1
|
Guyer G, Bertholet J, Mueller S, Zhu C, Volken W, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Fix MK. A dosimetrically motivated pathfinding approach for non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:185009. [PMID: 39214138 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad75e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) involves dynamic table translations in synchrony with intensity modulation and dynamic gantry, table, and/or collimator rotation. This work aims to develop and evaluate a novel dosimetrically motivated path determination technique for non-isocentric DTRT.Approach.The path determination considers all available beam directions, given on a user-specified grid of gantry angle, table angle, and longitudinal, vertical, and lateral table position. Additionally, the source-to-target distance of all beam directions can be extended by moving the table away from the gantry along the central beam axis to increase the collision-free space. The path determination uses a column generation algorithm to iteratively add beam directions to paths until a user-defined total path length is reached. A subsequent direct aperture optimization of the intensity modulation along the paths creates deliverable plans. Non-isocentric DTRT plans using the path determination and using a manual path setup were created for a craniospinal and a spinal irradiation case. Furthermore, VMAT, isocentric DTRT, and non-isocentric DTRT plans are created for a breast, head and neck (H&N), and esophagus case. Additionally, a HyperArc plan is created for the H&N case. The plans are compared in terms of the dosimetric treatment plan quality and estimated delivery time.Main results.For the craniospinal and spinal irradiation case, using path determination results in dose distributions with improved conformity but a slightly worse target homogeneity compared to manual path setup. The non-isocentric DTRT plans maintained target coverage while reducing the mean dose to organs-at-risk on average by 1.7 Gy (breast), 1.0 Gy (H&N), and 1.6 Gy (esophagus) compared to the VMAT plans and by 0.8 Gy (breast), 0.6 Gy (H&N), and 0.8 Gy (esophagus) compared to the isocentric DTRT plans.Significance.A general dosimetrically motivated path determination applicable to non-isocentric DTRT plans is successfully developed, further advancing the treatment planning for non-isocentric DTRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Chengchen Zhu
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Mueller S, Guyer G, Frei D, Volken W, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Organs-at-risk dose and normal tissue complication probability with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110237. [PMID: 38513960 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
We compared dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) to state-of-the-art volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 46 head and neck cancer cases. DTRT had lower dose to salivary glands and swallowing structure, resulting in lower predicted xerostomia and dysphagia compared to VMAT. DTRT is deliverable on C-arm linacs with high dosimetric accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bertholet J, Zhu C, Guyer G, Mueller S, Volken W, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Stampanoni MFM, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Dosimetrically motivated beam-angle optimization for non-coplanar arc radiotherapy with and without dynamic collimator rotation. Med Phys 2024; 51:1326-1339. [PMID: 38131614 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-coplanar techniques have shown to improve the achievable dose distribution compared to standard coplanar techniques for multiple treatment sites but finding optimal beam directions is challenging. Dynamic collimator trajectory radiotherapy (colli-DTRT) is a new intensity modulated radiotherapy technique that uses non-coplanar partial arcs and dynamic collimator rotation. PURPOSE To solve the beam angle optimization (BAO) problem for colli-DTRT and non-coplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT) by determining the table-angle and the gantry-angle ranges of the partial arcs through iterative 4π fluence map optimization (FMO) and beam direction elimination. METHODS BAO considers all available beam directions sampled on a gantry-table map with the collimator angle aligned to the superior-inferior axis (colli-DTRT) or static (NC-VMAT). First, FMO is performed, and beam directions are scored based on their contributions to the objective function. The map is thresholded to remove the least contributing beam directions, and arc candidates are formed by adjacent beam directions with the same table angle. Next, FMO and arc candidate trimming, based on objective function penalty score, is performed iteratively until a desired total gantry angle range is reached. Direct aperture optimization on the final set of colli-DTRT or NC-VMAT arcs generates deliverable plans. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT plans were created for seven clinically-motivated cases with targets in the head and neck (two cases), brain, esophagus, lung, breast, and prostate. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT were compared to coplanar VMAT plans as well as to class-solution non-coplanar VMAT plans for the brain and head and neck cases. Dosimetric validation was performed for one colli-DTRT (head and neck) and one NC-VMAT (breast) plan using film measurements. RESULTS Target coverage and conformity was similar for all techniques. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT plans had improved dosimetric performance compared to coplanar VMAT for all treatment sites except prostate where all techniques were equivalent. For the head and neck and brain cases, mean dose reduction-in percentage of the prescription dose-to parallel organs was on average 0.7% (colli-DTRT), 0.8% (NC-VMAT) and 0.4% (class-solution) compared to VMAT. The reduction in D2% for the serial organs was on average 1.7% (colli-DTRT), 2.0% (NC-VMAT) and 0.9% (class-solution). For the esophagus, lung, and breast cases, mean dose reduction to parallel organs was on average 0.2% (colli-DTRT) and 0.3% (NC-VMAT) compared to VMAT. The reduction in D2% for the serial organs was on average 1.3% (colli-DTRT) and 0.9% (NC-VMAT). Estimated delivery times for colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT were below 4 min for a full gantry angle range of 720°, including transitions between arcs, except for the brain case where multiple arcs covered the whole table angle range. These times are in the same order as the class-solution for the head and neck and brain cases. Total optimization times were 25%-107% longer for colli-DTRT, including BAO, compared to VMAT. CONCLUSIONS We successfully developed dosimetrically motivated BAO for colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT treatment planning. colli-DTRT and NC-VMAT are applicable to multiple treatment sites, including body sites, with beneficial or equivalent dosimetric performances compared to coplanar VMAT and reasonable delivery times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Chengchen Zhu
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Church C, MacDonald RL, Parsons D, Syme A. Evaluation of plan quality and treatment efficiency in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans with a variable source-to-axis distance. Med Phys 2023; 50:3039-3054. [PMID: 36774531 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy deliveries with dynamic couch motions that shorten the source-to-axis distance (SAD) on a C-arm linac have the potential to increase treatment efficiency through the increase of the effective dose rate. In this investigation, we convert clinically deliverable volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans for cranial radiosurgery into virtual isocenter plans through implementation of couch trajectories that maintain the target at a shortened but variable SAD throughout treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomly sampled population of patients treated with cranial radiosurgery from within the last three years were separated into groups with one, two, and three lesions. All plans had a single isocenter (regardless of number of targets), and a single prescription dose. Patient treatment plans were converted from their original delivery at a standard isocenter to a dynamic virtual isocenter in MATLAB. The virtual isocenter plan featured a variable isocenter position based upon the closest achievable source-to-target distance (referred to herein as a virtual source-to-axis distance [vSAD]) which avoided collision zones on a TrueBeam STx platform. Apertures were magnified according to the vSAD and monitor units at a given control point were scaled based on the inverse square law. Doses were calculated for the plans with a virtual isocenter in the Eclipse (v13.6.23) treatment planning system (TPS) and were compared with the clinical plans. Plan metrics (MU, Paddick conformity index, gradient index, and the volume receiving 12 Gy or more), normal brain dose-volume differences, as well as maximum doses received by organs at risk (OARs) were assessed. The values were compared between standard and virtual isocenter plans with Wilcoxon Sign Ranked tests to determine significance. A subset of the plans were mapped to the MAX-HD anthropomorphic phantom which contained an insert housing EBT3 GafChromic film and a PTW 31010 microion chamber for dose verification on a linac. RESULTS Delivering plans at a virtual isocenter resulted in an average reduction of 20.9% (p = 3×10-6 ) and 20.6% (p = 3.0×10-6 ) of MUs across all VMAT and all DCA plans, respectively. There was no significant change in OAR max doses received by plans delivered at a virtual isocenter. The low dose wash (1.0-2.0 Gy or 5-11% of the prescription dose) was increased (by approximately 20 cc) for plans with three lesions. This was equivalent to a 2.7%-3.8% volumetric increase in normal tissue receiving the respective dose level when comparing the plan with a virtual isocenter to a plan with a standard isocenter. Gamma pass rates with a 5%/1mm analysis criteria were 96.40% ± 2.90% and 95.07% ± 3.10% for deliveries at standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Absolute point dose agreements were within -0.36% ± 3.45% and -0.55% ± 3.39% for deliveries at a standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Potential time savings per arc were found to have linear relationship with the monitor units delivered per arc (savings of 0.009 s/MU with an r2 = 0.866 when fit to plans with a single lesion). CONCLUSIONS Converting clinical plans at standard isocenter to a virtual isocenter design did not show any losses to plan quality while simultaneously improving treatment efficiency through MU reductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody Church
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - R Lee MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Alasdair Syme
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guyer G, Mueller S, Koechli C, Frei D, Volken W, Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Loebner HA, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Fix MK. Enabling non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy by integration of dynamic table translations. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac840d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. The purpose of this study is to develop a treatment planning process (TPP) for non-isocentric dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) using dynamic gantry rotation, collimator rotation, table rotation, longitudinal, vertical and lateral table translations and intensity modulation and to validate the dosimetric accuracy. Approach. The TPP consists of two steps. First, a path describing the dynamic gantry rotation, collimator rotation and dynamic table rotation and translations is determined. Second, an optimization of the intensity modulation along the path is performed. We demonstrate the TPP for three use cases. First, a non-isocentric DTRT plan for a brain case is compared to an isocentric DTRT plan in terms of dosimetric plan quality and delivery time. Second, a non-isocentric DTRT plan for a craniospinal irradiation (CSI) case is compared to a multi-isocentric intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan. Third, a non-isocentric DTRT plan for a bilateral breast case is compared to a multi-isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan. The non-isocentric DTRT plans are delivered on a TrueBeam in developer mode and their dosimetric accuracy is validated using radiochromic films. Main results. The non-isocentric DTRT plan for the brain case is similar in dosimetric plan quality and delivery time to the isocentric DTRT plan but is expected to reduce the risk of collisions. The DTRT plan for the CSI case shows similar dosimetric plan quality while reducing the delivery time by 45% in comparison with the IMRT plan. The DTRT plan for the breast case showed better treatment plan quality in comparison with the VMAT plan. The gamma passing rates between the measured and calculated dose distributions are higher than 95% for all three plans. Significance. The versatile benefits of non-isocentric DTRT are demonstrated with three use cases, namely reduction of collision risk, reduced setup and delivery time and improved dosimetric plan quality.
Collapse
|
6
|
Leitão J, Bijman R, Wahab Sharfo A, Brus Y, Rossi L, Breedveld S, Heijmen B. Automated multi-criterial planning with beam angle optimization to establish non-coplanar VMAT class solutions for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Phys Med 2022; 101:20-27. [PMID: 35853387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Complexity in selecting optimal non-coplanar beam setups and prolonged delivery times may hamper the use of non-coplanar treatments for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Automated multi-criterial planning with integrated beam angle optimization was used to define non-coplanar VMAT class solutions (CSs), each consisting of a coplanar arc and additional 1 or 2 fixed, non-coplanar partial arcs. METHODS Automated planning was used to generate a coplanar VMAT plan with 5 complementary computer-optimized non-coplanar IMRT beams (VMAT+5) for each of the 20 included patients. Subsequently, the frequency distribution of the 100 patient-specific non-coplanar IMRT beam directions was used to select non-coplanar arcs for supplementing coplanar VMAT. A second investigated CS with only one non-coplanar arc consisted of coplanar VMAT plus a partial arc at 90° couch angle (VMATCS90). Plans generated with the two VMATCSs were compared to coplanar VMAT. RESULTS VMAT+5 analysis resulted in VMATCS60: two partial non-coplanar arcs at couch angles 60° and -60° to complement coplanar VMAT. Compared to coplanar VMAT, the non-coplanar VMATCS60 and VMATCS90 yielded substantial average dose reductions in OARs associated with xerostomia and dysphagia, i.e., parotids, submandibular glands, oral cavity and swallowing muscles (p < 0.05) for the same PTV coverage and without violating hard constraints. Impact of non-coplanar treatment and superiority of either VMACS60 and VMATCS90 was highly patient dependent. CONCLUSIONS Compared to coplanar VMAT, dose to OARs was substantially reduced with a CS with one or two non-coplanar arcs. Preferences for coplanar or one or two additional arcs are highly patient-specific, balancing plan quality and treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Leitão
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik Bijman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abdul Wahab Sharfo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yori Brus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertholet J, Mackeprang PH, Mueller S, Guyer G, Loebner HA, Wyss Y, Frei D, Volken W, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Fix MK, Manser P. Organ-at-risk sparing with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: comparison with volumetric arc therapy on a publicly available library of cases. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:122. [PMID: 35841098 PMCID: PMC9284789 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02092-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. The aim of the study is to establish DTRT path-finding strategies, demonstrate deliverability and dosimetric accuracy and compare DTRT to state-of-the-art VMAT for common head and neck (HN) cancer cases. Methods A publicly available library of seven HN cases was created on an anthropomorphic phantom with all relevant organs-at-risk (OARs) delineated. DTRT plans were generated with beam incidences minimizing fractional target/OAR volume overlap and compared to VMAT. Deliverability and dosimetric validation was carried out on the phantom. Results DTRT and VMAT had similar target coverage. For three locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinomas and one adenoid cystic carcinoma, mean dose to the contralateral salivary glands, pharynx and oral cavity was reduced by 2.5, 1.7 and 3.1 Gy respectively on average with DTRT compared to VMAT. For a locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, D0.03 cc to the ipsilateral optic nerve was above tolerance (54.0 Gy) for VMAT (54.8 Gy) but within tolerance for DTRT (53.3 Gy). For a laryngeal carcinoma, DTRT resulted in higher dose than VMAT to the pharynx and brachial plexus but lower dose to the upper oesophagus, thyroid gland and contralateral carotid artery. For a single vocal cord irradiation case, DTRT spared most OARs better than VMAT. All plans were delivered successfully on the phantom and dosimetric validation resulted in gamma passing rates of 93.9% and 95.8% (2%/2 mm criteria, 10% dose threshold). Conclusions This study provides a proof of principle of DTRT for common HN cases with plans that were deliverable on a C-arm linac with high accuracy. The comparison with VMAT indicates substantial OAR sparing could be achieved. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02092-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hannes A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yanick Wyss
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Friedbühlschulhaus, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
MacDonald L, Lincoln J, Church CM, Thomas C, Syme A. Mean Arc Distance (MAD): a quantity to compare trajectory 4 πsampling in single target cranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [PMID: 35764061 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac7c92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose:C-arm linac-based radiotherapy has seen a recent interest in 4 methods of delivery using simultaneous rotations of couch and gantry to reduce doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) and increase dose compactness. While many methods use heuristics to generate trajectories that avoid OARs, combined with arbitrary trajectory restrictions to prevent oversampling, a quantity has not yet been developed to succinctly compare sampling of the 4 space for candidate trajectories as a surrogate for dosimetric compactness.Methods:Evenly spaced sampling points were distributed across a 4 sphere centred on isocentre. A metric, mean arc distance (MAD), was defined that quantifies the average arc distance between all fields in a radiotherapy trajectory and their nearest sampling point. The relationship between isodose volume and MAD was examined in 2,047 plans: 900 unique trajectories of fixed port DCA plans, 900 unique trajectories of contiguous field DCA plans, 192 VMAT plans (eight volumes in four locations, each with six trajectories) in matRad with 5 VMAT plans repeated for validation in a clinical planning system, and 10 clinical VMAT cases replanned with five trajectories in a clinical treatment planning system.Results:All isodose volumes greater than 10 % of the prescription dose decreased with decreasing MAD in all comparisons. In the range of 10 % to 100 % of the prescription dose, the rate of isodose volume decrease was exponential as a function of MAD in all comparisons. Reduction of absolute isodose volume is seen with increased 4 sampling, with larger target volumes exhibiting larger absolute reductions. Very low isodoses (0 % to 10 % of prescription) increased with decreasing MAD.Conclusions:MAD is a 4 sampling quantity useful in quantifying the decrease of isodose volume, relevant for sparing normal tissues. By quantifying this feature, candidate dynamic trajectories can be efficiently compared for 4 sampling. This quantity is explored here for single target cranial radiotherapy but may have applications to other radiotherapy treatment site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee MacDonald
- Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, 5788 University Avenue, Halifax, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L 2C2, CANADA
| | - John Lincoln
- Medical Physics, Dalhousie University, Department of Medical Physics, QEII Health Sciences Centre, 5820 University Ave, Dickson Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, CANADA
| | - Cody Mathew Church
- Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, 6310 Coburg Road, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, CANADA
| | - Christopher Thomas
- Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, 5788 University Avenue, Halifax, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L 2C2, CANADA
| | - Alasdair Syme
- Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Department of Medical Physics, QEII Health Sciences Centre, 5820 University Ave, Dickson Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, CANADA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Y, Liu H, Yang Y, Lu B. A practical algorithm for VMAT optimization using column generation techniques. Med Phys 2022; 49:4335-4352. [PMID: 35616306 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As a challenging but important optimization problem, the inverse planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has attracted much research attention. The column generation (CG) type method is so far one of the most effective solution schemes. However, it often relies on simplifications leading to significant gaps between the output and the actual feasible plan. This paper presents a novel column generation (NCG) approach to push the planning results substantially closer to practice. METHODS The proposed NCG algorithm is equipped with multiple new quality-enhancing and computation-facilitating modules as below (A) Flexible constraints are enabled on both dose rates and treatment time to adapt to machine capabilities as well as planner's preferences, respectively; (B) A cross-control-point intermediate aperture simulation is incorporated to better conform to the underlying physics; (C) New pricing and pruning subroutines are adopted to achieve better optimization outputs. To evaluate the effectiveness of this NCG, five VMAT plans, i.e., three prostate cases and two head-and-neck cases, were computed using proposed NCG. The planning results were compared with those yielded by a historical benchmark planning scheme. RESULTS The NCG generated plans of significantly better quality than the benchmark planning algorithm. For prostate cases, NCG plans satisfied all PTV criteria whereas CG plans failed on D10% criteria of PTVs for over 9 Gy or more on all cases. For head-and-neck cases, again, NCG plans satisfied all PTVs criteria while CG plans failed on D10% criteria of PTVs for over 3 Gy or more on all cases as well as the max dose criteria of both cord and brain stem for over 13 Gy on one case. Moreover, the pruning scheme was found to be effective in enhancing the optimization quality. CONCLUSIONS The proposed NCG inherits the computational advantages of the traditional CG, while capturing a more realistic characterization of the machine capability and underlying physics. The output solutions of the NCG are substantially closer to practical implementation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanbo Wang
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6595, United States
| | - Hongcheng Liu
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6595, United States
| | - Yu Yang
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6595, United States
| | - Bo Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0385, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Okoli F, Bert J, Abdelaziz S, Boussion N, Visvikis D. Optimizing the Beam Selection for Noncoplanar VMAT by Using Simulated Annealing Approach. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2021.3111736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
11
|
Woods KE, Ma TM, Cook KA, Morris ED, Gao Y, Sheng K, Kishan AU, Hegde JV, Felix C, Basehart V, Narahara K, Shen Z, Tenn S, Steinberg ML, Chin RK, Cao M. A Prospective Phase II Study of Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Report of Feasibility, Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040939. [PMID: 35205686 PMCID: PMC8870161 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The delivery of higher radiation doses has been shown to increase local control, and ultimately survival, for head and neck cancer patients, but highly conformal dose distributions are necessary to minimize normal tissue toxicity. Varian’s HyperArc non-coplanar automated treatment planning and delivery technique has been shown to improve dose conformity for intracranial treatment, but its safety and efficacy for head and neck cancer treatment has yet to be verified. This study evaluates the initial results of a prospective clinical trial using HyperArc for recurrent head and neck cancer patients. We demonstrated that HyperArc can enable significant tumor dose escalation compared to conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning while minimizing the dose to organs at risk. Treatment delivery was feasible and safe, with minimal treatment-related toxicities and positive patient-reported quality of life measures. Abstract This study reports the initial results for the first 15 patients on a prospective phase II clinical trial exploring the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the HyperArc technique for recurrent head and neck cancer treatment. Eligible patients were simulated and planned with both conventional VMAT and HyperArc techniques and the plan with superior dosimetry was selected for treatment. Dosimetry, delivery feasibility and safety, treatment-related toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) were all evaluated. HyperArc was chosen over conventional VMAT for all 15 patients and enabled statistically significant increases in dose conformity (R50% reduced by 1.2 ± 2.1, p < 0.05) and mean PTV and GTV doses (by 15.7 ± 4.9 Gy, p < 0.01 and 17.1 ± 6.0 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively). The average HyperArc delivery was 2.8 min longer than conventional VMAT (p < 0.01), and the mean intrafraction motion was ≤ 0.5 ± 0.4 mm and ≤0.3 ± 0.1°. With a median follow-up of 12 months, treatment-related toxicity was minimal (only one grade 3 acute toxicity above baseline) and patient-reported QOL metrics were favorable. HyperArc enabled superior dosimetry and significant target dose escalation compared to conventional VMAT planning, and treatment delivery was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaley E. Woods
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Kiri A. Cook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | - Eric D. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - John V. Hegde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Carol Felix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Vincent Basehart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Kelsey Narahara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Zhouhuizi Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Stephen Tenn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Michael L. Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Robert K. Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
- Correspondence: (R.K.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; (K.E.W.); (T.M.M.); (E.D.M.); (Y.G.); (K.S.); (A.U.K.); (J.V.H.); (C.F.); (V.B.); (K.N.); (Z.S.); (S.T.); (M.L.S.)
- Correspondence: (R.K.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mann TD, Thind KS, Ploquin NP. Fast stereotactic radiosurgery planning using patient-specific beam angle optimization and automation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:90-95. [PMID: 35243038 PMCID: PMC8885579 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D. Mann
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Corresponding author at: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Center, 1331 – 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
| | - Kundan S. Thind
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nicolas P. Ploquin
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ventura T, Rocha H, da Costa Ferreira B, Dias J, do Carmo Lopes M. Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases. Phys Eng Sci Med 2021; 44:1273-1283. [PMID: 34618329 PMCID: PMC8668856 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01061-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Two methods for non-coplanar beam direction optimization, one for static beams and another for arc trajectories, were proposed for intracranial tumours. The results of the beam angle optimizations were compared with the beam directions used in the clinical plans. Ten meningioma cases already treated were selected for this retrospective planning study. Algorithms for non-coplanar beam angle optimization (BAO) and arc trajectory optimization (ATO) were used to generate the corresponding plans. A plan quality score, calculated by a graphical method for plan assessment and comparison, was used to guide the beam angle optimization process. For each patient, the clinical plans (CLIN), created with the static beam orientations used for treatment, and coplanar VMAT approximated plans (VMAT) were also generated. To make fair plan comparisons, all plan optimizations were performed in an automated multicriteria calculation engine and the dosimetric plan quality was assessed. BAO and ATO plans presented, on average, moderate global plan score improvements over VMAT and CLIN plans. Nevertheless, while BAO and CLIN plans assured a more efficient OARs sparing, the ATO and VMAT plans presented a higher coverage and conformity of the PTV. Globally, all plans presented high-quality dose distributions. No statistically significant quality differences were found, on average, between BAO, ATO and CLIN plans. However, automated plan solution optimizations (BAO or ATO) may improve plan generation efficiency and standardization. In some individual patients, plan quality improvements were achieved with ATO plans, demonstrating the possible benefits of this automated optimized delivery technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Ventura
- Physics Department of University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
- Medical Physics Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.
- Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Humberto Rocha
- Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Economy Faculty of University of Coimbra and Centre for Business and Economics Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Brigida da Costa Ferreira
- Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- I3N Physics Department of University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Joana Dias
- Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Economy Faculty of University of Coimbra and Centre for Business and Economics Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Maria do Carmo Lopes
- Medical Physics Department of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
- Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- I3N Physics Department of University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kutuzov I, Van Beek T, McCurdy BMC. Verification of the delivered patient radiation dose for non-coplanar beam therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:110-120. [PMID: 34021713 PMCID: PMC8292689 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is an increased interest in using non-coplanar beams for radiotherapy, including SBRT and SRS. This approach can significantly reduce doses to organs-at-risk, however, it requires stringent quality assurance, especially when a dynamic treatment couch is used. In this work, new functionality that allows using non-coplanar beam arrangements in addition to conventional coplanar beams was added and validated to the previously developed in vivo dose verification system. METHODS The existing program code was modified to manage the additional treatment couch parameters: angle and positions. Ten non-coplanar test plans that use a static couch were created in the treatment planning system. Also, two plans that use a dynamic treatment couch were created and delivered using Varian Developer mode, since the treatment planning system does not support a dynamic couch. All non-coplanar test trajectories were delivered on a simple geometric phantom, using an Edge linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems) with the megavoltage imager deployed and acquiring megavoltage transmission images that were used to calculate the delivered 3D dose distributions in the phantom with the updated dose calculation algorithm. The reconstructed dose distributions were compared using the 3D chi-comparison test with 2%/2mm tolerances to the corresponding reference dose distributions obtained from the treatment planning system. RESULTS The chi-comparison test resulted in at least a 97.0% pass rate over the entire 3D volume for all tested trajectories. For static gantry, static couch non-coplanar fields, and non-coplanar arcs using dynamic couch the pass rates observed were at least 98%, while for the static couch, non-transverse coplanar arc fields, pass rates were at least 97%. CONCLUSIONS A model-based 3D dose calculation algorithm has been extended and validated for a variety of non-coplanar beam trajectories of different complexities. This system can potentially be applied for quality assurance of treatment delivery systems that use complex, non-coplanar beam arrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Kutuzov
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Medical Physics Department, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Timothy Van Beek
- Medical Physics Department, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Boyd M C McCurdy
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Medical Physics Department, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ho HW, Yang CC, Lin HM, Chen HY, Huang CC, Wang SC, Lin YW. The feasibility and efficacy of new SBRT technique HyperArc for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: noncoplanar cone-based robotic system vs. noncoplanar high-definition MLC based Linac system. Med Dosim 2020; 46:164-170. [PMID: 33208290 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of HyperArc (HA) for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) by comparing it with the CyberKnife system (CK). Fifteen patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer who were treated using the noncoplanar cone-based robotic CK system were enrolled. CK was delivered with a median dose of 37.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The delivered CK treatment plans were the sources for the corresponding homogeneous HA (HA-H) and inhomogeneous HA (HA-IH) plans. The HA-H plans were generated to meet the corresponding treatment plan criteria for the CK plans. The HA-IH plans were designed to emulate the corresponding inhomogeneous CK isodose distributions. These three SBRT treatment plans were compared with target coverage, sparing of organs at risk (OARs), and dose distribution metrics. The HA-H and HA-IH plans consistently exhibited CTV and PTV coverage levels similar or better to those of the CK plans but significantly reduced the dose to OARs. Using the HA techniques (both HA-H and HA-IH plans), the mean maximal doses to the spinal cord, brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm were reduced by approximately 60%, compared to the CK plans. The high dose spillage, conformity, and homogeneity indices of the HA-H plans were significantly better than those of the CK plans. The HA-IH plans showed faster dose falloff and similar conformity of the HA-H plans and dose heterogeneity of the CK plans. Here we demonstrated the HA treatment plan system for recurrent NPC is feasible, either homogeneous or inhomogeneous delivery. Excellent sparing of OARs and dosimetric distribution and very efficient delivery make HA an attractive SBRT technique for recurrent NPC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Wen Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Man Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ho HW, Lee SP, Lin HM, Chen HY, Huang CC, Wang SC, Yang CC, Lin YW. Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc techniques in salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:164. [PMID: 32641082 PMCID: PMC7346374 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01602-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate dosimetric differences of salvage irradiations using two commercially available volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques: RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA), for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after initial radiation therapy. Methods Ten patients with recurrent NPC status previously treated with radiation therapy were considered suitable candidates for salvage SBRT using VMAT approach. Two separate treatment plans were created with HA and RA techniques for each case, with dosimetric outcomes compared with respect to tumor target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Furthermore, the cumulative radiobiological effects to the relevant OARs from the original radiotherapy to the respective salvage SBRT plans were analyzed in terms of biologically effective dose (BED). Results Treatment with HA exhibited similar target dose coverage as with RA, while delivering a higher mean dose to the targets. Using RA technique, the mean maximal doses to optic apparatus and the mean brain dose were reduced by 1 to 1.5 Gy, comparing to HA technique. The conformity index, gradient radius, and intermediate dose spillage in HA plans were significantly better than those in RA. With HA technique, the volume of brain receiving 12 Gy or more was reduced by 44%, comparing to RA technique. The cumulative BEDs to spinal cord and optic apparatus with RA technique were 1 to 2 Gy3 less than those with HA. HA technique significantly reduced the volume within body that received more than 100 Gy. Conclusions With better dose distribution than RA while maintaining sufficient target dose coverage, HA represents an attractive salvage SBRT technique for recurrent NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Wen Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Steve P Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hisu-Man Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan.,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan. .,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gayen S, Kombathula SH, Manna S, Varshney S, Pareek P. Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:138-147. [PMID: 33012157 PMCID: PMC7533406 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the dosimetric variations in patients of head and neck cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy using optimized non-coplanar (ncVMAT) beams with coplanar (cVMAT) beams using volumetric arc therapy. Materials and Methods Twenty-two patients of head and neck cancer that had received radiotherapy using VMAT in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Each of the patients was planned using coplanar and non-coplanar orientations using an optimized couch angle and fluences. We analyzed the Conformity Index (CIRTOG), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Heterogeneity Index (HIRTOG), low dose volume, target and organs-at-risk coverage in both the plans without changing planning optimization parameters. Results The prescription dose ranged from 60 Gy to 70 Gy. Using ncVMAT, CIRTOG, DHI and HIRTOG, and tumor coverage (ID95%) had improved, low dose spillage volume in the body V5Gy was increased and V10Gy was reduced. Integral dose and intensity-modulated radiation therapy factor had increased in ncVMAT. In the case of non-coplanar beam arrangements, maximum dose (Dmax) of right and left humeral head were reduced significantly whereas apex of the right and left lung mean dose were increased. Conclusion The use of ncVMAT produced better target coverage and sparing of the shoulder and soft tissue of the neck as well as the critical organ compared with the cVMAT in patients of head and neck malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjib Gayen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | - Sri Harsha Kombathula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | - Sumanta Manna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | - Sonal Varshney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | - Puneet Pareek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mullins J, Renaud MA, Serban M, Seuntjens J. Simultaneous trajectory generation and volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization. Med Phys 2020; 47:3078-3090. [PMID: 32215936 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Trajectory-based treatment planning involves the combination of a gantry-couch trajectory with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plan optimization. This work presents the implementation of an optimization methodology that generates a trajectory simultaneous with treatment plan optimization (simTr-VMAT). METHODS The optimization algorithm is based on the column generation approach, in which a treatment plan is iteratively constructed through the solution of a subproblem called the "pricing problem." The property of the pricing problem to rank candidate apertures based on their associated price is leveraged to select an optimal aperture while simultaneously determining the trajectory path. A progressively increasing gantry-couch grid resolution is used to provide an initial coarse sampling of the angular solution space while maintaining fine control point spacing with the final treatment plan. The trajectory optimization was applied and compared to coplanar VMAT treatment plans for a lung patient, a glioblastoma patient, and a prostate patient. Algorithm validation was performed through the generation of 5000 random trajectories and optimization using column generation VMAT for each patient case, representing the solution space for the trajectory optimization problem. The simTr-VMAT trajectories were compared against these random trajectories based on a quality metric that prefers trajectories with few control points and low objective function value over long, inefficient trajectories. RESULTS For the lung patient, the simTr-VMAT plan resulted in a decrease of the mean dose of 1.5 and 1.0 Gy to the heart and ipsilateral lung, respectively. For the glioblastoma patient, the simTr-VMAT plan resulted in improved planning target volume coverage with a decrease in mean dose to the eyes, lens, nose, and contralateral temporal lobe between 2 and 7 Gy. The prostate patient showed no clinically relevant dosimetric improvement. The simTr-VMAT treatment plans ranked at the 99.6, 96.3, and 99.4 percentiles compared to the distribution of randomly generated trajectories for the lung, glioblastoma, and prostate patients, respectively. CONCLUSION The simTr-VMAT optimization methodology resulted in treatment plans with equivalent or improved dosimetric outcomes compared to coplanar VMAT treatment plans, with the trajectories resulting from the optimization ranking among the optimal trajectories for each patient case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Mullins
- Department of Physics & Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Marc-André Renaud
- Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Monica Serban
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University & Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bedford JL, Nill S, Oelfke U. Dosimetric accuracy of delivering SBRT using dynamic arcs on Cyberknife. Med Phys 2020; 47:1533-1544. [PMID: 32048303 PMCID: PMC7216988 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Several studies have demonstrated potential improvements in treatment time through the use of dynamic arcs for delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on Cyberknife. However, the delivery system has a finite accuracy, so that potential exists for dosimetric uncertainties. This study estimates the expected dosimetric accuracy of dynamic delivery of SBRT, based on realistic estimates of the uncertainties in delivery parameters. METHODS Five SBRT patient cases (prostate A - conventional, prostate B - brachytherapy-type, lung, liver, partial left breast) were retrospectively studied. Treatment plans were produced for a fixed arc trajectory using fluence optimization, segmentation, and direct aperture optimization. Dose rate uncertainty was modeled as a smoothly varying random fluctuation of ± 1.0%, ±2.0% or ± 5.0% over a time period of 10, 30 or 60 s. Multileaf collimator uncertainty was modeled as a lag in position of each leaf up to 0.25 or 0.5 mm. Robot pointing error was modeled as a shift of the target location, with the direction of the shift chosen as a random angle with respect to the multileaf collimator and with a random magnitude in the range 0.0-1.0 mm at the delivery nodes and with an additional random magnitude of 0.5-1.0 mm in between the delivery nodes. The impact of the errors was investigated using dose-volume histograms. RESULTS Uncertainty in dose rate has the effect of varying the total monitor units delivered, which in turn produces a variation in mean dose to the planning target volume. The random sampling of dose rate error produces a distribution of mean doses with a standard deviation proportional to the magnitude of the dose rate uncertainty. A lag in multileaf collimator position of 0.25 or 0.5 mm produces a small impact on the delivered dose. In general, an increase in the PTV mean dose of around 1% is observed. An error in robot pointing of the order of 1 mm produces a small increase in dose inhomogeneity to the planning target volume, sometimes accompanied by an increase in mean dose by around 1%. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the limited data available on the dose rate stability and geometric accuracy of the Cyberknife system, this study estimates that dynamic arc delivery can be accomplished with sufficient accuracy for clinical application. Dose rate variation produces a change in dose to the planning target volume according to the perturbation of total monitor units delivered, while multileaf collimator lag and robot pointing error typically increase the mean dose to the planning target volume by up to 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L. Bedford
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mullins J, Renaud MA, Heng V, Ruo R, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J. Trajectory-based VMAT for cranial targets with delivery at shortened SAD. Med Phys 2020; 47:3103-3112. [PMID: 32198933 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trajectory-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (tr-VMAT) treatment plans enable the option for noncoplanar delivery yielding steeper dose gradients and increased sparing of critical structures compared to conventional treatment plans. The addition of translational couch motion to shorten the effective source-to-axis distance (SAD) may result in improved delivery precision and an increased effective dose rate. In this work, tr-VMAT treatment plans using a noncoplanar "baseball stitch" trajectory were implemented, applied to patients presented with cranial targets, and compared to the clinical treatment plans. METHODS A treatment planning workflow was implemented: (a) beamlet doses were calculated for control points defined along a baseball stitch trajectory using a collapsed-cone convolution-superposition algorithm; (b) VMAT treatment plans were optimized using the column generation approach; (c) a final dose distribution was calculated in Varian Eclipse using the analytical anisotropic algorithm by importing the optimized treatment plan parameters. Tr-VMAT plans were optimized for ten patients presented with cranial targets at both standard and shortened SAD, and compared to the clinical treatment plans through isodose distributions, dose-volume histograms, and dosimetric indices. The control point specifications of the optimized tr-VMAT plans were used to estimate the delivery time. RESULTS The optimized tr-VMAT plans with both shortened and standard SAD delivery yielded a comparable plan quality to the clinical treatment plans. A statistically significant benefit was observed for dose gradient index and monitor unit efficiency for shortened SAD tr-VMAT plans, while improved target volume conformity was observed for the clinical treatment plan (P ≤ 0.05). A clear dosimetric benefit was not demonstrated between tr-VMAT delivery at shortened SAD compared to standard SAD, but shortened SAD delivery yielded a fraction size-dependent reduction in the estimated delivery time. CONCLUSION The implementation of "baseball stitch" tr-VMAT treatment plans to patients presented with cranial targets demonstrated comparable plan quality to clinical treatment plans. The delivery at shortened SAD produced a fraction size-dependent decrease in estimated delivery time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Mullins
- Department of Physics & Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Marc-André Renaud
- Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Veng Heng
- Department of Physics & Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Russell Ruo
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - François DeBlois
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal & Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, H2X 3E4, Canada.,McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University & Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
MacDonald RL, Syme A, Little B, Ward L, Thomas CG. Toward the combined optimization of dynamic axes (CODA) for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery using fixed couch trajectories. Med Phys 2019; 47:307-316. [PMID: 31659750 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel system for patient-specific combined optimization of couch, collimator, and gantry angles for use in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning. The system was designed to produce highly compact dose distributions by extensively sampling the 4π space. Automated fixed couch trajectory planning was used to reduce normal tissue doses by avoiding beams-eye-view (BEV) overlap with organs-at-risk (OARs) and improve monitor unit (MU) efficiency through collimator angle optimization. METHODS By merging distinct BEV objective functions used to optimize the couch rotation angle and collimator angle, a three-dimensional (3D) cost space (the CODA cube) was constructed with axes of gantry, couch, and collimator rotation angles. At each voxel in this CODA cube, the cost of implementing this combination of axes positions in fixed couch trajectories was quantified. The CODA cube was sampled and explored using a modified constrained Bellman-Ford algorithm to suggest low-cost fixed candidate arcs on each plane of the space, from which 10-arcs are chosen throughout the 3D space using a k-means clustering algorithm. These fixed couch trajectories were then imported into the Eclipse treatment planning system (v.11) and inverse-optimized according to clinical standards. Eight artificial cranial targets were contoured in a test-patient anatomy, and seven treatment plans were generated from combinations of three and four targets. The CODA cube optimized plans were compared to standard 4-arc VMAT plans for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy/surgery that were optimized for the same sets of targets; maximum dose to each OAR, V12Gy to normal brain, conformity, and total MUs were compared. Both planning methods were inverse-optimized with identical dosimetric objectives. RESULTS CODA plans resulted in a reduction in maximum dose to OARs of 20.6% (P < 0.01), with maximum brainstem dose decreased by 2.63 Gy (P = 0.031) on average when compared to the standard arc arrangement. The mean reduction in total MU was 8.6% (P = 0.156), the mean increase in the inverse of the van't Riet conformation number was 0.1%, (P = 0.67) and the mean decrease in normal brain tissue receiving 12 Gy or higher was 3.9% (P = 0.16), when compared to the standard VMAT arc configuration (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS The optimization of couch, collimator, and gantry angles simultaneously using a 3D optimization space achieved improvement on multiple clinical metrics when compared to the standard VMAT arc configuration. A statistically significant sparing to OAR maximum doses was seen. Combining these optimizations may yield superior results to independent optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lee MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alasdair Syme
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4J5, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Brian Little
- Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Lucy Ward
- Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Christopher G Thomas
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4J5, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bedford JL, Tsang HS, Nill S, Oelfke U. Treatment planning optimization with beam motion modeling for dynamic arc delivery of SBRT using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation. Med Phys 2019; 46:5421-5433. [PMID: 31587322 PMCID: PMC6916282 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of dynamic arcs for delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on Cyberknife is investigated, with a view to improving treatment times. This study investigates the required modeling of robot and multileaf collimator (MLC) motion between control points in the trajectory and then uses this to develop an optimization method for treatment planning of a dynamic arc with Cyberknife. The resulting plans are compared in terms of dose-volume histograms and estimated treatment times with those produced by a conventional beam arrangement. METHODS Five SBRT patient cases (prostate A - conventional, prostate B - brachytherapy-type, lung, liver, and partial left breast) were retrospectively studied. A suitable arc trajectory with control points spaced at 5° was proposed and treatment plans were produced for typical clinical protocols. The optimization consisted of a fluence optimization, segmentation, and direct aperture optimization using a gradient descent method. Dose delivered by the moving MLC was either taken to be the dose delivered discretely at the control points or modeled using effective fluence delivered between control points. The accuracy of calculated dose was assessed by recalculating after optimization using five interpolated beams and 100 interpolated apertures between each optimization control point. The resulting plans were compared using dose-volume histograms and estimated treatment times with those for a conventional Cyberknife beam arrangement. RESULTS If optimization is performed based on discrete doses delivered at the arc control points, large differences of up to 40% of the prescribed dose are seen when recalculating with interpolation. When the effective fluence between control points is taken into account during optimization, dosimetric differences are <2% for most structures when the plans are recalculated using intermediate nodes, but there are differences of up to 15% peripherally. Treatment plan quality is comparable between the arc trajectory and conventional body path. All plans meet the relevant clinical goals, with the exception of specific structures which overlap with the planning target volume. Median estimated treatment time is 355 s (range 235-672 s) for arc delivery and 675 s (range 554-1025 s) for conventional delivery. CONCLUSIONS The method of using effective fluence to model MLC motion between control points is sufficiently accurate to provide for accurate inverse planning of dynamic arcs with Cyberknife. The proposed arcing method produces treatment plans with comparable quality to the body path, with reduced estimated treatment delivery time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L. Bedford
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| | - Henry S. Tsang
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonSM2 5PTUK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hou Y, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Yv L, Liu K, Tian X, Lv Y. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 187:105573. [PMID: 31706107 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Advanced techniques such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may reduce radiation damage and improve the quality of life for patients.We performed a study comparing dose distributions to the planning target volumes(PTVs) and other organs at risk (OARs) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT),coplanar VMAT (coVMAT), and non-coplanar VMAT (ncVMAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS 13 patients with GBM who had undergone postoperative radiotherapy were enrolled. Three plans for each patient were created, namely, IMRT, coVMAT, and ncVMAT. Prescription doses and normal-tissue constraints were identical for these three plans. The dosimetric differences of target dose distribution, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), the gradient index (GI), dose of OARs, monitor units (MUs) and beam-on times among these three plans were investigated. RESULTS These three techniques resulted in comparable maximum, minimum, and mean PTV doses. Small but insignificant differences were observed in GI,CI, and HI. Compared with IMRT, VMAT plans showed statistically significant reductions in the mean doses to the optic chiasm (P < 0.05). Compared with IMRT, VMAT techniques significantly reduced the number of MUs and less beam-on time than IMRT techniques (P < 0.05). However, calculation times were significantly longer for ncVMAT and coVMAT plans at 12 and 12.3 min, versus 2.6 min for IMRT. Our study showed that IMRT or VMAT planning is feasible and efficient for patients with GBM.Compared to IMRT plans, ncVMAT or coVMAT plans showed similar PTV coverage and comparable OARs sparing. VMAT plans significantly reduces the mean doses to the optic chiasm than IMRT plans. CONCLUSION There was no obvious superiority of ncVMAT over coVMAT in target coverage and sparing of OARs.Compared with IMRT, VMAT techniques significantly reduced the number of MUs and beam-on time but extended the calculation times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Hou
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China
| | - Zhen Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China
| | - Lili Yv
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China
| | - Kun Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China
| | - Xiufang Tian
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China
| | - Yajuan Lv
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250014, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wu Y, Zhu B, Han J, Xu H, Gong Z, Yang Y, Huang J, Lu E. A comparative dosimetric study of cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. 9-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:675. [PMID: 31930076 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Background To compare the dosimetric characteristics between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 9-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (9F-IMRT) for cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis. Methods We selected 20 patients who had received extended-field radiotherapy for cervical cancer with PALN metastasis. IMRT and VMAT plans were compared in terms of target, organs at risk (OARs), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), the number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time (s). Results The CI and HI of VMAT plans were superior to those of IMRT plans (P<0.05). As for OARs, the mean maximum doses (Dmean) to the kidneys in the VMAT plans were all lower than those in IMRT plans (P<0.001). V40, V50 of the rectum, and V40 of the bladder in VMAT plans involved fewer doses than IMRT plans (P<0.001). Compared with IMRT plans, VMAT reduced the average number of MUs by 51% and the average treatment time by 31%. Conclusions Both VMAT and IMRT plans can satisfy clinical dosimetric demands and protect OARs. VMAT has the best performance on CI and HI and can better protect the OARs. VMAT plans have fewer MUs and improve treatment efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaqin Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Biqing Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Jingjing Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Hanzi Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Zhen Gong
- Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing 210004, China
| | - Yongqin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Emei Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schüler E, Wang L, Loo BW, Maxim PG. Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:125014. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab246f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
26
|
Smyth G, Evans PM, Bamber JC, Bedford JL. Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180908. [PMID: 30694086 PMCID: PMC6580906 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper gives an overview of recent developments in non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Modern linear accelerators are capable of automating motion around multiple axes, allowing efficient delivery of highly non-coplanar radiotherapy techniques. Novel techniques developed for C-arm and non-standard linac geometries, methods of optimization, and clinical applications are reviewed. The additional degrees of freedom are shown to increase the therapeutic ratio, either through dose escalation to the target or dose reduction to functionally important organs at risk, by multiple research groups. Although significant work is still needed to translate these new non-coplanar radiotherapy techniques into the clinic, clinical implementation should be prioritized. Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy demonstrate that it continues to have a place in modern cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Smyth
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jeffrey C Bamber
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James L Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Smyth G, Evans PM, Bamber JC, Mandeville HC, Rollo Moore A, Welsh LC, Saran FH, Bedford JL. Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:08NT01. [PMID: 30808011 PMCID: PMC6877349 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0a8e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment plans using dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) reduce the dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to coplanar VMAT, while maintaining the dose to the planning target volume (PTV). This paper seeks to validate this finding with measurements. DCR-VMAT treatment plans were produced for five patients with primary brain tumours and delivered using a commercial linear accelerator (linac). Dosimetric accuracy was assessed using point dose and radiochromic film measurements. Linac-recorded mechanical errors were assessed by extracting deviations from log files for multi-leaf collimator (MLC), couch, and gantry positions every 20 ms. Dose distributions, reconstructed from every fifth log file sample, were calculated and used to determine deviations from the treatment plans. Median (range) treatment delivery times were 125 s (123-133 s) for DCR-VMAT, compared to 78 s (64-130 s) for coplanar VMAT. Absolute point doses were 0.8% (0.6%-1.7%) higher than prediction. For coronal and sagittal films, respectively, 99.2% (96.7%-100%) and 98.1% (92.9%-99.0%) of pixels above a 20% low dose threshold reported gamma <1 for 3% and 3 mm criteria. Log file analysis showed similar gantry rotation root-mean-square error (RMSE) for VMAT and DCR-VMAT. Couch rotation RMSE for DCR-VMAT was 0.091° (0.086-0.102°). For delivered dose reconstructions, 100% of pixels above a 5% low dose threshold reported gamma <1 for 2% and 2 mm criteria in all cases. DCR-VMAT, for the primary brain tumour cases studied, can be delivered accurately using a commercial linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Smyth
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bedford JL, Ziegenhein P, Nill S, Oelfke U. Beam selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation. Med Eng Phys 2019; 64:28-36. [PMID: 30579786 PMCID: PMC6358634 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Cyberknife system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) enables radiotherapy using stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with a large number of non-coplanar beam orientations. Recently, a multileaf collimator has also been available to allow flexibility in field shaping. This work aims to evaluate the quality of treatment plans obtainable with the multileaf collimator. Specifically, the aim is to find a subset of beam orientations from a predetermined set of candidate directions, such that the treatment quality is maintained but the treatment time is reduced. An evolutionary algorithm is used to successively refine a randomly selected starting set of beam orientations. By using an efficient computational framework, clinically useful solutions can be found in several hours. It is found that 15 beam orientations are able to provide treatment quality which approaches that of the candidate beam set of 110 beam orientations, but with approximately half of the estimated treatment time. Choice of an efficient subset of beam orientations offers the possibility to improve the patient experience and maximise the number of patients treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK.
| | - Peter Ziegenhein
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ye B, Tang Q, Yao J, Gao W. Collision-Free Path Planning and Delivery Sequence Optimization in Noncoplanar Radiation Therapy. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS 2019; 49:42-55. [PMID: 29990095 DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2017.2763682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is among the top three cancer treatments in current medical services. The novel noncoplanar radiation therapy which claimed the best characteristics in almost all dosimetric properties encountered the challenges of the potential collision and the long time delivering. In this paper, we proposed a brand new scheme which uses a combined method of the collision avoidance path planning based on an improved probability roadmap method (PRM) and the delivery sequence optimization based on a modified genetic algorithm (GA) to solve the problems in noncoplanar radiation therapy. A uniform sampling strategy, an improved connection strategy, and an efficient local planner are introduced to optimize the roadmap result and accelerate the roadmap construction. The GA is improved by the elitist selection, the local search strategy, and the similar substitution strategy to achieve a better performance both in convergence rate and optimal solution. Experiments are carried out on the simulation platform with typical therapy system models. The results show that our proposed methods work well with the radiation therapy system in a compact working area. Collision is avoided and time consumption is reduced. We believe that our proposed algorithms could solve the problems in current radiation therapy and promote their clinic applications.
Collapse
|
30
|
MacFarlane M, Hoover DA, Wong E, Goldman P, Battista JJ, Chen JZ. A fast inverse direct aperture optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys 2018; 46:1127-1139. [PMID: 30592539 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this work was to develop and evaluate a fast inverse direct aperture optimization (FIDAO) algorithm for IMRT treatment planning and plan adaptation. METHODS A previously proposed fluence map optimization algorithm called fast inverse dose optimization (FIDO) was extended to optimize the aperture shapes and weights of IMRT beams. FIDO is a very fast fluence map optimization algorithm for IMRT that finds the global minimum using direct matrix inversion without unphysical negative beam weights. In this study, an equivalent second-order Taylor series expansion of the FIDO objective function was used, which allowed for the objective function value and gradient vector to be computed very efficiently during direct aperture optimization, resulting in faster optimization. To evaluate the speed gained with FIDAO, a proof-of-concept algorithm was developed in MATLAB using an interior-point optimization method to solve the reformulated aperture-based FIDO problem. The FIDAO algorithm was used to optimize four step-and-shoot IMRT cases: on the AAPM TG-119 phantom as well as a liver, prostate, and head-and-neck clinical cases. Results were compared with a conventional DAO algorithm that uses the same interior-point method but using the standard formulation of the objective function and its gradient vector. RESULTS A substantial gain in optimization speed was obtained with the prototype FIDAO algorithm compared to the conventional DAO algorithm while producing plans of similar quality. The optimization time (number of iterations) for the prototype FIDAO algorithm vs the conventional DAO algorithm was 0.3 s (17) vs 56.7 s (50); 2.0 s (28) vs 134.1 s (57); 2.5 s (26) vs 180.6 s (107); and 6.7 s (20) vs 469.4 s (482) in the TG-119 phantom, liver, prostate, and head-and-neck examples, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A new direct aperture optimization algorithm based on FIDO was developed. For the four IMRT test cases examined, this algorithm executed approximately 70-200 times faster without compromising the IMRT plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael MacFarlane
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Center, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Douglas A Hoover
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Center, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Eugene Wong
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Center, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Pedro Goldman
- Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Jerry J Battista
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Jeff Z Chen
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Center, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tsang HS, Kamerling CP, Ziegenhein P, Nill S, Oelfke U. Novel adaptive beam-dependent margins for additional OAR sparing. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:215019. [PMID: 30372420 PMCID: PMC6372134 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Margins are employed in radiotherapy treatment planning to mitigate the dosimetric effects of geometric uncertainties for the clinical target volume (CTV). Unfortunately, whilst the use of margins can increase the probability that sufficient dose is delivered to the CTV, it can also result in delivering high dose of radiation to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). We expand on our previous work on beam-dependent margins and propose a novel adaptive margin concept, where margins are moulded away from selected OARs for better OAR-high-dose sparing, whilst maintaining similar dose coverage probability to the CTV. This, however, comes at a cost of a larger irradiation volume, and thus can negatively impact other structures. We investigate the impact of the adaptive margin concept when applied to prostate radiotherapy treatments, and compare treatment plans generated using our beam-dependent margins without adaptation, with adaption from the rectum and with adaptation from both the rectum and bladder. Five prostate patients were used in this planning study. All plans achieved similar dose coverage probability, and were able to ensure at least 90% population coverage with the target receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose to [Formula: see text]. We observed overall better high-dose sparing to OARs that were considered when using the adapted beam-dependent PTVs, with the degree of sparing dependent on both the number of OARs under consideration as well as the relative position between the CTV and the OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Tsang
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - C P Kamerling
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - P Ziegenhein
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - S Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - U Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mueller S, Manser P, Volken W, Frei D, Kueng R, Herrmann E, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK. Part 2: Dynamic mixed beam radiotherapy (DYMBER): Photon dynamic trajectories combined with modulated electron beams. Med Phys 2018; 45:4213-4226. [PMID: 29992574 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop a treatment technique for dynamic mixed beam radiotherapy (DYMBER) utilizing increased degrees of freedom (DoF) of a conventional treatment unit including different particle types (photons and electrons), intensity and energy modulation and dynamic gantry, table, and collimator rotations. METHODS A treatment planning process has been developed to create DYMBER plans combining photon dynamic trajectories (DTs) and step and shoot electron apertures collimated with the photon multileaf collimator (pMLC). A gantry-table path is determined for the photon DTs with minimized overlap of the organs at risk (OARs) with the target. In addition, an associated dynamic collimator rotation is established with minimized area between the pMLC leaves and the target contour. pMLC sequences of photon DTs and electron pMLC apertures are then simultaneously optimized using direct aperture optimization (DAO). Subsequently, the final dose distribution of the electron pMLC apertures is calculated using the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP). The pMLC sequences of the photon DTs are then re-optimized with a finer control point resolution and with the final electron dose distribution taken into account. Afterwards, the final photon dose distribution is calculated also using the SMCP and summed together with the one of the electrons. This process is applied for a brain and two head and neck cases. The resulting DYMBER dose distributions are compared to those of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) plans consisting only of photon DTs and clinically applied VMAT plans. Furthermore, the deliverability of the DYMBER plans is verified in terms of dosimetric accuracy, delivery time and collision avoidance. For this purpose, The DYMBER plans are delivered to Gafchromic EBT3 films placed in an anthropomorphic head phantom on a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. RESULTS For each case, the dose homogeneity in the target is similar or better for DYMBER compared to DTRT and VMAT. Averaged over all three cases, the mean dose to the parallel OARs is 16% and 28% lower, D2% to the serial OARs is 17% and 37% lower and V10% to normal tissue is 12% and 4% lower for the DYMBER plans compared to the DTRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The DYMBER plans are delivered without collision and with a 4-5 min longer delivery time than the VMAT plans. The absolute dose measurements are compared to calculation by gamma analysis using 2% (global)/2 mm criteria with passing rates of at least 99%. CONCLUSIONS A treatment technique for DYMBER has been successfully developed and verified for its deliverability. The dosimetric superiority of DYMBER over DTRT and VMAT indicates utilizing increased DoF to be the key to improve brain and head and neck radiation treatments in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Kueng
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - E Herrmann
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - O Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M F M Stampanoni
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich and PSI, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fix MK, Frei D, Volken W, Terribilini D, Mueller S, Elicin O, Hemmatazad H, Aebersold DM, Manser P. Part 1: Optimization and evaluation of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:4201-4212. [PMID: 29992587 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a well-accepted treatment technique in radiotherapy using a coplanar delivery approach, VMAT might be further improved by including dynamic table and collimator rotations leading to dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT). In this work, an optimization procedure for DTRT was developed and the potential benefit of DTRT was investigated for different treatment sites. METHODS For this purpose, a dedicated optimization framework for DTRT was developed using the Eclipse Scripting Research Application Programming Interface (ESRAPI). The contours of the target and organs at risk (OARs) structures were exported by applying the ESRAPI and were used to determine the fractional volume-overlap of the OARs with the target from several potential beam directions. Thereby, an additional weighting was applied taking into account the relative position of the OAR with respect to the target and radiation beam, that is, penalizing directions where the OAR is proximal to the target. The resulting two-dimensional gantry-table map was used as input for an A* path finding algorithm returning an optimized gantry-table path. Thereby, the process is also taking into account CT scan length and collision restrictions. The A* algorithm was used again to determine the dynamic collimator angle path by optimizing the area between the MLC leaves and the target contour for each gantry-table path leading to gantry-collimator paths. The resulting gantry-table and gantry-collimator paths are combined and serve as input for the intensity modulation optimization using a research VMAT optimizer and the ESRAPI resulting in dynamic trajectories. This procedure was evaluated for five clinically motivated cases: two head and neck, one lung, one esophagus, and one prostate. Final dose calculations were performed using the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP). Resulting dose distributions for the DTRT treatment plans and for the standard VMAT plans were compared based on dose distributions and dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters. For this comparison, the dose distribution for the VMAT plans were recalculated using the SMCP. In addition, the suitability of the delivery of a DTRT treatment plan was demonstrated by means of gafchromic film measurements on a TrueBeam linear accelerator. RESULTS DVHs for the target volumes showed similar or improved coverage and dose homogeneity for DTRT compared with VMAT using equal or less number of dynamic trajectories for DTRT than arcs for VMAT for all cases studied. Depending on the case, improvements in mean and maximum dose for the DTRT plans were achieved for almost all OARs compared with the VMAT plans. Improvements in DTRT treatment plans for mean and maximum dose compared to VMAT plans were up to 16% and 38% relative to the prescribed dose, respectively. The measured and calculated dose values resulted in a passing rate of more than 99.5% for the two-dimensional gamma analysis using 2% and 2 mm criteria and a threshold of 10%. CONCLUSIONS DTRT plans for different treatment sites were generated and compared with VMAT plans. The delivery is suitable and dose comparisons demonstrate a high potential of DTRT to reduce dose to OARs using less dynamic trajectories than arcs, while target coverage is preserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dario Terribilini
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dong P, Liu H, Xing L. Monte Carlo tree search -based non-coplanar trajectory design for station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT). Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:135014. [PMID: 29863493 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaca17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
An important yet challenging problem in LINAC-based rotational arc radiation therapy is the design of beam trajectory, which requires simultaneous consideration of delivery efficiency and final dose distribution. In this work, we propose a novel trajectory selection strategy by developing a Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) algorithm during the beam trajectory selection process. To search through the vast number of possible trajectories, the MCTS algorithm was implemented. In this approach, a candidate trajectory is explored by starting from a leaf node and sequentially examining the next level of linked nodes with consideration of geometric and physical constraints. The maximum Upper Confidence Bounds for Trees, which is a function of average objective function value and the number of times the node under testing has been visited, was employed to intelligently select the trajectory. For each candidate trajectory, we run an inverse fluence map optimization with an infinity norm regularization. The ranking of the plan as measured by the corresponding objective function value was then fed back to update the statistics of the nodes on the trajectory. The method was evaluated with a chest wall and a brain case, and the results were compared with the coplanar and noncoplanar 4pi beam configurations. For both clinical cases, the MCTS method found effective and easy-to-deliver trajectories within an hour. As compared with the coplanar plans, it offers much better sparing of the OARs while maintaining the PTV coverage. The quality of the MCTS-generated plan is found to be comparable to the 4pi plans. Artificial intelligence based on MCTS is valuable to facilitate the design of beam trajectory and paves the way for future clinical use of non-coplanar treatment delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5847, United States of America
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lyu Q, Yu VY, Ruan D, Neph R, O'Connor D, Sheng K. A novel optimization framework for VMAT with dynamic gantry couch rotation. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:125013. [PMID: 29786614 PMCID: PMC6075870 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Existing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) optimization using coplanar arcs is highly efficient but usually dosimetrically inferior to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with optimized non-coplanar beams. To achieve both dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency, we proposed in this study, a novel integrated optimization method for non-coplanar VMAT (4πVMAT). 4πVMAT with direct aperture optimization (DAO) was achieved by utilizing a least square dose fidelity objective, along with an anisotropic total variation term for regularizing the fluence smoothness, a single segment term for imposing simple apertures, and a group sparsity term for selecting beam angles. Continuous gantry/couch angle trajectories were selected using the Dijkstra's algorithm, where the edge and node costs were determined based on the maximal gantry rotation speed and the estimated fluence map at the current iteration, respectively. The couch-gantry-patient collision space was calculated based on actual machine geometry and a human subject 3D surface. Beams leading to collision are excluded from the DAO and beam trajectory selection (BTS). An alternating optimization strategy was implemented to solve the integrated DAO and BTS problem. The feasibility of 4πVMAT using one full-arc or two full-arcs was tested on nine patients with brain, lung, or prostate cancer. The plan was compared against a coplanar VMAT (2πVMAT) plan using one additional arc and collimator rotation. Compared to 2πVMAT, 4πVMAT reduced the average maximum and mean organs-at-risk dose by 9.63% and 3.08% of the prescription dose with the same target coverage. R50 was reduced by 23.0%. Maximum doses to the dose limiting organs, such as the brainstem, the major vessels, and the proximal bronchus, were reduced by 8.1 Gy (64.8%), 16.3 Gy (41.5%), and 19.83 Gy (55.5%), respectively. The novel 4πVMAT approach affords efficient delivery of non-coplanar arc trajectories that lead to dosimetric improvements compared with coplanar VMAT using more arcs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qihui Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Saito N, Schmitt D, Bangert M. Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT: Comparison of different adaptive strategies. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:87-97. [PMID: 29862644 PMCID: PMC6036361 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Revised: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To retrospectively analyze and estimate the dosimetric benefit of online and offline motion mitigation strategies for prostate IMRT. Methods Intrafractional motion data of 21 prostate patients receiving intensity‐modulated radiotherapy was acquired with an electromagnetic tracking system. Target trajectories of 734 fractions were analyzed per delivered multileaf‐collimator segment in five motion metrics: three‐dimensional displacement, distance from beam axis (DistToBeam), and three orthogonal components. Time‐resolved dose calculations have been performed by shifting the target according to the sampled motion for the following scenarios: without adaptation, online‐repositioning with a minimum threshold of 3 mm, and an offline approach using a modified field order applying horizontal before vertical beams. Change of D95 (targets) or V65 (organs at risk) relative to the static case, that is, ΔD95 or ΔV65, was extracted per fraction in percent. Correlation coefficients (CC) between the motion metrics and the dose metrics were extracted. Mean of patient‐wise CC was used to evaluate the correlation of motion metric and dosimetric changes. Mean and standard deviation of the patient‐wise correlation slopes (in %/mm) were extracted. Results For ΔD95 of the prostate, mean DistToBeam per fraction showed the highest correlation for all scenarios with a relative change of −0.6 ± 0.7%/mm without adaptation and −0.4 ± 0.5%/mm for the repositioning and field order strategies. For ΔV65 of the bladder and the rectum, superior–inferior and posterior–anterior motion components per fraction showed the highest correlation, respectively. The slope of bladder (rectum) was 14.6 ± 5.8 (15.1 ± 6.9) %/mm without adaptation, 14.0 ± 4.9 (14.5 ± 7.4) %/mm for repositioning with 3 mm, and 10.6 ± 2.5 (8.1 ± 4.6) %/mm for the field order approach. Conclusions The correlation slope is a valuable concept to estimate dosimetric deviations from static plan quality directly based on the observed motion. For the prostate, both mitigation strategies showed comparable benefit. For organs at risk, the field order approach showed less sensitive response regarding motion and reduced interpatient variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nami Saito
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schmitt
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Bangert
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hirashima H, Miyabe Y, Nakamura M, Mukumoto N, Mizowaki T, Hiraoka M. Quality assurance of geometric accuracy based on an electronic portal imaging device and log data analysis for Dynamic WaveArc irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:234-242. [PMID: 29633542 PMCID: PMC5978977 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a simple verification method for the routine quality assurance (QA) of Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) irradiation using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images and log data analysis. First, an automatic calibration method utilizing the outermost multileaf collimator (MLC) slits was developed to correct the misalignment between the center of the EPID and the beam axis. Moreover, to verify the detection accuracy of the MLC position according to the EPID images, various positions of the MLC with intentional errors in the range 0.1–1 mm were assessed. Second, to validate the geometric accuracy during DWA irradiation, tests were designed in consideration of three indices. Test 1 evaluated the accuracy of the MLC position. Test 2 assessed dose output consistency with variable dose rate (160–400 MU/min), gantry speed (2.2–6°/s), and ring speed (0.5–2.7°/s). Test 3 validated dose output consistency with variable values of the above parameters plus MLC speed (1.6–4.2 cm/s). All tests were delivered to the EPID and compared with those obtained using a stationary radiation beam with a 0° gantry angle. Irradiation log data were recorded simultaneously. The 0.1‐mm intentional error on the MLC position could be detected by the EPID, which is smaller than the EPID pixel size. In Test 1, the MLC slit widths agreed within 0.20 mm of their exposed values. The averaged root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) of the dose outputs was less than 0.8% in Test 2 and Test 3. Using log data analysis in Test 3, the RMSE between the planned and recorded data was 0.1 mm, 0.12°, and 0.07° for the MLC position, gantry angle, and ring angle, respectively. The proposed method is useful for routine QA of the accuracy of DWA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Miyabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mukumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hirashima H, Nakamura M, Miyabe Y, Uto M, Nakamura K, Mizowaki T. Monitoring of mechanical errors and their dosimetric impact throughout the course of non-coplanar continuous volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:27. [PMID: 29444693 PMCID: PMC5813375 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-0972-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volumetric-modulated Dynamic WaveArc therapy (VMDWAT) is a non-coplanar continuous volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) delivery technique. Here, we monitored mechanical errors and their impact on dose distributions in VMDWAT using logfiles throughout the course of treatment. METHODS Fifteen patients were enrolled (2 skull base tumor patients and 13 prostate cancer patients). VMDWAT plans were created for the enrolled patients. The prescribed dose for the skull base tumor was set as 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction, and that for the prostate cancer was set as 72 to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. We acquired logfiles to monitor mechanical errors and their impact on dose distribution in each fraction. The root mean square error (RMSE) in the multi-leaf collimator (MLC), gantry angle, O-ring angle and monitor unit (MU) were calculated using logfiles throughout the course of VMDWAT for each patient. The dosimetric impact of mechanical errors throughout the course of VMDWAT was verified using a logfile-based dose reconstruction method. Dosimetric errors between the reconstructed plans and the original plans were assessed. RESULTS A total of 517 datasets, including 55 datasets for the 2 skull base tumor patients and 462 datasets for the 13 prostate cancer patients, were acquired. The RMSE values were less than 0.1 mm, 0.2°, 0.1°, and 0.4 MU for MLC position, gantry angle, O-ring angle, and MU, respectively. For the skull base tumors, the absolute mean dosimetric errors and two standard deviations throughout the course of treatment were less than 1.4% and 1.1%, respectively. For prostate cancer, these absolute values were less than 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively. The largest dosimetric error of 2.5% was observed in a skull base tumor patient. The resultant dosimetric error in the accumulated daily delivered dose distribution, in the patient with the largest error, was up to 1.6% for all dose-volumetric parameters relative to the planned dose distribution. CONCLUSIONS MLC position, gantry rotation, O-ring rotation and MU were highly accurate and stable throughout the course of treatment. The daily dosimetric errors due to mechanical errors were small. VMDWAT provided high delivery accuracy and stability throughout the course of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN000023870 . Registered: 1 October 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. .,Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Yuki Miyabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Megumi Uto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Kiyonao Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Langhans M, Unkelbach J, Bortfeld T, Craft D. Optimizing highly noncoplanar VMAT trajectories: the NoVo method. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:025023. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa36d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
40
|
Tsang HS, Kamerling CP, Ziegenhein P, Nill S, Oelfke U. A novel probabilistic approach to generating PTV with partial voxel contributions. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:4917-4928. [PMID: 28379156 PMCID: PMC5953212 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6b90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment planning for use with high-energy photon beams currently employs a binary approach in defining the planning target volume (PTV). We propose a margin concept that takes the beam directions into account, generating beam-dependent PTVs (bdPTVs) on a beam-by-beam basis. The resulting degree of overlaps between the bdPTVs are used within the optimisation process; the optimiser effectively considers the same voxel to be both target and organ at risk (OAR) with fractional contributions. We investigate the impact of this novel approach when applied to prostate radiotherapy treatments, and compare treatment plans generated using beam dependent margins to conventional margins. Five prostate patients were used in this planning study, and plans using beam dependent margins improved the sparing of high doses to target-surrounding OARs, though a trade-off in delivering additional low dose to the OARs can be observed. Plans using beam dependent margins are observed to have a slightly reduced target coverage. Nevertheless, all plans are able to satisfy 90% population coverage with the target receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose to [Formula: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Tsang
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - C P Kamerling
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - P Ziegenhein
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - S Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - U Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Locke CB, Bush KK. Trajectory optimization in radiotherapy using sectioning (TORUS). Med Phys 2017; 44:3375-3392. [PMID: 28397968 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A challenging problem in trajectory optimization for radiotherapy is properly handling the synchronization of the medical accelerators dynamic delivery. The initial coarse sampling of control points implemented in a Progressive Resolution Optimization type approach (VMAT) routinely results in MLC aperture forming contention issues as the sampling resolution increases. This work presents an approach to optimize continuous, beam-on radiation trajectories through exploration of the anatomical topology present in the patient and formation of a novel dual-metric graph optimization problem. METHODS This work presents a new perspective on trajectory optimization in radiotherapy using the concept of sectioning (TORUS). TORUS avoids degradation of 3D dose optimization quality by mapping the connectedness of target regions from the BEV perspective throughout the space of deliverable coordinates. This connectedness information is then incorporated into a graph optimization problem to define ideal trajectories. The unique usage of two distance functions in this graph optimization permits the TORUS algorithm to generate efficient dynamic trajectories for delivery while maximizing the angular flux through all PTV voxels. 3D dose optimization is performed for trajectories using a commercial TPS progressive resolution optimizer. RESULTS The TORUS algorithm is applied to three example treatments: chest wall, scalp, and the TG-119 C-shape phantom. When static collimator coplanar trajectories are generated for the chest wall and scalp cases, the TORUS trajectories are found to outperform both 7 field IMRT and 2 arc VMAT plans in delivery time, organ at risk sparing, conformality, and homogeneity. For the TG-119 phantom, when static couch and collimator non-coplanar trajectories are optimized, TORUS trajectories have superior sparing of the central core avoidance with shorter delivery times, with similar dose conformality and homogeneity. CONCLUSIONS The TORUS algorithm is able to automatically generate trajectories having improved plan quality and delivery time over standard IMRT and VMAT treatments. TORUS offers an exciting and promising avenue forward toward increasing dynamic capabilities in radiation delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Barry Locke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5847, USA
| | - Karl Kenneth Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5847, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wieser HP, Cisternas E, Wahl N, Ulrich S, Stadler A, Mescher H, Müller LR, Klinge T, Gabrys H, Burigo L, Mairani A, Ecker S, Ackermann B, Ellerbrock M, Parodi K, Jäkel O, Bangert M. Development of the open-source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad. Med Phys 2017; 44:2556-2568. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Peter Wieser
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Eduardo Cisternas
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Niklas Wahl
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Silke Ulrich
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Alexander Stadler
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Henning Mescher
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Lucas-Raphael Müller
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Thomas Klinge
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Hubert Gabrys
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Lucas Burigo
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-HIT; Im Neuenheimer Feld 450 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Swantje Ecker
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-HIT; Im Neuenheimer Feld 450 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Benjamin Ackermann
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-HIT; Im Neuenheimer Feld 450 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Malte Ellerbrock
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-HIT; Im Neuenheimer Feld 450 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-HIT; Im Neuenheimer Feld 450 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Am Coulombwall 1 D-85748 Garching Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-HIT; Im Neuenheimer Feld 450 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| | - Mark Bangert
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology-HIRO; Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 D-69120 Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Burghelea M, Verellen D, Dhont J, Hung C, Gevaert T, Van den Begin R, Collen C, Poels K, Tournel K, Boussaer M, Jaudet C, Reynders T, Simon V, de Ridder M. Treating patients with Dynamic Wave Arc: First clinical experience. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:347-351. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Iterative methods for beam angle selection (BAS) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning sequentially construct a beneficial ensemble of beam directions. In a naïve implementation, the nth beam is selected by adding beam orientations one-by-one from a discrete set of candidates to an existing ensemble of (n - 1) beams. The best beam orientation is identified in a time consuming process by solving the fluence map optimization (FMO) problem for every candidate beam and selecting the beam that yields the largest improvement to the objective function value. This paper evaluates two alternative methods to accelerate iterative BAS based on surrogates for the FMO objective function value. METHODS We suggest to select candidate beams not based on the FMO objective function value after convergence but (1) based on the objective function value after five FMO iterations of a gradient based algorithm and (2) based on a projected gradient of the FMO problem in the first iteration. The performance of the objective function surrogates is evaluated based on the resulting objective function values and dose statistics in a treatment planning study comprising three intracranial, three pancreas, and three prostate cases. Furthermore, iterative BAS is evaluated for an application in which a small number of noncoplanar beams complement a set of coplanar beam orientations. This scenario is of practical interest as noncoplanar setups may require additional attention of the treatment personnel for every couch rotation. RESULTS Iterative BAS relying on objective function surrogates yields similar results compared to naïve BAS with regard to the objective function values and dose statistics. At the same time, early stopping of the FMO and using the projected gradient during the first iteration enable reductions in computation time by approximately one to two orders of magnitude. With regard to the clinical delivery of noncoplanar IMRT treatments, we could show that optimized beam ensembles using only a few noncoplanar beam orientations often approach the plan quality of fully noncoplanar ensembles. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that iterative BAS in combination with objective function surrogates can be a viable option to implement automated BAS at clinically acceptable computation times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Bangert
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Smyth G, Evans PM, Bamber JC, Mandeville HC, Welsh LC, Saran FH, Bedford JL. Non-coplanar trajectories to improve organ at risk sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy for primary brain tumors. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:124-131. [PMID: 27481571 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2016] [Revised: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) trajectories for organ at risk (OAR) sparing in primary brain tumor radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen patients were planned using coplanar VMAT and compared against non-coplanar VMAT plans for three trajectory optimization techniques. A geometric heuristic technique (GH) combined beam scoring and Dijkstra's algorithm to minimize the importance-weighted sum of OAR volumes irradiated. Fluence optimization was used to perform a local search around coplanar and GH trajectories, producing fluence-based local search (FBLS) and FBLS+GH trajectories respectively. RESULTS GH, FBLS, and FBLS+GH trajectories reduced doses to the contralateral globe, optic nerve, hippocampus, temporal lobe, and cochlea. However, FBLS increased dose to the ipsilateral lens, optic nerve and globe. Compared to GH, FBLS+GH increased dose to the ipsilateral temporal lobe and hippocampus, contralateral optics, and the brainstem and body. GH and FBLS+GH trajectories reduced bilateral hippocampi normal tissue complication probability (p=0.028 and p=0.043, respectively). All techniques reduced PTV conformity; GH and FBLS+GH trajectories reduced homogeneity but less so for FBLS+GH. CONCLUSIONS The geometric heuristic technique best spared OARs and reduced normal tissue complication probability, however incorporating fluence information into non-coplanar trajectory optimization maintained PTV homogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Smyth
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Philip M Evans
- Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Jeffrey C Bamber
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Liam C Welsh
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frank H Saran
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James L Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rocha H, Dias J, Ventura T, Ferreira B, Lopes MDC. A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT. Med Phys 2016; 43:5514. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4962477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
47
|
Yu VY, Tran A, Nguyen D, Cao M, Ruan D, Low DA, Sheng K. The development and verification of a highly accurate collision prediction model for automated noncoplanar plan delivery. Med Phys 2016; 42:6457-67. [PMID: 26520735 DOI: 10.1118/1.4932631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Significant dosimetric benefits had been previously demonstrated in highly noncoplanar treatment plans. In this study, the authors developed and verified an individualized collision model for the purpose of delivering highly noncoplanar radiotherapy and tested the feasibility of total delivery automation with Varian TrueBeam developer mode. METHODS A hand-held 3D scanner was used to capture the surfaces of an anthropomorphic phantom and a human subject, which were positioned with a computer-aided design model of a TrueBeam machine to create a detailed virtual geometrical collision model. The collision model included gantry, collimator, and couch motion degrees of freedom. The accuracy of the 3D scanner was validated by scanning a rigid cubical phantom with known dimensions. The collision model was then validated by generating 300 linear accelerator orientations corresponding to 300 gantry-to-couch and gantry-to-phantom distances, and comparing the corresponding distance measurements to their corresponding models. The linear accelerator orientations reflected uniformly sampled noncoplanar beam angles to the head, lung, and prostate. The distance discrepancies between measurements on the physical and virtual systems were used to estimate treatment-site-specific safety buffer distances with 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001% probability of collision between the gantry and couch or phantom. Plans containing 20 noncoplanar beams to the brain, lung, and prostate optimized via an in-house noncoplanar radiotherapy platform were converted into XML script for automated delivery and the entire delivery was recorded and timed to demonstrate the feasibility of automated delivery. RESULTS The 3D scanner measured the dimension of the 14 cm cubic phantom within 0.5 mm. The maximal absolute discrepancy between machine and model measurements for gantry-to-couch and gantry-to-phantom was 0.95 and 2.97 cm, respectively. The reduced accuracy of gantry-to-phantom measurements was attributed to phantom setup errors due to the slightly deformable and flexible phantom extremities. The estimated site-specific safety buffer distance with 0.001% probability of collision for (gantry-to-couch, gantry-to-phantom) was (1.23 cm, 3.35 cm), (1.01 cm, 3.99 cm), and (2.19 cm, 5.73 cm) for treatment to the head, lung, and prostate, respectively. Automated delivery to all three treatment sites was completed in 15 min and collision free using a digital Linac. CONCLUSIONS An individualized collision prediction model for the purpose of noncoplanar beam delivery was developed and verified. With the model, the study has demonstrated the feasibility of predicting deliverable beams for an individual patient and then guiding fully automated noncoplanar treatment delivery. This work motivates development of clinical workflows and quality assurance procedures to allow more extensive use and automation of noncoplanar beam geometries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Angelia Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Burghelea M, Verellen D, Poels K, Hung C, Nakamura M, Dhont J, Gevaert T, Van den Begin R, Collen C, Matsuo Y, Kishi T, Simon V, Hiraoka M, de Ridder M. Initial characterization, dosimetric benchmark and performance validation of Dynamic Wave Arc. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:63. [PMID: 27130434 PMCID: PMC4850693 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0633-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dynamic Wave Arc (DWA) is a clinical approach designed to maximize the versatility of Vero SBRT system by synchronizing the gantry-ring noncoplanar movement with D-MLC optimization. The purpose of this study was to verify the delivery accuracy of DWA approach and to evaluate the potential dosimetric benefits. Methods DWA is an extended form of VMAT with a continuous varying ring position. The main difference in the optimization modules of VMAT and DWA is during the angular spacing, where the DWA algorithm does not consider the gantry spacing, but only the Euclidian norm of the ring and gantry angle. A preclinical version of RayStation v4.6 (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden) was used to create patient specific wave arc trajectories for 31 patients with various anatomical tumor regions (prostate, oligometatstatic cases, centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer-LAPC). DWA was benchmarked against the current clinical approaches and coplanar VMAT. Each plan was evaluated with regards to dose distribution, modulation complexity (MCS), monitor units and treatment time efficiency. The delivery accuracy was evaluated using a 2D diode array that takes in consideration the multi-dimensionality of DWA during dose reconstruction. Results In centrally-located NSCLC cases, DWA improved the low dose spillage with 20 %, while the target coverage was increased with 17 % compared to 3D CRT. The structures that significantly benefited from using DWA were proximal bronchus and esophagus, with the maximal dose being reduced by 17 % and 24 %, respectively. For prostate and LAPC, neither technique seemed clearly superior to the other; however, DWA reduced with more than 65 % of the delivery time over IMRT. A steeper dose gradient outside the target was observed for all treatment sites (p < 0.01) with DWA. Except the oligometastatic cases, where the DWA-MCSs indicate a higher modulation, both DWA and VMAT modalities provide plans of similar complexity. The average ɣ (3 % /3 mm) passing rate for DWA plans was 99.2 ± 1 % (range from 96.8 to 100 %). Conclusions DWA proven to be a fully functional treatment technique, allowing additional flexibility in dose shaping, while preserving dosimetrically robust delivery and treatment times comparable with coplanar VMAT. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0633-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Burghelea
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,R&D Radiosurgery, BrainLAB AG, Munich, Germany. .,Babes Bolyai University, Faculty of Physics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jennifer Dhont
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robbe Van den Begin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Collen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Viorica Simon
- Babes Bolyai University, Faculty of Physics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mark de Ridder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Unkelbach J, Bortfeld T, Craft D, Alber M, Bangert M, Bokrantz R, Chen D, Li R, Xing L, Men C, Nill S, Papp D, Romeijn E, Salari E. Optimization approaches to volumetric modulated arc therapy planning. Med Phys 2015; 42:1367-77. [PMID: 25735291 PMCID: PMC5148175 DOI: 10.1118/1.4908224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2014] [Revised: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has found widespread clinical application in recent years. A large number of treatment planning studies have evaluated the potential for VMAT for different disease sites based on the currently available commercial implementations of VMAT planning. In contrast, literature on the underlying mathematical optimization methods used in treatment planning is scarce. VMAT planning represents a challenging large scale optimization problem. In contrast to fluence map optimization in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for static beams, VMAT planning represents a nonconvex optimization problem. In this paper, the authors review the state-of-the-art in VMAT planning from an algorithmic perspective. Different approaches to VMAT optimization, including arc sequencing methods, extensions of direct aperture optimization, and direct optimization of leaf trajectories are reviewed. Their advantages and limitations are outlined and recommendations for improvements are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - David Craft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Markus Alber
- Department of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Mark Bangert
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | | | - Danny Chen
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556
| | - Ruijiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Chunhua Men
- Department of Research, Elekta, Maryland Heights, Missouri 63043
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - Dávid Papp
- Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
| | - Edwin Romeijn
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
| | - Ehsan Salari
- Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas 67260
| |
Collapse
|