Dosimetric effect of respiratory motion on volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based lung SBRT treatment delivered by TrueBeam machine with flattening filter-free beam

Impact of setup and geometric uncertainties on the robustness of free-breathing photon radiotherapy of small lung tumors

PURPOSE

Respiratory motion and patient setup error both contribute to the dosimetric uncertainty in radiotherapy of lung tumors. Managing these uncertainties for free-breathing treatments is usually done by margin-based approaches or robust optimization. However, breathing motion can be irregular and concerns have been raised for the robustness of the treatment plans. We have previously reported the dosimetric effects of the respiratory motion, without setup uncertainties, in lung tumor photon radiotherapy using free-breathing images. In this study, we include setup uncertainty.

METHODS

Tumor positions from cine-CT images acquired in free-breathing were combined with per-fraction patient shifts to simulate treatment scenarios. A total of 14 patients with 300 tumor positions were used to evaluate treatment plans based on 4DCT. Four planning methods aiming at delivering 54 Gy as median tumor dose in three fractions were compared. The planning methods were denoted robust 4D (RB4), isodose to the PTV with a central higher dose (ISD), the ISD method normalized to the intended median tumor dose (IRN) and homogeneous fluence to the PTV (FLU).

RESULTS

For all planning methods 95% of the intended dose was achieved with at least 90% probability with RB4 and FLU having equal CTV D50% values at this probability. FLU gave the most consistent results in terms of CTV D50% spread and dose homogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the simulated patient shifts and tumor motions being larger than observed in the 4DCTs the dosimetric impact was suggested to be small. RB4 or FLU are recommended for the planning of free-breathing treatments.

A four-dimensional dynamic conformal arc approach for real-time tumor tracking: A retrospective treatment planning study

PURPOSE

For many thoracic tumors, patient respiration can introduce a significant amount of variability in tumor position that must be accounted for during radiotherapy. Of all existing techniques, real-time dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) represents the most ideal motion management strategy but can be limited by the treatment delivery technique. Our objective was to analyze the dosimetric performance of a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach to tumor tracking on standard linear accelerators that may offer similar dosimetric benefit, but with less complexity compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

METHODS

Ten patients who previously received free-breathing VMAT for lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patient 4D-CT and respiratory traces were simultaneously acquired prior to treatment and re-planned with DCA and VMAT using the Eclipse v15.6 Treatment Planning System with gated, deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), and motion encompassment techniques taken into consideration, generating seven new plans per patient. DTT with DCA was simulated using an in-house MATLAB script to parse the radiation dose into each phase of the 4D-CT based on the patient's respiratory trace. Dose distributions were normalized to the same prescription and analyzed using dose volume histograms (DVHs). DVH metrics were assessed using ANOVA with subsequent paired t-tests.

RESULTS

The DCA-based DTT plans outperformed or showed comparable performance in their DVH metrics compared to all other combinations of treatment techniques while using motion management in normal lung sparing (p < 0.05). Normal lung sparing was not significantly different when comparing DCA-based DTT to gated and DIBH VMAT (p > 0.05), while both outperformed the corresponding DCA plans (p < 0.05). Simulated treatment times using DCA-based DTT were significantly shorter than both gating and DIBH plans (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A DCA-based DTT technique showed significant advantages over conventional motion encompassment treatments in lung cancer radiotherapy, with comparable performance to stricter techniques like gating and DIBH while conferring greater time-saving benefits.

Dosimetric robustness of lung tumor photon radiotherapy evaluated from multiple event CT imaging

PURPOSE

Intrafractional respiratory motion is a concern for lung tumor radiotherapy but full evaluation of its impact is hampered by the lack of images representing the true motion. This study presents a novel evaluation using free-breathing images acquired over realistic treatment times to study the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion in photon radiotherapy.

METHODS

Cine-CT images of 14 patients with lung cancer acquired during eight minutes of free-breathing at three occasions were used to simulate dose tracking of four different planning methods. These methods aimed to deliver 54 Gy in three fractions to D_50% of the target and were denoted as robust 4D (RB4), homogeneous fluence to the ITV (FLU) and an isodose prescription to the ITV with a high central dose (ISD), concurrently renormalized (IRN). Differences in dose coverage probability and homogeneity between the methods were quantified. Correlations between underdosage and attributes regarding the tumor and its motion were investigated.

RESULTS

Despite tumor motion amplitudes being larger than in the 4DCT all but FLU achieved the intended CTV D_50% for the cohort average. For all methods but IRN at least 93% of the patients would have received 95% of the intended dose. No differences in D_50% were found between RB4 and ISD nor IRN. However, RB4 led to better homogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor motion in free-breathing not covered by the 4DCT had a small impact on dose. The RB4 is recommended for planning of free-breathing treatments. No factor was found that consistently correlated dose degradation with patient or motion attributes.

Harmonization of dose prescription for lung stereotactic radiotherapy

•

Doses standardization achieved between dedicated linac and robotic-assisted unit.

•

Both methods delivered 3×18.3 Gy to the near minimum dose of the tumor volume.

•

Four-Dimensional deformable method allowed to estimate dose to a mobile tumor.

•

The reliability of a double-check software using a Monte-Carlo algorithm was validated.

•

Gross Tumor Volume-based prescription presented less dose heterogeneities to the tumor.

Background and purpose

Pulmonary stereotactic treatments can be performed using dedicated linear accelerators as well as robotic-assisted units, and different strategies can be used for dose prescription. This study aimed to compare the doses received by the tumor with a gross tumor volume (GTV)-based prescription on D_98%GTV using a robotic-assisted unit (method A) and planning target volume (PTV)-based prescription on D_95%PTV using a dedicated linac (method B).

Material & methods

Plans of 32 patients were collected for method A, and a dose of 3 × 18 Gy was prescribed using type A algorithm and recalculated using a Monte-Carlo (MC) algorithm. The plans were normalized to match D_98%GTV with the mean D98%GTV¯ of the cohort. The plans of 23 patients were collected for method B, and a dose of 3 × 18 Gy was prescribed to D_95%PTV using a MC algorithm. A 4D-sum method was developed to estimate doses for PTV and GTV. For validation, all plans were recalculated using an independent MC double-check software. A dose harmonization on D_{98% GTV} was determined for both methods.

Results

For method A, mean doses were D_2%GTV = 59.9 ± 2.1 Gy, D_50%GTV = 55.6 ± 1.2 Gy, D_98%GTV = 49.5 ± 0.0 Gy. For method B, the reported doses were D_2%GTV = 64.6 ± 2.1 Gy, D_50%GTV = 62.8 ± 1.7 Gy, and D_98%GTV = 60.0 ± 1.7 Gy. The dose trade-off of D_98%GTV = 55 Gy was obtained for both methods. For method A, it corresponded to a dose prescription of 3 × 20 Gy using type A algorithm, followed by rescaling to obtain D_98%GTV = 55 Gy. For method B, it corresponded to a dose prescription of D_95%PTV = 3 × 16.5 Gy using the MC algorithm.

Conclusions

This study determined similar near-minimum doses D_{98% GTV} of approximately 3 × 18.3 Gy (55 Gy) using a GTV-based prescription on a robotic-assisted unit (method A) and a PTV-based prescription on a dedicated linac (method B).

Dosimetric effects of respiratory motion during stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors

BACKGROUND

Respiratory-induced lung tumor motion may affect the delivered dose in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Previous studies are often based on phantom studies for one specific treatment technique. In this study, the dosimetric effect of tumor motion was quantified in real patient geometries for different modulated treatments and tumor motion amplitudes for lung-SBRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A simulation method using deformable image registrations and 4-dimensional computed tomographies (4DCT) was developed to assess the dosimetric effects of tumor motion. The method was evaluated with ionization chamber and Gafchromic film measurements in a thorax phantom and used to simulate the effect for 15 patients with lung tumors moving 7.3-27.4 mm. Four treatment plans with different complexities were created for each patient and the motion-induced dosimetric effect to the gross tumor volume (GTV) was simulated. The difference between the planned dose to the static tumor and the simulated delivered dose to the moving tumor was quantified for the near minimum (D_98%), near maximum (D_2%) and mean dose (D_mean) to the GTV as well as the largest observed local difference within the GTV (Max_diff).

RESULTS

No correlation was found between the dose differences and the tumor motion amplitude or plan complexity. However, the largest deviations were observed for tumors moving >15.0 mm. The simulated delivered dose was within 2.5% from the planned dose for D_98% (tumors moving <15 mm) and within 3.3% (tumors moving >15 mm). The corresponding values were 1.7% vs. 6.4% (D_2%); 1.7% vs. 2.4% (D_mean) and 8.9% vs. 35.2% (Max_diff). Using less complex treatment techniques minimized Max_diff for tumors moving >15.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

The dosimetric effects of respiratory-induced motion during lung SBRT are patient and plan specific. The magnitude of the dosimetric effect cannot be assessed solely based upon tumor motion amplitude or plan complexity.

A study of the interplay effect in radiation therapy using a Monte-Carlo model

PURPOSE

In modulated radiotherapy, breathing motion can lead to Interplay (IE) and Blurring (BE) effects that can modify the delivered dose. The aim of this work is to present the implementation, the validation and the use of an open-source Monte-Carlo (MC) model that computes the delivered dose including these motion effects.

METHODS

The MC model of the Varian TrueBeam was implemented using GATE. The dose delivered by different modulated plans is computed for several breathing patterns. A validation of these MC predictions is achieved by a comparison with measurements performed using a dedicated programmable motion platform, carrying a quality assurance phantom. A specific methodology was used to separate the IE and the BE. The influence of different motion parameters (period, amplitude, shape) and plan parameters (volume margin, dose per fraction) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The MC model was validated against measurement performed with motion with a mean 3D global gamma index pass rate of 97.5% (3%/3 mm). A significant correlation is found between the IE and the period and the antero-posterior amplitude of the motion but not between the IE and the CTV margin or the shape of motion. The results showed that the IE increases D2% and decreases the D98% of CTV with mean values of +6.9% and -3.3% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We validated the feasibility to assess the IE using a MC model. We found that the most important parameter is the number of breathing cycles that must be greater than 20 for one arc to limit the IE.

3D dosimetric validation of ultrasound-guided radiotherapy with a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark gel dosimetry measurements in a dynamically deformable abdominal phantom for intrafraction image guidance through a multi-dosimeter comparison. Once benchmarked, the study aimed to perform a proof-of-principle study for validation measurements of an ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy delivery system.

METHODS

The phantom was dosimetrically benchmarked by delivering a liver VMAT plan and measuring the 3D dose distribution with DEFGEL dosimeters. Measured doses were compared to the treatment planning system and measurements acquired with radiochromic film and an ion chamber. The ultrasound image guidance validation was performed for a hands-free ultrasound transducer for the tracking of liver motion during treatment.

RESULTS

Gel dosimeters were compared to the TPS and film measurements, showing good qualitative dose distribution matches, low γ values through most of the high dose region, and average 3%/5 mm γ-analysis pass rates of 99.2%(0.8%) and 90.1%(0.8%), respectively. Gel dosimeter measurements matched ion chamber measurements within 3%. The image guidance validation study showed the measurement of the treatment delivery improvements due to the inclusion of the ultrasound image guidance system. Good qualitative matching of dose distributions and improvements of the γ-analysis results were observed for the ultrasound-gated dosimeter compared to the ungated dosimeter.

CONCLUSIONS

DEFGEL dosimeters in phantom showed good agreement with the planned dose and other dosimeters for dosimetric benchmarking. Ultrasound image guidance validation measurements showed good proof-of-principle of the utility of the phantom system as a method of validating ultrasound-based image guidance systems and potentially other image guidance methods.

On the reduction of aperture complexity in kidney SABR

Background

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of primary kidney cancers is confounded by motion. There is a risk of interplay effect if the dose is delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and flattening filter‐free (FFF) dose rates due to target and linac motion. This study aims to provide an efficient way to generate plans with minimal aperture complexity.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 62 patients who received kidney SABR were reviewed. For each patient, two plans were created using internal target volume based motion management, on the average intensity projection of a four‐dimensional CT. In the first plan, optimization was performed using a knowledge‐based planning model based on delivered clinical plans in our institution. In the second plan, the optimization was repeated, with a maximum monitor unit (MU) objective applied in the optimization. Dose‐volume, conformity, and complexity metric (with the field edge metric and the modulation complexity score) were compared between the two plans. Results are shown in terms of median (first quartile — third quartile).

Results

Similar dosimetry was obtained with and without the utilization of an objective on the MU. However, complexity was reduced by using the objective on the MUs (modulation complexity score = 0.55 (0.50–0.61) / 0.33 (0.29–0.36), P‐value < 10⁻¹⁰, with/without the MU objective). Reduction of complexity was driven by a larger aperture area (area aperture variability = 0.68 (0.64–0.73) / 0.42 (0.37–0.45), P‐value < 10⁻¹⁰, with/without the MU objective). Using the objective on the MUs resulted in a more spherical dose distribution (sphericity 50% isodose = 0.73 (0.69–0.75) / 0.64 (0.60–0.68), P‐value < 10⁻⁸, with/without the MU objective) reducing dose to organs at risk given respiratory motion.

Conclusions

Aperture complexity is reduced in kidney SABR by using an objective on the MU delivery with VMAT and FFF dose rate.

A method using 4D dose accumulation to quantify the interplay effect in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

The purpose of this study was to devise and evaluate a method to quantify the dosimetric uncertainty produced by the interplay between the movement of multileaf collimator and respiratory motion in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. The method calculates the dose distribution for all control points from a dynamic treatment in all respiratory phases. The methodology includes some characteristics of a patient's irregular breathing patterns. It selects, for each control point, the phases with maximum and minimum mean dose over the tumor and their corresponding adjacent phases, whenever necessary. According to this selection, the dose matrices from each control point are summed up to obtain two dose distributions in each phase, which are accumulated in the reference phase subsequently by deformable image registration (DIR). D ₉₅ and [Formula: see text] were calculated over those accumulated dose distributions for Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), Planning Target Volume-based on Internal Target Volume approach-and Evaluation Target Volume (ETV), a novel concept that applies to 4D dose accumulation. With the ETV, DIR and interplay uncertainties are separated. The methodology also evaluated how variations in the breathing rate and field size affects the mean dose received by the GTV. The method was applied retrospectively in five patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy-minimum area defined by the leaves configuration at any control point was at least 4 cm². Uncertainties in tumor coverage were small (in most patients, changes on D ₉₅ and [Formula: see text] were below 2% for GTV and ETV) but significant over- and under-dosages near ETV, which can be accentuated by highly irregular breathing. Uncertainties in mean dose for GTV tended to decrease exponentially with increasing field size and were reduced by an increase of breathing rate. The implementation of this method would be helpful to assess treatment quality in patients with irregular breathing. Furthermore, it could be used to study interplay uncertainties when small field sizes are used.

Interplay effects in highly modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy lung cases treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy

Interplay effects in highly modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy lung cases treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of tumor motion on dose delivery in highly modulated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

METHODS

4D-CT imaging data of the quasar respiratory phantom were acquired, using a GE Lightspeed 16-slice CT scanner, while the phantom reproduced patient specific respiratory traces. Flattening filter-free (FFF) dual-arc VMAT treatment plans were created on the acquired images in Pinnacle³ treatment planning system. Each plan was generated with varying levels of complexity characterized by the modulation complexity score. Static and dynamic measurements were delivered to GafChromic EBT3 film inside the respiratory phantom using an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. The treatment prescription was 10 Gy per fraction for 5 fractions. Comparisons of the planned and delivered dose distribution were performed using Radiological Imaging Technology (RIT) software.

RESULTS

For the motion amplitudes and periods studied, the interplay effect is insignificant to the GTV coverage. The mean dose deviations between the planned and delivered dose distribution never went below -2.00% and a minimum dose difference of -5.05% was observed for a single fraction. However for amplitude of 2 cm, the dose error could be as large as 20.00% near the edges of the PTV at increased levels of complexity. Additionally, the modulation complexity score showed an ability to provide information related to dose delivery. A correlation value (R) of 0.65 was observed between the complexity score and the gamma passing rate for GTV coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, respiratory motion effects are most evident for large amplitude respirations, complex fields, and small field margins. However, under all tested conditions target coverage was maintained.

Retrospective analysis of the impact of respiratory motion in treatment margins for frameless lung SBRT based on respiratory-correlated CBCT data-sets

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of respiratory motion in the treatment margins for lung SBRT frameless treatments and to validate our treatment margins using 4D CBCT data analysis.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty nine fractions with early stage NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated in frameless and free breathing conditions. The treatment margins were calculated according to van Herk equation in Mid-Ventilation. For each fraction, three 4D CBCT scans, pre- and postcorrection, and posttreatment, were acquired to assess target baseline shift, target localization accuracy and intra-fraction motion errors. A bootstrap analysis was performed to assess the minimum number of patients required to define treatment margins.

RESULTS

The retrospectively calculated target-baseline shift, target localization accuracy and intra-fraction motion errors agreed with the literature. The best tailored margins to our cohort of patients were retrospectively computed and resulted in agreement with already published data. The bootstrap analysis showed that fifteen patients were enough to assess treatment margins.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment margins applied to our patient's cohort resulted in good agreement with the retrospectively calculated margins based on 4D CBCT data. Moreover, the bootstrap analysis revealed to be a promising method to verify the reliability of the applied treatment margins for safe lung SBRT delivery.

Experimental evaluation of the dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate rotation using film measurement with a 6DoF robotic arm

PURPOSE

Tumor motion during radiotherapy can cause a reduction in target dose coverage and an increase in healthy tissue exposure. Tumor motion is not strictly translational and often exhibits complex six degree-of-freedom (6DoF) translational and rotational motion. Although the dosimetric impact of prostate tumor translational motion is well investigated, the dosimetric impact of 6DoF motion has only been studied with simulations or dose reconstruction. This study aims to experimentally quantify the dose error caused by 6DoF motion. The experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that 6DoF motion would cause larger dose errors than translational motion alone through gamma analyses of two-dimensional film measurements.

METHODS

Four patient-measured intrafraction prostate motion traces and four VMAT 7.25 Gy/Fx SBRT treatment plans were selected for the experiment. The traces represented typical motion patterns, including small-angle rotations (<4°), transient movement, persistent excursion, and erratic rotations (>6°). Gafchromic film was placed inside a custom-designed phantom, held by a high-precision 6DoF robotic arm for dose measurements in the coronal plane during treatment delivery. For each combination of the motion trace and treatment plan, two film measurements were made, one with 6DoF motion and the other with the three-dimensional (3D) translation components of the same trace. A gamma pass rate criteria of 2% relative dose/2 mm distance-to-agreement was used in this study and evaluated for each measurement with respect to the static reference film. Two test thresholds, 90% and 50% of the reference dose, were applied to investigate the difference in dose coverage for the PTV region and surrounding areas, respectively. The hypothesis was tested using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

For each of the 16 plan and motion trace pairs, a reduction in the gamma pass rate was observed for 6DoF motion compared with 3D translational motion. With 90% gamma-test threshold, the reduction was 5.8% ± 7.1% (P < 0.01). With 50% gamma-test threshold, the reduction was 4.1% ± 4.8% (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

For the first time, the dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate rotation during SBRT treatment was measured experimentally. The experimental results support the hypothesis that 6DoF tumor motion causes higher dose error than translation motion alone.

A study of the interplay effect for VMAT SBRT using a four-axes motion phantom

Purpose

To assess the accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) when treating moving targets (such as lung or liver lesions), focusing on the impact of the interplay effect in the event of complex breathing motion and when a gating window is used.

Methods

A dedicated programmable motion platform was implemented. This platform can carry large quality assurance (QA) phantoms and achieve complex three‐dimensional (3D) motion. Volumetric modulated arc therapy SBRT plans were delivered with TrueBeam linac to this moving setup and the measured dose was compared to the computed one. Several parameters were assessed such as breathing period, dose rate, dose prescription, shape of the breathing pattern, the use of a planning target volume (PTV) margin, and the use of a gating window.

Results

Loss of dose coverage (D95%) was acceptable in most situations. The doses received by 95% of the CTV, D95% ( CTVm) ranged from 94 to 101% (mean 98%) and the doses received by 2% of the CTV D2% ( CTVm) ranged from 94% to 110% of the prescribed dose. A visible interplay effect was observed when no margin was used or when the number of breathing cycles during the treatment delivery was lower than 20.

Conclusions

In our clinical context, treating lung and liver lesions using VMAT SBRT is reasonable. The interplay effect was moderated and acceptable in all simulated situations.

A robust VMAT delivery solution for single-fraction lung SABR utilizing FFF beams minimizing dosimetric compromise

Peripheral lung lesions treated with a single fraction of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery and flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams represent a potentially high‐risk scenario for clinically significant dose blurring effects due to interplay between the respiratory motion of the lesion and dynamic multi‐leaf collimators (MLCs). The aim of this study was to determine an efficient means of developing low‐modulation VMAT plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system (v15.5, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA) in order to minimize this risk, while maintaining dosimetric quality. The study involved 19 patients where an internal target volume (ITV) was contoured to encompass the entire range of tumor motion, and a planning target volume (PTV) created using a 5‐mm isotropic expansion of this contour. Each patient had seven plan variations created, with each rescaled to achieve the clinical planning goal for PTV coverage. All plan variations used the same field arrangement, and consisted of one dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) plan, and six VMAT plans with varying degrees of modulation restriction, achieved through utilizing different combinations of the aperture shape controller (ASC) in the calculation parameters, and monitor unit (MU) objective during optimization. The dosimetric quality was assessed based on RTOG conformity indices (CI100/CI50), as well as adherence to dose–volume metrics used clinically at our institution. Plan complexity was assessed based on the modulation factor (MU/cGy) and the field edge metric. While VMAT plans with the least modulation restriction achieved the best dosimetry, it was found that there was no clinically significant trade‐off in terms of dose to organs at risk and conformity by reducing complexity. Furthermore, it was found that utilizing the ASC and MU objective could reduce plan complexity to near‐DCAT levels with improved dosimetry, which may be sufficiently robust to overcome the interplay effect.

Investigation of 4D dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy: does fractional dose or number of arcs matter?

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of fractional dose and the number of arcs on interplay effects when volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is used to treat lung tumors with large respiratory motions. A three (fractional dose of 4, 7.5 or 12.5 Gy) by two (number of arcs, one or two) VMAT plan was created for 10 lung cancer cases. The median 3D tumor motion was 17.9 mm (range: 8.2-27.2 mm). Ten phase-specific subplans were generated by calculating the dose on each respiratory phase computed tomography (CT) scan using temporally assigned VMAT arcs. We performed temporal assignment of VMAT arcs using respiratory information obtained from infrared markers placed on the abdomens of the patients during CT simulations. Each phase-specific dose distribution was deformed onto exhale phase CT scans using contour-based deformable image registration, and a 4D plan was created by dose accumulation. The gross tumor volume dose of each 4D plan (4D GTV dose) was compared with the internal target volume dose of the original plan (3D ITV dose). The near-minimum 4D GTV dose (D99%) was higher than the near-minimum 3D internal target volume (ITV) dose, whereas the near-maximum 4D GTV dose (D1%) was lower than the near-maximum 3D ITV dose. However, the difference was negligible, and thus the 4D GTV dose corresponded well with the 3D ITV dose, regardless of the fractional dose and number of arcs. Therefore, interplay effects were negligible in VMAT-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors with large respiratory motions.

Dose deviations induced by respiratory motion for radiotherapy of lung tumors: Impact of CT reconstruction, plan complexity, and fraction size

A thorax phantom was used to assess radiotherapy dose deviations induced by respiratory motion of the target volume. Both intensity modulated and static, non‐modulated treatment plans were planned on CT scans of the phantom. The plans were optimized using various CT reconstructions, to investigate whether they had an impact on robustness to target motion during delivery. During irradiation, the target was programmed to simulate respiration‐induced motion of a lung tumor, using both patient‐specific and sinusoidal motion patterns in three dimensions. Dose was measured in the center of the target using an ion chamber. Differences between reference measurements with a stationary target and dynamic measurements were assessed. Possible correlations between plan complexity metrics and measured dose deviations were investigated. The maximum observed motion‐induced dose differences were 7.8% and 4.5% for single 2 Gy and 15 Gy fractions, respectively. The measurements performed with the largest target motion amplitude in the superior–inferior direction yielded the largest dosimetric deviations. For 2 Gy fractionation schemes, the summed dose deviation after 33 fractions is likely to be less than 2%. Measured motion‐induced dose deviations were significantly larger for one CT reconstruction compared to all the others. Static, non‐modulated plans showed superior robustness to target motion during delivery. Moderate correlations between the modulation complexity score applied to VMAT (MCSv) and measured dose deviations were found for 15 Gy SBRT treatment plans. Correlations between other plan complexity metrics and measured dose deviations were not found.

4D Monte Carlo dose calculations for pre-treatment quality assurance of VMAT SBRT: a phantom-based feasibility study

Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is challenging due to both breathing-induced motion and the dynamic components of the linear accelerator. In this study, a 4D Monte Carlo (4DMC) dose calculation method for VMAT SBRT is proposed and the feasibility of the method is evaluated. A rigidly-moving lung phantom was imaged using four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). VMAT SBRT plans were generated on the average intensity projection dataset using the internal target volume (ITV) strategy (ITV-plan) and a single phase to simulate a dynamic treatment-couch tracking technique (TRACKING-plan). 4DMC simulations were performed and compared to 3D Monte Carlo (3DMC) and 3D- and 4D- calculations in the treatment planning system using the adaptive convolution (AC) algorithm. Dose metrics calculated for the ITV-plan showed an overestimation with 3D adaptive convolution (3DAC) for D[Formula: see text] (GTV) by 3.5% and by 2.0% for 3DMC, both compared to 4DMC. The TRACKING-plan D[Formula: see text] (GTV) calculated with the 3DAC method overestimated by 2.0% compared with 4DMC. Deviations between the calculation methods for D _mean (Lung) and D[Formula: see text] (PTV) were minimal. For both plans, measurements were taken with EBT3 film inside the phantom tumour. EBT3 film profiles showed good agreement with 4DMC for the TRACKING-plan giving a gamma pass rate of 97.2% for 3%/3 mm global and for 3DAC compared with measured, 95.8%. Whereas for the ITV-plan, the 3D profiles varied from film in the ITV periphery region with a pass rates of 50% and 48.6% for 3DAC and 3DMC, respectively. 4DMC agreed more closely to measurements for this plan with a pass rate of 95.8%. We have proposed an accurate method to perform 4D dose calculations for pre-treatment quality assurance of VMAT SBRT. The method was compared to experimental measurements and for both plans, 4DMC dose agreed with measurements more closely than other evaluated dose calculation methods. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of this 4DMC method.

Variation in accumulated dose of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for pancreatic cancer due to different beam starting phases

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of different beam starting phases on dosimetric variations in the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and to identify the relationship between plan complexity and the dosimetric impact of interplay effects in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Single and double full-arc VMAT plans were generated for 11 patients. A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was prescribed to cover 50% of the planning target volume. Patient-specific Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiation Therapy plan files were divided into 10 files based on the respiratory phases in four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) simulations. The phase-divided VMAT plans were calculated in consideration of the beam starting phase for each arc and were then combined in the mid-ventilation phase of 4DCT (4D plans). The dose-volumetric parameters were compared with the calculated dose distributions without consideration of the interplay effects (3D plans). Additionally, relationships among plan parameters such as modulation complexity scores, monitor units (MUs), and dose-volumetric parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Dosimetric differences in the median values associated with different beam starting phases were within ± 1.0% and ± 0.2% for the CTV and ± 0.5% and ± 0.9% for the OARs during single and double full-arc VMAT, respectively. Significant differences caused by variations in the beam starting phases were observed only for the dose-volumetric parameters of the CTV during single full-arc VMAT (P < 0.05), associated with moderate or strong correlations between the MUs and the dosimetric differences between the 4D and 3D plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The beam starting phase affected CTV dosimetric variations of single full-arc VMAT. The use of double full-arc VMAT mitigated this problem. However, variation in the dose delivered to OARs was not dependent on the beam starting phase, even for single full-arc VMAT.

The irregular breathing effect on target volume and coverage for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

The major challenge in treating a mobile target is obtaining the temporal and spatial information imaging and treatment details. This phantom study quantitatively evaluates the geometric and dosimetric effects of various treatment techniques under different respiratory patterns. The regular motion model was a sinusoidal waveform with a longitudinal range of ±1.5 cm and a period of 4 sec, while irregular motion models were generated by extracting signals from clinical cases. Helical CT for a static target and 4D CT with retrospective sorting were acquired. Phase bin, maximum, and average intensity projection (MIP and AIP) CT datasets were reconstructed. RapidArc and IMRT plans were generated on static and moving target CT datasets with different motion patterns using the phase-based gating and nongating treatment. Dose measurements were performed using EBT3 films. Dose profile and gamma analysis (±3%/1 mm criteria) were used for dose comparisons. For the irregular motions, internal target volume variations between AIP and MIP datasets (AIP/MIP) had slight differences (-6.2% to -7.7%) for gated plans, and larger differences (-12.3% to -15.2%) for nongated plans. Dosimetric measurements showed a high gamma passing rate (>98.5%) for the static plan in the target region, while the AIP and MIP gated plans had average passing rates of 92.2% ± 5.7% and 85.8% ± 9.5%, respectively. Nongated plans had significantly lower and deviated passing rates, while the AIP and MIP plans had passing rates of 43.6% ± 22.2% and 66.7% ± 28.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment delivered with the gated technique did not compromise the gross tumor volumes coverage, and was insensitive to the breathing irregularities and plan techniques. Adequate margins should be accounted to cover the mis-gating effect when using the phase-based gating under irregular motion.

Results of a multicentre dosimetry audit using a respiratory phantom within the EORTC LungTech trial

INTRODUCTION

The EORTC 22113-08113 LungTech trial assesses the safety and efficacy of SBRT for centrally located NSCLC. To insure protocol compliance an extensive RTQA procedure was implemented.

METHODS

Twelve centres were audited using a CIRS008A phantom. The phantom was scanned using target inserts of 7.5 mm and 12.5 mm radius in static condition. For the 7.5 mm insert a 4DCT was acquired while moving according to a cos⁶ function. Treatment plans were measured using film and an ionization chamber. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were performed to compare the three plans across institutions. A Spearman correlation was calculated to evaluate the influence of factors such as PTV, slice thickness and total number of monitor units on the dosimetric results.

RESULTS

The reference output dose median [min, max] variation was 0.5% [-1.1, +1.5]. The median deviations between chamber doses and point-planned doses were 1.8% [-0.1; 6.7] for the 7.5 mm and 1.1% [-2.8; 5.0] for the 12.5 mm sphere in static situation and 3.2% [-3.2; 15.7] for the dynamic situation. Film gamma median pass rates were 92.0% [68.0, 99.0] for 7.5 mm static, 96.2% [73.0, 99.0] for 12.5 mm static and 71.0% [40.0, 99.0] for 7.5 mm dynamic. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests showed that the dynamic irradiations resulted in significantly lower gamma pass rates compared to the 12.5 mm static plan (p = 0.001). The total number of MUs per plan was correlated to both film and IC results.

CONCLUSION

An end-to-end audit was successfully performed, revealing important variations between institutions especially in dynamic irradiations. This shows the importance of dosimetry audits and the potentials for further technique and methodology improvements.

Safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during treatment planning for breast cancer treated with arc therapy

Purpose

This study evaluates the benefit of a virtual bolus method for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan optimization to compensate breast modifications that may occur during breast treatment.

Methods

Ten files were replanned with VMAT giving 50 Gy to the breast and 47 Gy to the nodes within 25 fractions. The planning process used a virtual bolus for the first optimization, then the monitors units were reoptimized without bolus, after fixing the segments shapes. Structures and treatment planning were exported on a second scanner (CT) performed during treatment as a consequence to modifications in patient's anatomy. The comparative end‐point was clinical target volume's coverage. The first analysis compared the VMAT plans made using the virtual bolus method (VB‐VMAT) to the plans without using it (NoVB‐VMAT) on the first simulation CT. Then, the same analysis was performed on the second CT. Finally, the level of degradation of target volume coverage between the two CT using VB‐VMAT was compared to results using a standard technique of forward‐planned multisegment technique (Tan‐IMRT).

Results

Using a virtual bolus for VMAT does not degrade dosimetric results on the first CT. No significant result in favor of the NoVB‐VMAT plans was noted. The VB‐VMAT method led to significant better dose distribution on a second CT with modified anatomies compared to NoVB‐VMAT. The clinical target volume's coverage by 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 98.9% [96.1–99.6] on the second CT for VB‐VMAT compared to 92.6% [85.2–97.7] for NoVB‐VMAT (P = 0.0002). The degradation of the target volume coverage for VB‐VMAT is not worse than for Tan‐IMRT: the median differential of V95% between the two CT was 0.9% for VMAT and 0.7% for Tan‐IMRT (P = 1).

Conclusion

This study confirms the safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during the VMAT planning process to compensate potential breast shape modifications.

Under-reported dosimetry errors due to interplay effects during VMAT dose delivery in extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapy of extracranial metastases changed from normofractioned 3D CRT to extreme hypofractionated stereotactic treatment using VMAT beam techniques. Random interaction between tumour motion and dynamically changing beam parameters might result in underdosage of the CTV even for an appropriately dimensioned ITV (interplay effect). This study presents a clinical scenario of extreme hypofractionated stereotactic treatment and analyses the impact of interplay effects on CTV dose coverage.

METHODS

For a thoracic/abdominal phantom with an integrated high-resolution detector array placed on a 4D motion platform, dual-arc treatment plans with homogenous target coverage were created using a common VMAT technique and delivered in a single fraction. CTV underdosage through interplay effects was investigated by comparing dose measurements with and without tumour motion during plan delivery.

RESULTS

Our study agrees with previous works that pointed out insignificant interplay effects on target coverage for very regular tumour motion patterns like simple sinusoidal motion. However, we identified and illustrated scenarios that are likely to result in a clinically relevant CTV underdosage. For tumour motion with abnormal variability, target coverage quantified by the CTV area receiving more than 98% of the prescribed dose decreased to 78% compared to 100% at static dose measurement.

CONCLUSION

This study is further proof of considerable influence of interplay effects on VMAT dose delivery in stereotactic radiotherapy. For selected conditions of an exemplary scenario, interplay effects and related motion-induced target underdosage primarily occurred in tumour motion pattern with increased motion variability and VMAT plan delivery using complex MLC dose modulation.

Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review

Tumors in thoracic and upper abdomen regions such as lungs, liver, pancreas, esophagus, and breast move due to respiration. Respiration-induced motion introduces uncertainties in radiotherapy treatments of these sites and is regarded as a significant bottleneck in achieving highly conformal dose distributions. Recent developments in radiation therapy have resulted in (i) motion-encompassing, (ii) respiratory gating, and (iii) tracking methods for adapting the radiation beam aperture to account for the respiration-induced target motion. The purpose of this review is to discuss the magnitude, impact, and management of respiration-induced tumor motion.

4D dose simulation in volumetric arc therapy: Accuracy and affecting parameters

Radiotherapy of lung and liver lesions has changed from normofractioned 3D-CRT to stereotactic treatment in a single or few fractions, often employing volumetric arc therapy (VMAT)-based techniques. Potential unintended interference of respiratory target motion and dynamically changing beam parameters during VMAT dose delivery motivates establishing 4D quality assurance (4D QA) procedures to assess appropriateness of generated VMAT treatment plans when taking into account patient-specific motion characteristics. Current approaches are motion phantom-based 4D QA and image-based 4D VMAT dose simulation. Whereas phantom-based 4D QA is usually restricted to a small number of measurements, the computational approaches allow simulating many motion scenarios. However, 4D VMAT dose simulation depends on various input parameters, influencing estimated doses along with mitigating simulation reliability. Thus, aiming at routine use of simulation-based 4D VMAT QA, the impact of such parameters as well as the overall accuracy of the 4D VMAT dose simulation has to be studied in detail–which is the topic of the present work. In detail, we introduce the principles of 4D VMAT dose simulation, identify influencing parameters and assess their impact on 4D dose simulation accuracy by comparison of simulated motion-affected dose distributions to corresponding dosimetric motion phantom measurements. Exploiting an ITV-based treatment planning approach, VMAT treatment plans were generated for a motion phantom and different motion scenarios (sinusoidal motion of different period/direction; regular/irregular motion). 4D VMAT dose simulation results and dose measurements were compared by local 3% / 3 mm γ-evaluation, with the measured dose distributions serving as ground truth. Overall γ-passing rates of simulations and dynamic measurements ranged from 97% to 100% (mean across all motion scenarios: 98% ± 1%); corresponding values for comparison of different day repeat measurements were between 98% and 100%. Parameters of major influence on 4D VMAT dose simulation accuracy were the degree of temporal discretization of the dose delivery process (the higher, the better) and correct alignment of the assumed breathing phases at the beginning of the dose measurements and simulations. Given the high γ-passing rates between simulated motion-affected doses and dynamic measurements, we consider the simulations to provide a reliable basis for assessment of VMAT motion effects that–in the sense of 4D QA of VMAT treatment plans–allows to verify target coverage in hypofractioned VMAT-based radiotherapy of moving targets. Remaining differences between measurements and simulations motivate, however, further detailed studies.

Evaluation of tracking accuracy of the CyberKnife system using a webcam and printed calibrated grid

Tracking accuracy for the CyberKnife's Synchrony system is commonly evaluated using a film‐based verification method. We have evaluated a verification system that uses a webcam and a printed calibrated grid to verify tracking accuracy over three different motion patterns. A box with an attached printed calibrated grid and four fiducial markers was attached to the motion phantom. A target marker was positioned at the grid's center. The box was set up using the other three markers. Target tracking accuracy was evaluated under three conditions: 1) stationary; 2) sinusoidal motion with different amplitudes of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm for the same cycle of 4 s and different cycles of 2, 4, 6, and 8 s with the same amplitude of 15 mm; and 3) irregular breathing patterns in six human volunteers breathing normally. Infrared markers were placed on the volunteers’ abdomens, and their trajectories were used to simulate the target motion. All tests were performed with one‐dimensional motion in craniocaudal direction. The webcam captured the grid's motion and a laser beam was used to simulate the CyberKnife's beam. Tracking error was defined as the difference between the grid's center and the laser beam. With a stationary target, mean tracking error was measured at 0.4 mm. For sinusoidal motion, tracking error was less than 2 mm for any amplitude and breathing cycle. For the volunteers’ breathing patterns, the mean tracking error range was 0.78‐1.67 mm. Therefore, accurate lesion targeting requires individual quality assurance for each patient.

PACS number(s): 87.55.D‐, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc

VMAT-SBRT planning based on an average intensity projection for lung tumors located in close proximity to the diaphragm: a phantom and clinical validity study

The aim of the this study was to validate the use of an average intensity projection (AIP) for volumetric-modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT-SBRT) planning for a moving lung tumor located near the diaphragm. VMAT-SBRT plans were created using AIPs reconstructed from 10 phases of 4DCT images that were acquired with a target phantom moving with amplitudes of 5, 10, 20 and 30 mm. To generate a 4D dose distribution, the static dose for each phase was recalculated and the doses were accumulated by using the phantom position known for each phase. For 10 patients with lung tumors, a deformable registration was used to generate 4D dose distributions. Doses to the target volume obtained from the AIP plan and the 4D plan were compared, as were the doses obtained from each plan to the organs at risk (OARs). In both phantom and clinical study, dose discrepancies for all parameters of the dose volume (D(min), D(99), D(max), D(1) and D(mean)) to the target were <3%. The discrepancies of D(max) for spinal cord, esophagus and heart were <1 Gy, and the discrepancy of V20 for lung tissue was <1%. However, for OARs with large respiratory motion, the discrepancy of the D(max) was as much as 9.6 Gy for liver and 5.7 Gy for stomach. Thus, AIP is clinically acceptable as a planning CT image for predicting 4D dose, but doses to the OARs with large respiratory motion were underestimated with the AIP approach.

A planning comparison of 3-dimensional conformal multiple static field, conformal arc, and volumetric modulated arc therapy for the delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer

The primary objective of this study was to compare dosimetric variables as well as treatment times of multiple static fields (MSFs), conformal arcs (CAs), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for the treatment of early stage lung cancer using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Treatments of 23 patients previously treated with MSF of 48Gy to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) in 4 fractions were replanned using CA and VMAT techniques. Dosimetric parameters of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0915 trial were evaluated, along with the van׳t Riet conformation number (CN), monitor units (MUs), and actual and calculated treatment times. Paired t-tests for noninferiority were used to compare the 3 techniques. CA had significant dosimetric improvements over MSF for the ratio of the prescription isodose volume to PTV (R100%, p < 0.0001), the maximum dose 2cm away from the PTV (D2cm, p = 0.005), and van׳t Riet CN (p < 0.0001). CA was not statistically inferior to MSF for the 50% prescription isodose volume to PTV (R50%, p = 0.05). VMAT was significantly better than CA for R100% (p < 0.0001), R50% (p < 0.0001), D2cm (p = 0.006), and CN (p < 0.0001). CA plans had significantly shorter treatment times than those of VMAT (p < 0.0001). Both CA and VMAT planning showed significant dosimetric improvements and shorter treatment times over those of MSF. VMAT showed the most favorable dosimetry of all 3 techniques; however, the dosimetric effect of tumor motion was not evaluated. CA plans were significantly faster to treat, and minimize the interplay of tumor motion and dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) motion effects. Given these results, CA has become the treatment technique of choice at our facility.

Off-target-isocentric approach in non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning for lung SBRT treatments

PURPOSE

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) has emerged as an efficient alternative to traditional three-dimensional (3D) non-coplanar conformal (3D-NC-C) beams for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) because of its superior dosimetric properties and native ease in planning and treatment delivery. However, patient immobilization in lung SBRT often presents challenging geometrical clearance issues in the execution of large (in excess of 180°) non-coplanar arcs. In this study, we present an off-target-isocentric, non-coplanar VMAT (OTI-NC-VMAT) technique that appears to be simple, dosimetrically robust and allows for ample patient/couch-gantry clearance. We compared this technique to a target-isocentric, non-coplanar VMAT (TI-NC-VMAT) technique and the 3D-NC-C beams for dosimetric evaluations.

METHODS

Nineteen lung cancer patients previously treated with 3D-NC-C SBRT technique at our institution were selected. For each patient, an OTI-NC-VMAT plan and TI-NC-VMAT plan were created and compared to the original 3D-NC-C treatment plan. All of the plans were created for the same prescription dose of 54 Gy total in 3 fractions, covering 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). Nine to ten non-coplanar beams were used for the 3D technique and three non-coplanar arcs were used in both the TI-NC-VMAT and OTI-NC-VMAT plans, with the couch set at ± 20° and 0°, with each arc rotation in excess of 180°. Progressive Resolution Optimizer (PRO) in Varian Eclipse version 11 was used for all of the treatment planning. Conformity Index (CI), conformity number (CN), gradient index (GI), maximum dose at 2 cm away from the PTV (D2cm), mean lung dose (MLD), V20, V5 and mean target dose (MTD) were analyzed for all of the plans. We also performed statistical analysis to examine differences in the dosimetric indices between 3D and VMAT techniques.

RESULTS

Dosimetric indices CI, CN, GI, V20 and MTD values were similar, within 5%, for all three plans: 3D-NC-C, TI-NC-VMAT and OTI-NC-VMAT. However, both types of VMAT plans were dosimetrically superior to 3D conformal plans in organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing; D2cm, MLD, and V5 values were significantly lower at 6-8%, 9-12% and 26-30% in VMAT plans, respectively. The OTI-NC-VMAT plans showed equivalent plan quality to the TI-NC-VMAT plans and exhibited robust freedom from limiting arc rotation due to potential patient/couch-gantry collision.

CONCLUSIONS

The OTI-NC-VMAT plans appear dosimetrically equivalent to TI-NC-VMAT plans for lung SBRT, while permitting large angle arc selection, free from obstructional limitations. Both OTI-NC-VMAT and TI-NC-VMAT plans were dosimetrically superior to 3D-NC-C plans in terms of organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing.

Kilovoltage intrafraction motion monitoring and target dose reconstruction for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy of tumors in the liver

PURPOSE

To use intrafraction kilovoltage (kV) imaging during liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to estimate the intra-treatment target motion and to reconstruct the delivered target dose.

METHODS

Six liver SBRT patients with 2-3 implanted gold markers received SBRT in three fractions of 18.75 Gy or 25 Gy. CTV-to-PTV margins of 5 mm in the axial plane and 10 mm in the cranio-caudal directions were applied. A VMAT plan was designed to give minimum target doses of 95% (CTV) and 67% (PTV). At each fraction, the 3D marker trajectory was estimated by fluoroscopic kV imaging throughout treatment delivery and used to reconstruct the actually delivered CTV dose. The reduction in D95 (minimum dose to 95% of the CTV) relative to the planned D95 was calculated.

RESULTS

The kV position estimation had mean root-mean-square errors of 0.36 mm and 0.47 mm parallel and perpendicular to the kV imager, respectively. Intrafraction motion caused a mean 3D target position error of 2.9 mm and a mean D95 reduction of 6.0%. The D95 reduction correlated with the mean 3D target position error during a fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Kilovoltage imaging for detailed motion monitoring with dose reconstruction of VMAT-based liver SBRT was demonstrated for the first time showing large dosimetric impact of intrafraction tumor motion.