A phantom based evaluation of the clinical imaging performance of electronic portal imaging devices

Purpose

In this study an evaluation of the imaging performance of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is presented. The evaluation performed employing the QC-3V image quality phantom.

Methods

An EPID system of a 6 MV LINAC, was used to obtain images of a QC-3V EPID phantom. The X-ray source to phantom distance was 100 cm and the field size was 15x15 cm2. The irradiation conditions comprised Dose Rates (DR) of 200, 400 and 600 for a 2 MU-100 MU range. The Contrast Transfer Function (CTF), the Noise Power Spectrum (NPS), the Normalized Noise Power Spectrum (NNPS) and the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) were studied. In addition, an alternative factor showing a frequency related output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the Signal-to-Noise-Frequency Response (SNFR), has been introduced. SNFR is a comprehensive quality index, easily determined in clinical environment.

Results

The CTF curves were found comparable to each other. The lowest values were measured at 2 MU and 200 MU/min. Concerning the NPS and NNPS graphs it was found that the values decrease up to approximately 0.3 lp/mm and demonstrate a white noise shape afterwards. SNFR values were found reducing with spatial frequency. Highest CNR were found between the region 7 and 11 of the phantom.

Conclusions

The influence of MU and DR on EPID performance were investigated. Image quality was assessed using the QC-3V phantom. The presented results can lead to image quality amelioration and act supportively to current image quality control routine protocols.

Assessing the accuracy of electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based dosimetry: II. Evaluation of a dosimetric uncertainty budget and development of a new film-in-EPID absorbed dose calibration methodology

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to reduce the uncertainty associated with determining dose-to-water using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging detector (EPID) under reference conditions by developing a direct calibration formalism based on radiochromic film measurements made within the EPID panel and detailed Monte Carlo simulations. To our knowledge, this is the first EPID-based dosimetry study reporting an uncertainty budget .

METHODS

Pixel sensitivity and relative off-axis response was mapped by simultaneously irradiating film contained within the imager panel and acquiring an EPID image set. The detector panel was disassembled for the purpose of modeling the EPID in detail using the EGSnrc DOSXYZnrc usercode, which was in turn used to calculate dose-to-film in EPID to dose-to-water in water conversion factors .

RESULTS

A direct comparison of the two correction methodologies investigated in this work, the previously established empirical method and the proposed simultaneous measurement approach involving in-EPID film dosimetry, produced an agreement with an RMS deviation of 1.4 % overall. A combined standard relative uncertainty of 3.3 % (k = 1) was estimated for the determination of absorbed dose to water at the position of the EPID using the proposed calibration methodology .

CONCLUSIONS

This work describes a direct method of calibrating EPID response in terms of absorbed dose to water requiring fewer measurements than other empirical approaches, and without 2D spatial interpolation of correction factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AAPM Task Group 198 Report: An implementation guide for TG 142 quality assurance of medical accelerators

The charges on this task group (TG) were as follows: (a) provide specific procedural guidelines for performing the tests recommended in TG 142; (b) provide estimate of the range of time, appropriate personnel, and qualifications necessary to complete the tests in TG 142; and (c) provide sample daily, weekly, monthly, or annual quality assurance (QA) forms. Many of the guidelines in this report are drawn from the literature and are included in the references. When literature was not available, specific test methods reflect the experiences of the TG members (e.g., a test method for door interlock is self-evident with no literature necessary). In other cases, the technology is so new that no literature for test methods was available. Given broad clinical adaptation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which is not a specific topic of TG 142, several tests and criteria specific to VMAT were added.