Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64

Technical note: An automated document verification tool in radiation oncology EMR: Application for LDR prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to illustrate how a script-based automated tool can efficiently verify documentation for LDR prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An in-house Python-scripts-based tool was developed to automatically verify the specific checklists, aligned with our institutional practice guidelines for prostate seed implants (PSI). The scripts, compatible with our radiation oncology information system, could be executed with an optional web-based middleware to access and evaluate Aria documents. Optimized based on data from the previous 400 patients, the automated tool was applied to a random cohort of 50 LDR patients. It evaluated the adequacy of specific EMR documents by performing checks for data completeness, consistency, and allowable value range. We analyzed the efficiency of using this tool against conventional manual checks in two LDR processes: seed ordering and monthly audits for our PSI programs.

RESULTS

The automated tool effectively performed chart checks on the involved PSI documents. Human errors, such as typos and inconsistent information, were identified in 7 out of 50 patients during the seed ordering process and in 2 out of 50 patients during the monthly audit. Meanwhile, this automation reduced the majority of manual chart-checking time by an average of 5 and 10 min per patient for these processes, respectively. The anticipated efficiency gains will continue to accrue as more check items are digitalized and assessable to the scripts.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of an automated tool tailored for LDR prostate brachytherapy has demonstrated its efficiency benefits. Such an approach can help other clinics substantially enhance routine chart checks, periodic audits, and other applications in similar clinical settings.

AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy

Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.

A postimplant dosimetry simulation framework for robustness evaluation in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) brachytherapy is a promising treatment that has the potential to be widely utilized with increased standardization, optimization, and robustness. Excellent early efficacy and very high patient acceptance were reported, however, to further evaluate and improve planning strategies, a framework to quantify plan robustness to implant uncertainties is necessary.

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to quantify clinical seed displacement using an automated algorithm and develop and validate a PBSI post-implant dosimetry simulation framework to evaluate PBSI plan robustness to implant uncertainties.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical PBSI seed displacements were quantified for 63 consecutive patients. A PBSI simulator was developed in Matlab (2020) by resampling clinical seed displacements and computing a range of possible post-implant dosimetry outcomes under various seed displacement scenarios. Simulations were performed retrospectively on 63 previous clinical plans to evaluate plan robustness to seed displacement.

RESULTS

Mean seed displacement for the whole cohort was 10 ± 6 mm. A clinical seed displacement database was established and a user interface was developed for the simulation framework. For all clinical plans, the median (range) value of simulated median ETV V90 in various seed displacement scenarios was 97.8% (87.5-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

A PBSI postimplant dosimetry simulation framework was developed and validated. Simulation results showed that the current PTV planning margin is sufficient to provide adequate postimplant dose coverage of ETV. This simulator can be used to evaluate plan robustness to seed displacement and will facilitate future research in improving PBSI planning methods.

Current status and issues with the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seed sources at medical facilities in Japan: a questionnaire-based survey†

In conducting dosimetric assays of seed sources containing iodine-125 (125I), several major guidelines require the medical physicist to verify the source strength before patient treatment. Japanese guidelines do not mandate dosimetric assays at medical facilities, but since 2017, three incidents have occurred in Japan wherein seeds with incorrect strengths were delivered to medical facilities. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the current situation and any barriers to conducting the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seeds at medical facilities in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey from December 2020 to April 2021, to examine whether seed assay and verification of the number of seeds delivered were being performed. We found that only 9 facilities (16%) performed seed assay and 28 (52%) verified the number of seeds. None of the facilities used an assay method that ensured traceability. The reasons for not performing an assay were divided into two categories: lack of resources and legal issues. Lack of resources included lack of instruments, lack of knowledge of assay methods, shorthand, or all of the above, whereas legal issues included the inability to resterilize iodine-125 seeds distributed in Japan and/or purchase seeds dedicated to the assay. Dosimetric assays, including simple methods, are effective in detecting calibration date errors and non-radioactive seeds. The study findings suggest that familiarization of medical personnel with these assay methods and investigation of the associated costs of labor and equipment should be recommended, as these measures will lead to medical reimbursement for quality assurance.

Smart Radiotherapy Biomaterials for Image-Guided In Situ Cancer Vaccination

Recent studies have highlighted the potential of smart radiotherapy biomaterials (SRBs) for combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy. These SRBs include smart fiducial markers and smart nanoparticles made with high atomic number materials that can provide requisite image contrast during radiotherapy, increase tumor immunogenicity, and provide sustained local delivery of immunotherapy. Here, we review the state-of-the-art in this area of research, the challenges and opportunities, with a focus on in situ vaccination to expand the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of both local and metastatic disease. A roadmap for clinical translation is outlined with a focus on specific cancers where such an approach is readily translatable or will have the highest impact. The potential of FLASH radiotherapy to synergize with SRBs is discussed including prospects for using SRBs in place of currently used inert radiotherapy biomaterials such as fiducial markers, or spacers. While the bulk of this review focuses on the last decade, in some cases, relevant foundational work extends as far back as the last two and half decades.

Patient-specific dose correction for prostate postimplant evaluation with flexible timing of postimplant imaging

PURPOSE

The dosimetric effect of edema on prostate implants have long been realized, but large uncertainties still exist in the estimation of dose actually received by the prostate. This study attempted to develop a new method to accurately estimate dose delivered to the prostate accounting for the variation of prostate volume and seed distribution, edema half-lives, and times for postimplant evaluation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A series of prostate seed implants for Cs-131, Pd-103, and I-125 with various prostate volumes were simulated in a water phantom using the TG-43 algorithm on the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Dose analysis was performed to derive a quantitative relationship between the prostate peripheral dose and the prostate radius with the variation of prostate volume and seed distribution. Using this relationship to calculate dynamically, the total dose accumulated in the prostate (D_T ) accounting for the variation of prostate volume and seed distribution and edema half-lives. Moreover, the total dose can be estimated statically based on the prostate volume that can be determined in a computerized tomography (CT) image taken at a time after implantation. The statically estimated total dose (D_CT ) was compared with D_T to determine optimal imaging times as well as dose correction factors for other imaging times.

RESULTS

An inverse power law was established between the prostate peripheral dose and prostate radius. The value of the power was 1.3 for Cs-131 and I-125, and 1.5 for Pd-103, respectively. D_T was derived dynamically using the inverse power law. Given the edema half-lives, T_E , of 4, 9.3, and 25 days and the volume expansion of 1.1 and 2.0 times of the prostate without edema, the optimal times for postimplant imaging were: 7, 9, and 16 days for T_E  = 4 days; 10, 14, and 28 days for T_E  = 9.3 days; and 12, 19, 45 days T_E  = 25 days, for Cs-131, Pd-103, and I-125, respectively. D_CT calculated using the prostate volume determined on the optimal days agreed with D_T to 0.0%-1.8% and within 0.3% for most cases. For various prostate volumes, edema half-lives, and nonoptimal times, D_CT was able to achieve a 1% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The postimplant dose calculation based on the proposed inverse power law for prostate seed implants with edema has improved the accuracy of postimplant dosimetry with accurate and patient-specific dose corrections accounting for prostate size, edema half-life, and postimplant imaging times. Optimal times for postimplant imaging have been accurately determined, and the high accuracy of postimplant dose calculation can be achieved for both optimal imaging times and nonoptimal imaging times.

From Structure to Function: Understanding Synthetic Conditions in Relation to Magnetic Properties of Hybrid Pd/Fe-Oxide Nanoparticles

Heterostructured magnetic nanoparticles show great potential for numerous applications in biomedicine due to their ability to express multiple functionalities in a single structure. Magnetic properties are generally determined by the morphological characteristics of nanoparticles, such as the size/shape, and composition of the nanocrystals. These in turn are highly dependent on the synthetic conditions applied. Additionally, incorporation of a non-magnetic heterometal influences the final magnetic behavior. Therefore, construction of multifunctional hybrid nanoparticles with preserved magnetic properties represents a certain nanotechnological challenge. Here, we focus on palladium/iron oxide nanoparticles designed for combined brachytherapy, the internal form of radiotherapy, and MRI-guided hyperthermia of tumors. The choice of palladium forming the nanoparticle core is envisioned for the eventual radiolabeling with ¹⁰³Pd to enable the combination of hyperthermia with brachytherapy, the latter being beyond the scope of the present study. At this stage, we investigated the synthetic mechanisms and their effects on the final magnetic properties of the hybrid nanoparticles. Thermal decomposition was applied for the synthesis of Pd/Fe-oxide nanoparticles via both, one-pot and seed-mediated processes. The latter method was found to provide better control over morphology of the nanoparticles and was therefore examined closely by varying reaction conditions. This resulted in several batches of Pd/Fe-oxide nanoparticles, whose magnetic properties were evaluated, revealing the most relevant synthetic parameters leading to promising performance in hyperthermia and MRI.

Contrast-Specific Spherical Lesion Phantoms and Ancillary Analysis Software for the Objective Evaluation of Transrectal Ultrasound System Contrast Detectability

Brachytherapy is an efficacious treatment option because of its benefits for patient recovery, dose localization and conformity, but these favorable outcomes can be ensured only if the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) system is optimized for the specific application of ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. The ability to delineate the prostate from surrounding tissue during TRUS-guided prostate brachytherapy is vital for treatment planning, and consequently, so is the contrast resolution. This study describes the development of task-specific contrast-detail phantoms with clinically relevant contrast and spherical target sizes for contrast-detail performance evaluation of TRUS systems used in the brachytherapy procedure. The procedure for objective assessment of the contrast detectability of the TRUS systems is also described; a program was developed in MATLAB (R2017a, The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) to quantitatively analyze image quality in terms of the lesion signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR) and validated with representative control test images. The LSNR of the Hitachi EUB-7500A (2013, Hitachi, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) TRUS system was measured on sagittal and transverse TRUS images of the contrast-detail phantoms described in this work. Results revealed the efficacy of the device as an image quality evaluation tool and the impact of the size, depth and relative contrast of the targets to the surrounding tissue on the contrast detectability of a TRUS system for both transducer arrays. The MATLAB program objectively measured the contrast detectability of the TRUS system and has the potential to determine optimized imaging parameters that could be designed as part of standardization of the imaging protocol used in TRUS-guided prostate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer

AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO.

RESULTS

This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.

Extracranial 125I Seed Implantation Allows Non-invasive Stereotactic Radioablation of Hippocampal Adult Neurogenesis in Guinea Pigs

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) is important for multiple cognitive functions. We sort to establish a minimal or non-invasive radiation approach to ablate AHN using guinea pigs as an animal model. ¹²⁵I seeds with different radiation dosages (1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.3 mCi) were implanted unilaterally between the scalp and skull above the temporal lobe for 30 and 60 days, with the radiation effect on proliferating cells, immature neurons, and mature neurons in the hippocampal formation determined by assessment of immunolabeled (+) cells for Ki67, doublecortin (DCX), and neuron-specific nuclear antigen (NeuN), as well as Nissl stain cells. Spatially, the ablation effect of radiation occurred across the entire rostrocaudal and largely the dorsoventral dimensions of the hippocampus, evidenced by a loss of DCX⁺ cells in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of dentate gyrus (DG) in the ipsilateral relative to contralateral hemispheres in reference to the ¹²⁵I seed implant. Quantitatively, Ki67⁺ and DCX⁺ cells at the SGZ in the dorsal hippocampus were reduced in all dosage groups at the two surviving time points, more significant in the ipsilateral than contralateral sides, relative to sham controls. NeuN⁺ neurons and Nissl-stained cells were reduced in the granule cell layer of DG and the stratum pyramidale of CA1 in the groups with 0.6-mCi radiation for 60 days and 1.0 mCi for 30 and 60 days. Minimal cranial trauma was observed in the groups with 0.3– 1.0-mCi radiation at 60 days. These results suggest that extracranial radiation with ¹²⁵I seed implantation can be used to deplete HAN in a radioactivity-, duration-, and space-controllable manner, with a “non-invasive” stereotactic ablation achievable by using ¹²⁵I seeds with relatively low radioactivity dosages.

Steering a Tendon-Driven Needle in High-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy for Patients with Pubic Arch Interference

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) is a radiation therapy that places radioactive sources at cancerous tissue using needles. HDR BT offers better dose conformality and sparing of clinical structures, lower operator dependency, and fewer acute irritative symptoms compared to the other form of BT (low-dose-rate (LDR)). However, use of HDR BT is limited for patients with pubic arch interference, where the transperineal path to the prostate is blocked. This study aims to introduce a tendon-driven needle that can bend inside tissue to reach desired positions inside prostate. Initial experiments in a phantom tissue showed the feasibility of the needle to get around the pubic arch for placement at hard-to-reach target positions.

Clinical Outcome of CT-Guided Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy for Unresectable Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

Objective

To analyze the efficacy and safety of low dose rate stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (L-SABT) for treatment of unresectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Data of patients with early-stage NSCLC who received CT-guided L-SABT (radioactive I-125 seeds implantation) at eight different centers from December 2010 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment efficacy and complications were evaluated.

Results

A total of 99 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up duration was 46.3 months (6.1-119.3 months). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year local control rates were 89.1%, 77.5%, and 75.7%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.7%, 70.1%, and 54.4%, respectively. Treatment failure occurred in 38.4% of patients. Local/regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and recurrence combined with metastasis accounted for 15.1%, 12.1%, and 11.1%, respectively. Pneumothorax occurred in 47 patients (47.5%) with 19 cases (19.2%) needing closed drainage. The only radiation-related adverse reaction was two cases of grade 2 radiation pneumonia. KPS 80-100, T1, the lesion was located in the left lobe, GTV D90 ≥150 Gy and the distance between the lesion and chest wall was < 1 cm, were associated with better local control (all P < 0.05); on multivariate analysis KPS, GTV D90, and the distance between the lesion and chest wall were independent prognostic factors for local control (all P < 0.05). KPS 80-100, T1, GTV D90 ≥150 Gy, and the distance between the lesion and chest wall was < 1 cm were also associated with better survival (all P < 0.05); on multivariate analysis KPS, T stage, and GTV D90 were independent prognostic factors for survival (all P < 0.05). The incidence of pneumothorax in patients with lesions <1 cm and ≥1cm from the chest wall was 33.3% and 56.7%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.026).

Conclusion

L-SABT showed acceptable efficacy in the treatment of unresectable early-stage NSCLC. But the incidence of pneumothorax is high. For patients with T1 stage and lesions <1 cm from the chest wall, it may have better efficacy. Prescription dose greater than 150 Gy may bring better results.

Effect of well chamber altitude pressure corrections for cesium Blu 131 Cs and CivaDot 103 Pd brachytherapy sources

PURPOSE

Previous publications have described how the standard temperature and pressure correction will overcorrect measurements with a low-energy photon low-dose rate brachytherapy source at low ambient air pressures. To account for this effect, an additional correction factor is applied after the standard temperature and pressure correction. This additional correction is dependent on the source being measured and the chamber it is measured in. Well chamber corrections for two sources and findings regarding aspects that may affect the altitude response of the sources are presented.

METHODS

A purpose-built pressure vessel was constructed previously, which could achieve pressures ranging from 74.661 to 106.66 kPa (560-800 mmHg). Three Cesium Blu sources (¹³¹ Cs) from Isoray Inc. and three CivaDots (¹⁰³ Pd) from CivaTech Oncology Inc. were tested over this pressure range in increments of 2.7 kPa (20 mmHg) in three HDR 1000 Plus chambers, and the Cesium Blu sources were also tested in two IVB 1000 chambers. Both chamber models are air communicating well-type ionization chambers produced by Standard Imaging Inc. Multiple runs of each source/chamber combination were completed, corrected with the standard temperature and pressure correction, normalized to the result at 101.325 kPa, and averaged with runs of the same combination. The chamber response was also simulated using MCNP6 to validate the experimental results.

RESULTS

Measurements of both sources in all chambers followed the expected power dependence on ambient pressure as seen in previous studies. The Cesium Blu source, however, demonstrated a significant difference in response in the HDR 1000 Plus chamber versus the IVB 1000 chamber. For an altitude correction factor of the form, P_A  = k₁ (P)^{k 2} , new coefficients are proposed for both sources for pressure units of kPa and mmHg. The Monte Carlo calculated chamber response agreed with the experimental results within 2% for all sources and chambers at all pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

Altitude correction coefficients for two new low-energy photon low-dose rate brachytherapy sources are provided. The directional dependence of the CivaDot has no bearing on its dependence on pressure; however, the difference in construction materials from other ¹⁰³ Pd sources leads to unique correction coefficients. The higher energy of the Cesium Blu source with respect to ¹⁰³ Pd and ¹²⁵ I sources yields a difference in correction factors depending on which model chamber is used for air-kerma strength calculations. Clinics must be careful to select the correct pair of coefficients for the chamber model they used.

Recommendations for intraoperative mesh brachytherapy: Report of AAPM Task Group No. 222

Mesh brachytherapy is a special type of a permanent brachytherapy implant: it uses low-energy radioactive seeds in an absorbable mesh that is sutured onto the tumor bed immediately after a surgical resection. This treatment offers low additional risk to the patient as the implant procedure is carried out as part of the tumor resection surgery. Mesh brachytherapy utilizes identification of the tumor bed through direct visual evaluation during surgery or medical imaging following surgery through radiographic imaging of radio-opaque markers within the sources located on the tumor bed. Thus, mesh brachytherapy is customizable for individual patients. Mesh brachytherapy is an intraoperative procedure involving mesh implantation and potentially real-time treatment planning while the patient is under general anesthesia. The procedure is multidisciplinary and requires the complex coordination of multiple medical specialties. The preimplant dosimetry calculation can be performed days beforehand or expediently in the operating room with the use of lookup tables. In this report, the guidelines of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) are presented on the physics aspects of mesh brachytherapy. It describes the selection of radioactive sources, design and preparation of the mesh, preimplant treatment planning using a Task Group (TG) 43-based lookup table, and postimplant dosimetric evaluation using the TG-43 formalism or advanced algorithms. It introduces quality metrics for the mesh implant and presents an example of a risk analysis based on the AAPM TG-100 report. Recommendations include that the preimplant treatment plan be based upon the TG-43 dose calculation formalism with the point source approximation, and the postimplant dosimetric evaluation be performed by using either the TG-43 approach, or preferably the newer model-based algorithms (viz., TG-186 report) if available to account for effects of material heterogeneities. To comply with the written directive and regulations governing the medical use of radionuclides, this report recommends that the prescription and written directive be based upon the implanted source strength, not target-volume dose coverage. The dose delivered by mesh implants can vary and depends upon multiple factors, such as postsurgery recovery and distortions in the implant shape over time. For the sake of consistency necessary for outcome analysis, prescriptions based on the lookup table (with selection of the intended dose, depth, and treatment area) are recommended, but the use of more advanced techniques that can account for real situations, such as material heterogeneities, implant geometric perturbations, and changes in source orientations, is encouraged in the dosimetric evaluation. The clinical workflow, logistics, and precautions are also presented.

Acute and late side-effects after low dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer; incidence, management and technical considerations

PURPOSE

To review common reported side effects and complications after primary LDR-BT (monotherapy) and discuss some of the technical aspects that could impact the treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was undertaken using medical subject headings (MeSH) complemented by the authors' personal and institutional expertise.

RESULTS

The reported incidence of acute and late grade 2 or above urinary, bowel and sexual side effects is very variable across the literature. The learning curve and the implant quality have a clear impact on the toxicity outcomes. Being aware of some of the technical challenges encountered during the procedure and ways to mitigate them could decrease the incidence of side effects. Careful planning of seed placement and seed deposition allow sparing of the organs at risk and a lower incidence of urinary and gastro-intestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose-rate brachytherapy remains a standard monotherapy treatment in the setting of favorable-risk prostate cancer. High disease control and low long-term toxicities are achievable in expert hands with a good technique.

The one hundred most cited publications in prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to identify the leaders in research on prostate brachytherapy through a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited publications in the field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A broad search was performed with the term "prostate brachytherapy" using the Web of Science database to generate wide-ranging results that were reviewed by reading the abstracts and, if necessary, the articles to select the top 100 most cited publications.

RESULTS

The median of the total citation count was 187 (range 132-1464). The median citation per year index (citations/year since publication) was 13.5 (range 6.3-379.0). In all publications, the first author was also the corresponding author. The top publishing countries of the first author included the United States (n = 78), Canada (n = 6), the UK (n = 5), and Germany (n = 4). The journal with the most publications was the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (n = 38). There were 27 more publications on low-dose-rate (LDR) than on high-dose-rate (HDR) (43 vs 16) among the top 100. HDR publications had only one first author that had three articles in comparison to LDR publications, which had four first authors, each with three articles on LDR. The United States was the leading country in 43.8% of HDR publications (n = 7) and 88.4% of LDR publications (n = 38).

CONCLUSIONS

Our bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited publications clearly demonstrates the North American dominance in the publications of prostate brachytherapy, especially in LDR. However, European first authors were more frequent in HDR publications.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Anthropomorphic Trans-rectal Ultrasound Prostate Brachytherapy Training Phantom

The quality of the trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) image, and thus seed placement during the prostate brachytherapy (PBT) procedure, relies on the user's technical and clinical competency. Simulation-based medical education can provide a structured approach for the acquisition of clinical competencies, but the efficacy of the training relies on the fidelity of the training simulators. In this work, the design, development and preliminary evaluation of an anthropomorphic training phantom for TRUS PBT is described. TRUS clinical patient data informed the design of 3-D printed moulds to fabricate prostate targets. Tissue-mimicking materials were included that had the sonographic characteristics of the prostate and overlying tissues, as well as the clinically relevant physical response, to provide haptic feedback to the user. Through an iterative design process, prototypes were constructed. These prototypes were quantitatively evaluated using a specification list and evaluated by an experienced clinical brachytherapy oncologist; their feedback was implemented, and the results of this evaluation are presented.

Design, Fabrication, and Testing of a Flexible Three-Dimensional Printed Percutaneous Needle With Embedded Actuators

Percutaneous needle-based procedures have replaced open surgeries in cancer treatments to perform the tasks with minimal invasiveness to the tissue. Precise placement of the needle at target positions in cancer diagnostic (e.g., breast biopsy) or therapeutic (e.g., prostate brachytherapy) procedures governs the success of such procedures. Also, in many needle insertion applications, it is desired to steer away from critical organs or to maneuver around anatomical obstacles in tissue. This work introduces a flexible three-dimensional (3D) printed percutaneous needle with embedded actuators for improved navigation inside the tissue toward the target. The needle is manipulated via a programmed portable motorized control unit to realize an average angular deflection of about 15 and 14 deg in air and a tissue-mimicking phantom, respectively. We demonstrated the needle's capability to reach the target, while avoiding obstacles. We also demonstrated that the flexible needle can be guided through a desired trajectory by controlling its angular deflection and axial movement. The 3D deflection of the needle is expected to assist in breast cancer lumpectomy for multiple extractions of tissue samples or in prostate brachytherapy via a curvilinear approach. The flexible needle may help reducing the complexity of current path planning algorithms, and thereby improve efficiency of closed-loop control systems in needle steering.

Endorectal digital prostate tomosynthesis (endoDPT): a proof-of-concept study

In this study we present endorectal digital prostate tomosynthesis (endoDPT), a proposed method of high resolution prostate imaging using an endorectal x-ray sensor and an external x-ray source. endoDPT may be useful for visualizing the fine detail of small structures such as low dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) seeds that are difficult to visualize with current methods. The resolution of endoDPT was characterized through measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and artifact spread function (ASF) in computational and physical phantoms. The qualitative resolution of endoDPT was assessed relative to computed tomography (CT) through imaging of LDRBT seeds implanted inex vivocanine prostates. The x-ray sensor MTF reached 10% at 11.50 mm^-1, the reconstruction algorithm MTF reached a maximum at 7.08 mm^-1, and the ASF was 2.5 mm (full-width at half-maximum). Fine structures in LDRBT seeds like the 0.05 mm thick shell were visible with endoDPT but not CT. All endoDPT images exhibited an overshoot artifact. The measured MTFs were consistent with other studies using similar x-ray sensors and demonstrated improved resolution compared to digital breast tomosynthesis; this result was due to the smaller endoDPT x-ray sensor detection element size and quantitatively demonstrates the high resolution of endoDPT. The ASF demonstrated worse depth resolution compared to in-plane resolution, due to partial angular sampling; partial angular sampling also caused the observed overshoot artifact in the endoDPT images. However, endoDPT still was able to visualize fine structures such as the LDRBT seed shell to a much higher degree than CT. This high-resolution visualization may be useful for improvements in patient specific LDRBT dosimetry. Overall, these results indicate endoDPT is capable of high in-plane spatial resolution and is thus well poised for optimization and studies assessing clinical utility.

Comparison of post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds and loose seeds by sector analysis at 24 hours and 1 month for localized prostate cancer

Purpose

To compare post-implant dosimetrics between intraoperatively built custom-linked (IBCL) seeds and loose seeds (LS) at 24 hours and 1 month by sector analysis, and to evaluate the effect of IBCL seeds with regard to change in dosimetric parameters, in patients with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Consecutive patients treated for localized prostate cancer who received definitive brachytherapy between March 2013 and October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate V₁₀₀ (PV₁₀₀), prostate D₉₀ (PD₉₀), prostate V₁₅₀ (PV₁₅₀), urethral D₃₀ (UD₃₀), urethral V₁₅₀ (UV₁₅₀), and rectal V₁₀₀ (RV₁₀₀) were assessed.

Results

Thirty-two patients were treated with LS and 32 patients were treated with IBCL seeds. The median follow-up time was 49.9 months in the LS group and 27.1 months in the IBCL group. PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀ at 24 hours and UD₃₀ at 1 month showed significant difference (F-test), and standard deviation (SD) tended to be lower in the IBCL group. Analysis of change in the variables revealed significance for ΔPV₁₀₀ and ΔPD₉₀ (F-test, p = 0.014 and < 0.001, respectively), and ΔPV₁₅₀ and ΔUD₃₀ showed marginal significance (p = 0.084 and 0.097, respectively). PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀ at 24 hours and 1 month were significantly lower in the IBCL group, and there was no significant difference in PV₁₀₀, PD₉₀, and RV₁₀₀ compared with the LS group (t-test). The homogeneity index (HI) was significantly higher in the IBCL group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this retrospective single institutional study, there was a decrease in the SD of the dosimetric parameters in the IBCL group, and it was statistically significant in change in the variables between 24 hours and 1 month (F-test). The use of IBCL seeds significantly decreased PV₁₅₀, UV₁₅₀, and UD₃₀, and significantly improved HI, without lowering PD₉₀ or PD₁₀₀.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): state of art and future perspectives

Purpose

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a central role in building decision supporting systems (DSS), and its application in healthcare is rapidly increasing. The aim of this study was to define the role of AI in healthcare, with main focus on radiation oncology (RO) and interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy).

Artificial intelligence in interventional radiation therapy

AI in RO has a large impact in providing clinical decision support, data mining and advanced imaging analysis, automating repetitive tasks, optimizing time, and modelling patients and physicians' behaviors in heterogeneous contexts. Implementing AI and automation in RO and IRT can successfully facilitate all the steps of treatment workflow, such as patient consultation, target volume delineation, treatment planning, and treatment delivery.

Conclusions

AI may contribute to improve clinical outcomes through the application of predictive models and DSS optimization. This approach could lead to reducing time-consuming repetitive tasks, healthcare costs, and improving treatment quality assurance and patient's assistance in IRT.

AAPM recommendations on medical physics practices for ocular plaque brachytherapy: Report of task group 221

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed Task Group 221 (TG-221) to discuss a generalized commissioning process, quality management considerations, and clinical physics practice standards for ocular plaque brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is also, in part, to aid the clinician to implement recommendations of the AAPM TG-129 report, which placed emphasis on dosimetric considerations for ocular brachytherapy applicators used in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). This report is intended to assist medical physicists in establishing a new ocular brachytherapy program and, for existing programs, in reviewing and updating clinical practices. The report scope includes photon- and beta-emitting sources and source:applicator combinations. Dosimetric studies for photon and beta sources are reviewed to summarize the salient issues and provide references for additional study. The components of an ocular plaque brachytherapy quality management program are discussed, including radiation safety considerations, source calibration methodology, applicator commissioning, imaging quality assurance tests for treatment planning, treatment planning strategies, and treatment planning system commissioning. Finally, specific guidelines for commissioning an ocular plaque brachytherapy program, clinical physics practice standards in ocular plaque brachytherapy, and other areas reflecting the need for specialized treatment planning systems, measurement phantoms, and detectors (among other topics) to support the clinical practice of ocular brachytherapy are presented. Expected future advances and developments for ocular brachytherapy are discussed.

Prostate brachytherapy procedural training: incorporation of related procedures in resident training and competency assessment

Purpose

Inadequate procedural training is of increasing concern in resident training, especially in prostate brachytherapy (PB). Transperineal rectal spacer placement (TRSP) requires many of the same proficiencies as PB. This work describes the assessment of teaching techniques focusing on developing critical competencies for PB using related clinical procedures (TRSP).

Material and methods

For PB and TRSP, key competencies were identified: 9 for PB and 7 for TRSP; 4 are shared between PB and TRSP. "Comfort level" with these procedures was assessed prior to and following participation in TRSP.

Results

8 of 12 trainees at our institution participated in TRSP procedures. 2 of these trainees had prior experience with PB or related procedures and were excluded. Trainees self-reported "comfort levels" between 0 and 3 for four competency domains. Initial median comfort (MC) level for competency domains relevant to PB included: patient positioning (median 1, range 0-2), transrectal ultrasound imaging (median 1, range 0-1), fiducial placement (median 1, range 0-1), and hydrodissection (median 0, range 0-1). Median number of TRSP procedures performed by assessed trainees during the analysis period was 4 (range 1-6). Following TRSP procedure training, MC level increased: 2 points for patient positioning (median 3, range 1-3; p < 0.01), 1.5 points for transrectal ultrasound imaging (median 2.5, range 1.3, p < 0.001); 1 point for fiducial placement (median score 2, range 1-3; p < 0.001); and 1.5 points for hydrodissection (median score 2, range 1-3; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Increasing trainee involvement in related procedures to develop core competencies may help facilitate increased comfort with common skills critical to the independent performance of PB.

Low-dose-rate iodine-125 seed air kerma strength measurement intercomparison

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of compliance of air kerma strength (AKS) measurements of iodine-125 (I-125) seeds with international recommendations by departments in Australia and determine the potential impact of noncompliance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To achieve this aim, we present an intercomparison of AKS measurements for a single I-125 seed performed by 11 radiotherapy departments in Australia. Measurements were performed at two sites, with each participating department traveling to one of the two host sites and measuring the AKS using their own equipment and local protocols. Each of the AKS measurements was compared with each other and the manufacturer-certified AKS.

RESULTS

Nine of the 11 participating departments measured AKS fell within ±3% of the manufacturer's calibration certificate value, whereas all participating departments measured AKS within ±5% of the manufacturer's calibration certificate value. The total spread of the measured AKS among the 11 departments was 7.7%. Only two of the 11 participating departments complied with international recommendations and had their well chamber calibrated within the last 2 years. In addition, 2 of the 11 departments used a well chamber calibrated that was calibrated with a different seed model used during the intercomparison, whereas 4 of the 11 departments calibrated their well chamber "in-house" using a factory-calibrated seed provided by the seed manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant variation in the methods used and frequency of calibration of well chambers were observed among the participating departments. The results of this study support the international recommendations on frequency and methodology of well chamber calibration. Failure to follow these recommendations significantly increases the uncertainty in AKS measurement of I-125 seeds.

Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide guidance on quality management for electronic brachytherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The task group used the risk-assessment approach of Task Group 100 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Because the quality management program for a device is intimately tied to the procedure in which it is used, the task group first designed quality interventions for intracavitary brachytherapy for both commercial electronic brachytherapy units in the setting of accelerated partial-breast irradiation. To demonstrate the methodology to extend an existing risk analysis for a different application, the task group modified the analysis for the case of post-hysterectomy, vaginal cuff irradiation for one of the devices.

RESULTS

The analysis illustrated how the TG-100 methodology can lead to interventions to reduce risks and improve quality for each unit and procedure addressed.

CONCLUSION

This report provides a model to guide facilities establishing a quality management program for electronic brachytherapy.

BrachyView: Reconstruction of seed positions and volume of an LDR prostate brachytherapy patient plan using a baseline subtraction algorithm

PURPOSE

BrachyView is a novel in-body imaging system developed with the objective to provide real-time intraoperative dosimetry for low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy treatments. The BrachyView coordinates combined with conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging, provides the possibility to localise the effective position of the implanted seeds inside the prostate volume, providing a unique tool for intra-operative verification of the quality of the implantation. This research presents the first complete LDR brachytherapy plan reconstructed by the BrachyView system and is used to evaluate the effectiveness of an imaging algorithm with baseline subtraction.

METHODS

A plan featuring 98 I-125 brachytherapy seeds, with an average activity of 0.248 mCi, were implanted into a prostate gel phantom under TRUS guidance. Images of implanted seeds were obtained by the BrachyView after the implantation of seeds. The baseline subtraction algorithm is applied as a pixel-to-pixel counts subtraction and is applied to every second projection obtained after the implantation of each needle. Seed positions and effectiveness of the baseline reconstruction in the identification of seeds were verified by a high-resolution post-implant CT scan.

RESULTS

A complete brachytherapy plan has been reconstructed with a 100% detection rate. This is possible due to the effectiveness of the baseline subtraction, with its application an overall increase of 11.3% in position accuracy and 8.2% increase in detection rate was noted.

CONCLUSION

It has been demonstrated that the BrachyView system shows the potential to be a solution to providing clinics with the means for intraoperative dosimetry for LDR prostate brachytherapy treatments.

Prostate Brachytherapy with Iodine-125 Seeds: Radiation Protection Issues

Aims and background

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer by means of permanently implanted 125 I sources is a well established procedure. An increasing number of patients all over the world are treated with this modality. When the technique was introduced at our institution, radiation protection issues relative to this technique were investigated in order to comply with international recommendations and national regulations. Particular attention was paid to the need for patient shielding after discharge from hospital.

Methods

The effective and equivalent doses to personnel related to implantation, the effective dose to patient relatives as computed by a developed algorithm, the air kerma strength values for the radioactive sources certified by the manufacturer compared with those measured by a well chamber, and the effectiveness of lead gloves in shielding the hands were evaluated.

Results

The effective dose to the bodies of personnel protected by a lead apron proved to be negligible. The mean equivalent doses to the physician's hands was 420 μSv for one implant; the technician's hands received 65 μSv. The mean air kerma rate measured at the anterior skin surface of the patient who had received an implant was 55 μGy/h (range, 10–115) and was negligible with lead protection. The measured and certified air kerma strength for 125I seeds in RAPID Strand corresponded within a margin of ± 5%. The measured attenuation by lead gloves in operative conditions was about 80%. We also defined the recommendations to be given to the patient at discharge.

Conclusions

The exposure risks related to brachytherapy with 125I to operators and public are limited. However, alternation of operators should be considered to minimize exposure. Patient-related measurements should verify the dose rate around the patient to evaluate the need for shielding and to define appropriate radiation protection recommendations.

Hybrid optimization based on non-coplanar needles for brachytherapy dose planning

PURPOSE

An ideal dose distribution in a target is the ultimate goal of preoperative dose planning. Furthermore, avoiding vital organs or tissues such as blood vessels or bones during the puncture procedure is significant in low-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of this work is to develop a hybrid inverse optimization method based on non-coplanar needles to assist the physician during conformal dose planning, which cannot be properly achieved with a traditional coplanar template.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The hybrid inverse optimization technique include two novel technologies: an inverse optimization algorithm and a dose volume histogram evaluation method. Brachytherapy treatment planning system was designed as an experimental platform. Left lung adenocarcinoma case was used to test the performance of the method in non-coplanar and coplanar needles, and malignant tumor of spine case was involved to test the practical application of this technique. In addition, the optimization time of every test was also recorded.

RESULTS

The proposed method can achieve an ideal dose distribution, avoiding vital organs (bones). In the first experiment, 13 non-coplanar needles and 24 seeds were used to get an ideal dose distribution to cover the target, whereas 11 coplanar needles and 23 seeds were used to cover the same target. In the second experiment, the new method used 22 non-coplanar needles and 65 seeds to cover the target, while 63 seeds and 22 needles were used in the actual operation. In addition, the computation time of the hybrid inverse optimization method was 20.5 seconds in the tumor of 94.67 cm3 by using 22 needles, which was fast enough for clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid inverse optimization method achieved high conformity in the clinical practice. The non-coplanar needle can help to achieve a better dose distribution than the coplanar needle.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations on calibration and traceability of LE-LDR photon-emitting brachytherapy sources at the hospital level

Prostate brachytherapy treatment using permanent implantation of low-energy (LE) low-dose rate (LDR) sources is successfully and widely applied in Europe. In addition, seeds are used in other tumour sites, such as ophthalmic tumours, implanted temporarily. The calibration issues for LE-LDR photon emitting sources are specific and different from other sources used in brachytherapy. In this report, the BRAPHYQS (BRAchytherapy PHYsics Quality assurance System) working group of GEC-ESTRO, has developed the present recommendations to assure harmonized and high-quality seed calibration in European clinics. There are practical aspects for which a clarification/procedure is needed, including aspects not specifically accounted for in currently existing AAPM and ESTRO societal recommendations. The aim of this report has been to provide a European wide standard in LE-LDR source calibration at end-user level, in order to keep brachytherapy treatments with high safety and quality levels. The recommendations herein reflect the guidance to the ESTRO brachytherapy users and describe the procedures in a clinic or hospital to ensure the correct calibration of LE-LDR seeds.

Technical Note: The design, construction, and evaluation of a liquid-based single phantom solution for TG128 brachytherapy ultrasound QA

PURPOSE

Since the publication of the AAPM TG128 report for the quality assurance (QA) of prostate brachytherapy ultrasound systems, no commercially available phantoms have been developed which satisfy all of the task group recommendations. Current solid phantoms require a separate user-implemented setup using a container with liquid medium to evaluate the alignment between the needle template and the electronic grid, a test of geometric accuracy with critical implications in dosimetric quality. Utilizing a 3D printer, we constructed a cost-effective, liquid-based phantom that provides a complete TG128 solution which improves the efficiency of brachytherapy ultrasound QA.

METHODS

The TG128 report was used to guide the design process of the liquid-based phantom. The needle template and electronic grid alignment setup served as the foundation with specific components developed to integrate all remaining tests. Water was chosen as the liquid medium, with speed of sound adjusted to 1,540 m/s via salinity per the task group recommendations. The proof of concept was evaluated by comparing the time stamps labeled on QA images between the liquid-based phantom and a commercially available one for both a new and experienced user.

RESULTS

A TG128 QA trial run demonstrated that all recommended tests can be completed with the single phantom setup. Evaluation of the time data revealed a total QA duration of 45 min (average of two trials) with the liquid-based phantom, compared to 70 and 90 min with the commercial phantom for a new and experienced user.

CONCLUSIONS

The liquid-based phantom is specifically designed to satisfy the recommendations of the TG128 report. The incorporation of 3D printing allows simple design modifications to adapt the phantom on-the-fly if needed. The resulting product improves the efficiency of brachytherapy ultrasound QA by eliminating the need for multiple phantom setups.

Reducing seed waste and increasing value of dynamic intraoperative implantation of Pd-103 seeds in prostate brachytherapy

Several nomograms exist for ordering palladium‐103 seeds for permanent prostate seed implants (PSI). Excess seeds from PSIs pose additional radiation safety risks and increase the cost of care. This study compared five nomograms to clinical data from dynamic modified‐peripheral intraoperative PSI to determine (a) the cause of excess seeds and (b) the optimal nomogram for our institution. Pre‐ and intraoperative patient data were collected for monotherapy PSIs and compiled into a clinical database. All patients were prescribed 125 Gy with dose coverage of D90% = 100% to the planning target volume (PTV) using ¹⁰³Pd seeds with mean air‐kerma strength (SK¯) of 2 U. Seeds were ordered based upon an in‐house nomogram as a function of preoperative prostate volume and prescription dose. Preoperative prostate volume was assessed with transrectal ultrasound. If any of the following four conditions were not met: (a) preoperative volume = intraoperative volume, (b) D90% = 100%, (c) SK¯=2U, and (d) seed ordering matched the in‐house nomogram, then a normalization factor was applied to the number of seeds used intraoperatively to meet all four conditions. Four published nomograms, an in‐house nomogram, and the normalized number of implanted seeds for each patient were plotted against intraoperative prostate volume. Of the 226 patients, 223 had excess seeds at the completion of their PSI. On average, 25.7 ± 9.9% of ordered seeds were not implanted. Excess seeds were separated into two categories, accounted‐for excess, determined by the four normalization factors, and residual excess, assumed to be due to overordering. The upper 99.9% CI linear fit of the normalized clinical data plus a 5% “cushion” may provide a more reasonable nomogram for ¹⁰³Pd seed ordering for our institution. Nomograms customized for individual institutions may reduce seed waste, thereby reducing radiation safety risks and increasing the value of prostate brachytherapy.

An in vitro verification of strength estimation for moving an 125I source during implantation in brachytherapy

This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of a method for estimating the strength of a moving brachytherapy source during implantation in a patient. Experiments were performed under the same conditions as in the actual treatment, except for one point that the source was not implanted into a patient. The brachytherapy source selected for this study was 125I with an air kerma strength of 0.332 U (μGym2h-1), and the detector used was a plastic scintillator with dimensions of 10 cm × 5 cm × 5 cm. A calibration factor to convert the counting rate of the detector to the source strength was measured and then the accuracy of the proposed method was investigated for a manually driven source. The accuracy was found to be under 10% when the shielding effect of additional needles for implantation at other positions was corrected, and about 30% when the shielding was not corrected. Even without shielding correction, the proposed method can detect dead/dropped source, implantation of a source with the wrong strength, and a mistake in the number of the sources implanted. Furthermore, when the correction was applied, the achieved accuracy came close to within 7% required to find the Oncoseed 6711 (125I seed with unintended strength among the commercially supplied values of 0.392, 0.462 and 0.533 U).

Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

Low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an evidence based radiation technique with excellent oncologic outcomes. By utilizing direct image guidance for radioactive source placement, LDR brachytherapy provides superior radiation dose escalation and conformality compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). With this level of precision, late grade 3 or 4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity rates are typically between 1% and 4%. Furthermore, when performed as a same day surgical procedure, this technique provides a cost effective and convenient strategy. A large body of literature with robust follow-up has led multiple expert consensus groups to endorse the use of LDR brachytherapy as an appropriate management option for all risk groups of non-metastatic prostate cancer. LDR brachytherapy is often effective when delivered as a monotherapy, although for some patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, optimal outcome are achieved in combination with supplemental EBRT and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In addition to reviewing technical aspects and reported clinical outcomes of LDR prostate brachytherapy, this article will focus on the considerations related to appropriate patient selection and other aspects of its use in the treatment of prostate cancer.

COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy

The Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP), in close partnership with the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) has developed a series of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment. These guidelines outline the performance objectives that equipment should meet in order to ensure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The TQC guidelines have been rigorously reviewed and field tested in a variety of Canadian radiation treatment facilities. The development process enables rapid review and update to keep the guidelines current with changes in technology. This article contains detailed performance objectives and safety criteria for low‐dose‐rate (LDR) permanent seed brachytherapy.

Correlations of post-implant regional dosimetric parameters at 24 hours and one month, with clinical results of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the correlations of post-implant regional dosimetrics at 24 hours (24 h) and 1 month after implant procedures, with clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Material and methods

Between January 2008 and December 2014, 130 consecutive patients treated for localized prostate cancer, receiving definitive iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy treatment were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent post-implant CT imaging for dosimetric analysis at 24 h and 1 month after implantation procedure. Prostate contours were divided into quadrants: anterior-superior (ASQ), posterior-superior (PSQ), anterior-inferior (AIQ), and posterior-inferior (PIQ). Predictive factors and cut-off values of biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and toxicities of LDR brachytherapy were analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up time was 69.5 months. Seven patients (5.4%) had biochemical failure. The 3-year and 5-year BFFS rates were 96.7% and 93.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score were significant prognostic factors for biochemical failure. D₉₀ (the minimal dose received by 90% of the volume) of PSQ and PIQ at 24 h, and D₉₀ of PSQ at 1 month were also significant factors. The cut-off values of PSQ D₉₀ were 145 Gy at 24 h and 160 Gy at 1 month. D₉₀ of the whole prostate was not significant at 24 h and at 1 month. D₉₀ of PSQ at 1 month was a significant factor for rectal hemorrhage.

Conclusions

Post-implant D₉₀ of PSQ is significantly associated with BFFS for localized prostate cancer not only at 1 month, but also at 24 hours. D₉₀ of PSQ at 1 month is also a significant factor for rectal hemorrhage.

Dosimetric impact of dual-energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy prostate brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a novel tissue characterization method using dual-energy over single-energy computed tomography (DECT and SECT) on Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations for low-dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy performed in a patient like geometry. A virtual patient geometry is created using contours from a real patient pelvis CT scan, where known elemental compositions and varying densities are overwritten in each voxel. A second phantom is made with additional calcifications. Both phantoms are the ground truth with which all results are compared. Simulated CT images are generated from them using attenuation coefficients taken from the XCOM database with a 100 kVp spectrum for SECT and 80 and 140Sn kVp for DECT. Tissue segmentation for Monte Carlo dose calculation is made using a stoichiometric calibration method for the simulated SECT images. For the DECT images, Bayesian eigentissue decomposition is used. A LDR prostate brachytherapy plan is defined with ¹²⁵I sources and then calculated using the EGSnrc user-code Brachydose for each case. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH) are compared to ground truth to assess the accuracy of tissue segmentation. For noiseless images, DECT-based tissue segmentation outperforms the SECT procedure with a root mean square error (RMS) on relative errors on dose distributions respectively of 2.39% versus 7.77%, and provides DVHs closest to the reference DVHs for all tissues. For a medium level of CT noise, Bayesian eigentissue decomposition still performs better on the overall dose calculation as the RMS error is found to be of 7.83% compared to 9.15% for SECT. Both methods give a similar DVH for the prostate while the DECT segmentation remains more accurate for organs at risk and in presence of calcifications, with less than 5% of RMS errors within the calcifications versus up to 154% for SECT. In a patient-like geometry, DECT-based tissue segmentation provides dose distributions with the highest accuracy and the least bias compared to SECT. When imaging noise is considered, benefits of DECT are noticeable if important calcifications are found within the prostate.

The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Brachytherapy (BT), using low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent seed implantation or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary source implantation, is an acceptable treatment option for select patients with prostate cancer of any risk group. The benefits of HDR-BT over LDR-BT include the ability to use the same source for other cancers, lower operator dependence, and - typically - fewer acute irritative symptoms. By contrast, the benefits of LDR-BT include more favourable scheduling logistics, lower initial capital equipment costs, no need for a shielded room, completion in a single implant, and more robust data from clinical trials. Prospective reports comparing HDR-BT and LDR-BT to each other or to other treatment options (such as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery) suggest similar outcomes. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease are >85%, 69-97%, and 63-80%, respectively. Brachytherapy with EBRT (versus brachytherapy alone) is an appropriate approach in select patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. The 10-year rates of overall survival, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality are >85%, <10%, and <5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with HDR-BT and LDR-BT are rare, at <4% in most series, and quality of life is improved in patients who receive brachytherapy compared with those who undergo surgery.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant magnetic resonance imaging dosimetry using positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging markers

PURPOSE

Permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT-MRI) fusion combines the anatomic detail of MRI with seed localization on CT but requires multimodality imaging acquisition and fusion. The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of MRI only postimplant dosimetry to standard CT-MRI fusion-based dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy with use of positive contrast MRI markers were included in this study. Dose calculation to the whole prostate, apex, mid-gland, and base was performed via standard CT-MRI fusion and MRI only dosimetry with prostate delineated on the same T2 MRI sequence. The 3-dimensional (3D) distances between seed positions of these two methods were also evaluated. Wilcoxon-matched-pair signed-rank test compared the D90 and V100 of the prostate and its sectors between methods.

RESULTS

The day 0 D90 and V100 for the prostate were 98% versus 94% and 88% versus 86% for CT-MRI fusion and MRI only dosimetry. There were no differences in the D90 or V100 of the whole prostate, mid-gland, or base between dosimetric methods (p > 0.19), but prostate apex D90 was high by 13% with MRI dosimetry (p = 0.034). The average distance between seeds on CT-MRI fusion and MRI alone was 5.5 mm. After additional automated rigid registration of 3D seed positions, the average distance between seeds was 0.3 mm, and the previously observed differences in apex dose between methods was eliminated (p > 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry based only on MRI using positive contrast MRI markers is feasible, accurate, and reduces the uncertainties arising from CT-MRI fusion abating the need for postimplant multimodality imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging basics for the prostate brachytherapist

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in radiation therapy, and integration of MRI into brachytherapy in particular is becoming more common. We present here a systematic review of the basic physics and technical aspects of incorporating MRI into prostate brachytherapy. Terminology and MRI system components are reviewed along with typical work flows in prostate high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy. In general, the brachytherapy workflow consists of five key components: diagnosis, implantation, treatment planning (scan + plan), implant verification, and delivery. MRI integration is discussed for diagnosis; treatment planning; and MRI-guided brachytherapy implants, in which MRI is used to guide the physical insertion of the brachytherapy applicator or needles. Considerations and challenges for establishing an MRI brachytherapy program are also discussed.