Evaluating and modeling of photon beam attenuation by a standard treatment couch

Verification of Qfix Encompass™ couch modeling using the Acuros XB algorithm and HypeArc™ using a high-spatial-resolution two-dimensional diode array

We modeled the Qfix Encompass™ immobilization system and further verified the calculated dose distribution of the AcurosXB (AXB) dose calculation algorithm using SRS MapCHECKⓇ (SRSMC) in the HyperArc™ (HA) clinical plan. An Encompass system with a StereoPHAN™ QA phantom was scanned by SOMATOM go.Sim and imported to an Eclipse™ treatment planning system to create a treatment plan for Encompass modeling. The Encompass modeling was performed in the StereoPHAN with a pinpoint ion chamber for 6 MV and 6 MV flattening filter free (6 MV FFF), and 2 × 2 cm2, 4 × 4 cm2, and 6 × 6 cm2 irradiation field sizes. The dose calculation algorithm used was AXB ver. 15.5 with a 1.0 mm calculation grid size. The Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the Encompass modeling were set to 400, -100, -200, and -300 for Encompass, and -400, -600, -700, and -800 for the Encompass base. We evaluated the dose distribution after Encompass modeling by SRSMC using gamma analysis in 12 patients. We adopted HU values of -200 for Encompass, -800 for Encompass base for 6 MV, and -200 for Encompass and -700 for Encompass. Base for 6 MV FFF was adopted as the HU values for the Encompass modeling based on the measurement results. The proposed Encompass modeling resulted in a mean pass rate evaluation >98% for both 6 MV and 6 MV FFF when the 1%/1 mm criterion was used, demonstrating that the proposed HU value can be adopted to calculate more accurate dose distributions.

A simple and efficient method to measure beam attenuation through a radiotherapy treatment couch and immobilization devices

We propose a simple and efficient method to measure beam attenuation in one or two dimensions using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID). The proposed method was validated against ionization chamber measurements. Beam attenuation through treatment couches (Varian Medical Systems) and immobilization devices (CIVCO Radiotherapy, USA) was examined. The dependency of beam attenuation on field size, photon energy, thickness of the couch, and the presence of a phantom were studied. Attenuation images were derived by computing the percentage difference between images obtained without and with a couch or immobilization devices determining the percentage of attenuation at the center and the mean attenuation. The beam attenuation measurements obtained with an a-Si EPID and an ionization chamber agreed to within ± 0.10 to 1.80%. No difference was noted between the center and mean of an attenuated image for a small field size of 5 × 5 cm², whereas a large field size of 15 × 15 cm² exhibited differences of up to 1.13%. For an 18 MV beam, the a-Si EPID required additional build-up material for accurate assessment of beam attenuation. The a-Si EPID could measure differences in beam attenuation through an image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) couch regardless of the variabilities in couch thickness. Interestingly, the addition of a phantom reduced the magnitude of attenuation by approximately 1.20% for a field size of 15 × 15 cm². A simple method is proposed that provides the user with beam attenuation data in either 2D or 1D within a few minutes.

Depth dose comparison of measured and calculated dose for the Eclipse virtual carbon couch top models with air gap variation

This study assessed the accuracy of Eclipse™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) treatment planning system (TPS) dose calculations when using virtual couch top models to account for couch presence in patient treatments. The Flat panel and Unipanel couch tops for the Varian Exact Couch were used in this study. Assigned Hounsfield unit (HU) for the virtual couch tops were varied and TPS calculated dose was compared to measured data to determine an optimal assigned HU. Air gaps of up to 10 cm were introduced between couch and phantom to assess the ability of the models to replicate dose in this situation, commonly seen clinically. Dose was measured at a range of depths, for each air gap thickness, in order to assess the model both near surface and at various depths beyond the dose maximum. Optimal HU was taken to be that which had the best agreement between measured and calculated dose over the range of gaps and depths tested. For the Flat panel couch top this was found to be -500 HU and for the Unipanel couch top, -200 HU. Default HU parameters originally set in the models was found to be not optimal for the whole range of depths studied. With optimal HU parameters set, there was good agreement between calculated and measured dose for depths greater than 0.5 cm, but discrepancies were still observed near surface. When implementing virtual couch top models, users could improve dose calculation accuracy by determining the optimal HU from comparisons over several clinical depths rather than a single depth.