Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system

Self-supervised denoising of projection data for low-dose cone-beam CT

BACKGROUND

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promising results in image denoising tasks. While most existing CNN-based methods depend on supervised learning by directly mapping noisy inputs to clean targets, high-quality references are often unavailable for interventional radiology such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

PURPOSE

In this paper, we propose a novel self-supervised learning method that reduces noise in projections acquired by ordinary CBCT scans.

METHODS

With a network that partially blinds input, we are able to train the denoising model by mapping the partially blinded projections to the original projections. Additionally, we incorporate noise-to-noise learning into the self-supervised learning by mapping the adjacent projections to the original projections. With standard image reconstruction methods such as FDK-type algorithms, we can reconstruct high-quality CBCT images from the projections denoised by our projection-domain denoising method.

RESULTS

In the head phantom study, we measure peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) values of the proposed method along with the other denoising methods and uncorrected low-dose CBCT data for a quantitative comparison both in projection and image domains. The PSNR and SSIM values of our self-supervised denoising approach are 27.08 and 0.839, whereas those of uncorrected CBCT images are 15.68 and 0.103, respectively. In the retrospective study, we assess the quality of interventional patient CBCT images to evaluate the projection-domain and image-domain denoising methods. Both qualitative and quantitative results indicate that our approach can effectively produce high-quality CBCT images with low-dose projections in the absence of duplicate clean or noisy references.

CONCLUSIONS

Our self-supervised learning strategy is capable of restoring anatomical information while efficiently removing noise in CBCT projection data.

Dose estimation for cone-beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy using mesh-type reference computational phantoms and assuming head and neck cancer

This study aimed to estimate the additional dose the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system integrated into the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator delivers to a patient with head and neck cancer using mesh-type International Commission on Radiological Protection reference computational phantoms. In the first part, for use as a benchmark for the accuracy of the Monte Carlo geometry of CBCT, Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) calculations were confirmed against measured lateral and depth dose profiles using a computed tomography dose profiler. After obtaining good agreement, organ dose calculations were performed by PHITS using mesh-type reference computational phantom (MRCP) and irradiating the neck region; the effective dose was calculated utilising absorbed organ doses and tissue weighting factors for male and female MRCP. Substantially, it has been found that the effective doses for male and female MRCP are 0.81 and 1.06 mSv, respectively. As this study aimed to assess the imaging dose from the CBCT system used in image-guided radiation therapy, it is required to take into account this dose in terms of both the target organ and surrounding tissues. Although the absorbed organ dose values and effective dose values obtained for both MRCP males and females were small, attention should be paid to the additional dose resulting from CBCT. This study can create awareness on the importance of doses arising from imaging techniques, especially CBCT.

A generalized image quality improvement strategy of cone-beam CT using multiple spectral CT labels in Pix2pix GAN

Objective. The quantitative and routine imaging capabilities of cone-beam CT (CBCT) are hindered from clinical applications due to the severe shading artifacts of scatter contamination. The scatter correction methods proposed in the literature only consider the anatomy of the scanned objects while disregarding the impact of incident x-ray energy spectra. The multiple-spectral model is in urgent need for CBCT scatter estimation. Approach. In this work, we incorporate the multiple spectral diagnostic multidetector CT labels into the pixel-to-pixel (Pix2pix) GAN to estimate accurate scatter distributions from CBCT projections acquired at various imaging volume sizes and x-ray energy spectra. The Pix2pix GAN combines the residual network as the generator and the PatchGAN as the discriminator to construct the correspondence between the scatter-contaminated projection and scatter distribution. The network architectures and loss function of Pix2pix GAN are optimized to achieve the best performance on projection-to-scatter transition. Results. The CBCT data of a head phantom and abdominal patients are applied to test the performance of the proposed method. The error of the corrected CBCT image using the proposed method is reduced from over 200 HU to be around 20 HU in both phantom and patient studies. The mean structural similarity index of the CT image is improved from 0.2 to around 0.9 after scatter correction using the proposed method compared with the MC-simulation method, which indicates a high similarity of the anatomy in the images before and after the proposed correction. The proposed method achieves higher accuracy of scatter estimation than using the Pix2pix GAN with the U-net generator. Significance. The proposed scheme is an effective solution to the multiple spectral CBCT scatter correction. The scatter-correction software using the proposed model will be available at: https://github.com/YangkangJiang/Cone-beam-CT-scatter-correction-tool.

On the improvement of CBCT image quality for soft tissue-based SRS localization

Purpose

We explore the optimal cone‐beam CT (CBCT) acquisition parameters to improve CBCT image quality to enhance intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) localization and also assess the imaging dose levels associated with each imaging protocol.

Methods

Twenty‐six CBCT acquisition protocols were generated on an Edge^® linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with different x‐ray tube current and potential settings, gantry rotation trajectories, and gantry rotation speeds. To assess image quality, images of the Catphan 504 phantom were analyzed to evaluate the following image quality metrics: uniformity, HU constancy, spatial resolution, low contrast detection, noise level, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR). To evaluate the imaging dose for each protocol, the cone‐beam dose index (CBDI) was measured. To validate the phantom results, further analysis was performed with an anthropomorphic head phantom as well as image data acquired for a clinical SRS patient.

Results

The Catphan data indicates that adjusting acquisition parameters had direct effects on the image noise level, low contrast detection, and CNR, but had minimal effects on uniformity, HU constancy, and spatial resolution. The noise level was reduced from 34.5 ± 0.3 to 18.5 ± 0.2 HU with a four‐fold reduction in gantry speed, and to 18.7 ± 0.2 HU with a four‐fold increase in tube current. Overall, the noise level was found to be proportional to inverse square root of imaging dose, and imaging dose was proportional to the product of total tube current‐time product and the cube of the x‐ray potential. Analysis of the anthropomorphic head phantom data and clinical SRS imaging data also indicates that noise is reduced with imaging dose increase.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that optimization of the imaging protocol, and thereby an increase in the imaging dose, is warranted for improved soft‐tissue visualization for intracranial SRS.

Neutron track length estimator for GATE Monte Carlo dose calculation in radiotherapy

The out-of-field dose in radiation therapy is a growing concern in regards to the late side-effects and secondary cancer induction. In high-energy x-ray therapy, the secondary neutrons generated through photonuclear reactions in the accelerator are part of this secondary dose. The neutron dose is currently not estimated by the treatment planning system while it appears to be preponderant for distances greater than 50 cm from the isocenter. Monte Carlo simulation has become the gold standard for accurately calculating the neutron dose under specific treatment conditions but the method is also known for having a slow statistical convergence, which makes it difficult to be used on a clinical basis. The neutron track length estimator, a neutron variance reduction technique inspired by the track length estimator method has thus been developped for the first time in the Monte Carlo code GATE to allow a fast computation of the neutron dose in radiotherapy. The details of its implementation, as well as the comparison of its performances against the analog MC method, are presented here. A gain of time from 15 to 400 can be obtained by our method, with a mean difference in the dose calculation of about 1% in comparison with the analog MC method.

Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180

BACKGROUND

With radiotherapy having entered the era of image guidance, or image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), imaging procedures are routinely performed for patient positioning and target localization. The imaging dose delivered may result in excessive dose to sensitive organs and potentially increase the chance of secondary cancers and, therefore, needs to be managed.

AIMS

This task group was charged with: a) providing an overview on imaging dose, including megavoltage electronic portal imaging (MV EPI), kilovoltage digital radiography (kV DR), Tomotherapy MV-CT, megavoltage cone-beam CT (MV-CBCT) and kilovoltage cone-beam CT (kV-CBCT), and b) providing general guidelines for commissioning dose calculation methods and managing imaging dose to patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We briefly review the dose to radiotherapy (RT) patients resulting from different image guidance procedures and list typical organ doses resulting from MV and kV image acquisition procedures.

RESULTS

We provide recommendations for managing the imaging dose, including different methods for its calculation, and techniques for reducing it. The recommended threshold beyond which imaging dose should be considered in the treatment planning process is 5% of the therapeutic target dose.

DISCUSSION

Although the imaging dose resulting from current kV acquisition procedures is generally below this threshold, the ALARA principle should always be applied in practice. Medical physicists should make radiation oncologists aware of the imaging doses delivered to patients under their care.

CONCLUSION

Balancing ALARA with the requirement for effective target localization requires that imaging dose be managed based on the consideration of weighing risks and benefits to the patient.

Evaluation of coefficients to derive organ and effective doses from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans: a Monte Carlo study

Regular imaging is used throughout image guided radiation therapy to improve treatment delivery. In order for treatment procedures to be optimized, the doses delivered by imaging exposures should be taken into account. CT dosimetry methods based on the CT dose index (CTDI), measured with a 100 mm long pencil ionization chamber (CTDI₁₀₀) in standard phantoms, are not designed for cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging systems used in radiotherapy, therefore a modified version has been proposed for CBCT by the International Electrotechnical Commission (CTDI_IEC). Monte Carlo simulations based on a Varian On-Board Imaging system were used to derive conversion coefficients that enable organ doses for ICRP reference phantoms to be determined from the CTDI_IEC for different scan protocols and different beam widths (80-320) mm. A dose-width product calculated by multiplying the CTDI_IEC by the width of the CBCT beam is proposed as a quantity that can be used for estimating effective dose. The variation in coefficients with CBCT beam width was studied. Coefficients to allow estimation of effective doses were derived, namely 0.0034 mSv (mGy cm)^-1 for the head, 0.0252 mSv (mGy cm)^-1 for the thorax, 0.0216 mSv (mGy cm)^-1 for the abdomen and 0.0150 mSv (mGy cm)^-1 for the pelvis, and these may be applicable more generally to other CBCT systems in radiotherapy. If data on effective doses are available, these can be used in making judgements on the contributions to patient dose from imaging, and thereby assist in optimization of the treatment regimes. The coefficients can also be employed in converting dosimetry data recorded in patient records into quantities relating directly to patient doses.

A Monte Carlo study of organ and effective doses of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in radiotherapy

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans utilised for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) procedures have become an essential part of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess organ and effective doses resulting from new CBCT scan protocols (head, thorax, and pelvis) released with a software upgrade of the kV on-board-imager (OBI) system. Organ and effective doses for protocols of the new software (V2.5) and a previous version (V1.6) were assessed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) adult male and female reference computational phantoms. The number of projections and the mAs values were increased and the size of the scan field was extended in the new protocols. Influence of these changes on organ and effective doses of the scans was investigated. The OBI system was modelled in EGSnrc/BEAMnrc, and organ doses were estimated using EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc. The MC model was benchmarked against experimental measurements. Organ doses resulting from the V2.5 protocols were higher than those of V1.6 for organs that were partially or fully inside the scans fields, and increased by (3-13)%, (10-77)%, and (13-21)% for the head, thorax, and pelvis protocols for both phantoms, respectively. As a result, effective doses rose by 14%, 17%, and 16% for the male phantom, and 13%, 18%, and 17% for the female phantom for the three scan protocols, respectively. The scan field extension for the V2.5 protocols contributed significantly in the dose increases, especially for organs that were partially irradiated such as the thyroid in head and thorax scans and colon in the pelvic scan. The contribution of the mAs values and projection numbers was minimal in the dose increases, up to 2.5%. The field size extension plays a major role in improving the treatment output by including more markers in the field of view to match between CBCT and CT images and hence setting up the patient precisely. Therefore, a trade-off between the risk and benefits of CBCT scans should be considered, and the dose increases should be monitored. Several recommendations have been made for optimisation of the patient dose involved for IGRT procedures.

Investigation of the radiation dose from cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy: A comparison of methodologies

Four methodologies were evaluated for quantifying kilovoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) dose: the Cone‐Beam Dose Index (CBDI), IAEA Report 5 recommended methodology (IAEA), the AAPM Task Group 111 methodology (TG111), and the current dose metric; the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) on two commercial Varian cone‐beam CT imaging systems; the Clinac iX On‐Board Imager (OBI); and the TrueBeam X‐ray Imaging system (XI). The TG111 methodology measured the highest overall dose (21.199 ± 0.035 mGy OBI and 22.420 ± 0.002 XI for pelvis imaging) due to the full scatter of the TG111 phantom and was within 5% of CTDI measurements taken using a full scatter TG111 phantom and 30‐cm film strips. CBDI measured the second highest overall dose, within 10% of the TG111, with IAEA measuring the third highest dose. For head CBCT protocols, CBDI measured the highest dose, followed by IAEA. The CTDI method measured lowest across all scan modes highlighting its limitations for CBCT dosimetry. The XI imaging system delivered lower doses for head and thorax scan modes and similar doses to the OBI system for pelvis scan modes due to additional beam hardening filtration in the XI system. The TG111 method measured the highest dose in the center of a CBCT scan during image guidance procedures; however, CBDI provided a good approximation to TG111 with existing CTDI equipment and may be more applicable clinically.

Comprehensive Monte Carlo study of patient doses from cone-beam CT imaging in radiotherapy

Accurate knowledge of ionizing radiation dose from cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging in radiotherapy is important to allow concomitant risks to be estimated and for justification of imaging exposures. This study uses a Monte Carlo CBCT model to calculate imaging dose for a wide range of imaging protocols for male and female patients. The Elekta XVI CBCT system was modeled using GATE and simulated doses were validated against measurements in a water tank and thorax phantom. Imaging dose was simulated in the male and female ICRP voxel phantoms for a variety of anatomical sites and imager settings (different collimators, filters, full and partial rotation). The resulting dose distributions were used to calculate effective doses for each scan protocol. The Monte Carlo simulated doses agree with validation measurements within 5% and 10% for water tank and thorax phantom respectively. Effective dose for head CBCT scans was generally lower for scans centred on the pituitary than the larynx (0.03 mSv versus 0.06 mSv for male ICRP phantom). Pelvis CBCT scan effective dose was higher for the female than male phantom (5.11 mSv versus 2.80 mSv for M15 collimator scan), principally due to the higher dose received by gonads for the female scan. Medium field of view thorax scan effective doses ranged from 1.38-3.19 mSv depending on scan length and phantom sex. Effective dose for half rotation thorax scans with offset isocentre varied by almost a factor of three depending on laterality of the isocentre, patient sex and imaged field length. The CBCT imaging doses simulated here reveal large variations in dose depending on imaging isocentre location, patient sex and partial rotation angles. This information may be used to estimate risks from CBCT and to optimize CBCT imaging protocols.

A comparison of interfraction setup error, patient comfort, and therapist acceptance for 2 different prostate radiation therapy immobilization devices

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to investigate interfraction setup error of the immobilization device required to implement transperineal ultrasound compared with the current, standard immobilization device. Patient comfort and radiation therapist (RT) satisfaction were also assessed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Cone beam computed tomography images were acquired before 4069 fractions from 111 patients (control group, n = 56; intervention group, n = 55) were analyzed. The intervention group was immobilized using the Clarity Immobilization System (CIS), comprising a knee rest with autoscan probe kit and transperineal ultrasound probe (n = 55), and control group using a leg immobilizer (LI) (n = 56). Interfraction setup errors were compared for both groups. Weekly questionnaires using a 10-point visual analog scale were administered to both patient groups to measure and compare patient comfort. RT acceptance for both devices was also compared using a survey.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the magnitude of interfraction cone beam computed tomography-derived setup shifts in the lateral and anteroposterior direction between the LI and CIS (P = .878 and .690, respectively). However, a significant difference (P = .003) was observed in the superoinferior direction between the 2 groups of patients. Patient-reported level of comfort and stability demonstrated no significant difference between groups (P = .994 and .132). RT user acceptance measures for the LI and CIS were ease of handling (100% vs 53.7%), storage (100% vs 61.1%), and cleaning of the devices (100% vs 64.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CIS demonstrated stability and reproducibility in prostate treatment setup comparable to LI. The CIS device had no impact on patient comfort; however, RTs indicated a preference for LI over the CIS mainly because of its weight and bulkiness.

Accuracy of automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in cone-beam computed tomography for tube current-exposure time product

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of automatic matching in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images relative to the reduction of total tube current-exposure time product (mAs) for the X-ray imaging (XI) system. The CBCT images were acquired with the Catphan 504 phantom various total mAs ratios such as 1.00, 0.83, 0.67, 0.57, and 0.50. For studying the automatic match-ing accuracy, the phantom images were acquired with a six-dimensional shifting table. The image quality and correction of automatic matching were compared. With a decreasing total mAs ratio, the noise of the images increased and the low-contrast resolution decreased, while the accuracy of the automatic matching did not change. Therefore, this study shows that a change of the total mAs while acquiring CBCT images has no effect on the automatic matching of Catphan 504 phantom in XI system.

A methodology for on-board CBCT imaging dose using optically stimulated luminescence detectors

Cone‐beam computed tomography CBCT systems are used in radiation therapy for patient alignment and positioning. The CBCT imaging procedure for patient setup adds substantial radiation dose to patient's normal tissue. This study presents a complete procedure for the CBCT dosimetry using the InLight optically‐stimulated‐luminescence (OSL) nanoDots. We report five dose parameters: the mean slice dose (DMSD); the cone beam dose index (CBDIW); the mean volume dose (DMVD); point‐dose profile, D(FOV); and the off‐field Dose. In addition, CBCT skin doses for seven pelvic tumor patients are reported. CBCT‐dose measurement was performed on a custom‐made cylindrical acrylic body phantom (50 cm length, 32 cm diameter). We machined 25 circular disks (2 cm thick) with grooves and holes to hold OSL‐nanoDots. OSLs that showed similar sensitivities were selected and calibrated against a Farmer‐type ionization‐chamber (0.6 CT) before being inserted into the grooves and holes. For the phantom scan, a standard CBCT‐imaging protocol (pelvic sites: 125 kVp, 80 mA and 25 ms) was used. Five dose parameters were quantified: DMSD, CBDIW, DMVD, D(FOV), and the off‐field dose. The DMSD for the central slice was 31.1±0.85 mGy, and CBDIW was 34.5±0.6 mGy at 16 cm FOV. The DMVD was 25.6±1.1 mGy. The off‐field dose was 10.5 mGy. For patients, the anterior and lateral skin doses attributable to CBCT imaging were 39.04±4.4 and 27.1±1.3 mGy, respectively.

OSL nanoDots were convenient to use in measuring CBCT dose. The method of selecting the nanoDots greatly reduced uncertainty in the OSL measurements. Our detailed calibration procedure and CBCT dose measurements and calculations could prove useful in developing OSL routines for CBCT quality assessment, which in turn gives them the property of high spatial resolution, meaning that they have the potential for measurement of dose in regions of severe dose‐gradients.

PACS number(s): 87.57.‐s, 87.57.Q, 87.57.uq

Experimental validation of a kV source model and dose computation method for CBCT imaging in an anthropomorphic phantom

We present an experimental validation of a kilovoltage (kV) X‐ray source characterization model in an anthropomorphic phantom to estimate patient‐specific absorbed dose from kV cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging procedures and compare these doses to nominal weighted CT‐dose index (CTDIw) dose estimates. We simulated the default Varian on‐board imager 1.4 (OBI) default CBCT imaging protocols (i.e., standard‐dose head, low‐dose thorax, pelvis, and pelvis spotlight) using our previously developed and easy to implement X‐ray point‐source model and source characterization approach. We used this characterized source model to compute absorbed dose in homogeneous and anthropomorphic phantoms using our previously validated in‐house kV dose computation software (kVDoseCalc). We compared these computed absorbed doses to doses derived from ionization chamber measurements acquired at several points in a homogeneous cylindrical phantom and from thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) placed in the anthropomorphic phantom. In the homogeneous cylindrical phantom, computed values of absorbed dose relative to the center of the phantom agreed with measured values within ≤2% of local dose, except in regions of high‐dose gradient where the distance to agreement (DTA) was 2 mm. The computed absorbed dose in the anthropomorphic phantom generally agreed with TLD measurements, with an average percent dose difference ranging from 2.4%±6.0% to 5.7%±10.3%, depending on the characterized CBCT imaging protocol. The low‐dose thorax and the standard dose scans showed the best and worst agreement, respectively. Our results also broadly agree with published values, which are approximately twice as high as the nominal CTDIw would suggest. The results demonstrate that our previously developed method for modeling and characterizing a kV X‐ray source could be used to accurately assess patient‐specific absorbed dose from kV CBCT procedures within reasonable accuracy, and serve as further evidence that existing CTDIw assessments underestimate absorbed dose delivered to patients.

PACS number(s): 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.uq, 87.10.Rt

CAN AN ENERGY-COMPENSATED SOLID-STATE X-RAY DETECTOR BE USED FOR RADIATION PROTECTION APPLICATIONS AT HIGHER PHOTON ENERGIES?

The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics of a solid-state detector commonly available at hospitals for parallel use as a real-time personal radiation monitor following radiation emergency situations. A solid-state detector probe with an inherent filtration (R100, RTI Electronics AB, Mölndal, Sweden) was chosen for evaluation. The energy dependence and the linearity in signal response with kerma in air were examined, and the detector was exposed to both X-ray beams using a conventional X-ray unit with effective photon energies ranging between 28.5 and 48.9 keV and to gamma rays 1.17 and 1.33 MeV from (60)Co. The R100 exhibited ∼1.7 times over-response at the lowest X-ray energy relative to the (60)Co source. The detector demonstrated a linear response (R(2) = 1) when irradiated with (60)Co to air kerma values in the range of 20-200 mGy. The conclusion is that high-energy photons such as those from (60)Co can be detected by the R100 with an energy response within a factor of <2 over the energy range examined and that the detector can provide real-time dose measurements following nuclear or radiological events.

GPU-accelerated regularized iterative reconstruction for few-view cone beam CT

PURPOSE

The present work proposes an iterative reconstruction technique designed for x-ray transmission computed tomography (CT). The main objective is to provide a model-based solution to the cone-beam CT reconstruction problem, yielding accurate low-dose images via few-views acquisitions in clinically acceptable time frames.

METHODS

The proposed technique combines a modified ordered subsets convex (OSC) algorithm and the total variation minimization (TV) regularization technique and is called OSC-TV. The number of subsets of each OSC iteration follows a reduction pattern in order to ensure the best performance of the regularization method. Considering the high computational cost of the algorithm, it is implemented on a graphics processing unit, using parallelization to accelerate computations.

RESULTS

The reconstructions were performed on computer-simulated as well as human pelvic cone-beam CT projection data and image quality was assessed. In terms of convergence and image quality, OSC-TV performs well in reconstruction of low-dose cone-beam CT data obtained via a few-view acquisition protocol. It compares favorably to the few-view TV-regularized projections onto convex sets (POCS-TV) algorithm. It also appears to be a viable alternative to full-dataset filtered backprojection. Execution times are of 1-2 min and are compatible with the typical clinical workflow for nonreal-time applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the image quality and execution times, this method may be useful for reconstruction of low-dose clinical acquisitions. It may be of particular benefit to patients who undergo multiple acquisitions by reducing the overall imaging radiation dose and associated risks.

Evaluation of lens absorbed dose with Cone Beam IGRT procedures

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the absorbed dose to the eye lenses due to the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system used to accurately position the patient during head-and-neck image guided procedures. The on-board imaging (OBI) systems (v.1.5) of Clinac iX and TrueBeam (Varian) accelerators were used to evaluate the imparted dose to the eye lenses and some additional points of the head. All CBCT scans were acquired with the Standard-Dose Head protocol from Varian. Doses were measured using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) placed in an anthropomorphic phantom. TLDs were calibrated at the beam quality used to reduce their energy dependence. Average dose to the lens due to the OBI systems of the Clinac iX and the TrueBeam were 0.71  ±  0.07 mGy/CBCT and 0.70  ±  0.08 mGy/CBCT, respectively. The extra absorbed dose received by the eye lenses due to one CBCT acquisition with the studied protocol is far below the 500 mGy threshold established by ICRP for cataract formation (ICRP 2011 Statement on Tissue Reactions). However, the incremental effect of several CBCT acquisitions during the whole treatment should be taken into account.

Assessment of testicular dose during preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer can have adverse effects on testicular function resulting in azoospermia and low testosterone levels. Variability of testicular dose (TD) due to differences in position of testes has been assessed with scrotal dosimeters and resulted in substantial variability of delivered TD. The aim of this study was to estimate planned and delivered TD using a treatment planning system (TPS).

METHODS

In 101 men treated with RT for rectal cancer the cumulative mean TD (mTD) was calculated by TPS based on plan-computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the effect of different predictors on planned TD. The delivered TD was estimated by TPS based on repeated cone-beam CTs in 32 of 101 men to assess within-person variability of planned and delivered TD in a longitudinal analysis.

RESULTS

The median planned mTD for short course RT was 0.57 Gy (range 0.06-14.37 Gy) and 0.81 Gy (range 0.36-10.80 Gy) for long course RT. The median planned mTD was similar to the median delivered mTD in the 32 men analysed over the entire course of RT (p=0.84). The mTD did not change significantly over time of planning and delivering RT. The variation in proximity between testes and planning target volume (PTV) was related to within-person variability of mTD in men on the 50th and 75th percentile of mTD and as expected the absolute difference between planned and delivered mTD increased with higher mTD.

CONCLUSION

Testicular doses calculated based on plan-CT are an accurate estimation of delivered TD based on repeated cone beam (CB)CT. The within-person variability of TD is related to variation in proximity between testes and PTV in men with moderate to high TD.

Imaging dose from cone beam computed tomography in radiation therapy

Imaging dose in radiation therapy has traditionally been ignored due to its low magnitude and frequency in comparison to therapeutic dose used to treat patients. The advent of modern, volumetric, imaging modalities, often as an integral part of linear accelerators, has facilitated the implementation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), which is often accomplished by daily imaging of patients. Daily imaging results in additional dose delivered to patient that warrants new attention be given to imaging dose. This review summarizes the imaging dose delivered to patients as the result of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging performed in radiation therapy using current methods and equipment. This review also summarizes methods to calculate the imaging dose, including the use of Monte Carlo (MC) and treatment planning systems (TPS). Peripheral dose from CBCT imaging, dose reduction methods, the use of effective dose in describing imaging dose, and the measurement of CT dose index (CTDI) in CBCT systems are also reviewed.

Concomitant Imaging Dose and Cancer Risk in Image Guided Thoracic Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (CT) (kVCBCT) imaging guidance improves the accuracy of radiation therapy but imposes an extra radiation dose to cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate concomitant imaging dose and associated cancer risk in image guided thoracic radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The planning CT images and structure sets of 72 patients were converted to CT phantoms whose chest circumferences (Cchest) were calculated retrospectively. A low-dose thorax protocol on a Varian kVCBCT scanner was simulated by a validated Monte Carlo code. Computed doses to organs and cardiac substructures (for 5 selected patients of various dimensions) were regressed as empirical functions of Cchest, and associated cancer risk was calculated using the published models. The exposures to nonthoracic organs in children were also investigated.

RESULTS

The structural mean doses decreased monotonically with increasing Cchest. For all 72 patients, the median doses to the heart, spinal cord, breasts, lungs, and involved chest were 1.68, 1.33, 1.64, 1.62, and 1.58 cGy/scan, respectively. Nonthoracic organs in children received 0.6 to 2.8 cGy/scan if they were directly irradiated. The mean doses to the descending aorta (1.43 ± 0.68 cGy), left atrium (1.55 ± 0.75 cGy), left ventricle (1.68 ± 0.81 cGy), and right ventricle (1.85 ± 0.84 cGy) were significantly different (P<.05) from the heart mean dose (1.73 ± 0.82 cGy). The blade shielding alleviated the exposure to nonthoracic organs in children by an order of magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

As functions of patient size, a series of models for personalized estimation of kVCBCT doses to thoracic organs and cardiac substructures have been proposed. Pediatric patients received much higher doses than did the adults, and some nonthoracic organs could be irradiated unexpectedly by the default scanning protocol. Increased cancer risks and disease adverse events in the thorax were strongly related to higher imaging doses and smaller chest dimensions.

Radiation burden from secondary doses to patients undergoing radiation therapy with photons and light ions and radiation doses from imaging modalities

Ionising radiation is increasingly used for the treatment of cancer, being the source of a considerable fraction of the medical irradiation to patients. With the increasing success rate of cancer treatments and longer life expectancy of the treated patients, the issue of secondary cancer incidence is of growing concern, especially for paediatric patients who may live long after the treatment and be more susceptible to carcinogenesis. Also, additional imaging procedures like computed tomography, kilovoltage and megavoltage imaging and positron emission tomography, alone or in conjunction with radiation therapy, may add to the radiation burden associated with the risk of occurrence of secondary cancers. This work has been based on literature studies and is focussed on the assessment of secondary doses to healthy tissues that are delivered by the use of modern radiation therapy and diagnostic imaging modalities in the clinical environment.

Measurement of radiotherapy CBCT dose in a phantom using different methods

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used widely for the precise and accurate patient set up needed during radiation therapy, notably for hypo fractionated treatments, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic radiation therapy. Reported doses associated with CBCT indicate the potential to approach radiation tolerance levels for some critical organs. However while some manufacturers state the CBCT dose for each standard protocol, currently there are no standard or recognised protocols for CBCT dosimetry. This study has applied wide beam computed tomography dosimetry approaches as reported by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate dosimetry for the Varian Trilogy linear accelerator with on-board imager v1.5. Three detection methods were used including (i) the use of both 100 mm and 300 mm pencil ionisation chambers, (ii) a 0.6 cm(3) ionisation chamber and (iii) gafchromic film. Measurements were performed using custom built 45 cm long PMMA phantoms as well as standard 15 cm long phantoms for both head and body simulation. The results showed good agreement between each other detector system (within 3 %). The measured CBCT dose for the above methods showed a large difference to the dose stated by Varian, with the measured dose being 40 % over the stated dose for the standard head protocol. This shows the importance of independently verifying the stated dose given by the vendor for standard procedures.

Evaluation of gantry rotation overrun in axial CT scanning

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a simple method to assess gantry rotation overrun in a single axial CT scanning. The exposure time in the axial scanning was measured at selected nominal rotation times (400, 700, and 1000 ms) using a solid‐state detector, the RTI's CT dose profiler (CTDP). CTDP was placed at the isocenter and the radiation dose rate signal (profile) was recorded. Subsequently, the full width of this profile was determined as the exposure time (Taxial). Next, CTDP was positioned on the inner cover of the gantry with a sheet of lead (1 mm thick) placed on top of the detector. Gantry rotation time (Thelical) was determined by the time between two successive radiation peaks during continuous helical scanning. The gantry overrun time (Toverrun) is, thus, determined as Taxial‐Thelical. The exposure times in the axial scanning, Taxial, obtained with CTDP for nominal rotation times of 400, 700, and 1000 ms were 409.5, 709.6, and 1008.7 ms, respectively. On the other hand, the measured gantry rotation times, Thelical, were 400.0, 700.3, and 999.8 ms, respectively. Therefore, the overruns were 9.5, 9.3, and 8.9 ms for nominal rotation times of 400, 700, and 1000 ms, respectively. The evaluation of overrun in axial scanning can be accomplished with the measurements of both the exposure time in axial scanning and the gantry rotation time. It is also noteworthy that in this context, overrun implies overexposure in axial scanning, which is still used, particularly, in head CT examination.

PACS number: 87.57.Q‐

Are IMRT treatments in the head and neck region increasing the risk of secondary cancers?

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been increasingly employed for treating head and neck (H&N) tumours due to its ability to produce isodoses suitable for the complex anatomy of the region. The aim of this study was to assess possible differences between IMRT and conformal radiation therapy (CRT) with regard to risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies for H&N tumours.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

IMRT and CRT plans were made for 10 H&N adult patients and the resulting treatment planning data were used to calculate the risk of radiation-induced malignancies in four different tissues. Three risk models with biologically relevant parameters were used for calculations. The influence of scatter radiation and repeated imaging sessions has also been investigated.

RESULTS

The results showed that the total lifetime risks of developing radiation-induced secondary malignancies from the two treatment techniques, CRT and IMRT, were comparable and in the interval 0.9-2.5%. The risk contributions from the primary beam and scatter radiation were comparable, whereas the contribution from repeated diagnostic imaging was considerably smaller.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the redistribution of the dose characteristic to IMRT leads to a redistribution of the risks in individual tissues. However, the total levels of risk were similar between the two irradiation techniques considered.

Volumetric and Dosimetric Assessment by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans in Head and Neck Radiation Therapy: A Monitoring in Four Phases of Treatment

Due to the anatomical changes frequently occurring during the course of head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy, the dose distribution, which was actually delivered to the patient, might significantly differ from that planned. The aim of this paper is to investigate these volumetric changes and the resulting dosimetric implications on organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans throughout the treatment. Ten H&N patients, treated by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, were analyzed. CTVs and OARs were delineated on four CBCT, acquired at the 10th, 15th, 20th and 25th treatment session, and then compared with the ones at planning CT. The planned beams were applied to each CBCT to recalculate the dose distribution and the corresponding dose volume histograms were compared with those generated on planning CT. To evaluate the HU discrepancies between the conventional CT and CBCT images we used a Catphan® 504, observing a maximum discrepancy of about 30 HU. We evaluated the impact of this HU difference in dose calculation and a not clinically relevant error, within 2.8%, was estimated. No inhomogeneity correction was used. The results showed an increased CTV mean dose (Dmean) of about 3% was found, without significant reduction in volume. Due to the parotids' shrinkage (up to 42%), significant dosimetric increases were observed: ipsilateral gland at 15th CBCT (Dmean by 18%; V30 by 31%); controlateral gland at the 10th CBCT (Dmean by 12.2%; V30 by 18.7%). For the larynx, a significant increase of volume was found at the 20th (15.7%) and 25th CBCT (13.3%) but it complied with dose constraint. The differences observed for the spinal cord and mandible maximum doses were not clinically relevant. In conclusion, the dosimetric analysis on CBCT can help clinicians to monitor treatment progress and to evaluate whether and when a new plan is necessary. The main benefit of replanning could be to preserve the parotids and our data support the hypothesis that the 3rd week of radiotherapy should be a check point for parotids.

Evaluation of radiation dose to organs during kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography using Monte Carlo simulation

Image-guided techniques for radiation therapy have improved the precision of radiation delivery by sparing normal tissues. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a key technique for patient positioning and target localization in radiotherapy. Here, we investigated the imaging radiation dose delivered to radiosensitive organs of a patient during CBCT scan. The 4D extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom and Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool were used for the study. A computed tomography dose index (CTDI) standard polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom was used to validate the MC-based dosimetric evaluation. We implemented an MC model of a clinical on-board imager integrated with the Trilogy accelerator. The MC model's accuracy was validated by comparing its weighted CTDI (CTDIw) values with those of previous studies, which revealed good agreement. We calculated the absorbed doses of various human organs at different treatment sites such as the head-and-neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis regions, in both standard CBCT scan mode (125 kVp, 80 mA, and 25 ms) and low-dose scan mode (125 kVp, 40 mA, and 10 ms). In the former mode, the average absorbed doses of the organs in the head and neck and chest regions ranged 4.09-8.28 cGy, whereas those of the organs in the abdomen and pelvis regions were 4.30-7.48 cGy. In the latter mode, the absorbed doses of the organs in the head and neck and chest regions ranged 1.61-1.89 cGy, whereas those of the organs in the abdomen and pelvis region ranged between 0.79-1.85 cGy. The reduction in the radiation dose in the low-dose mode compared to the standard mode was about 20%, which is in good agreement with previous reports. We opine that the findings of this study would significantly facilitate decisions regarding the administration of extra imaging doses to radiosensitive organs.

Comprehensive evaluations of cone-beam CT dose in image-guided radiation therapy via GPU-based Monte Carlo simulations

Cone beam CT (CBCT) has been widely used for patient setup in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Radiation dose from CBCT scans has become a clinical concern. The purposes of this study are (1) to commission a graphics processing unit (GPU)-based Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation package gCTD for Varian On-Board Imaging (OBI) system and test the calculation accuracy, and (2) to quantitatively evaluate CBCT dose from the OBI system in typical IGRT scan protocols. We first conducted dose measurements in a water phantom. X-ray source model parameters used in gCTD are obtained through a commissioning process. gCTD accuracy is demonstrated by comparing calculations with measurements in water and in CTDI phantoms. Twenty-five brain cancer patients are used to study dose in a standard-dose head protocol, and 25 prostate cancer patients are used to study dose in pelvis protocol and pelvis spotlight protocol. Mean dose to each organ is calculated. Mean dose to 2% voxels that have the highest dose is also computed to quantify the maximum dose. It is found that the mean dose value to an organ varies largely among patients. Moreover, dose distribution is highly non-homogeneous inside an organ. The maximum dose is found to be 1-3 times higher than the mean dose depending on the organ, and is up to eight times higher for the entire body due to the very high dose region in bony structures. High computational efficiency has also been observed in our studies, such that MC dose calculation time is less than 5 min for a typical case.

Comparative dose evaluations between XVI and OBI cone beam CT systems using Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of energy (kVp) and filters (no filter, half Bowtie, and full Bowtie) on the dose response curves of the Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) in CBCT dose fields. To measure surface and internal doses received during x-ray volume imager (XVI) (Version R4.5) and on board imager (OBI) (Version 1.5) CBCT imaging protocols using these two types of dosimeters.

METHODS

Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot OSLD dose response curves were generated at different kV imaging settings used by XVI (software version R4.5) and OBI (software version 1.5) CBCT systems. The settings for the XVI system were: 100 kVp∕F0 (no filter), 120 kVp∕F0, and 120 kVp∕F1 (Bowtie filter), and for the OBI system were: 100 kVp∕full fan, 125 kVp∕full fan, and 125 kVp∕half fan. XRQA2 film was calibrated in air to air kerma levels between 0 and 11 cGy and scanned using reflection scanning mode with the Epson Expression 10000 XL flat-bed document scanner. NanoDot OSLDs were calibrated on phantom to surface dose levels between 0 and 14 cGy and read using the inLight(TM) MicroStar reader. Both dosimeters were used to measure in field surface and internal doses in a male Alderson Rando Phantom.

RESULTS

Dose response curves of XRQA2 film and nanoDot OSLDs at different XVI and OBI CBCT settings were reported. For XVI system, the surface dose ranged between 0.02 cGy in head region during fast head and neck scan and 4.99 cGy in the chest region during symmetry scan. On the other hand, the internal dose ranged between 0.02 cGy in the head region during fast head and neck scan and 3.17 cGy in the chest region during chest M20 scan. The average (internal and external) dose ranged between 0.05 cGy in the head region during fast head and neck scan and 2.41 cGy in the chest region during chest M20 scan. For OBI system, the surface dose ranged between 0.19 cGy in head region during head scan and 4.55 cGy in the pelvis region during spot light scan. However, the internal dose ranged between 0.47 cGy in the head region during head scan and 5.55 cGy in the pelvis region during spot light scan. The average (internal and external) dose ranged between 0.45 cGy in the head region during head scan and 3.59 cGy in the pelvis region during spot light scan. Both Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot OSLDs gave close estimation of dose (within uncertainties) in many cases. Though, discrepancies of up to 20%-30% were observed in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose response curves of Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot OSLDs indicated that the dose responses of these two dosimeters were different even at the same photon energy when different filters were used. Uncertainty levels of both dosimetry systems were below 6% at doses above 1 cGy. Both dosimetry systems gave almost similar estimation of doses (within uncertainties) in many cases, with exceptions of some cases when the discrepancy was around 20%-30%. New versions of the CBCT systems (investigated in this study) resulted in lower imaging doses compared with doses reported on earlier versions in previous studies.

Measurement of gantry rotation time in modern ct

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a noninvasive method to assess rotation time in modern commercial computed tomography (CT) systems. The rotation time was measured at a selected nominal rotation time (400 ms) utilizing two types of solid‐state detectors: the RTI's CT Dose Profiler (CTDP) and Unfors’ Xi (Xi) probes. Either CTDP or Xi was positioned on the inner cover of the gantry and a sheet of lead (1 mm thick) placed on top of the detector. Since a pair of two successive peaks is used to determine the gantry rotation time, by necessity the helical scan must be employed. Upon completion of the data acquisition, these peak times were determined with the dedicated software to obtain rotation time. The average rotation time obtained with CTDP and Xi operated under the dedicated software was found to be 400.6 and 400.5 ms, respectively. The detector for this measurement need not be specifically designed for CT dosimetry. The measurements of CT scanner rotation time can be accomplished with a radiation probe designed for the CT application or a conventional radiation probe designed for radiography and fluoroscopy applications. It is also noteworthy to point out that the measurement results are in good agreement between the two radiation detector systems. Finally, clinical medical physicists should be aware of the accuracy and precision of gantry rotation time, and take into consideration for QA where and when applicable.

PACS number: 87.57.Q‐

Radiation exposure to patients from image guidance procedures and techniques to reduce the imaging dose

PURPOSE

To compare imaging doses from MV images, kV radiographs, and kV-CBCT and describe methods to reduce the dose to patient's organs using existing on-board imaging devices.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Monte Carlo techniques were used to simulate kV X-ray sources. The kV image doses to a variety of patient anatomies were calculated by using the simulated realistic sources to deposit dose in patient CT images. For MV imaging, the doses for the same patients were calculated using a commercial treatment planning system.

RESULTS

Portal imaging results in the largest dose to anatomic structures, followed by Varian OBI CBCT, Varian TrueBeam CBCT and then kV radiographs. The imaging doses for the 50% volume from the DVHs, D50, to the eyes for representative head images are 4.3-4.8cGy; 0.05-0.06cGy; 0.04-0.05cGy; and, 0.12cGy; D50 to the bladder for representative pelvis images are 3.3cGy; 1.6cGy; 1.0cGy; and, 0.07cGy; while D50 to the heart for representative thorax images are 3.5cGy; 0.42cGy; 0.2cGy; and, 0.07cGy; when using portal imaging, OBI kV-CBCT scans, TrueBeam kV-CBCT scans and kV radiographs, respectively. The orientation of the kV beam can affect organ dose. For example, D50 to the eyes can be reduced from 0.12cGy using AP and right lateral radiographs to 0.008-0.017cGy when using PA and right lateral radiographs. In addition, organ exposures can be further reduced to 15-70% of their original values with the use of a full-fan, bow-tie filter for kV radiographs. In contrast, organ doses increase by a factor of ∼2-4 if bow-tie filters are not used during kV-CBCT acquisitions.

CONCLUSION

Current on-board kV imaging devices result in much lower imaging doses compared to MV imagers even taking into account of higher bone dose from kV X-rays. And a variety of approaches are available to significantly reduce the image doses.

Imaging doses and secondary cancer risk from kilovoltage cone-beam CT in radiation therapy

The authors assessed the radiation-induced cancer risk due to organ doses from kilovoltage (kV) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), a verification technique in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). CBCTs were performed for three different treatment sites: the head and neck, chest, and pelvis. Using a glass dosimeter, primary doses versus depth were measured inside a homemade phantom, and organ doses were measured at various locations inside an anthropomorphic phantom. The excess relative risk (ERR), excess absolute risk (EAR), and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for cancer induction were estimated using the BEIR VII models based on dose measurement. The average primary (i.e., in-field) doses at the center of the phantom for standard imaging options were 1.9, 5.1, and 16.7 cGy for the head and neck, chest, and pelvis, respectively. The average secondary dose per scan for the pelvis measured 20-50 cm from the isocenter and ranged from 0.67-0.02 cGy, whereas the secondary dose per scan for the head and neck ranged from 0.07-0.003 cGy, indicating that CBCT for treatment of the head and neck is associated with a smaller secondary radiation dose than CBCT for treatment of the pelvis. The estimation of LAR from CBCT in IGRT indicated that the lifetime cancer risk for major organs can reach approximately 400 per 10,000 persons if 30 CBCT scans are performed to position a patient during radiation treatment of the pelvis site.

A simplified approach to characterizing a kilovoltage source spectrum for accurate dose computation

PURPOSE

To investigate and validate the clinical feasibility of using half-value layer (HVL) and peak tube potential (kVp) for characterizing a kilovoltage (kV) source spectrum for the purpose of computing kV x-ray dose accrued from imaging procedures. To use this approach to characterize a Varian® On-Board Imager® (OBI) source and perform experimental validation of a novel in-house hybrid dose computation algorithm for kV x-rays.

METHODS

We characterized the spectrum of an imaging kV x-ray source using the HVL and the kVp as the sole beam quality identifiers using third-party freeware Spektr to generate the spectra. We studied the sensitivity of our dose computation algorithm to uncertainties in the beam's HVL and kVp by systematically varying these spectral parameters. To validate our approach experimentally, we characterized the spectrum of a Varian® OBI system by measuring the HVL using a Farmer-type Capintec ion chamber (0.06 cc) in air and compared dose calculations using our computationally validated in-house kV dose calculation code to measured percent depth-dose and transverse dose profiles for 80, 100, and 125 kVp open beams in a homogeneous phantom and a heterogeneous phantom comprising tissue, lung, and bone equivalent materials.

RESULTS

The sensitivity analysis of the beam quality parameters (i.e., HVL, kVp, and field size) on dose computation accuracy shows that typical measurement uncertainties in the HVL and kVp (±0.2 mm Al and ±2 kVp, respectively) source characterization parameters lead to dose computation errors of less than 2%. Furthermore, for an open beam with no added filtration, HVL variations affect dose computation accuracy by less than 1% for a 125 kVp beam when field size is varied from 5 × 5 cm(2) to 40 × 40 cm(2). The central axis depth dose calculations and experimental measurements for the 80, 100, and 125 kVp energies agreed within 2% for the homogeneous and heterogeneous block phantoms, and agreement for the transverse dose profiles was within 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The HVL and kVp are sufficient for characterizing a kV x-ray source spectrum for accurate dose computation. As these parameters can be easily and accurately measured, they provide for a clinically feasible approach to characterizing a kV energy spectrum to be used for patient specific x-ray dose computations. Furthermore, these results provide experimental validation of our novel hybrid dose computation algorithm.