Energy-dependent polarity correction factors for four commercial ionization chambers used in electron dosimetry

AAPM WGTG51 Report 385: Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy electron beams

An Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for the determination of absorbed dose to water is presented for electron beams with energies between 4 MeV and 22 MeV (1.70 cm ≤ R 50 ≤ 8.70 cm $1.70\nobreakspace {\rm cm} \le R_{\text{50}} \le 8.70\nobreakspace {\rm cm}$ ). This updated formalism allows simplified calibration procedures, including the use of calibrated cylindrical ionization chambers in all electron beams without the use of a gradient correction. Newk Q $k_{Q}$ data are provided for electron beams based on Monte Carlo simulations. Implementation guidance is provided. Components of the uncertainty budget in determining absorbed dose to water at the reference depth are discussed. Specifications for a reference-class chamber in electron beams include chamber stability, settling, ion recombination behavior, and polarity dependence. Progress in electron beam reference dosimetry is reviewed. Although this report introduces some major changes (e.g., gradient corrections are implicitly included in the electron beam quality conversion factors), they serve to simplify the calibration procedure. Results for absorbed dose per linac monitor unit are expected to be up to approximately 2 % higher using this Addendum compared to using the original TG-51 protocol.

AAPM WGTG51 Report 374: Guidance for TG-51 reference dosimetry

Practical guidelines that are not explicit in the TG-51 protocol and its Addendum for photon beam dosimetry are presented for the implementation of the TG-51 protocol for reference dosimetry of external high-energy photon and electron beams. These guidelines pertain to: (i) measurement of depth-ionization curves required to obtain beam quality specifiers for the selection of beam quality conversion factors, (ii) considerations for the dosimetry system and specifications of a reference-class ionization chamber, (iii) commissioning a dosimetry system and frequency of measurements, (iv) positioning/aligning the water tank and ionization chamber for depth ionization and reference dose measurements, (v) requirements for ancillary equipment needed to measure charge (triaxial cables and electrometers) and to correct for environmental conditions, and (vi) translation from dose at the reference depth to that at the depth required by the treatment planning system. Procedures are identified to achieve the most accurate results (errors up to 8% have been observed) and, where applicable, a commonly used simplified procedure is described and the impact on reference dosimetry measurements is discussed so that the medical physicist can be informed on where to allocate resources.

Comparing the dosimeter-specific corrections for influence quantities of some parallel-plate ionization chambers in conventional electron beam dosimetry

The performance characteristics of some widely employed parallel-plate ionization chambers in dosimetry of conventional high energy electron beams were evaluated and compared in the present study following the recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 reference dosimetry protocol. Three different types of PTW-made parallel-plate ionization chambers including Roos (TM34001), Markus (TM23343), and Advanced Markus (TM34045) were employed, and correction factors for polarity (k_pol), recombination (k_s), and quality conversion factor ( [Formula: see text] ) were determined at different nominal electron energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV produced by a Varian Trilogy clinical Linac. All measurements were performed inside a MP3-M automatic water phantom in the reference condition of 100 cm SSD (source to surface distance), reference measurement depth (z_ref), and 10 × 10 cm² field size at the phantom surface. The maximum and minimum range of k_pol deviations from unity were respectively found for Markus and Roos ionization chambers. The maximum k_s values also belonged to the Markus ionization chamber, while the minimum k_s values were observed for the Advanced Markus chamber. The measured k_s values through recommendations of the TRS-398 dosimetry protocol were in good accordance with those obtained by Jaffe-plot analysis for all considered ionization chambers. The type of employed ionization chamber can minimally affect the measured electron beam quality index (R₅₀), while it can have a more considerable impact on [Formula: see text] value, especially in the case of the Markus chamber. From the results, it can be concluded that the Roos and Advanced Markus ionization chambers have a superior performance in the case of electron beam dosimetry, although all considered ionization chambers fulfilled the criteria requested by relevant reference dosimetry protocols.

Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation

Relative dose measurements with small ionization chambers in combination with an electrometer placed in the treatment room ("internal electrometer") show a large dependence on the polarity used. While this was observed previously for percent depth dose curves (PDDs), the effect has not been understood or preventable. To investigate the polarity dependence of internal electrometers used in conjunction with a small-volume ionization chamber, we placed an internal electrometer at a distance of 1 m from the isocenter and exposed it to different amounts of scattered radiation by varying the field size. We identified irradiation of the electrometer to cause a current of approximately -1 pA, regardless of the sign of the biasing voltage. For low-sensitivity detectors, such a current noticeably distorts relative dose measurements. To demonstrate how the current systematically changes PDDs, we collected measurements with nine ionization chambers of different volumes. As the chamber volume decreased, signal ratios at 20 and 10 cm depth (M20/M10) became smaller for positive bias voltage and larger for negative bias voltage. At the size of the iba CC04 (40 mm³) the difference of M20/M10 was around 1% and for the smallest studied chamber, the iba CC003 chamber (3 mm³), around 7% for a 10 × 10 cm² field. When the electrometer was moved further from the source or shielded, the additional current decreased. Consequently, PDDs at both polarities were brought into alignment at depth even for the 3 mm³ ionization chamber. The apparent polarity effect on PDDs and lateral beam profiles was reduced considerably by shielding the electrometer. Due to normalization the effect on output values was low. When measurements with a low-sensitivity probe are carried out in conjunction with an internal electrometer, we recommend careful monitoring of the particular setup by testing both polarities, and if deemed necessary, we suggest shielding the electrometer.

Determination of relative ion chamber calibration coefficients from depth-ionization measurements in clinical electron beams

A method is presented to obtain ion chamber calibration coefficients relative to secondary standard reference chambers in electron beams using depth-ionization measurements. Results are obtained as a function of depth and average electron energy at depth in 4, 8, 12 and 18 MeV electron beams from the NRC Elekta Precise linac. The PTW Roos, Scanditronix NACP-02, PTW Advanced Markus and NE 2571 ion chambers are investigated. The challenges and limitations of the method are discussed. The proposed method produces useful data at shallow depths. At depths past the reference depth, small shifts in positioning or drifts in the incident beam energy affect the results, thereby providing a built-in test of incident electron energy drifts and/or chamber set-up. Polarity corrections for ion chambers as a function of average electron energy at depth agree with literature data. The proposed method produces results consistent with those obtained using the conventional calibration procedure while gaining much more information about the behavior of the ion chamber with similar data acquisition time. Measurement uncertainties in calibration coefficients obtained with this method are estimated to be less than 0.5%. These results open up the possibility of using depth-ionization measurements to yield chamber ratios which may be suitable for primary standards-level dissemination.

Intra- and intervariability in beam data commissioning among water phantom scanning systems

Accurate beam data acquisition during commissioning is essential for modeling the treatment planning system and dose calculation in radiotherapy. Although currently several commercial scanning systems are available, there is no report that compared the differences among the systems because most institutions do not acquire several scanning systems due to the high cost, storage space, and infrequent usage. In this report, we demonstrate the intra‐ and intervariability of beam profiles measured with four commercial scanning systems. During a recent educational and training workshop, four different vendors of beam scanning water phantoms were invited to demonstrate the operation and data collection of their systems. Systems were set up utilizing vendor‐recommended protocols and were operated with a senior physicist, who was assigned as an instructor along with vendor. During the training sessions, each group was asked to measure beam parameters, and the intravariability in percent depth dose (PDD). At the end of the day, the profile of one linear accelerator was measured with each system to evaluate intervariability. Relatively very small (SD < 0.12%) intervariability in PDD was observed among four systems at a region deeper than peak (1.5 cm). All systems showed almost identical profiles. At the area within 80% of radiation field, the average, and maximum differences were within ± 0.35% and 0.80%, respectively, compared to arbitrarily chosen IBA system as reference. In the penumbrae region, the distance to agreement (DTA) of the region where dose difference exceed ± 1% was less than 1 mm. Repeated PDD measurement showed small intravariability with SD < 0.5%, although large SD was observed in the buildup region. All four water phantom scanning systems demonstrated adequate accuracy for beam data collection (i.e., within 1% of dose difference or 1 mm of DTA among each other). It is concluded that every system is capable of acquiring accurate beam. Thus the selection of a water scanning system should be based on institutional comfort, personal preference of software and hardware, and financial consideration.

PACS number: 87.53.Bn

Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration

To achieve a good clinical outcome in radiotherapy treatment, a certain accuracy in the dose delivered to the patient is required. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the uncertainty in each of the steps of the process inside some acceptable values, which implies as low a global uncertainty as possible. The work reported here focused on the uncertainty evaluation of absorbed dose to water in the routine calibration for clinical beams in the range of energies used in external‐beam radiotherapy. With this aim, we considered various uncertainty components (corrected electrometer reading, calibration factor, beam quality correction factor, and reference conditions) associated with beam calibration. Results show a typical uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water during beam calibration of approximately 1.3% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams (k=1 in both cases) when the ND,w formalism is used and kQ,Q0 is calculated theoretically. These values may vary depending on the uncertainty provided by the standards laboratory for calibration factor, which is shown in the work. For primary standards based on clinical linear accelerator beam energies, the uncertainty in this step of the process could be placed close to 1.0%. We also discuss the possibility of an uncertainty reduction with the adoption of the absorbed dose to water formalism as compared with the air kerma formalism.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Hv

An experimental study of recombination and polarity effect in a set of customized plane parallel ionization chambers

Plane parallel ionization chambers are an important tool for dosimetry and absolute calibration of electron beams used for radiotherapy. Most dosimetric protocols require corrections for recombination and polarity effects, which are to be determined experimentally as they depend on chamber design and radiation quality. Both effects were investigated in electron beams from a linear accelerator (Varian 21CD) for a set of four tissue equivalent plane parallel ionization chambers customized for the present research by Standard Imaging (Madison WI). All four chambers share the same design and air cavity dimensions, differing only in the diameter of their collecting electrode and the corresponding width of the guard ring. The diameters of the collecting electrodes were 2 mm, 4 mm, 10 mm and 20 mm. Measurements were taken using electron beams of nominal energy 6 to 20 MeV in a 10 cm x 10 cm field size with a SSD of 100 cm at various depths in a Solid Water slab phantom. No significant variation of recombination effect was found with radiation quality, depth of measurement or chamber design. However, the polarity effect exceeded 5% for the chambers with small collecting electrode for an effective electron energy below 4 MeV at the point of measurement. The magnitude of the effect increased with decreasing electron energy in the phantom. The polarity correction factor calculated following AAPM protocol TG51 ranged from approximately 1.00 for the 20.0 mm chamber to less than 0.95 for the 2 mm chamber at 4.1 cm depth in a electron beam of nominally 12 MeV. By inverting the chamber it could be shown that the polarity effect did not depend on the polarity of the electrode first traversed by the electron beam. Similarly, the introduction of an air gap between the overlying phantom layer and the chambers demonstrated that the angular distribution of the electrons at the point of measurement had a lesser effect on the polarity correction than the electron energy itself. The magnitude of the absolute difference between charge collected at positive and negative polarity was found to correlate with the area of the collecting electrode which is consistent with the explanation that differences in thickness of the collecting electrodes and the number of electrons stopped in them contribute significantly to the polarity effect. Overall, the polarity effects found in the present study would have a negligible effect on electron beam calibration at a measurement depth recommended by most calibration protocols. However, the present work tested the corrections under extreme conditions thereby aiming at greater understanding of the mechanism underlying the correction factors for these chambers. This may lead to better chamber design for absolute dosimetry and electron beam characterization with less reliance on empirical corrections.

Radiation induced currents in parallel plate ionization chambers: Measurement and Monte Carlo simulation for megavoltage photon and electron beams

Polarity effects in ionization chambers are caused by a radiation induced current, also known as Compton current, which arises as a charge imbalance due to charge deposition in electrodes of ionization chambers. We used a phantom-embedded extrapolation chamber (PEEC) for measurements of Compton current in megavoltage photon and electron beams. Electron contamination of photon beams and photon contamination of electron beams have a negligible effect on the measured Compton current. To allow for a theoretical understanding of the Compton current produced in the PEEC effect we carried out Monte Carlo calculations with a modified user code, the COMPTON/ EGSnrc. The Monte Carlo calculated COMPTON currents agree well with measured data for both photon and electron beams; the calculated polarity correction factors, on the other hand, do not agree with measurement results. The conclusions reached for the PEEC can be extended to parallel-plate ionization chambers in general.

Polarity effects of ionization chambers used in tbi dosimetry due to cable irradiation

This paper presents the results of an investigation on polarity effects in total-body irradiation (TBI) dosimetry. Thimble (NE2571, 0.6 cc) and plane-parallel (Markus NE2534 0.055 cc) chambers were investigated in a 30 x 30 x 30-cm3 acrylic phantom in TBI conditions (6-MV x-rays). The thimble chamber was positioned at the midline and at the entrance and exit Dmax (1.5 cm from the phantom surface) levels. The Markus chamber, which is generally used for skin dose estimations, was positioned at various depths from the entrance surface of the phantom (from 0- to 2-cm depth). The polarity factor (Ppol) was defined as (Q+ + Q-)/2Q-, where Q+ and Q- were the collected charges at positive and negative bias voltage, respectively. The variations of Ppol with many parameters (absorbed dose, dose rate, the presence or absence of a 1-cm acrylic spoiler, irradiated cable length) were investigated. Results show that Ppol is quite small (within 1.002 for on-axis measurements and 1.005 for off-axis measurements) for the NE2571 chamber when the beam spoiler is placed. Ppol was significantly higher without the beam spoiler (within 1.008 for on-axis measurements, up to 1.02 for off-axis measurements). Concerning the Markus chamber, for on-axis skin dose measurements, Ppol was found to be less than unity (around 0.988) or more than unity (around 1.0035), respectively, with and without the beam spoiler. Possible "directional effects" of the currents generated in the cable were investigated for both chambers and found to be insignificant. This shows that the application of Ppol correction has to be considered a reliable procedure in minimizing these effects. When the beam spoiler is placed, the cable has to be drawn to minimize the portion of cable just outside the beam; if this is not the case, Ppol may significantly vary (for the NE2571 chamber values up to 1.0035 were found for on-axis measurements).

Ionization chamber, electrometer, linear accelerator, field size, and energy dependence of the polarity effect in electron dosimetry

Plane-parallel ionization chambers are the instrument of choice for use in electron calibration and dosimetry, but these chambers may exhibit large polarity effects. This study concentrates on measuring the dependence of the polarity error at various mean energies using different linear accelerator, field size, ion chamber, and electrometer combinations. The polarity error was shown to increase for all four ionization chambers as the mean energy at depth decreased, but was always less than one percent at d(max). Polarity error dependence was also observed for similar plane-parallel chambers, varying field sizes, and different linear accelerators, but no polarity error dependence was observed for similar cylindrical chambers and different electrometers. Measurements of the polarity error can be used to develop correction factors for future measurements that will help minimize the time spent performing electron dosimetry and calibrations. These correction factors can be used to calculate the correct reading without the need to reverse the chamber bias, thus reducing the number of measurements required.