flat-panel detector and a slot-scanning device (EOS system)

PURPOSE

To compare radiation dose and image quality between a slot-scanning system (SSS) and a dynamic flat-panel detector (DFD) in assessing scoliosis in children.

METHODS

An experimental study was first performed with a phantom to assess the quality of each device. The clinical part included a prospective observational dosimetric and qualitative comparative study with acquisition of whole-spine X-ray: SSS (31 children), DFD (26 children). Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Dosimetric statistical analysis was performed from dose area product (DAP) and entrance skin dose measured by thermo-luminescent dosimeters localized in the cervical, thoracic and sacral areas. Assessment of the diagnostic quality (phantom and clinical) was realized by independent evaluation by 3 observers, using statistical analysis of quality score and inter-observer reproducibility.

RESULTS

DAP was equivalent with the 2 systems. Entrance skin dose was significantly higher with DFD in thoracic and pelvic regions (P<0.05). Image quality scores of the SSS were significantly better than DFD for a majority of criteria, in both phantom and clinical evaluations.

CONCLUSION

For scoliosis evaluation, the SSS, compared to the DFD system, offers enhanced image quality while reducing the entrance skin dose in the most radiosensitive areas.

Cumulative Radiation Exposure With EOS Imaging Compared With Standard Spine Radiographs

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to estimate the total radiation exposure to scoliosis patients during the entire treatment course using standard imaging techniques versus EOS posteroanterior (PA) and anteroposterior (AP) views.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

EOS is a slot-scanning X-ray system designed to reduce radiation exposure in orthopedic imaging. There are few independent studies comparing organ and total effective radiation dose from standard EOS PA, AP, and lateral imaging versus conventional projection radiographs for children with spinal deformity.

METHODS

A total of 42 skeletally immature idiopathic scoliosis patients were treated with bracing (21) or spinal fusion (21) and were followed to skeletal maturity. The number of scoliosis radiographs (PA and lateral) for each patient was recorded. A computerized dosing model was used to calculate estimated patient and organ doses for PA and lateral scoliosis X-rays taken with EOS or computed radiography with a filter (CR) or without a filter (CRF). Assuming that each X-ray taken delivered the same radiation as the phantom calculation, the authors estimated the total effective and organ dose that each adolescent would have received using EOS, CR, or CRF. Annual background radiation is 3 mSv.

RESULTS

Mean number of radiographs per patient was 20.9 (range, 8-43). Patients who underwent surgical treatment had a significantly greater number of X-rays than those who were braced (27.3 vs. 14.5; p < .001). Assuming all films were CR, the mean cumulative dose was estimated at 5.38 mSv. With standard EOS films, the mean cumulative estimated dose was 2.66 mSv, a decrease of 50.6%. An AP versus PA EOS radiograph resulted in an 8 times higher radiation dose to the breasts and 4 times higher dose to the thyroid.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard EOS imaging system moderately reduced the total radiation exposure to skeletally immature scoliosis patients. Over the entire treatment course, this represented 2.72 mSv mean reduction or 0.91 years of background radiation. Posteroanterior films significantly reduced breast and thyroid dose.