The effects of a universal wedge and beam obliquity upon the central axis dose buildup for 6-MV x rays

Surface dose and build-up region depth dose measurements in non-standard beams of Cyberknife and tomotherapy systems

The purpose of this study was to measure the surface dose and build-up region depth dose characteristics of 6 MV photon beams in Cyberknife and helical tomotherapy (HT) systems for non-standard small fields using parallel plate chambers (Roos and Markus), Gafchromic EBT3 films, and nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), as well as to investigate the effect of oblique incidence on the surface dose of the beam. All measurements were conducted in a virtual water phantom under machine-specific reference conditions. The Roos and OSLDs overestimated the surface dose when compared with the Markus chamber and EBT3 films by 20%. We applied water equivalent thickness (WET) correction to account for the intrinsic build-up thickness of the detectors from their effective point of measurement (EPOM). With WET correction, a reasonably close surface dose estimate was obtained for all detectors, within 1.9% agreement for the 60 mm collimator of Cyberknife and 3.1% agreement for the HT system, with a 5 × 10 cm² field size. The surface dose increased from the normally incident Cyberknife and HT fields with increasing angle of incidence. The surface dose increased to twice its value at normal incidence for highly oblique angles of incidence above 55°. For the tested fields, a reasonable surface dose estimate could be measured with the detectors if the correction for intrinsic buildup thickness was applied. Nevertheless, the use of Roos chambers with large dimensions and nanoDot OSLDs is not recommended for estimating the surface dose for small fields.

Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams

AIM

The purpose of this study is to determine the central-axis dose in the buildup region and the surface dose delivered by a 6 MV flattened photon beam (6 MV-FB) and a higher energy unflattened (7 MV-FFF) therapeutic photon beam for different-sized square fields with open fields and modifying filters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The beams are produced by a Siemens Artiste linear accelerator with a NACP-02 ionization chamber and the dose is measured by using GafChromic film and two different, commonly used, dosimeters: a p-type photon semiconductor dosimeter (PFD) and a cylindrical ionization chamber (CC13).

RESULTS

The results indicate that the surface dose increases linearly with FS for both open and wedged fields for the 6 MV-FB and 7 MV-FFF beams. The surface dose delivered by the 7 MV-UFB beam is consistent with that delivered by the 6 MV-FB beam for field sizes up to 10 cm × 10 cm, after which the surface dose decreases. The buildup dose for the 7 MV-UFB beam is slightly less than that for the 6 MV-FB beam for field sizes ranging from 5 cm × 5 cm to 15 cm × 15 cm. For both the 6 MV-FB and 7 MV-FFF beams, the measured surface dose clearly increases with increasing field size, regardless of the detector used in the measurement. The surface dose measured with the PFD dosimeter and the NACP-02 and CC13 chambers differ significantly from the results obtained when using GafChromic film. The 7 MV-FFF beam results in a slightly smaller surface dose in the buildup region compared with the 6 MV-FB beam.

CONCLUSIONS

The surface dose delivered by the higher energy 7 MV-FFF beam is less than that delivered by the energy-unmatched FFF beam in previously published works.

Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the central axis dose in the build-up region and the surface dose of a 6 MV and 10 MV flattened photon beam (FB) and flattening filter free (FFF) therapeutic photon beam for different square field sizes (FSs) for a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator using parallel-plate ionization chamber and Gafchromic film. Knowledge of dosimetric characteristics in the build-up region and surface dose of the FFF is essential for clinical care. The dose measurements were also obtained empirically using two different commonly used dosimeters: a p-type photon semiconductor dosimeter and a cylindrical ionization chamber. Surface dose increased linearly with FS for both FB and FFF photon beams. The surface dose values of FFF were higher than the FB FSs. The measured surface dose clearly increases with increasing FS. The FFF beams have a modestly higher surface dose in the build-up region than the FB. The dependence of source to skin distance (SSD) is less significant in FFF beams when compared to the flattened beams at extended SSDs.

Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the performance characteristics of the Magic Plate (MP) system when operated upstream of the patient in transmission mode (MPTM). The MPTM is an essential component of a real‐time QA system designed for operation during radiotherapy treatment. Of particular interest is a quantitative study into the influence of the MP on the radiation beam quality at several field sizes and linear accelerator potential differences. The impact is measured through beam perturbation effects such as changes in the skin dose and/or percentage depth dose (PDD) (both in and out of field). The MP was placed in the block tray of a Varian linac head operated at 6, 10 and 18 MV beam energy. To optimize the MPTM operational setup, two conditions were investigated and each setup was compared to the case where no MP is positioned in place (i.e., open field): (i) MPTM alone and (ii) MPTM with a thin passive contamination electron filter. The in‐field and out‐of‐field surface doses of a solid water phantom were investigated for both setups using a Markus plane parallel (Model N23343) and Attix parallel‐plate, MRI model 449 ionization chambers. In addition, the effect on the 2D dose distribution measured by the Delta⁴ QA system was also investigated. The transmission factor for both of these MPTM setups in the central axis was also investigated using a Farmer ionization chamber (Model 2571A) and an Attix ionization chamber. Measurements were performed for different irradiation field sizes of 5×5 cm2 and 10×10 cm2. The change in the surface dose relative to dmax was measured to be less than 0.5% for the 6 MV, 10 MV, and 18 MV energy beams. Transmission factors measured for both set ups (i & ii above) with 6 MV, 10 MV, and 18 MV at a depth of dmax and a depth of 10 cm were all within 1.6% of open field. The impact of both the bare MPTM and the MPTM with 1 mm buildup on 3D dose distribution in comparison to the open field investigated using the Delta⁴ system and both the MPTM versions passed standard clinical gamma analysis criteria. Two MPTM operational setups were studied and presented in this article. The results indicate that both versions may be suitable for the new real‐time megavoltage photon treatment delivery QA system under development. However, the bare MPTM appears to be slightly better suited of the two MP versions, as it minimally perturbs the radiation field and does not lead to any significant increase in skin dose to the patient.

PACS number(s): 87.50.up, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.N, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc.

Photon beam skin dose analyses for different clinical setups

A comprehensive set of data on skin dose for 8 MV and 18 MV photon beams from a medical linear accelerator was measured using a parallel-plate chamber to document the effect of field size, source-to-surface distance (SSD), off-axis distance, acrylic block tray, wedge (external standard wedge), Lipowitz's metal block, multileaf collimator (MLC), and dynamic wedge. The skin dose increased as field size increased from 5 X 5 cm2 to 40 X 40 cm2 (6% to 38% for 8 MV and 5% to 44% for 18 MV beam). With the use of an acrylic block tray, the skin dose increased for all field sizes (7% to 59% for 8 MV and 5% to 62% for 18 MV beam), but the increase was minimal for small fields. The skin dose with a wedge showed a much more complex trend. It was generally lower than the dose for an open field, but higher in the case of large fields and higher degree wedges. When both wedge and block tray were used, the tray was a major contributor to the skin dose because some of the contaminant electrons from the wedge assembly were absorbed by the block tray. Field-shaping blocks increased the skin dose, but, interestingly, the block tray reduced the skin dose for small blocked fields treated with a high-energy photon beam. The effect of an MLC on skin dose was very similar to that of a Lipowitz's metal block, but its magnitude was less. The skin dose was higher for dynamic wedge fields than it was for standard wedge fields. As SSD decreased, the skin dose increased, and this effect was dominant in larger field sizes. The SSD effect was enhanced in the presence of an acrylic block tray. The skin dose off-axis was the same as at the central axis, or smaller. A similar pattern of behavior of the skin dose is expected for photon beams from other linear accelerators.

Effects of beam modifiers and immobilization devices on the dose in the build-up region

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect that immobilization devices used in conjunction with beam modifiers may have on the dose to the skin and build-up region.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Central axis depth dose measurements were made in a polystyrene phantom in the build-up regions using the 6 and 15 MV photon beams, at two different source-to-phantom distances, and various field sizes. The effects of acrylic blocking trays, lead wedges, and cerrobend blocks were assessed in conjunction with the enhancement of dose in the build-up region due to immobilizing devices using plaster and thermoplastic casting materials of different thicknesses.

RESULTS

For the 6 MV photons, solid (3 mm) thermoplastic casting material was found to have the greatest effect on surface dose: for a 12 x 12 cm field we measured 79% of maximum dose when treating through the material versus 22% of maximum dose when no beam modifiers or immobilization devices are used. Measurements were also made to evaluate the effect of the immobilization of patients receiving three-dimensional conformal treatments using a 15 MV photon beam.

CONCLUSIONS

The relevance of these results to treatments in the pelvis, breast, and head and neck regions is discussed. For 6 MV beams, special consideration should be given if the need arises to treat through the immobilization device, as unacceptable skin reactions may result.