Carbon fiber couches and skin sparing

Effects of Siemens TT-D carbon fiber table top on beam attenuation, and build up region of 6 MV photon beam

AIM

This study deals with Monte Carlo simulations of the effects which the 550 TXT carbon fiber couch can have on the relevant parameters of a 6 MV clinical photon beam in three field sizes.

BACKGROUND

According to the reports issued by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), the calculated dose across a high gradient distribution should be within 2% of the relative dose, or within 0.2 cm of the isodose curve position in the target volume. Nowadays, the use of posterior oblique beam has become a common practice. It is clear that, in radiotherapy, the presence of the couch affects the beam intensity and, as a result, the skin dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Firstly, Siemens linear accelerator validation for 6 MV photon beam was performed, and satisfactory agreement between Monte Carlo and experimental data for various field sizes was observed. Secondly, the couch transmission factor for the reference field size and depth was computed, and the skin dose enhancement by the couch was assessed.

RESULTS

The largest impact of the carbon fiber couch effect was observed for the 5 × 5 cm2 field size. Such evaluation has not been reported for this couch before.

CONCLUSION

Despite providing minimal attenuation for the primary radiation, the assumption that carbon fiber couches are radiotranslucent is not valid, and the effects of couches of this type on the transmission factor, and on the skin dose should be carefully investigated for each field size and depth.

Depth dose comparison of measured and calculated dose for the Eclipse virtual carbon couch top models with air gap variation

This study assessed the accuracy of Eclipse™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) treatment planning system (TPS) dose calculations when using virtual couch top models to account for couch presence in patient treatments. The Flat panel and Unipanel couch tops for the Varian Exact Couch were used in this study. Assigned Hounsfield unit (HU) for the virtual couch tops were varied and TPS calculated dose was compared to measured data to determine an optimal assigned HU. Air gaps of up to 10 cm were introduced between couch and phantom to assess the ability of the models to replicate dose in this situation, commonly seen clinically. Dose was measured at a range of depths, for each air gap thickness, in order to assess the model both near surface and at various depths beyond the dose maximum. Optimal HU was taken to be that which had the best agreement between measured and calculated dose over the range of gaps and depths tested. For the Flat panel couch top this was found to be -500 HU and for the Unipanel couch top, -200 HU. Default HU parameters originally set in the models was found to be not optimal for the whole range of depths studied. With optimal HU parameters set, there was good agreement between calculated and measured dose for depths greater than 0.5 cm, but discrepancies were still observed near surface. When implementing virtual couch top models, users could improve dose calculation accuracy by determining the optimal HU from comparisons over several clinical depths rather than a single depth.