Virtual light field projection for CT-simulation

Performance and characteristics of an IR localizing system for radiation therapy

We report the development of a new system for interactive patient posture, position and respiratory control during radiation therapy treatment. The system consists of an infrared camera, retro-reflective markers and dedicated software that makes it practical to use in the clinic. The system is designed to be used with multiple retro-reflective markers to monitor not only position, but also the posture of the patient in real time. Specific features of the system include: 1. The system reports an absolute misalignment at several points on a patients, and also provides feedbacks on any necessary adjustments in terms of site specific set-up parameters, such as focus to surface distance (PIN), superior and inferior alignment, chest-wall angle, etc. 2. The system is based on the set of predefined templates containing number and position of control points and feedback parameters developed for different treatment sites. 3. A "virtual portal vision" procedure is developed to project organ contours in the beams-eye-view (BEV) based on the marker locations obtained in real time and compare them with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) from CT simulation. Assuming good correlation between external markers and internal anatomy, the system offers the possibility of mimicking a verification procedure without taking port-films, which can potentially reduce the setup time. In this paper, we concentrate on system properties and performance, while initial applications on a number of clinical sites is ongoing. Accuracy and precision of this system are evaluated in the context of breast/chest treatments using rigid phantoms. The system has an intrinsic uncertainty of +/- 1 mm; and when two systems in different rooms (CT and treatment room) are used for correlating positional information, the uncertainty is less than 2 mm.

A 3D digitzation system for conventional radiation therapy

While the majority of patients receiving external beam radiation therapy treatment are planned by CT simulation, a significant number of them are still planned using conventional simulators for various reasons. The information-collection process in a conventional simulation is often fragmented and done with primitive tools. For example, in many institutions body contours are still acquired using solder wires and tracing paper, a time-consuming and error-prone procedure. We have developed a 3D digitization system to assist the information-acquisition process at conventional simulations. The system consists of an infrared camera assembly, a wireless digitizer probe, and Windows-based software. The system can provide 3D coordinates of any points in space accessible by the probe with submillimeter accuracy. It can be used to capture body contours, to record the coordinates of portal points, and to take various measurements for dose calculations as well as for patient setup. The software can display all the captured data together with the planned treatment fields, providing a comprehensive geometric verification of the treatment configuration. The system can also transfer all the information to dose planning programs in DICOM-RT format, providing an integrated information flow from simulation to dose planning.

Assessment of the accuracy of a conventional simulation for radiotherapy of head and skull base tumors

In this prospective study we investigated the absolute accuracy of the conventional simulation in head and skull base tumors. 41 isocenters in 40 consecutive patients with tumors of the head and skull base were included. In all cases a rigid stereotactic mask system was used for non-invasive fixation. The stereotactic ("calculated") coordinates of the isocenter were defined by the treatment planning computer. Each patient underwent a physical simulation using exclusively anatomical reference points to define the "preliminary" isocenter. The displacement between its coordinates and those of the stereotactic target point was recorded in X-, Y- and Z-direction with help of the targeting device, and the spatial error was calculated. Additionally, the patients were stratified by basal or calvarial tumor site to estimate the importance of the basal bone structures in the simulation accuracy. The influence of the learning effect on simulation accuracy was also determined. The results showed an accuracy of set-up at the linac within 1 mm in all three directions as calculated from orthogonal portal films. Mean shift of the isocenter coordinates obtained from physical simulation compared to the calculated stereotactic coordinates was 2.15 mm, 2.54 mm, and 2.69 mm for X-, Y-, and Z-direction, respectively. Mean spatial displacement amounted 5.06 mm, and the median was 4.50 mm. No significant difference could be noted between basal and calvarial location of the isocenter. A significant "learning effect" was observed with a decrease in spatial shift with increasing patient numbers. This effect was stronger in basal lesions, whereas calvarial lesions showed only a minor, insignificant effect. In conclusion, a physical simulation requires a safety margin of 5 mm in PTV definition in addition to other factors, e.g. organ movement.