1
|
Krishnamoorthy S, Surti S. Advances in Breast PET Instrumentation. PET Clin 2024; 19:37-47. [PMID: 37949606 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Dedicated breast PET scanners currently have a spatial resolution in the 1.5 to 2 mm range, and the ability to provide tomographic images and quantitative data. They are also commercially available from a few vendors. A review of past and recent advances in the development and performance of dedicated breast PET scanners is summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srilalan Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - Suleman Surti
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Breast-specific positron imaging systems provide higher sensitivity than whole-body PET for breast cancer detection. The clinical applications for breast-specific positron imaging are similar to breast MRI including preoperative local staging and neoadjuvant therapy response assessment. Breast-specific positron imaging may be an alternative for patients who cannot undergo breast MRI. Further research is needed in expanding the field-of-view for posterior breast lesions, increasing biopsy capability, and reducing radiation dose. Efforts are also necessary for developing appropriate use criteria, increasing availability, and advancing insurance coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Fowler
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Kanae K Miyake
- Department of Advanced Medical Imaging Research, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Nakamoto
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patel MM, Adrada BE, Fowler AM, Rauch GM. Molecular Breast Imaging and Positron Emission Mammography. PET Clin 2023; 18:487-501. [PMID: 37258343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in application of functional imaging modalities for adjunct breast imaging due to their unique ability to evaluate molecular/pathophysiologic changes, not visible by standard anatomic breast imaging. This has led to increased use of nuclear medicine dedicated breast-specific single photon and coincidence imaging systems for multiple indications, such as supplemental screening, staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosis of local disease recurrence in the breast, and problem solving. Studies show that these systems maybe especially useful for specific subsets of patients, not well served by available anatomic breast imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miral M Patel
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, CPB5.3208, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Beatriz Elena Adrada
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, CPB5.3208, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amy M Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Section of Breast Imaging and Intervention, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krishnamoorthy S, Vent T, Barufaldi B, Maidment ADA, Karp JS, Surti S. Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:235028. [PMID: 33113520 PMCID: PMC7870546 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc5a8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We are developing a dedicated, combined breast positron emission tomography (PET)-tomosynthesis scanner. Both the PET and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) scanners are integrated in a single gantry to provide spatially co-registered 3D PET-tomosynthesis images. The DBT image will be used to identify the breast boundary and breast density to improve the quantitative accuracy of the PET image. This paper explores PET attenuation correction (AC) strategies that can be performed with the combined breast PET-DBT scanner to obtain more accurate, quantitative high-resolution 3D PET images. The PET detector is comprised of a 32 × 32 array of 1.5 × 1.5 × 15 mm3 LYSO crystals. The PET scanner utilizes two detector heads separated by either 9 or 11 cm, with each detector head having a 4 × 2 arrangement of PET detectors. GEANT4 Application for Tomographic Emission simulations were performed using an anthropomorphic breast phantom with heterogeneous attenuation under clinical DBT-compression. FDG-avid lesions, each 5 mm in diameter with 8:1 uptake, were simulated at four locations within the breast. Simulations were performed with a scan time of 2 min. PET AC was performed using the actual breast simulation model as well as DBT reconstructed volumetric images to derive the breast outline. In addition to using the known breast density as defined by the breast model, we also modeled it as uniform patient-independent soft-tissue, and as a uniform patient-specific material derived from breast tissue composition. Measured absolute lesion uptake was used to evaluate the quantitative accuracy of performing AC using the various strategies. This study demonstrates that AC is necessary to obtain a closer estimate of the true lesion uptake and background activity in the breast. The DBT image dataset assists in measuring lesion uptake with low bias by facilitating accurate breast delineation as well as providing accurate information related to the breast tissue composition. While both the uniform soft-tissue and patient-specific material approaches provides a close estimate to the ground truth, <5% bias can be achieved by using a uniform patient-specific material to define the attenuation map.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srilalan Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Trevor Vent
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Bruno Barufaldi
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Andrew D A Maidment
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Joel S Karp
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Suleman Surti
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Evaluation of primary breast cancers using dedicated breast PET and whole-body PET. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21930. [PMID: 33318514 PMCID: PMC7736887 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78865-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Metabolic imaging of the primary breast tumor with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET may assist in predicting treatment response in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting. Dedicated breast PET (dbPET) is a high-resolution imaging modality with demonstrated ability in highlighting intratumoral heterogeneity and identifying small lesions in the breast volume. In this study, we characterized similarities and differences in the uptake of [18F]FDG in dbPET compared to whole-body PET (wbPET) in a cohort of ten patients with biopsy-confirmed, locally advanced breast cancer at the pre-treatment timepoint. Patients received bilateral dbPET and wbPET following administration of 186 MBq and 307 MBq [18F]FDG on separate days, respectively. [18F]FDG uptake measurements and 20 radiomic features based on morphology, tumor intensity, and texture were calculated and compared. There was a fivefold increase in SULpeak for dbPET (median difference (95% CI): 4.0 mL−1 (1.8–6.4 mL−1), p = 0.006). Additionally, spatial heterogeneity features showed statistically significant differences between dbPET and wbPET. The higher [18F]FDG uptake in dbPET highlighted the dynamic range of this breast-specific imaging modality. Combining with the higher spatial resolution, dbPET may be able to detect treatment response in the primary tumor during NAC, and future studies with larger cohorts are warranted.
Collapse
|
6
|
Molecular Breast Cancer Imaging in the Era of Precision Medicine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215:1512-1519. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.22883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
7
|
MacDonald LR, Lo JY, Sturgeon GM, Zeng C, Harrison RL, Kinahan PE, Segars WP. Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020; 4:585-593. [PMID: 33163753 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.2991120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
We investigated PET image quantification when using a uniform attenuation coefficient (μ) for attenuation correction (AC) of anthropomorphic density phantoms derived from high-resolution breast CT scans. A breast PET system was modeled with perfect data corrections except for AC. Using uniform μ for AC resulted in quantitative errors roughly proportional to the difference between μ used in AC (μ AC) and local μ, yielding approximately ± 5% bias, corresponding to the variation of μ for 511 keV photons in breast tissue. Global bias was lowest when uniform μ AC was equal to the phantom mean μ (μ mean). Local bias in 10-mm spheres increased as the sphere μ deviated from μ mean, but remained only 2-3% when the μ sphere was 6.5% higher than μ mean. Bias varied linearly with and was roughly proportional to local μ mismatch. Minimizing local bias, e.g., in a small sphere, required the use of a uniform μ value between the local μ and the μ mean. Thus, biases from using uniform-μ AC are low when local μ sphere is close to μ mean. As the μ sphere increasingly differs from the phantom μ mean, bias increases, and the optimal uniform μ is less predictable, having a value between μ sphere and the phantom μ mean.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Y Lo
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705
| | - Gregory M Sturgeon
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705
| | - Chengeng Zeng
- University of Washington Radiology Department, Seattle, WA 98195
| | | | - Paul E Kinahan
- University of Washington Radiology Department, Seattle, WA 98195
| | - William Paul Segars
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Emami A, Ghadiri H, Ghafarian P, Geramifar P, Ay MR. Performance evaluation of developed dedicated breast PET scanner and improvement of the spatial resolution by wobbling: a Monte Carlo study. Jpn J Radiol 2020; 38:790-799. [PMID: 32253654 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-020-00966-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular imaging, particularly PET scanning, has become an important cancer diagnostic tool. Whole-body PET is not effective for local staging of cancer because of their declining efficiency in detecting small lesions. The preliminary results of the performance evaluation of designed dedicated breast PET scanner presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS A new scanner is based on LYSO crystals coupled with SiPM, and it consists of 14 compact modules with a transaxial FOV of 180 mm in diameter. In this study, initial GATE simulation studies were performed to predict the spatial resolution, absolute sensitivity, noise equivalent count rate (NECR) and scatter fraction (SF) of the new design. Spatial wobbling acquisitions were also implemented. Finally, the obtained projections were reconstructed using analytical and iterative algorithms. RESULTS The simulation results indicate that absolute sensitivity is 1.42% which is appropriate than other commercial breast PET systems. The calculated SF and NECR in our design are 20.6% and 21.8 kcps. The initial simulation results demonstrate the potential of this design for breast cancer detection. A small wobble motion to improve spatial resolution and contrast. CONCLUSION The performance of the dedicated breast PET scanner is considered to be reasonable enough to support its use in breast cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azadeh Emami
- Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Campus, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran.,International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Ghadiri
- Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. .,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Campus, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran.
| | - Pardis Ghafarian
- Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. .,PET/CT and Cyclotron Center, Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Parham Geramifar
- Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohammad Reza Ay
- Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. .,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Campus, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koyasu H, Goshima S, Noda Y, Nishibori H, Takeuchi M, Matsunaga K, Yamada T, Matsuo M. The feasibility of dedicated breast PET for the assessment of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Jpn J Radiol 2018; 37:81-87. [DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0785-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
10
|
Raylman RR, Van Kampen W, Stolin AV, Gong W, Jaliparthi G, Martone PF, Smith MF, Sarment D, Clinthorne NH, Perna M. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics. Med Phys 2018; 45:1603-1613. [PMID: 29389017 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Application of advanced imaging techniques, such as PET and x ray CT, can potentially improve detection of breast cancer. Unfortunately, both modalities have challenges in the detection of some lesions. The combination of the two techniques, however, could potentially lead to an overall improvement in diagnostic breast imaging. The purpose of this investigation is to test the basic performance of a new dedicated breast-PET/CT. METHODS The PET component consists of a rotating pair of detectors. Its performance was evaluated using the NEMA NU4-2008 protocols. The CT component utilizes a pulsed x ray source and flat panel detector mounted on the same gantry as the PET scanner. Its performance was assessed using specialized phantoms. The radiation dose to a breast during CT imaging was explored by the measurement of free-in-air kerma and air kerma measured at the center of a 16 cm-diameter PMMA cylinder. Finally, the combined capabilities of the system were demonstrated by imaging of a micro-hot-rod phantom. RESULTS Overall, performance of the PET component is comparable to many pre-clinical and other dedicated breast-PET scanners. Its spatial resolution is 2.2 mm, 5 mm from the center of the scanner using images created with the single-sliced-filtered-backprojection algorithm. Peak NECR is 24.6 kcps; peak sensitivity is 1.36%; the scatter fraction is 27%. Spatial resolution of the CT scanner is 1.1 lp/mm at 10% MTF. The free-in-air kerma is 2.33 mGy, while the PMMA-air kerma is 1.24 mGy. Finally, combined imaging of a micro-hot-rod phantom illustrated the potential utility of the dual-modality images produced by the system. CONCLUSION The basic performance characteristics of a new dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner are good, demonstrating that its performance is similar to current dedicated PET and CT scanners. The potential value of this system is the capability to produce combined duality-modality images that could improve detection of breast disease. The next stage in development of this system is testing with more advanced phantoms and human subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond R Raylman
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, 1 Medical Center Dr., West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Will Van Kampen
- Xoran Technologies Inc., 5210 S State Rd., Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Alexander V Stolin
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, 1 Medical Center Dr., West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Wenbo Gong
- Xoran Technologies Inc., 5210 S State Rd., Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Gangadhar Jaliparthi
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, 1 Medical Center Dr., West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Peter F Martone
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, 1 Medical Center Dr., West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Mark F Smith
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - David Sarment
- Xoran Technologies Inc., 5210 S State Rd., Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | | | - Mark Perna
- Perna Health Physics, Inc., 705 Augusta Dr, Bridgeville, PA, 15017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zeng C, Kinahan PE, Qian H, Harrison RL, Champley KM, MacDonald LR. Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2017; 4:045502. [PMID: 29134188 PMCID: PMC5661484 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.4.4.045502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal for positron emission tomography (PET)/X is measuring changes in radiotracer uptake for early assessment of response to breast cancer therapy. Upper bounds for detecting such changes were investigated using simulation and two image reconstruction algorithms customized to the PET/X rectangular geometry. Analytical reconstruction was used to study spatial resolution, comparing results with the distance of the closest approach (DCA) resolution surrogate that is independent of the reconstruction method. An iterative reconstruction algorithm was used to characterize contrast recovery in small targets. Resolution averaged [Formula: see text] full width at half maximum when using depth-of-interaction (DOI) information. Without DOI, resolution ranged from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] for scanner crystal thickness between 5 and 15 mm. The DCA resolution surrogate was highly correlated to image-based FWHM. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed specificity and sensitivity over 95% for detecting contrast change from 5:1 to 4:1 (area under curve [Formula: see text]). For PET/X parameters modeled here, the ability to measure contrast changes benefited from higher photon absorption efficiency of thicker crystals while being largely unaffected by degraded resolution obtained with thicker crystals; DOI provided marginal improvements. These results assumed perfect data corrections and other idealizations, and thus represent an upper bound for detecting changes in small lesion radiotracer uptake of clinical interest using the PET/X system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengeng Zeng
- University of Washington, Radiology Department, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Paul E. Kinahan
- University of Washington, Radiology Department, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Hua Qian
- GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, United States
| | - Robert L. Harrison
- University of Washington, Radiology Department, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Kyle M. Champley
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kyme AZ, Judenhofer MS, Gong K, Bec J, Selfridge A, Du J, Qi J, Cherry SR, Meikle SR. Open-field mouse brain PET: design optimisation and detector characterisation. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:6207-6225. [PMID: 28475491 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
'Open-field' PET, in which an animal is free to move within an enclosed space during imaging, is a very promising advance for neuroscientific research. It provides a key advantage over conventional imaging under anesthesia by enabling functional changes in the brain to be correlated with an animal's behavioural response to environmental or pharmacologic stimuli. Previously we have demonstrated the feasibility of open-field imaging of rats using motion compensation techniques applied to a commercially available PET scanner. However, this approach of 'retro-fitting' motion compensation techniques to an existing system is limited by the inherent geometric and performance constraints of the system. The goal of this project is to develop a purpose-built PET scanner with geometry, motion tracking and imaging performance tailored and optimised for open-field imaging of the mouse brain. The design concept is a rail-based sliding tomograph which moves according to the animal's motion. Our specific aim in this work was to evaluate candidate scanner designs and characterise the performance of a depth-of-interaction detector module for the open-field system. We performed Monte Carlo simulations to estimate and compare the sensitivity and spatial resolution performance of four scanner geometries: a ring, parallel plate, and two box variants. Each system was based on a detector block consisting of a 23 × 23 array of 0.785 × 0.785 × 20 mm3 LSO crystals (overall dim. 19.6 × 19.6 × 20 mm). We found that a DoI resolution capability of 3 mm was necessary to achieve approximately uniform sub-millimetre spatial resolution throughout the FoV for all scanners except the parallel-plate geometry. With this DoI performance, the sensitivity advantage afforded by the box geometry with overlapping panels (16% peak absolute sensitivity, a 36% improvement over the ring design) suggests this unconventional design is best suited for imaging the mouse brain. We also built and characterised the block detector modelled in the simulations, including a dual-ended readout based on 6 × 6 arrays of through-silicon-via silicon photomultipliers (active area 84%) for DoI estimation. Identification of individual crystals in the flood map was excellent, energy resolution varied from 12.4% ± 0.6% near the centre to 24.4% ± 3.4% at the ends of the crystal, and the average DoI resolution was 2.8 mm ± 0.35 mm near the central depth (10 mm) and 3.5 mm ± 1.0 mm near the ends. Timing resolution was 1.4 ± 0.14 ns. Therefore, the DoI detector module meets the target specifications for the application and will be used as the basis for a prototype open-field mouse PET scanner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Z Kyme
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis CA 95616, United States of America. Faculty of Health Sciences and Brain & Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Faculty of Engineering, School of AMME, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Mammography versus Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2017; 2017:5438395. [PMID: 29097927 PMCID: PMC5612739 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5438395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) positron emission mammography (PEM) versus whole body positron emission tomography (WBPET) for breast cancer. Methods A total of 410 women with normal breast or benign or highly suspicious malignant tumors were randomized at 1 : 1 ratio to undergo 3D-PEM followed by WBPET or WBPET followed by 3D-PEM. Lumpectomy or mastectomy was performed on eligible participants after the scanning. Results The sensitivity and specificity of 3D-PEM were 92.8% and 54.5%, respectively. WBPET showed a sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 56.8%. After exclusion of the patients with lesions beyond the detecting range of the 3D-PEM instrument, 3D-PEM showed higher sensitivity than WBPET (97.0% versus 95.5%, P = 0.913), particularly for small lesions (<1 cm) (72.0% versus 60.0%, P = 0.685). Conclusions The 3D-PEM appears more sensitive to small lesions than WBPET but may fail to detect lesions that are beyond the detecting range. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee (E2012052) at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (Tianjin, China). The instrument positron emission mammography (PEMi) was approved by China State Food and Drug Administration under the registration number 20153331166.
Collapse
|
14
|
Li Y, Defrise M, Matej S, Metzler SD. Fourier rebinning and consistency equations for time-of-flight PET planograms. INVERSE PROBLEMS 2016; 32:095004. [PMID: 28255191 PMCID: PMC5328636 DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/9/095004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Due to the unique geometry, dual-panel PET scanners have many advantages in dedicated breast imaging and on-board imaging applications since the compact scanners can be combined with other imaging and treatment modalities. The major challenges of dual-panel PET imaging are the limited-angle problem and data truncation, which can cause artifacts due to incomplete data sampling. The time-of-flight (TOF) information can be a promising solution to reduce these artifacts. The TOF planogram is the native data format for dual-panel TOF PET scanners, and the non-TOF planogram is the 3D extension of linogram. The TOF planograms is five-dimensional while the objects are three-dimensional, and there are two degrees of redundancy. In this paper, we derive consistency equations and Fourier-based rebinning algorithms to provide a complete understanding of the rich structure of the fully 3D TOF planograms. We first derive two consistency equations and John's equation for 3D TOF planograms. By taking the Fourier transforms, we obtain two Fourier consistency equations and the Fourier-John equation, which are the duals of the consistency equations and John's equation, respectively. We then solve the Fourier consistency equations and Fourier-John equation using the method of characteristics. The two degrees of entangled redundancy of the 3D TOF data can be explicitly elicited and exploited by the solutions along the characteristic curves. As the special cases of the general solutions, we obtain Fourier rebinning and consistency equations (FORCEs), and thus we obtain a complete scheme to convert among different types of PET planograms: 3D TOF, 3D non-TOF, 2D TOF and 2D non-TOF planograms. The FORCEs can be used as Fourier-based rebinning algorithms for TOF-PET data reduction, inverse rebinnings for designing fast projectors, or consistency conditions for estimating missing data. As a byproduct, we show the two consistency equations are necessary and sufficient for 3D TOF planograms. Finally, we give numerical examples of implementation of a fast 2D TOF planogram projector and Fourier-based rebinning for a 2D TOF planograms using the FORCEs to show the efficacy of the Fourier-based solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusheng Li
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Michel Defrise
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuel Matej
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Scott D Metzler
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zaidi H, Thompson C. Evolution and Developments in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Mammography. PET Clin 2016; 4:317-27. [PMID: 27157301 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2009.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Molecular imaging using high-resolution PET instrumentation is now playing a pivotal role in basic and clinical research. The development of optimized detection geometries combined with high-performance detector technologies and compact designs of PET tomographs have become the goal of active research groups in academic and corporate settings. Significant progress has been achieved in the design of commercial PET instrumentation in the last decade allowing a spatial resolution of about 4 to 6 mm to be reached for whole-body imaging, about 2.4 mm for PET cameras dedicated for brain imaging, and submillimeter resolution for female breast, prostate, and small-animal imaging. In particular, significant progress has been made in the design of dedicated positron emission mammography (PEM) units. The initial concept suggested in 1993 consisted of placing 2 planar detectors capable of detecting the 511-keV annihilation photons in a conventional mammography unit. Since that time, many different design paths have been pursued and it will be interesting to see which technologies become the most successful in the future. This paper discusses recent advances in PEM instrumentation and the advantages and challenges of dedicated standalone and dual-modality imaging systems. Future opportunities and the challenges facing the adoption of PEM imaging instrumentation and its role in clinical and research settings are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Habib Zaidi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Thompson
- Department of Medical Physics, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
MacDonald LR, Hippe DS, Bender LC, Cotter EW, Voria PR, Hallam PS, Wang CL, Haseley DR, Kelly MM, Parikh JR, Beatty JD, Rogers JV. Positron Emission Mammography Image Interpretation for Reduced Image Count Levels. J Nucl Med 2015; 57:348-54. [PMID: 26635337 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED We studied the effects of reduced (18)F-FDG injection activity on interpretation of positron emission mammography (PEM) images and compared image interpretation between 2 postinjection imaging times. METHODS We performed a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) study using PEM images reconstructed with different count levels expected from injected activities between 23 and 185 MBq. Thirty patients received 2 PEM scans at postinjection times of 60 and 120 min. Half of the patients were scanned with a standard protocol; the others received one-half of the standard activity. Images were reconstructed using 100%, 50%, and 25% of the total counts acquired. Eight radiologists used a 5-point confidence scale to score 232 PEM images for the presence of up to 3 malignant lesions. Paired images were analyzed with conditional logistic regression and ROC analysis to investigate changes in interpretation. RESULTS There was a trend for increasing lesion detection sensitivity with increased image counts: odds ratios were 2.2 (P = 0.01) and 1.9 (P = 0.04) per doubling of image counts for 60- and 120-min uptake images, respectively, without significant difference between time points (P = 0.7). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was highest for the 100%-count, 60-min images (0.83 vs. 0.75 for 50%-counts, P = 0.02). The 120-min images had a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (AUC = 0.79 vs. 0.73, P = 0.1). Our data did not yield significant trends between specificity and image counts. Lesion-to-background ratios increased between 60- and 120-min scans (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Reducing the image counts relative to the standard protocol decreased diagnostic accuracy. The increase in lesion-to-background ratio between 60- and 120-min uptake times was not enough to improve detection sensitivity in this study, perhaps in part due to fewer counts in the later scan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel S Hippe
- Radiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Leila C Bender
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Pooja R Voria
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paula S Hallam
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Carolyn L Wang
- Radiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - David R Haseley
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mary M Kelly
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jay R Parikh
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - J David Beatty
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - James V Rogers
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raylman RR, Vaigneur K, Stolin AV, Jaliparthi G. Arrays of Segmented, Tapered Light Guides for Use with Large, Planar Scintillation Detectors. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE 2015; 62:694-698. [PMID: 26538685 PMCID: PMC4629776 DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2392085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Metabolic imaging techniques can potentially improve detection and diagnosis of cancer in women with radiodense and/or fibrocystic breasts. Our group has previously developed a high-resolution positron emission tomography imaging and biopsy device (PEM-PET) to detect and guide the biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Initial testing revealed that the imaging field-of-view (FOV) of the scanner was smaller than the physical size of the detector's active area, which could hinder sampling of breast areas close to the chest wall. The purpose of this work was to utilize segmented, tapered light guides for optically coupling the scintillator arrays to arrays of position-sensitive photomultipliers to increase both the active FOV and identification of individual scintillator elements. Testing of the new system revealed that the optics of these structures made it possible to discern detector elements from the complete active area of the detector face. In the previous system the top and bottom rows and left and right columns were not identifiable. Additionally, use of the new light guides increased the contrast of individual detector elements by up to 129%. Improved element identification led to a spatial resolution increase by approximately 12%. Due to attenuation of light in the light guides the detector energy resolution decreased from 18.5% to 19.1%. Overall, these improvements should increase the field-of-view and spatial resolution of the dedicated breast-PET system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond R. Raylman
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26508 USA
| | - Keith Vaigneur
- President of Agile Technologies, Knoxville, TN 37932 USA
| | - Alexander V. Stolin
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26508 USA
| | - Gangadhar Jaliparthi
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26508 USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Uzun D, De Lorenzo G, Kolstein M, Chmeissani M. Simulation and evaluation of a high resolution VIP PEM system with a dedicated LM-OSEM algorithm. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION : AN IOP AND SISSA JOURNAL 2014; 9:C05011. [PMID: 24883078 PMCID: PMC4035764 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/c05011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Over the last two decades there have been a growing number of designs for positron emission tomography (PET) cameras optimized to image the breast. These devices, commonly known as positron emission mammography (PEM) cameras allow much more spatial resolution by putting the photon detectors directly on the breast. PEM cameras have a compact geometry with a restricted field of view (FOV) thus exhibiting higher performance and lower cost than large whole body PET scanners. Typical PEM designs are based on scintillators such as bismuth germanate (BGO), lutetium oxorthosilicate (LSO) or lutetium yttrium orthosicilate (LYSO), and characterized by large parallax error due to deficiency of the depth of interaction (DOI) information from crystals. In the case of parallel geometry PEM, large parallax error results in poor image resolution along the vertical axis. In the framework of the Voxel Imaging PET (VIP) pathfinder project, we propose a high resolution PEM scanner based on pixelated solid-state CdTe detectors. The pixel PEM device with a millimeter-size pixel pitch provides an excellent spatial resolution in all directions 8 times better than standard commercial devices with a point spread function (PSF) of 1 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) and excellent energy resolution of down to 1.6% FWHM at 511 keV photons at room temperature. The system is capable to detect down to 1 mm diameter hot spheres in warm background.
Collapse
|
19
|
Miyake KK, Matsumoto K, Inoue M, Nakamoto Y, Kanao S, Oishi T, Kawase S, Kitamura K, Yamakawa Y, Akazawa A, Kobayashi T, Ohi J, Togashi K. Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards. J Nucl Med 2014; 55:1198-203. [PMID: 24812244 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.131565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED The aim of this work was to evaluate the performance characteristics of a newly developed dedicated breast PET scanner, according to National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 4-2008 standards. METHODS The dedicated breast PET scanner consists of 4 layers of a 32 × 32 lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based crystal array, a light guide, and a 64-channel position-sensitive photomultiplier tube. The size of a crystal element is 1.44 × 1.44 × 4.5 mm. The detector ring has a large solid angle with a 185-mm aperture and an axial coverage of 155.5 mm. The energy windows at depth of interaction for the first and second layers are 400-800 keV, and those at the third and fourth layers are 100-800 keV. A fixed timing window of 4.5 ns was used for all acquisitions. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, counting rate capabilities, and image quality were evaluated in accordance with NEMA NU 4-2008 standards. Human imaging was performed in addition to the evaluation. RESULTS Radial, tangential, and axial spatial resolution measured as minimal full width at half maximum approached 1.6, 1.7, and 2.0 mm, respectively, for filtered backprojection reconstruction and 0.8, 0.8, and 0.8 mm, respectively, for dynamic row-action maximum-likelihood algorithm reconstruction. The peak absolute sensitivity of the system was 11.2%. Scatter fraction at the same acquisition settings was 30.1% for the rat-sized phantom. Peak noise-equivalent counting rate and peak true rate for the ratlike phantom was 374 kcps at 25 MBq and 603 kcps at 31 MBq, respectively. In the image-quality phantom study, recovery coefficients and uniformity were 0.04-0.82 and 1.9%, respectively, for standard reconstruction mode and 0.09-0.97 and 4.5%, respectively, for enhanced-resolution mode. Human imaging provided high-contrast images with restricted background noise for standard reconstruction mode and high-resolution images for enhanced-resolution mode. CONCLUSION The dedicated breast PET scanner has excellent spatial resolution and high sensitivity. The performance of the dedicated breast PET scanner is considered to be reasonable enough to support its use in breast cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanae K Miyake
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keiichi Matsumoto
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kyoto College of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mika Inoue
- Department of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; and
| | - Yuji Nakamoto
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shotaro Kanao
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tae Oishi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shigeto Kawase
- Department of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; and
| | - Keishi Kitamura
- Technology Research Laboratory, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Ayako Akazawa
- Technology Research Laboratory, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Junichi Ohi
- Technology Research Laboratory, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kaori Togashi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Breast cancer mammography is a well-acknowledged technique for patient screening due to its high sensitivity. However, in addition to its low specificity the sensitivity of mammography is limited when imaging patients with dense breasts. Radionuclide imaging techniques, such as coincidence photon-based positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography or scintimammography, can play a role in assisting screening of such patients. Radionuclide techniques can also be useful in assessing treatment response of patients with breast cancer to therapy, and staging of patients to diagnose the disease extent. However, the performance of these imaging modalities is generally limited because of the poor spatial resolution and sensitivity of the commercially available multipurpose imaging systems. Here, we describe some of the dedicated imaging systems (positron emission mammography [PEM] and breast-specific gamma imaging [BSGI]) that have been developed both commercially and in research laboratories for radionuclide imaging of breast cancer. Clinical studies with dedicated PEM scanners show improved sensitivity to detecting cancer in patients when using PEM in conjunction with additional imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging or mammography or both, as well as improved disease staging that can have an effect on surgical planning. High-resolution BSGI systems are more widely available commercially and several clinical studies have shown very high sensitivity and specificity in detecting cancer in high-risk patients. Further development of dedicated PEM and BSGI systems is ongoing, promising further expansion of radionuclide imaging techniques in the realm of breast cancer detection and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleman Surti
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hruska CB, O'Connor MK. Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use. Med Phys 2013; 40:050901. [PMID: 23635248 DOI: 10.1118/1.4802733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Approaches to imaging the breast with nuclear medicine and∕or molecular imaging methods have been under investigation since the late 1980s when a technique called scintimammography was first introduced. This review charts the progress of nuclear imaging of the breast over the last 20 years, covering the development of newer techniques such as breast specific gamma imaging, molecular breast imaging, and positron emission mammography. Key issues critical to the adoption of these technologies in the clinical environment are discussed, including the current status of clinical studies, the efforts at reducing the radiation dose from procedures associated with these technologies, and the relevant radiopharmaceuticals that are available or under development. The necessary steps required to move these technologies from bench to bedside are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie B Hruska
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
MacDonald LR, Hunter WCJ, Kinahan PE, Miyaoka RS. Effects of Detector Thickness on Geometric Sensitivity and Event Positioning Errors in the Rectangular PET/X Scanner. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE 2013; 60:3242-3252. [PMID: 26160982 PMCID: PMC4494122 DOI: 10.1109/tns.2013.2278841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
We used simulations to investigate the relationship between sensitivity and spatial resolution as a function of crystal thickness in a rectangular PET scanner intended for quantitative assessment of breast cancers. The system had two 20 × 15-cm2 and two 10 × 15-cm2 flat detectors forming a box, with the larger detectors separated by 4 or 8 cm. Depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution was modeled as a function of crystal thickness based on prior measurements. Spatial resolution was evaluated independent of image reconstruction by deriving and validating a surrogate metric from list-mode data (dFWHM). When increasing crystal thickness from 5 to 40 mm, and without using DOI information, the dFWHM for a centered point source increased from 0.72 to 1.6 mm. Including DOI information improved dFWHM by 12% and 27% for 5- and 40-mm-thick crystals, respectively. For a point source in the corner of the FOV, use of DOI information improved dFWHM by 20% (5-mm crystal) and 44% (40-mm crystal). Sensitivity was 7.7% for 10-mm-thick crystals (8-cm object). Increasing crystal thickness on the smaller side detectors from 10 to 20 mm (keeping 10-mm crystals on the larger detectors) boosted sensitivity by 24% (relative) and degraded dFWHM by only ~3%/8% with/without DOI information. The benefits of measuring DOI must be evaluated in terms of the intended clinical task of assessing tracer uptake in small lesions. Increasing crystal thickness on the smaller side detectors provides substantial sensitivity increase with minimal accompanying loss in resolution.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mathews AJ, Komarov S, Wu H, O'Sullivan JA, Tai YC. Improving PET imaging for breast cancer using virtual pinhole PET half-ring insert. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:6407-27. [PMID: 23999026 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/18/6407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A PET insert with detector having smaller crystals and placed near a region of interest in a conventional PET scanner can improve image resolution locally due to the virtual-pinhole PET (VP-PET) effect. This improvement is from the higher spatial sampling of the imaging area near the detector. We have built a prototype half-ring PET insert for head-and-neck cancer imaging applications. In this paper, we extend the use of the insert to breast imaging and show that such a system provides high resolution images of breast and axillary lymph nodes while maintaining the full imaging field of view capability of a clinical PET scanner. We characterize the resolution and contrast recovery for tumors across the imaging field of view. First, we model the system using Monte Carlo methods to determine its theoretical limit of improvement. Simulations were conducted with hot spherical tumors embedded in background activity at tumor-to-background contrast ranging from 3:1 to 12:1. Tumors are arranged in a Derenzo-like pattern with their diameters ranging from 2 to 12 mm. Experimental studies were performed using a chest phantom with cylindrical breast attachment. Tumors of different sizes arranged in a Derenzo-like pattern with tumor-to-background ratio of 6:1 are inserted into the breast phantom. Imaging capability of mediastinum and axillary lymph nodes is explored. Both Monte Carlo simulations and experiment show clear improvement in image resolution and contrast recovery with VP-PET half-ring insert. The degree of improvement in resolution and contrast recovery depends on location of the tumor. The full field of view imaging capability is shown to be maintained. Minor artifacts are introduced in certain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aswin John Mathews
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Xie Q, Wan L, Cao X, Xiao P. Conceptual design and simulation study of an ROI-focused panel-PET scanner. PLoS One 2013; 8:e72109. [PMID: 23977221 PMCID: PMC3748112 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2013] [Accepted: 07/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is an important imaging modality for clincial use. Conventionally, the PET scanner is generally built to provide a roomy enough transverse field-of-view (FOV) for imaging most adults’ torsos. However, in many cases, the region-of-interest (ROI) for imaging is usually a small area inside the human body. Therefore, to fulfill a PET system which provides an FOV comparable in size to the target ROI seems appealing and more cost effective. Meanwhile, such a PET system has the potential for portable or bedside application with the reduced system size. In this work, we have investigated the feasibility of using dual-headed panel-detectors to build an ROI-focused PET scanner. A novel windowed list-mode ordered subset expectation maximization method was developed to perform the ROI image reconstruction. With this method, the ROI of the object can be reconstructed from the coincidences whose position determined by time-of-flight (TOF) measurements was inside the ROI. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrates the feasibility of detecting lesions not less than 1 cm in diameter, with a 300 ps full width at half maximum timing resolution. As a critical system performance, the impact of TOF information on image quality has been studied and the required TOF capability was assessed. With enhanced timing resolution, the distortions and artifacts were reduced effectively. The further improved TOF capability also shows a noticeable improvement of detection performance for low uptake lesions, as well as the recovery speed of lesion contrast, which is of practical significance in the lesion detection task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingguo Xie
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China ; Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
De Lorenzo G, Chmeissani M, Uzun D, Kolstein M, Ozsahin I, Mikhaylova E, Arce P, Cañadas M, Ariño G, Calderón Y. Pixelated CdTe detectors to overcome intrinsic limitations of crystal based positron emission mammographs. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION : AN IOP AND SISSA JOURNAL 2013; 8:C01030. [PMID: 23750176 PMCID: PMC3672962 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/8/01/c01030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
A positron emission mammograph (PEM) is an organ dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) scanner for breast cancer detection. State-of-the-art PEMs employing scintillating crystals as detection medium can provide metabolic images of the breast with significantly higher sensitivity and specificity with respect to standard whole body PET scanners. Over the past few years, crystal PEMs have dramatically increased their importance in the diagnosis and treatment of early stage breast cancer. Nevertheless, designs based on scintillators are characterized by an intrinsic deficiency of the depth of interaction (DOI) information from relatively thick crystals constraining the size of the smallest detectable tumor. This work shows how to overcome such intrinsic limitation by substituting scintillating crystals with pixelated CdTe detectors. The proposed novel design is developed within the Voxel Imaging PET (VIP) Pathfinder project and evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation. The volumetric spatial resolution of the VIP-PEM is expected to be up to 6 times better than standard commercial devices with a point spread function of 1 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) in all directions. Pixelated CdTe detectors can also provide an energy resolution as low as 1.5% FWHM at 511 keV for a virtually pure signal with negligible contribution from scattered events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. De Lorenzo
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
- Corresponding author.
| | - M. Chmeissani
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| | - D. Uzun
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| | - M. Kolstein
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| | - I. Ozsahin
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| | - E. Mikhaylova
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| | - P. Arce
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Av. Complutense, 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - M. Cañadas
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Av. Complutense, 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - G. Ariño
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Y. Calderón
- Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Breast cancer screening is a highly complex and more recently a controversial topic. Conventional screening includes breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and screening mammography. Several newer imaging modalities have been introduced into the screening armamentarium including breast magnetic resonance imaging and whole-breast automated ultrasound. Novel imaging techniques like positron emission mammography are currently under clinical investigation in the hopes of improving the sensitivity of breast cancer screening. In addition, the development of biochemical assays, which employ minimally invasive sampling are also promising.
Collapse
|
27
|
The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer 2012; 20:123-30. [PMID: 23239242 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-012-0433-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Accepted: 11/29/2012] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Mammography is currently the standard breast cancer screening procedure, even though it is constrained by low specificity in the detection of malignancy and low sensitivity in women with dense breast tissue. Modern imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been developed in an effort to replace or complement mammography, because the early detection of breast cancer is critical for efficient treatment and long-term survival of patients. Nuclear medicine imaging technology has been introduced in the field of oncology with the development of positron emission tomography (PET), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and, ultimately, positron emission mammography (PEM). PET offers the advantage of precise diagnosis, by measuring metabolism with the use of a radiotracer and identifying changes at the cellular level. PET/CT imaging allows for a more accurate assessment by merging the anatomic localization to the functional image. However, both techniques have not yet been established as diagnostic tools in early breast cancer detection, primarily because of low sensitivity, especially for sub-centimeter and low-grade tumors. PEM, a breast-specific device with increased spatial resolution, has been developed in order to overcome these limitations. It has demonstrated higher detectability than PET/CT and comparable or better sensitivity than MRI. The ability to target the lesions visible in PEM with PEM-guided breast biopsy systems adds to its usability in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. The results from recent studies summarized in this review indicate that PEM may prove to be a useful first-line diagnostic tool, although further evaluation and improvement are required.
Collapse
|
28
|
Optical imaging in breast cancer diagnosis: the next evolution. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2012; 2012:863747. [PMID: 23304141 PMCID: PMC3529498 DOI: 10.1155/2012/863747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2012] [Accepted: 08/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among the population of the Western world. Diagnostic methods include mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance; meanwhile, nuclear medicine techniques have a secondary role, being useful in regional assessment and therapy followup. Optical imaging is a very promising imaging technique that uses near-infrared light to assess optical properties of tissues and is expected to play an important role in breast cancer detection. Optical breast imaging can be performed by intrinsic breast tissue contrast alone (hemoglobin, water, and lipid content) or with the use of exogenous fluorescent probes that target specific molecules for breast cancer. Major advantages of optical imaging are that it does not use any radioactive components, very high sensitivity, relatively inexpensive, easily accessible, and the potential to be combined in a multimodal approach with other technologies such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and positron emission tomography. Moreover, optical imaging agents could, potentially, be used as “theranostics,” combining the process of diagnosis and therapy.
Collapse
|
29
|
MacDonald LR, Wang CL, Eissa M, Haseley D, Kelly MM, Liu F, Parikh JR, Beatty JD, Rogers JV. Positron emission mammography (PEM): Effect of activity concentration, object size, and object contrast on phantom lesion detection. Med Phys 2012; 39:6499-508. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4754651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
30
|
Seiler S, Lenkinski RE. Dedicated PET device for breast PET and MRI/PET correlations. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 Suppl 1:S149-50. [DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(12)70062-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
31
|
Iima M, Nakamoto Y, Kanao S, Sugie T, Ueno T, Kawada M, Mikami Y, Toi M, Togashi K. Clinical Performance of 2 Dedicated PET Scanners for Breast Imaging: Initial Evaluation. J Nucl Med 2012; 53:1534-42. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.100958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
32
|
Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2012; 2012:438647. [PMID: 22848217 PMCID: PMC3400419 DOI: 10.1155/2012/438647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2012] [Accepted: 05/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET), with or without integrated computed tomography (CT), using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is based on the principle of elevated glucose metabolism in malignant tumors, and its use in breast cancer patients is frequently being investigated. It has been shown useful for classification, staging, and response monitoring, both in primary and recurrent disease. However, because of the partial volume effect and limited resolution of most whole-body PET scanners, sensitivity for the visualization of small tumors is generally low. To improve the detection and quantification of primary breast tumors with FDG PET, several dedicated breast PET devices have been developed. In this nonsystematic review, we shortly summarize the value of whole-body PET/CT in breast cancer and provide an overview of currently available dedicated breast PETs.
Collapse
|
33
|
Godinez F, Chaudhari AJ, Yang Y, Farrell R, Badawi RD. Characterization of a high-resolution hybrid DOI detector for a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:3435-49. [PMID: 22581109 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/3435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to design and test a new high-resolution hybrid depth of interaction (DOI) detector for a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner. Two detectors have been designed and built. The completed detectors are based on a 14 × 14 array of 1.5 × 1.5 × 20 mm(3) unpolished lutetium orthosilicate scintillation crystals, with each element coated in a 50 μm layer of reflective material. The detector is read out from both ends using a position-sensitive photomultiplier tube (PSPMT) and a large active area (20 × 20 mm(2)) avalanche photodiode (APD) to enable acquisition of DOI information. Nuclear instrumentation modules were used to characterize the detectors' performances in terms of timing, intrinsic spatial resolution (ISR) and energy resolution, as well as DOI resolution with a dual-ended readout configuration. Measurements with the APD were performed at a temperature of 10 °C. All crystals were identified at all depths, even though the signal amplitude from the PSPMT decreases with depth away from it. We measured a timing resolution of 2.4 ns, and an average energy resolution of 19%. The mean ISR was measured to be 1.2 mm for crystals in the central row of the array for detectors in the face-to-face position. Two off-center positions were measured corresponding to 26° and 51° oblique photon incidence, and the mean ISR at these positions was 1.5 and 1.7 mm, respectively. The average DOI resolution across all crystals and depths was measured to be 2.9 mm (including the beam width of 0.6 mm). This detector design shows good promise as a high-resolution detector for a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Godinez
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Comparative Effectiveness of Positron Emission Mammography and MRI in the Contralateral Breast of Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198:219-32. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.6342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
35
|
Shkumat NA, Springer A, Walker CM, Rohren EM, Yang WT, Adrada BE, Arribas E, Carkaci S, Chuang HH, Santiago L, Mawlawi OR. Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study. Med Phys 2011; 38:5176-85. [PMID: 21978062 PMCID: PMC5148033 DOI: 10.1118/1.3627149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A new positron emission mammography (PEM) device (PEM Flex Solo II, Naviscan Inc., San Diego, CA) has recently been introduced and its performance characteristics have been documented. However, no systematic assessment of its limit of detectability has been evaluated. The aim of this work is to investigate the limit of detectability of this new PEM system using a novel, customized breast phantom. METHODS Two sets of F-18 infused gelatin breast phantoms of varying thicknesses (2, 4, 6, and 8 cm) were constructed with and without (blank) small, shell-less contrast objects (2 mm thick disks) of varying diameters (3-14.5 mm) [volumes: 0.15-3.3 cc] and activity concentration to background ratio (ACR) (2.7-58). For the phantom set with contrast objects, the disks were placed centrally inside the phantoms and both phantom sets were imaged for a period of 10 min on the PEM device. In addition, scans for the 2 and 6 cm phantoms were repeated at different times (0, 90, and 150 min) post phantom construction to evaluate the impact of total activity concentration (count density) on lesion detectability. Each object from each phantom scan was then segmented and placed randomly in a corresponding blank phantom image. The resulting individual images were presented blindly to seven physician observers (two nuclear medicine and five breast imaging radiologists) and scored in a binary fashion (1-correctly identified object, 0-incorrect). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of lesion detectability were calculated and plots of sensitivity versus ACR and lesion diameters for different phantom thicknesses and count density were generated. RESULTS The overall (mean) detection sensitivity across all variables was 0.68 (95% CI: [0.64, 0.72]) with a corresponding specificity of 0.93 [0.87, 0.98], and diagnostic accuracy of 0.72 [0.70, 0.75]. The smallest detectable object varied strongly as a function of ACR, as sensitivity ranged from 0.36 [0.29, 0.44] for the smallest lesion size (3 mm) to 0.80 [0.75, 0.84] for the largest (14.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS The detectability performance of this PEM system demonstrated its ability to resolve small objects with low activity concentration ratios which may assist in the identification of early stage breast cancer. The results of this investigation can be used to correlate lesion detectability with tumor size, ACR, count rate, and breast thickness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Shkumat
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Raylman RR, Abraham J, Hazard H, Koren C, Filburn S, Schreiman JS, Kurian S, Majewski S, Marano GD. Initial clinical test of a breast-PET scanner. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2011; 55:58-64. [PMID: 21382190 DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02230.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The goal of this initial clinical study was to test a new positron emission/tomography imager and biopsy system (PEM/PET) in a small group of selected subjects to assess its clinical imaging capabilities. Specifically, the main task of this study is to determine whether the new system can successfully be used to produce images of known breast cancer and compare them to those acquired by standard techniques. METHODS The PEM/PET system consists of two pairs of rotating radiation detectors located beneath a patient table. The scanner has a spatial resolution of ∼2 mm in all three dimensions. The subjects consisted of five patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer ranging in age from 40 to 55 years old scheduled for pre-treatment, conventional whole body PET imaging with F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The primary lesions were at least 2 cm in diameter. RESULTS The images from the PEM/PET system demonstrated that this system is capable of identifying some lesions not visible in standard mammograms. Furthermore, while the relatively large lesions imaged in this study where all visualised by a standard whole body PET/CT scanner, some of the morphology of the tumours (ductal infiltration, for example) was better defined with the PEM/PET system. Significantly, these images were obtained immediately following a standard whole body PET scan. CONCLUSIONS The initial testing of the new PEM/PET system demonstrated that the new system is capable of producing good quality breast-PET images compared standard methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond R Raylman
- Department of Radiology Hematology/Oncology, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Positron Emission Mammography: Correlation of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status and18F-FDG. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:W247-55. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.6478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
38
|
Springer A, Mawlawi OR. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner. Med Phys 2011; 38:2132-9. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3560881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
39
|
Vandenbroucke A, Foudray AMK, Olcott PD, Levin CS. Performance characterization of a new high resolution PET scintillation detector. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:5895-911. [PMID: 20844332 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/19/018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Performance of a new high resolution PET detection concept is presented. In this new concept, annihilation radiation enters the scintillator detectors edge-on. Each detector module comprises two 8 × 8 LYSO scintillator arrays of 0.91 × 0.91 × 1 mm(3) crystals coupled to two position-sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs) mounted on a flex circuit. Appropriate crystal segmentation allows the recording of all three spatial coordinates of the interaction(s) simultaneously with submillimeter resolution. We report an average energy resolution of 14.6 ± 1.7% for 511 keV photons at FWHM. Coincident time resolution was determined to be 2.98 ± 0.13 ns FWHM on average. The coincidence point spread function (PSF) has an average FWHM of 0.837 ± 0.049 mm (using a 500 μm spherical source) and is uniform across the arrays. Both PSF and coincident time resolution degrade when Compton interactions are included in the data. Different blurring factors were evaluated theoretically, resulting in a calculated PSF of 0.793 mm, in good agreement with the measured value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vandenbroucke
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tafreshi NK, Kumar V, Morse DL, Gatenby RA. Molecular and Functional Imaging of Breast Cancer. Cancer Control 2010; 17:143-55. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481001700302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Significant efforts have been directed toward developing and enhancing imaging methods for the early detection, diagnosis, and characterization of small breast tumors. Molecular and functional imaging sets the stage for enhancement of current methodology. Methods Current imaging modalities are described based on the molecular characteristics of normal and malignant tissue. New molecular imaging methods that have the potential for clinical use are also discussed. Results: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than mammography in BRCA1 carriers. It is used in screening and in the early evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy. Positron emission mammography is 91% sensitive and 93% specific in detecting primary breast cancers. Sentinel node scintigraphy is a key component of axillary lymph node evaluation. Other imaging modalities being studied include Tc99m sestamibi, radiolabeled thymidine or uridine, estrogen receptor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions Molecular and functional imaging of the breast will likely alter clinical practice in diagnosing and staging primary breast cancer and assessing response to therapy since it will provide earlier information regarding the underlying biology of individual breast cancers, tumor stage, potential treatment strategies, and biomarkers for early evaluation of treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Virendra Kumar
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - David L. Morse
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Peng H, Levin CS. Design study of a high-resolution breast-dedicated PET system built from cadmium zinc telluride detectors. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:2761-88. [PMID: 20400807 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/9/022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
We studied the performance of a dual-panel positron emission tomography (PET) camera dedicated to breast cancer imaging using Monte Carlo simulation. The proposed system consists of two 4 cm thick 12 x 15 cm(2) area cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) panels with adjustable separation, which can be put in close proximity to the breast and/or axillary nodes. Unique characteristics distinguishing the proposed system from previous efforts in breast-dedicated PET instrumentation are the deployment of CZT detectors with superior spatial and energy resolution, using a cross-strip electrode readout scheme to enable 3D positioning of individual photon interaction coordinates in the CZT, which includes directly measured photon depth-of-interaction (DOI), and arranging the detector slabs edge-on with respect to incoming 511 keV photons for high photon sensitivity. The simulation results show that the proposed CZT dual-panel PET system is able to achieve superior performance in terms of photon sensitivity, noise equivalent count rate, spatial resolution and lesion visualization. The proposed system is expected to achieve approximately 32% photon sensitivity for a point source at the center and a 4 cm panel separation. For a simplified breast phantom adjacent to heart and torso compartments, the peak noise equivalent count (NEC) rate is predicted to be approximately 94.2 kcts s(-1) (breast volume: 720 cm(3) and activity concentration: 3.7 kBq cm(-3)) for a approximately 10% energy window around 511 keV and approximately 8 ns coincidence time window. The system achieves 1 mm intrinsic spatial resolution anywhere between the two panels with a 4 cm panel separation if the detectors have DOI resolution less than 2 mm. For a 3 mm DOI resolution, the system exhibits excellent sphere resolution uniformity (sigma(rms)/mean) < or = 10%) across a 4 cm width FOV. Simulation results indicate that the system exhibits superior hot sphere visualization and is expected to visualize 2 mm diameter spheres with a 5:1 activity concentration ratio within roughly 7 min imaging time. Furthermore, we observe that the degree of spatial resolution degradation along the direction orthogonal to the two panels that is typical of a limited angle tomography configuration is mitigated by having high-resolution DOI capabilities that enable more accurate positioning of oblique response lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Peng
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
MacDonald L, Edwards J, Lewellen T, Haseley D, Rogers J, Kinahan P. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II. J Nucl Med 2009; 50:1666-75. [PMID: 19759118 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.064345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED We evaluated a commercial positron emission mammography (PEM) camera, the PEM Flex Solo II. This system comprises two 6 x 16.4 cm detectors that scan together covering up to a 24 x 16.4 cm field of view (FOV). There are no specific standards for testing this detector configuration. We performed several tests important to breast imaging, and we propose tests that should be included in standardized testing of PEM systems. METHODS We measured spatial resolution, uniformity, counting- rate linearity, recovery coefficients, and quantification accuracy using the system's software. Image linearity and coefficient of variation at the edge of the FOV were also characterized. Anecdotal examples of clinical patient data are presented. RESULTS The spatial resolution was 2.4 mm in full width at half maximum for image planes parallel to the detector faces. The background variability was approximately 5%, and quantification accuracy and recovery coefficients varied within the FOV. Positioning linearity began at approximately 13 mm from the edge of the detector housing. The coefficient of variation was significantly higher close to the edge of the FOV because of limited sensitivity in these image planes. CONCLUSION A reconstructed spatial resolution of 2.4 mm represented a significant improvement over conventional whole-body PET scanners and should reduce the lower threshold on lesion size and tracer uptake for detection in the breast. Limited-angle tomography and a lack of data corrections result in spatially variable quantitative results. PEM acquisition geometry limits sampling statistics at the chest-wall edge of the camera, resulting in high variance in that portion of the image. Example patient images demonstrate that lesions can be detected at the chest-wall edge despite variance artifacts, and fine structure is visualized routinely throughout the FOV in the focal plane. The PEM Flex camera should enable the functional imaging of breast cancer earlier in the disease process than whole-body PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence MacDonald
- Radiology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kuerer HM, Albarracin CT, Yang WT, Cardiff RD, Brewster AM, Symmans WF, Hylton NM, Middleton LP, Krishnamurthy S, Perkins GH, Babiera G, Edgerton ME, Czerniecki BJ, Arun BK, Hortobagyi GN. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State of the Science and Roadmap to Advance the Field. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:279-88. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.18.3103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the fourth leading cancer for women in the United States. Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS is imperfect. This article highlights the current knowledge base and the scientific roadmap needed to advance the field. Methods This article is based on work done by and consultations obtained from leading experts in the field over a 6-month period that culminated in a full-day symposium designed to systematically review the most pertinent MEDLINE published reports and develop a roadmap to elucidate the molecular steps of carcinogenesis, reduce the extent or prevent the need for therapies, eliminate recurrences, and reduce morbidity. Results Expression profiling of pure DCIS will help elucidate the molecular characteristics that distinguish high-risk lesions from clinically irrelevant lesions. The development of new methods of extracting RNA from processed tissues may provide opportunities for research. Mammography often underestimates the pathologic extent of DCIS; other imaging methods need to be investigated for detection and monitoring of disease stability or progression. Novel biologic agents are being delivered in neoadjuvant clinical trials, and alternative methods for breast irradiation are being studied. Future trials of treatment versus no treatment for biologically selected cases of DCIS should be developed. Conclusion There is a critical need for a concerted international effort among patients with DCIS, clinicians, and basic scientists to conduct the research necessary to improve fundamental understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS and prevent development of invasive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry M. Kuerer
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Constance T. Albarracin
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wei T. Yang
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert D. Cardiff
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abenaa M. Brewster
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - W. Fraser Symmans
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nola M. Hylton
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lavinia P. Middleton
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Savitri Krishnamurthy
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - George H. Perkins
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gildy Babiera
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mary E. Edgerton
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brian J. Czerniecki
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Banu K. Arun
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
- From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Cancer Prevention, Radiation Oncology, and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and the Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Karellas A, Vedantham S. Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. Med Phys 2009; 35:4878-97. [PMID: 19070222 DOI: 10.1118/1.2986144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast imaging is largely indicated for detection, diagnosis, and clinical management of breast cancer and for evaluation of the integrity of breast implants. In this work, a prospective view of techniques for breast cancer detection and diagnosis is provided based on an assessment of current trends. The potential role of emerging techniques that are under various stages of research and development is also addressed. It appears that the primary imaging tool for breast cancer screening in the next decade will be high-resolution, high-contrast, anatomical x-ray imaging with or without depth information. MRI and ultrasonography will have an increasingly important adjunctive role for imaging high-risk patients and women with dense breasts. Pilot studies with dedicated breast CT have demonstrated high-resolution three-dimensional imaging capabilities, but several technological barriers must be overcome before clinical adoption. Radionuclide based imaging techniques and x-ray imaging with intravenously injected contrast offer substantial potential as a diagnostic tools and for evaluation of suspicious lesions. Developing optical and electromagnetic imaging techniques hold significant potential for physiologic information and they are likely to be of most value when integrated with or adjunctively used with techniques that provide anatomic information. Experimental studies with breast specimens suggest that phase-sensitive x-ray imaging techniques can provide edge enhancement and contrast improvement but more research is needed to evaluate their potential role in clinical breast imaging. From the technological perspective, in addition to improvements within each modality, there is likely to be a trend towards multi-modality systems that combine anatomic with physiologic information. We are also likely to transition from a standardized screening, where all women undergo the same imaging exam (mammography), to selection of a screening modality or modalities based an individual-risk or other classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Karellas
- Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Raylmana RR, Smith MF, Kinahan PE, Majewski S. Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system. Med Phys 2009; 35:4989-97. [PMID: 19070233 DOI: 10.1118/1.2990781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Tomographic breast imaging techniques can be used to quantify radiotracer uptake in breast and tumor tissue. However, physical processes common to PET imaging can confound accurate quantification. In this investigation, we assessed the effects of these phenomena and tested correction schemes for our new positron emission mammography-tomography system (PEM-PET). The PEM-PET scanner utilizes two sets of rotating planar detector heads. Each unit consists of a 4 x 3 array of Hamamatsu H8500 flat panel position sensitive photomultipliers coupled to a 96 x 72 array of 2 x 2 x 15 mm3 LYSO detector elements (pitch = 2.1 mm). Image reconstruction is performed with a 3D-OSEM algorithm parallelized to run on a multiprocessor computer system. The reconstructed field-of-view is 15 x 15 x 15 cm3. Much of the testing procedures were based on NEMA-NU2/2001 protocols. Count rate losses due to pulse pile-up, image contamination due to acceptance of random coincidences and Compton scatter, and image artifacts produced by photon attenuation were measured. It was found that the system was susceptible to count rate losses when moderate levels of radiation were present in the scanner due to the current design of the event trigger electronics. Application of corrections for Compton scattering, photon attenuation and dead time resulted in improved estimations of 18F concentration in simplified phantom studies. Results from these preliminary studies indicate that the PEM-PET scanner will be useful for the quantification of radiotracer uptake in breast tumors, possibly facilitating early assessment of cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond R Raylmana
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9236, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Macdonald L, Edwards J, Lewellen T, Rogers J, Kinahan P. Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography PEM Flex Solo II. IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD. NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM 2008; 11:4494-4501. [PMID: 20502537 DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2008.4774291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission mammography (PEM) uses two opposing gamma-ray imagers and limited-angle tomography techniques to image radiotracer distributions within the breast. Due to their smaller size and closer proximity to the source, dedicated PEM cameras can provide better spatial resolution and count sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomographs. We performed several clinical imaging tests on a commercially available PEM camera, the PEM Flex Solo II. This system is comprised of two opposing 6 cm × 16.4 cm detectors that scan in unison to cover up to a 24 cm × 16.4 cm field of view (FOV). We measured spatial resolution, uniformity, recovery coefficients (RC), and quantification using the system clinical software. Image linearity and coefficient of variation (CV) at the edge of the FOV were also characterized. Anecdotal examples of clinical patient data are presented. Spatial resolution is 2.4 mm FWHM for image planes parallel to the detector faces; background variability is 6%; quantification and RC varied within the FOV; positioning linearity began at ~ 13 mm from the edge of the detector housing; CV increased rapidly at the edge of the FOV due to limited sampling in these image planes.
Collapse
|
48
|
Surti S, Karp JS. Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:2911-21. [PMID: 18460745 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Development of partial ring, dedicated breast positron emission tomography (PET) scanners is an active area of research. Due to the limited angular coverage, generation of distortion and artifact-free, fully 3D tomographic images is not possible without rotation of the detectors. With time-of-flight (TOF) information, it is possible to achieve the 3D tomographic images with limited angular coverage and without detector rotation. We performed simulations for a breast scanner design with a ring diameter and an axial length of 15 cm and comprising a full (180 degrees in-plane angular coverage), 2/3 (120 degrees in-plane angular coverage) or 1/2 (90 degrees in-plane angular coverage) ring detector. Our results show that as the angular coverage decreases, improved timing resolution is needed to achieve distortion-free and artifact-free images with TOF. The contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) value for small hot lesions in a partial ring scanner is similar to a full ring non-TOF scanner. Our results indicate that a timing resolution of 600 ps is needed for a 2/3 ring scanner, while a timing resolution of 300 ps is needed for a 1/2 ring scanner. We also analyzed the ratio of lesion CRC to the background pixel noise (SNR) and concluded that TOF improves the SNR values of the partial ring scanner, and helps to compensate for the loss in sensitivity due to reduced geometric sensitivity in a limited angle coverage PET scanner. In particular, it is possible to maintain similar SNR characteristic in a 2/3 ring scanner with a timing resolution of 300 ps as in a full ring non-TOF scanner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Surti
- Department of Radiology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Matheoud R, Secco C, Ridone S, Inglese E, Brambilla M. The use of molecular sieves to simulate hot lesions in18F-fluorodeoxyglucose—positron emission tomography imaging. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:N137-48. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/8/n03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
50
|
Raylman RR, Majewski S, Smith MF, Proffitt J, Hammond W, Srinivasan A, McKisson J, Popov V, Weisenberger A, Judy CO, Kross B, Ramasubramanian S, Banta LE, Kinahan PE, Champley K. The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:637-53. [PMID: 18199907 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|