1
|
Faccenda V, Panizza D, Niespolo RM, Colciago RR, Rossano G, De Sanctis L, Gandola D, Ippolito D, Arcangeli S, De Ponti E. Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4066. [PMID: 39682252 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Revised: 11/29/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. Methods: Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (tdelay) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired contrast phase, based on diagnostic triple-phase CT. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated on ten contrast phases, and a panel of three experts qualitatively evaluated tumor visibility. Aortic HU values were measured to refine the tdelay for subsequent patients. The commonly used approach of combining triple-phase CT with unenhanced 4DCT was simulated, and differences in target delineation were evaluated by volume, centroid shift, Dice and Jaccard indices, and mean distance agreement (MDA). The margins required to account for motion were calculated. Results: The ce4DCT acquisitions substantially improved tumor visibility over the entire breathing cycle in 20 patients, according to the experts' unanimous evaluation. The median contrast peak time was 54.5 s, and the washout plateau was observed at 70.3 s, with mean peak and plateau HU values of 292 ± 59 and 169 ± 25. The volumes from the commonly used procedure (ITV2) were significantly smaller than the ce4DCT volumes (ITV1) (p = 0.045). The median centroid shift was 4.7 mm. The ITV1-ITV2 overlap was 69% (Dice index), 53% (Jaccard index), and 2.89 mm (MDA), with the liver volumes showing significantly lower indices compared to the pancreatic volumes (p ≤ 0.011). The margins required to better encompass ITV1 were highly variable, with mean values ≥ 4 mm in all directions except for the left-right axis. Conclusions: The ce4DCT simulation was feasible, resulting in optimal tumor enhancement with minimal resource investment, while significantly mitigating uncertainties in SBRT planning by addressing poor visibility and respiratory motion. Triple-phase 3DCT with unenhanced 4DCT led to high variability in target delineation, making the isotropic margins ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Denis Panizza
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Marina Niespolo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Rossano
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Lorenzo De Sanctis
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Davide Gandola
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zaidi F, Calame P, Chevalier C, Henriques J, Vernerey D, Vuitton L, Heyd B, Borg C, Boustani J. A comparison of target volumes drawn on arterial and venous phase scans during radiation therapy planning for patients with pancreatic cancer: the PANCRINJ study. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:90. [PMID: 39010133 PMCID: PMC11251351 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02477-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The planification of radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer (PC) requires a dosimetric computed tomography (CT) scan to define the gross tumor volume (GTV). The main objective of this study was to compare the inter-observer variability in RT planning between the arterial and the venous phases following intravenous contrast. METHODS PANCRINJ was a prospective monocentric study that included twenty patients with non-metastatic PC. Patients underwent a pre-therapeutic CT scan at the arterial and venous phases. The delineation of the GTV was performed by one radiologist (gold standard) and two senior radiation oncologists (operators). The primary objective was to compare the Jaccard conformity index (JCI) for the GTVs computed between the GS (gold standard) and the operators between the arterial and the venous phases with a Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples. The secondary endpoints were the geographical miss index (GMI), the kappa index, the intra-operator variability, and the dose-volume histograms between the arterial and venous phases. RESULTS The median JCI for the arterial and venous phases were 0.50 (range, 0.17-0.64) and 0.41 (range, 0.23-0.61) (p = 0.10) respectively. The median GS-GTV was statistically significantly smaller compared to the operators at the arterial (p < 0.0001) and venous phases (p < 0.001), respectively. The GMI were low with few tumors missed for all patients with a median GMI of 0.07 (range, 0-0.79) and 0.05 (range, 0-0.39) at the arterial and venous phases, respectively (p = 0.15). There was a moderate agreement between the radiation oncologists with a median kappa index of 0.52 (range 0.38-0.57) on the arterial phase, and 0.52 (range 0.36-0.57) on the venous phase (p = 0.08). The intra-observer variability for GTV delineation was lower at the venous phase than at the arterial phase for the two operators. There was no significant difference between the arterial and the venous phases regarding the dose-volume histogram for the operators. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed inter- and intra-observer variability in delineating GTV for PC without significant differences between the arterial and the venous phases. The use of both phases should be encouraged. Our findings suggest the need to provide training for radiation oncologists in pancreatic imaging and to collaborate within a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Zaidi
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, CHRU Besançon, Service de Radiothérapie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, Besançon, 25030, France
| | - Paul Calame
- Department of Radiology, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Besançon, 25030, France
| | - Cédric Chevalier
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, CHRU Besançon, Service de Radiothérapie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, Besançon, 25030, France
| | - Julie Henriques
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
- Université de Franche-Comté, EFS, INSERM, UMR RIGHT, Besançon, F-25000, France
| | - Dewi Vernerey
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
- Université de Franche-Comté, EFS, INSERM, UMR RIGHT, Besançon, F-25000, France
| | - Lucine Vuitton
- Department of Gastroenteroly, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Besançon, 25030, France
| | - Bruno Heyd
- Department of Digestive surgery, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Besançon, 25030, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- Department of Oncology, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, Besançon, 25030, France
| | - Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, CHU Besançon, CHRU Besançon, Service de Radiothérapie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, Besançon, 25030, France.
- Université de Franche-Comté, EFS, INSERM, UMR RIGHT, Besançon, F-25000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schneider M, Bodenstein E, Bock J, Dietrich A, Gantz S, Heuchel L, Krause M, Lühr A, von Neubeck C, Nexhipi S, Schürer M, Tillner F, Beyreuther E, Suckert T, Müller JR. Combined proton radiography and irradiation for high-precision preclinical studies in small animals. Front Oncol 2022; 12:982417. [PMID: 36419890 PMCID: PMC9677333 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.982417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proton therapy has become a popular treatment modality in the field of radiooncology due to higher spatial dose conformity compared to conventional radiotherapy, which holds the potential to spare normal tissue. Nevertheless, unresolved research questions, such as the much debated relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, call for preclinical research, especially regarding in vivo studies. To mimic clinical workflows, high-precision small animal irradiation setups with image-guidance are needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS A preclinical experimental setup for small animal brain irradiation using proton radiographies was established to perform planning, repositioning, and irradiation of mice. The image quality of proton radiographies was optimized regarding the resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and minimal dose deposition in the animal. Subsequently, proof-of-concept histological analysis was conducted by staining for DNA double-strand breaks that were then correlated to the delivered dose. RESULTS The developed setup and workflow allow precise brain irradiation with a lateral target positioning accuracy of<0.26mm for in vivo experiments at minimal imaging dose of<23mGy per mouse. The custom-made software for image registration enables the fast and precise animal positioning at the beam with low observer-variability. DNA damage staining validated the successful positioning and irradiation of the mouse hippocampus. CONCLUSION Proton radiography enables fast and effective high-precision lateral alignment of proton beam and target volume in mouse irradiation experiments with limited dose exposure. In the future, this will enable irradiation of larger animal cohorts as well as fractionated proton irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schneider
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Bodenstein
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Johanna Bock
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Antje Dietrich
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), partner site Dresden- German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Gantz
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lena Heuchel
- Technical University (TU) Dortmund- Faculty of Physics, Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), partner site Dresden- German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- Technical University (TU) Dortmund- Faculty of Physics, Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), partner site Dresden- German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sindi Nexhipi
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Falk Tillner
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Theresa Suckert
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), partner site Dresden- German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Richard Müller
- OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus- Technische Universitat Dresden-Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Choi W, Nadeem S, Alam SR, Deasy JO, Tannenbaum A, Lu W. Reproducible and Interpretable Spiculation Quantification for Lung Cancer Screening. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 200:105839. [PMID: 33221055 PMCID: PMC7920914 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Spiculations are important predictors of lung cancer malignancy, which are spikes on the surface of the pulmonary nodules. In this study, we proposed an interpretable and parameter-free technique to quantify the spiculation using area distortion metric obtained by the conformal (angle-preserving) spherical parameterization. We exploit the insight that for an angle-preserved spherical mapping of a given nodule, the corresponding negative area distortion precisely characterizes the spiculations on that nodule. We introduced novel spiculation scores based on the area distortion metric and spiculation measures. We also semi-automatically segment lung nodule (for reproducibility) as well as vessel and wall attachment to differentiate the real spiculations from lobulation and attachment. A simple pathological malignancy prediction model is also introduced. We used the publicly-available LIDC-IDRI dataset pathologists (strong-label) and radiologists (weak-label) ratings to train and test radiomics models containing this feature, and then externally validate the models. We achieved AUC = 0.80 and 0.76, respectively, with the models trained on the 811 weakly-labeled LIDC datasets and tested on the 72 strongly-labeled LIDC and 73 LUNGx datasets; the previous best model for LUNGx had AUC = 0.68. The number-of-spiculations feature was found to be highly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ=0.44) with the radiologists' spiculation score. We developed a reproducible and interpretable, parameter-free technique for quantifying spiculations on nodules. The spiculation quantification measures was then applied to the radiomics framework for pathological malignancy prediction with reproducible semi-automatic segmentation of nodule. Using our interpretable features (size, attachment, spiculation, lobulation), we were able to achieve higher performance than previous models. In the future, we will exhaustively test our model for lung cancer screening in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wookjin Choi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia State University, 1 Hayden St, Petersburg, VA 23806, USA
| | - Saad Nadeem
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Sadegh R Alam
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Joseph O Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Allen Tannenbaum
- Departments of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11790, USA
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brunner TB, Haustermans K, Huguet F, Morganti AG, Mukherjee S, Belka C, Krempien R, Hawkins MA, Valentini V, Roeder F. ESTRO ACROP guidelines for target volume definition in pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:60-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
6
|
Gupta A, Kumar R, Yadav HP, Sharma M, Kamal R, Thaper D, Banik P, Gupta S, Saroha K, Singh S, Kumar Sarin S. Feasibility of 4D CT simulation with synchronized intravenous contrast injection in hepatocellular carcinoma. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:293-298. [PMID: 32194348 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delivering Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is challenging mainly for two reasons: first, motion of the liver occurs in six degrees of freedom and, second, delineation of the tumor is difficult owing to a similar density of HCC to that of the adjoining healthy liver tissue in a non-contrast CT scan. To overcome both these challenges simultaneously, we performed a feasibility study to synchronize intravenous contrast to obtain an arterial and a delayed phase 4D CT. Materials and Methods We included seven HCC patients of planned for SBRT. 4D CT simulation was performed with synchronized intravenous contrast based on the formula TSCAN DELAY = T peak - (L0/Detector Coverage × Cine Duration in Seconds). This was followed by a delayed 4D CT scan. Results We found that, with our protocol, it is feasible to obtain a 4DCT with an arterial and a delayed phase making it comparable to a diagnostic multi-phase CT. The peak HU of the 4D scan and diagnostic CT were similar (mean peak HU 134.2 vs 143.1, p value = 0.58 N.S). Whereas in comparison with a non-contrast CT a significant rise in the peak HU was seen (mean peak 134.2 vs 61.4 p value = .00003). Conclusion A synchronized contrast 4D CT simulation for HCC is safe and feasible. It results in good contrast enhancement comparable to a diagnostic 3D contrast CT scan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Gupta
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Rishabh Kumar
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | | | - Manik Sharma
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Rose Kamal
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Deepak Thaper
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Prabir Banik
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Shipra Gupta
- Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Kartik Saroha
- Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Sandeep Singh
- Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| | - Shiv Kumar Sarin
- Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang J, Markova S, Garcia A, Huang K, Nie X, Choi W, Lu W, Wu A, Rimner A, Li G. Evaluation of automatic contour propagation in T2-weighted 4DMRI for normal-tissue motion assessment using internal organ-at-risk volume (IRV). J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:598-608. [PMID: 30112797 PMCID: PMC6123161 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of automatically propagated contours of organs at risk (OARs) based on respiratory‐correlated navigator‐triggered four‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (RC‐4DMRI) for calculation of internal organ‐at‐risk volume (IRV) to account for intra‐fractional OAR motion. Methods and Materials T2‐weighted RC‐4DMRI images were of 10 volunteers acquired and reconstructed using an internal navigator‐echo surrogate and concurrent external bellows under an IRB‐approved protocol. Four major OARs (lungs, heart, liver, and stomach) were delineated in the 10‐phase 4DMRI. Two manual‐contour sets were delineated by two clinical personnel and two automatic‐contour sets were propagated using free‐form deformable image registration. The OAR volume variation within the 10‐phase cycle was assessed and the IRV was calculated as the union of all OAR contours. The OAR contour similarity between the navigator‐triggered and bellows‐rebinned 4DMRI was compared. A total of 2400 contours were compared to the most probable ground truth with a 95% confidence level (S95) in similarity, sensitivity, and specificity using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm. Results Visual inspection of automatically propagated contours finds that approximately 5–10% require manual correction. The similarity, sensitivity, and specificity between manual and automatic contours are indistinguishable (P > 0.05). The Jaccard similarity indexes are 0.92 ± 0.02 (lungs), 0.89 ± 0.03 (heart), 0.92 ± 0.02 (liver), and 0.83 ± 0.04 (stomach). Volume variations within the breathing cycle are small for the heart (2.6 ± 1.5%), liver (1.2 ± 0.6%), and stomach (2.6 ± 0.8%), whereas the IRV is much larger than the OAR volume by: 20.3 ± 8.6% (heart), 24.0 ± 8.6% (liver), and 47.6 ± 20.2% (stomach). The Jaccard index is higher in navigator‐triggered than bellows‐rebinned 4DMRI by 4% (P < 0.05), due to the higher image quality of navigator‐based 4DMRI. Conclusion Automatic and manual OAR contours from Navigator‐triggered 4DMRI are not statistically distinguishable. The navigator‐triggered 4DMRI image provides higher contour quality than bellows‐rebinned 4DMRI. The IRVs are 20–50% larger than OAR volumes and should be considered in dose estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China.,Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Svetlana Markova
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alejandro Garcia
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kirk Huang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xingyu Nie
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Wookjin Choi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Guang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi W, Oh JH, Riyahi S, Liu C, Jiang F, Chen W, White C, Rimner A, Mechalakos JG, Deasy JO, Lu W. Radiomics analysis of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT for early detection of lung cancer. Med Phys 2018; 45:1537-1549. [PMID: 29457229 PMCID: PMC5903960 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a radiomics prediction model to improve pulmonary nodule (PN) classification in low-dose CT. To compare the model with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) for early detection of lung cancer. METHODS We examined a set of 72 PNs (31 benign and 41 malignant) from the Lung Image Database Consortium image collection (LIDC-IDRI). One hundred three CT radiomic features were extracted from each PN. Before the model building process, distinctive features were identified using a hierarchical clustering method. We then constructed a prediction model by using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A tenfold cross-validation (CV) was repeated ten times (10 × 10-fold CV) to evaluate the accuracy of the SVM-LASSO model. Finally, the best model from the 10 × 10-fold CV was further evaluated using 20 × 5- and 50 × 2-fold CVs. RESULTS The best SVM-LASSO model consisted of only two features: the bounding box anterior-posterior dimension (BB_AP) and the standard deviation of inverse difference moment (SD_IDM). The BB_AP measured the extension of a PN in the anterior-posterior direction and was highly correlated (r = 0.94) with the PN size. The SD_IDM was a texture feature that measured the directional variation of the local homogeneity feature IDM. Univariate analysis showed that both features were statistically significant and discriminative (P = 0.00013 and 0.000038, respectively). PNs with larger BB_AP or smaller SD_IDM were more likely malignant. The 10 × 10-fold CV of the best SVM model using the two features achieved an accuracy of 84.6% and 0.89 AUC. By comparison, Lung-RADS achieved an accuracy of 72.2% and 0.77 AUC using four features (size, type, calcification, and spiculation). The prediction improvement of SVM-LASSO comparing to Lung-RADS was statistically significant (McNemar's test P = 0.026). Lung-RADS misclassified 19 cases because it was mainly based on PN size, whereas the SVM-LASSO model correctly classified 10 of these cases by combining a size (BB_AP) feature and a texture (SD_IDM) feature. The performance of the SVM-LASSO model was stable when leaving more patients out with five- and twofold CVs (accuracy 84.1% and 81.6%, respectively). CONCLUSION We developed an SVM-LASSO model to predict malignancy of PNs with two CT radiomic features. We demonstrated that the model achieved an accuracy of 84.6%, which was 12.4% higher than Lung-RADS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wookjin Choi
- Department of Medical
PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Jung Hun Oh
- Department of Medical
PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Sadegh Riyahi
- Department of Medical
PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Chia‐Ju Liu
- Department of
RadiologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of
PathologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMD21201USA
| | - Wengen Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology
and Nuclear MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMD21201USA
| | - Charles White
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology
and Nuclear MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMD21201USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation
OncologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - James G. Mechalakos
- Department of Medical
PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Joseph O. Deasy
- Department of Medical
PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Medical
PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| |
Collapse
|