1
|
Pushpavanam K, Dutta S, Inamdar S, Bista T, Sokolowski T, Rapchak A, Sadeghi A, Sapareto S, Rege K. Versatile Detection and Monitoring of Ionizing Radiation Treatment Using Radiation-Responsive Gel Nanosensors. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2022; 14:14997-15007. [PMID: 35316013 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c01019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Modern radiation therapy workflow involves complex processes intended to maximize the radiation dose delivered to tumors while simultaneously minimizing excess radiation to normal tissues. Safe and accurate delivery of radiation doses is critical to the successful execution of these treatment plans and effective treatment outcomes. Given extensive differences in existing dosimeters, the choice of devices and technologies for detecting biologically relevant doses of radiation has to be made judiciously, taking into account anatomical considerations and modality of treatment (invasive, e.g., interstitial brachytherapy vs noninvasive, e.g., external-beam therapy radiotherapy). Rapid advances in versatile radiation delivery technologies necessitate new detection platforms and devices that are readily adaptable into a multitude of form factors in order to ensure precision and safety in dose delivery. Here, we demonstrate the adaptability of radiation-responsive gel nanosensors as a platform technology for detecting ionizing radiation using three different form factors with an eye toward versatile use in the clinic. In this approach, ionizing radiation results in the reduction of monovalent gold salts leading to the formation of gold nanoparticles within gels formulated in different morphologies including one-dimensional (1D) needles for interstitial brachytherapy, two-dimensional (2D) area inserts for skin brachytherapy, and three-dimensional (3D) volumetric dose distribution in tissue phantoms. The formation of gold nanoparticles can be detected using distinct but complementary modes of readout including optical (visual) and photothermal detection, which further enhances the versatility of this approach. A linear response in the readout was seen as a function of radiation dose, which enabled straightforward calibration of each of these devices for predicting unknown doses of therapeutic relevance. Taken together, these results indicate that the gel nanosensor technology can be used to detect ionizing radiation in different morphologies and using different detection methods for application in treatment planning, delivery, and verification in radiotherapy and in trauma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Pushpavanam
- Chemical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Subhadeep Dutta
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Sahil Inamdar
- Chemical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| | - Tomasz Bista
- Banner-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona 85234, United States
| | | | - Alek Rapchak
- Banner-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona 85234, United States
| | - Amir Sadeghi
- Banner-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona 85234, United States
| | - Stephen Sapareto
- Banner-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona 85234, United States
| | - Kaushal Rege
- Chemical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
- Biological Design Graduate Program, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Optimization of bromine-based radical initiators using leucomalachite green and solvents in PRESAGE® dosimeter. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.109985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
3
|
Velten C, Wang YF, Adamovics J, Wuu CS. 3D isocentricity analysis for clinical linear accelerators. Med Phys 2020; 47:1460-1467. [PMID: 31970794 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a three-dimensional (3D) concurrent isocentricity measurement of a clinical linear accelerator's (linac) using a single 3D dosimeter, PRESAGE. METHODS A 3D dosimeter, PRESAGE, set up on the treatment couch of a Varian TrueBeam LINAC using the setup lasers, was irradiated under gantry angles of 0 ∘ , 50 ∘ , 160 ∘ , and 270 ∘ with the couch fixed at 0 ∘ and subsequently, under couch angles of 10 ∘ , 330 ∘ , 300 ∘ , and 265 ∘ with the gantry fixed at 270 ∘ . The 1 cm 2 (at 100 cm SAD) square fields were delivered at 6 MV with 800 MU/field. After irradiation, the dosimeter was scanned using a single-beam optical scanner and images were reconstructed with submillimeter resolution using filtered back-projection. Postprocessing was used to extract views parallel to the star-shot planes from which beam trajectories and the smallest circles enclosing these were drawn and extracted. These circles and information from the view orthogonal to both star-shots were used to represent the rotational centers as spheroids. The linac isocenter was defined by the distribution of midpoints between any, randomly selected, points lying inside the center spheroids defined by the table and gantry rotations; isocenter location and size were defined by the average midpoint and the distribution's semi-axes. Collimator rotations were not included in this study. RESULTS Relative to the setup center defined by lasers, the table and gantry rotation center coordinates (lat., long., vert.) were measured in units of millimeters, to be (-0.24, 0.18, -0.52) and (0.10, 0.53, -0.52), respectively. Displacements from the setup center were 0.60 and 0.75 mm for the table and gantry centers, while the distance between them measured 0.49 mm. The linac's radiation isocenter was calculated to be at (-0.07, -0.17, 0.51) relative to the setup lasers and its size was found to be most easily described by a spheroid prolate in vertical direction with semi-axis lengths of 0.13 and 0.23 mm for the lateral-longitudinal and vertical directions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates how to measure the location and sizes of rotational centers in 3D with one setup. The proposed method provides a more comprehensive view on the isocentricity of LINAC than the conventional two-dimensional film measurements. Additionally, a new definition of isocenter and its size was proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Velten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Yi-Fang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Adamovics
- Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Physics, Rider University, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | - Cheng-Shie Wuu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pappas EP, Peppa V, Hourdakis CJ, Karaiskos P, Papagiannis P. On the use of a novel Ferrous Xylenol-orange gelatin dosimeter for HDR brachytherapy commissioning and quality assurance testing. Phys Med 2018; 45:162-169. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
5
|
Mein S, Rankine L, Adamovics J, Li H, Oldham M. Development of a 3D remote dosimetry protocol compatible with MRgIMRT. Med Phys 2017; 44:6018-6028. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Medical Physics Graduate Program; Duke University; Durham NC 27705 USA
| | - Leith Rankine
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of North Carolina; Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Washington University School of Medicine; Saint Louis MO 63110 USA
| | - John Adamovics
- Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry & Physics; Rider University; Lawrenceville NY 08648 USA
| | - Harold Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Washington University School of Medicine; Saint Louis MO 63110 USA
| | - Mark Oldham
- Medical Physics Graduate Program; Duke University; Durham NC 27705 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Duke University Medical Center; Durham NC 27710 USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee HJ, Roed Y, Venkataraman S, Carroll M, Ibbott GS. Investigation of magnetic field effects on the dose-response of 3D dosimeters for magnetic resonance - image guided radiation therapy applications. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:426-432. [PMID: 28964533 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 08/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The strong magnetic field of integrated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiation treatment systems influences secondary electrons resulting in changes in dose deposition in three dimensions. To fill the need for volumetric dose quality assurance, we investigated the effects of strong magnetic fields on 3D dosimeters for MR-image-guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) applications. MATERIAL AND METHODS There are currently three main categories of 3D dosimeters, and the following were used in this study: radiochromic plastic (PRESAGE®), radiochromic gel (FOX), and polymer gel (BANG™). For the purposes of batch consistency, an electromagnet was used for same-day irradiations with and without a strong magnetic field (B0, 1.5T for PRESAGE® and FOX and 1.0T for BANG™). RESULTS For PRESAGE®, the percent difference in optical signal with and without B0 was 1.5% at the spectral peak of 632nm. For FOX, the optical signal percent difference was 1.6% at 440nm and 0.5% at 585nm. For BANG™, the percent difference in R2 MR signal was 0.7%. CONCLUSIONS The percent differences in responses with and without strong magnetic fields were minimal for all three 3D dosimeter systems. These 3D dosimeters therefore can be applied to MR-IGRT without requiring a correction factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah J Lee
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, USA.
| | - Yvonne Roed
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Physics, University of Houston, USA
| | - Sara Venkataraman
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Mitchell Carroll
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, USA
| | - Geoffrey S Ibbott
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pappas EP, Zoros E, Moutsatsos A, Peppa V, Zourari K, Karaiskos P, Papagiannis P. On the experimental validation of model-based dose calculation algorithms for192Ir HDR brachytherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:4160-4182. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6a01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
8
|
Rankine LJ, Mein S, Cai B, Curcuru A, Juang T, Miles D, Mutic S, Wang Y, Oldham M, Li HH. Three-Dimensional Dosimetric Validation of a Magnetic Resonance Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:1095-1104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Watanabe Y, Warmington L, Gopishankar N. Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry using polymer gel and solid radiochromic polymer: From basics to clinical applications. World J Radiol 2017; 9:112-125. [PMID: 28396725 PMCID: PMC5368627 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Revised: 12/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate dose measurement tools are needed to evaluate the radiation dose delivered to patients by using modern and sophisticated radiation therapy techniques. However, the adequate tools which enable us to directly measure the dose distributions in three-dimensional (3D) space are not commonly available. One such 3D dose measurement device is the polymer-based dosimeter, which changes the material property in response to radiation. These are available in the gel form as polymer gel dosimeter (PGD) and ferrous gel dosimeter (FGD) and in the solid form as solid plastic dosimeter (SPD). Those are made of a continuous uniform medium which polymerizes upon irradiation. Hence, the intrinsic spatial resolution of those dosimeters is very high, and it is only limited by the method by which one converts the dose information recorded by the medium to the absorbed dose. The current standard methods of the dose quantification are magnetic resonance imaging, optical computed tomography, and X-ray computed tomography. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging is well established as a method for obtaining clinically relevant dosimetric data by PGD and FGD. Despite the likely possibility of doing 3D dosimetry by PGD, FGD or SPD, the tools are still lacking wider usages for clinical applications. In this review article, we summarize the current status of PGD, FGD, and SPD and discuss the issue faced by these for wider acceptance in radiation oncology clinic and propose some directions for future development.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bache ST, Juang T, Belley MD, Koontz BF, Adamovics J, Yoshizumi TT, Kirsch DG, Oldham M. Investigating the accuracy of microstereotactic-body-radiotherapy utilizing anatomically accurate 3D printed rodent-morphic dosimeters. Med Phys 2015; 42:846-55. [PMID: 25652497 DOI: 10.1118/1.4905489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Sophisticated small animal irradiators, incorporating cone-beam-CT image-guidance, have recently been developed which enable exploration of the efficacy of advanced radiation treatments in the preclinical setting. Microstereotactic-body-radiation-therapy (microSBRT) is one technique of interest, utilizing field sizes in the range of 1-15 mm. Verification of the accuracy of microSBRT treatment delivery is challenging due to the lack of available methods to comprehensively measure dose distributions in representative phantoms with sufficiently high spatial resolution and in 3 dimensions (3D). This work introduces a potential solution in the form of anatomically accurate rodent-morphic 3D dosimeters compatible with ultrahigh resolution (0.3 mm(3)) optical computed tomography (optical-CT) dose read-out. METHODS Rodent-morphic dosimeters were produced by 3D-printing molds of rodent anatomy directly from contours defined on x-ray CT data sets of rats and mice, and using these molds to create tissue-equivalent radiochromic 3D dosimeters from Presage. Anatomically accurate spines were incorporated into some dosimeters, by first 3D printing the spine mold, then forming a high-Z bone equivalent spine insert. This spine insert was then set inside the tissue equivalent body mold. The high-Z spinal insert enabled representative cone-beam CT IGRT targeting. On irradiation, a linear radiochromic change in optical-density occurs in the dosimeter, which is proportional to absorbed dose, and was read out using optical-CT in high-resolution (0.5 mm isotropic voxels). Optical-CT data were converted to absolute dose in two ways: (i) using a calibration curve derived from other Presage dosimeters from the same batch, and (ii) by independent measurement of calibrated dose at a point using a novel detector comprised of a yttrium oxide based nanocrystalline scintillator, with a submillimeter active length. A microSBRT spinal treatment was delivered consisting of a 180° continuous arc at 225 kVp with a 20 × 10 mm field size. Dose response was evaluated using both the Presage/optical-CT 3D dosimetry system described above, and independent verification in select planes using EBT2 radiochromic film placed inside rodent-morphic dosimeters that had been sectioned in half. RESULTS Rodent-morphic 3D dosimeters were successfully produced from Presage radiochromic material by utilizing 3D printed molds of rat CT contours. The dosimeters were found to be compatible with optical-CT dose readout in high-resolution 3D (0.5 mm isotropic voxels) with minimal artifacts or noise. Cone-beam CT image guidance was possible with these dosimeters due to sufficient contrast between high-Z spinal inserts and tissue equivalent Presage material (CNR ∼10 on CBCT images). Dose at isocenter measured with optical-CT was found to agree with nanoscintillator measurement to within 2.8%. Maximum dose in line profiles taken through Presage and film dose slices agreed within 3%, with FWHM measurements through each profile found to agree within 2%. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates the feasibility of using 3D printing technology to make anatomically accurate Presage rodent-morphic dosimeters incorporating spinal-mimicking inserts. High quality optical-CT 3D dosimetry is feasible on these dosimeters, despite the irregular surfaces and implanted inserts. The ability to measure dose distributions in anatomically accurate phantoms represents a powerful useful additional verification tool for preclinical microSBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven T Bache
- Duke University Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina 27705
| | - Titania Juang
- Duke University Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina 27705
| | - Matthew D Belley
- Duke University Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina 27705
| | | | | | | | - David G Kirsch
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| | - Mark Oldham
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jackson J, Juang T, Adamovics J, Oldham M. An investigation of PRESAGE® 3D dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT radiation therapy treatment verification. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:2217-30. [PMID: 25683902 PMCID: PMC4764093 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to characterize three formulations of PRESAGE(®) dosimeters (DEA-1, DEA-2, and DX) and to identify optimal readout timing and procedures for accurate in-house 3D dosimetry. The optimal formulation and procedure was then applied for the verification of an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment technique. PRESAGE(®) formulations were studied for their temporal stability post-irradiation, sensitivity, and linearity of dose response. Dosimeters were read out using a high-resolution optical-CT scanner. Small volumes of PRESAGE(®) were irradiated to investigate possible differences in sensitivity for large and small volumes ('volume effect'). The optimal formulation and read-out technique was applied to the verification of two patient treatments: an IMRT plan and a VMAT plan. A gradual decrease in post-irradiation optical-density was observed in all formulations with DEA-1 exhibiting the best temporal stability with less than 4% variation between 2-22 h post-irradiation. A linear dose response at the 4 h time point was observed for all formulations with an R(2) value >0.99. A large volume effect was observed for DEA-1 with sensitivity of the large dosimeter being ~63% less than the sensitivity of the cuvettes. For the IMRT and VMAT treatments, the 3D gamma passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria using absolute measured dose were 99.6 and 94.5% for the IMRT and VMAT treatments, respectively. In summary, this work shows that accurate 3D dosimetry is possible with all three PRESAGE(®) formulations. The optimal imaging windows post-irradiation were 3-24 h, 2-6 h, and immediately for the DEA-1, DEA-2, and DX formulations, respectively. Because of the large volume effect, small volume cuvettes are not yet a reliable method for calibration of larger dosimeters to absolute dose. Finally, PRESAGE(®) is observed to be a useful method of 3D verification when careful consideration is given to the temporal stability and imaging protocols for the specific formulation used.
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Schreiner LJ. True 3D chemical dosimetry (gels, plastics): Development and clinical role. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/573/1/012003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|