1
|
Franciosini G, Carlotti D, Cattani F, De Gregorio A, De Liso V, De Rosa F, Di Francesco M, Di Martino F, Felici G, Pensavalle JH, Leonardi MC, Marafini M, Muscato A, Paiar F, Patera V, Poortmans P, Sciubba A, Schiavi A, Toppi M, Traini G, Trigilio A, Sarti A. IOeRT conventional and FLASH treatment planning system implementation exploiting fast GPU Monte Carlo: The case of breast cancer. Phys Med 2024; 121:103346. [PMID: 38608421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Partial breast irradiation for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients can be performed by means of Intra Operative electron Radiation Therapy (IOeRT). One of the main limitations of this technique is the absence of a treatment planning system (TPS) that could greatly help in ensuring a proper coverage of the target volume during irradiation. An IOeRT TPS has been developed using a fast Monte Carlo (MC) and an ultrasound imaging system to provide the best irradiation strategy (electron beam energy, applicator position and bevel angle) and to facilitate the optimisation of dose prescription and delivery to the target volume while maximising the organs at risk sparing. The study has been performed in silico, exploiting MC simulations of a breast cancer treatment. Ultrasound-based input has been used to compute the absorbed dose maps in different irradiation strategies and a quantitative comparison between the different options was carried out using Dose Volume Histograms. The system was capable of exploring different beam energies and applicator positions in few minutes, identifying the best strategy with an overall computation time that was found to be completely compatible with clinical implementation. The systematic uncertainty related to tissue deformation during treatment delivery with respect to imaging acquisition was taken into account. The potential and feasibility of a GPU based full MC TPS implementation of IOeRT breast cancer treatments has been demonstrated in-silico. This long awaited tool will greatly improve the treatment safety and efficacy, overcoming the limits identified within the clinical trials carried out so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Franciosini
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - D Carlotti
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitatio Campus-Bio Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - F Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A De Gregorio
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy
| | - V De Liso
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - F De Rosa
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy
| | | | - F Di Martino
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Felici
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - J Harold Pensavalle
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy; Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M C Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Marafini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "E. Fermi", Rome, Italy
| | - A Muscato
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Specialty School of Medical Physics, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Paiar
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy
| | - V Patera
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A Sciubba
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Schiavi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - M Toppi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - G Traini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - A Trigilio
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Sarti
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petoukhova A, Snijder R, Vissers T, Ceha H, Struikmans H. In vivodosimetry in cancer patients undergoing intraoperative radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:18TR01. [PMID: 37607566 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf2e4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
In vivodosimetry (IVD) is an important tool in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to detect major errors by assessing differences between expected and delivered dose and to record the received dose by individual patients. Also, in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), IVD is highly relevant to register the delivered dose. This is especially relevant in low-risk breast cancer patients since a high dose of IORT is delivered in a single fraction. In contrast to EBRT, online treatment planning based on intraoperative imaging is only under development for IORT. Up to date, two commercial treatment planning systems proposed intraoperative ultrasound or in-room cone-beam CT for real-time IORT planning. This makes IVD even more important because of the possibility for real-time treatment adaptation. Here, we summarize recent developments and applications of IVD methods for IORT in clinical practice, highlighting important contributions and identifying specific challenges such as a treatment planning system for IORT. HDR brachytherapy as a delivery technique was not considered. We add IVD for ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy that promises to improve the treatment efficacy, when compared to conventional radiotherapy by limiting the rate of toxicity while maintaining similar tumour control probabilities. To date, FLASH IORT is not yet in clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Petoukhova
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Medical Physics, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Snijder
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Medical Physics, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Vissers
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Medical Library, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen Ceha
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Struikmans
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lozares-Cordero S, Bermejo-Barbanoj C, Badías-Herbera A, Ibáñez-Carreras R, Ligorred-Padilla L, Ponce-Ortega JM, González-Pérez V, Gandía-Martínez A, Font-Gómez JA, Blas-Borroy O, González-Ibáñez D. An open-source development based on photogrammetry for a real-time IORT treatment planning system. Phys Med 2023; 112:102622. [PMID: 37331081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study presents a treatment planning system for intraoperative low-energy photon radiotherapy based on photogrammetry from real images of the surgical site taken in the operating room. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study population comprised 15 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. The system obtains the images of the area to be irradiated with a smartphone or tablet, so that the absorbed doses in the tissue can be calculated from the reconstruction without the need for computed tomography. The system was commissioned using 3D printing of the reconstructions of the tumor beds. The absorbed doses at various points were verified using radiochromic films that were suitably calibrated for the corresponding energy and beam quality. RESULTS The average reconstruction time of the 3D model from the video sequence in the 15 patients was 229,6±7,0 s. The entire procedure, including video capture, reconstruction, planning, and dose calculation was 520,6±39,9 s. Absorbed doses were measured on the 3D printed model with radiochromic film, the differences between these measurements and those calculated by the treatment planning system were 1.4% at the applicator surface, 2.6% at 1 cm, 3.9% at 2 cm and 6.2% at 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS The study shows a photogrammetry-based low-energy photon IORT planning system, capable of obtaining real-time images inside the operating room, immediately after removal of the tumor and immediately before irradiation. The system was commissioned with radiochromic films measurements in 3D-printed model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Lozares-Cordero
- Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | - Alberto Badías-Herbera
- Higher Technical School of Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luis Ligorred-Padilla
- Esophagogastric Surgery and Sarcoma Unit (Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery), Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | - José Antonio Font-Gómez
- Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Olga Blas-Borroy
- Engineering and Maintenance Service, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chand-Fouché ME, Colnard C, Gal J, Lam Cham Kee D, Dejean C, Gautier M, Feuillade J, Mana A, Fouché Y, Delpech Y, Dejode M, Gérard JP, Barranger E. Feasibility and early toxicity of intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer using the papillon + system: First results. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 38:47-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
5
|
State of the art in breast intraoperative electron radiation therapy after intraoperative ultrasound introduction. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:333-340. [PMID: 33991470 PMCID: PMC8366729 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast intraoperative electron radiation therapy (B-IOERT) can be used in clinical practice both as elective irradiation (partial breast irradiation - APBI) in low risk breast cancer patients, and as an anticipated boost. The procedure generally includes the use of a shielding disk between the residual breast and the pectoralis fascia for the protection of the tissues underneath the target volume. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in improving the quality of B-IOERT. PATIENTS AND METHODS B-IOERT was introduced in Trieste in 2012 and its technique was improved in 2014 with IOUS. Both, needle and IOUS were used to measure target thickness and the latter was used even to check the correct position of the shielding disk. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the effectiveness of IOUS in reducing the risk of a disk misalignment related to B-IOERT and the secondary endpoint was the analysis of acute and late toxicity, by comparing two groups of patients treated with IOERT as a boost, either measured with IOUS and needle (Group 1) or with needle alone (Group 2). Acute and late toxicity were evaluated by validated scoring systems. RESULTS From the institutional patients who were treated between June 2012 and October 2019, 109 were eligible for this study (corresponding to 110 cases, as one patients underwent bilateral conservative surgery and bilateral B-IOERT). Of these, 38 were allocated to group 1 and 72 to group 2. The target thickness measured with the IOUS probe and with the needle were similar (mean difference of 0.1 mm, p = 0.38). The percentage of patients in which the shield was perfectly aligned after IOUS introduction increased from 23% to more than 70%. Moreover, patients treated after IOUS guidance had less acute toxicity (36.8% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.33) from radiation therapy, which reached no statistical significance. Late toxicity turned out to be similar regardless of the use of IOUS guidance: 39.5% vs. 37.5% (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS IOUS showed to be accurate in measuring the target depth and decrease the misalignment between collimator and disk. Furthermore there was an absolute decrease in acute toxicity, even though not statistically significant, in the group of women who underwent B-IOERT with IOUS guidance.
Collapse
|
6
|
Radiochromic Films for the Two-Dimensional Dose Distribution Assessment. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/app11052132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Radiochromic films are mainly used for two-dimensional dose verification in photon, electron, and proton therapy treatments. Moreover, the radiochromic film types available today allow their use in a wide dose range, corresponding to applications from low-medical diagnostics to high-dose beam profile measurements in charged particle medical accelerators. An in-depth knowledge of the characteristics of radiochromic films, of their operating principles, and of the dose reading techniques is of paramount importance to exploit all the features of this interesting and versatile radiation detection system. This short review focuses on these main aspects by considering the most recent works on the subject.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lozares S, Font JA, Gandía A, Campos A, Flamarique S, Ibáñez R, Villa D, Alba V, Jiménez S, Hernández M, Casamayor C, Vicente I, Hernando E, Rubio P. In vivo dosimetry in low-voltage IORT breast treatments with XR-RV3 radiochromic film. Phys Med 2021; 81:173-181. [PMID: 33465753 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The objectives of the study were to establish a procedure for in vivo film-based dosimetry for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), evaluate the typical doses delivered to organs at risk, and verify the dose prescription. MATERIALS AND METHODS In vivo dose measurements were studied using XR-RV3 radiochromic films in 30 patients with breast cancer undergoing IORT using the Axxent® device (Xoft Inc.). The stability of the radiochromic films in the energy ranges used was verified by taking measurements at different depths. The stability of the scanner response was tested, and 5 different calibration curves were constructed for different beam qualities. Six pieces of film were placed in each of the 30 patients. All the pieces were correctly sterilized and checked to ensure that the process did not affect the outcome. All calibration and dose measurements were analyzed using the Radiochromic.com software application. RESULTS The doses were measured for 30 patients. The doses in contact with the applicator (prescription zone) were 19.8 ± 0.9 Gy. In the skin areas, the doses were as follows: 1-2 cm from the applicator, 1.86 ± 0.77 Gy; 2-5 cm, 0.73 ± 0.14 Gy; and greater than 5 cm, 0.28 ± 0.17 Gy. The dose delivered to the pectoral muscle (tungsten shielding disc) was 0.51 ± 0.27 Gy. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated the viability of XR-RV3 films for in vivo dose measurement in the dose and energy ranges applied in a complex procedure, such as breast IORT. The doses in organs at risk were far below the tolerances for cases such as those studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Lozares
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Jose A Font
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Almudena Gandía
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Arantxa Campos
- Radiation Oncology Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sonia Flamarique
- Radiation Oncology Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Reyes Ibáñez
- Radiation Oncology Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - David Villa
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Verónica Alba
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sara Jiménez
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Mónica Hernández
- Medical Physics Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carmen Casamayor
- Endocrine, Bariatric and Breast Surgery Unit. General and Digestive Surgery Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Isabel Vicente
- Breast Unit. Gynaecology Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Ernesto Hernando
- Endocrine, Bariatric and Breast Surgery Unit. General and Digestive Surgery Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Patricia Rubio
- Breast Unit. Gynaecology Department. Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Santos J, Silva S, Sarmento S. Optimized method for in vivo dosimetry with small films in pelvic IOERT for rectal cancer. Phys Med 2020; 81:20-30. [PMID: 33338728 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intra-Operative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) is used to treat rectal cancer at our institution, and in vivo measurements with Gafchromic EBT3® films were introduced as quality assurance. The purpose of this work was to quantify the uncertainties associated with digitization of very small EBT3 films irradiated simultaneously, in order to optimize in vivo dosimetry for IOERT. METHODS Film samples of different sizes - M1 (5×5cm2), M2 (1.5×1.5 cm2), M3 (1.0×1.5 cm2) and M4 (0.75×1.5 cm2) - were used to quantify typical variations (uncertainties) due to scanner fluctuations, misalignment, film inhomogeneity, long-term effect of film cutting, small rotations, film curling, edge effects and the influence of opaque templates. Fitting functions and temporal validity of sensitometric curves were also assessed. RESULTS Film curling, intra-film variability and scanner fluctuations are important effects that need to be minimized or considered in the uncertainty budget. Small rotations, misalignments and film cutting have little or no influence on the readings. Most fitting functions perform well, but the quantity used for dose quantification determines over- or under-valuation of dose in the long term. Edge effects and the influence of opaque templates need to be well understood, to allow optimization of methodology to the intended purpose. CONCLUSION The proposed method allows practical and simultaneous digitization of up to ten small irradiated film samples, with an experimental uncertainty of 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Santos
- Physics and Astronomy Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal; Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Silva
- Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; Medical Physics Service, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Sandra Sarmento
- Management, Outcomes Research and Economics in Healthcare Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; Medical Physics Service, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baghani HR, Robatjazi M, Mahdavi SR. Comparing the performance of some dedicated radioprotection disks in breast intraoperative electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2020; 59:265-281. [PMID: 32253497 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-020-00836-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Radiation-shielding of healthy tissue is mandatory in breast intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT). In this regard, dedicated radioprotection disks have been introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three radioprotection disks widely used for breast IOERT. A Monte Carlo simulation approach was used for this purpose. The considered disks included Al + Pb, PMMA + Copper, and PTFE + Steel. They were stimulated by means of the MCNPX Monte Carlo code at depths around R100 and R90 of different electron energies in a water phantom, and their impact on the dosimetric properties of the therapeutic beam was evaluated in both correct and upside down disk placements. The electron energy spectrum immediately above and below each disk was calculated and analyzed. Furthermore, performance characteristics of the studied disks such as backscatter factors (BSFs) and transmission factors (TFs) at different electron energies were determined and compared. The results show that the Al + Pb disk most effectively attenuates the beam, while at the same time exhibits maximum BSF values. Employing the PMMA + Copper disk can minimize the BSF value but at the expense of an increased TF. The Al + Pb disk showed the best performance from the radiation protection viewpoint, while its highest BSF values could lead to perturbation of dose homogeneity within the target volume. PTFE + Steel disk showed an intermediate performance regarding the electron backscattering and transmission among the studied disks. The reverse placement of each disk can substantially increase the BSF value as compared to the correct situation but had less impact on the TF value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mostafa Robatjazi
- Medical Physics and Radiological Sciences Department, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
| | - Seyed Rabi Mahdavi
- Medical Physics Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baghani HR, Robatjazi M, Mahdavi SR, Nafissi N, Akbari ME. Breast intraoperative electron radiotherapy: Image-based setup verification and in-vivo dosimetry. Phys Med 2019; 60:37-43. [PMID: 31000084 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Single fraction nature of intraoperative radiotherapy highly demands a quality assurance procedure to qualify both beam setup and treatment delivery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment setup during breast intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) and in-vivo dose delivery verification. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five breast cancer patients were enrolled and setup verification for each case was performed using C-arm imaging. The received dose by surface and distal end of target was measured by EBT2 film. The significance level of difference between obtained dosimetry results and predicted ones was evaluated by the T statistical test. RESULTS Acquired C-arm images in two different oblique views revealed any misalignment between the applicator and shielding disk. The mean difference between the measured surface dose and expected one was 1.8% ± 1.2 (p = 0.983) while a great disagreement, 11.1% ± 1.5 (p < 0.001), was observed between the measured distal end dose and expected one. This discrepancy is mainly correlated to the backscattering effect from the shielding disk. Target depth nonuniformities can also contribute to this remarkable difference. CONCLUSION Employing the intraoperative imaging for IOERT setup verification can considerably improve the treatment quality. Therefore, it is suggested to implement this imaging procedure as a part of treatment quality assurance. Favorable agreement between the predicted and measured surface doses demonstrates the applicability of EBT2 film for dose delivery verification. The results of in-vivo dosimetry showed that the electron backscattering from employed shielding disk can affect the received dose by the distal end of tumor bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Reza Baghani
- Physics Department, Hakim Sabzevari University, Shohada-e Hastei Blvd, P.O. 9617976487, Sabzevar, Iran.
| | - Mostafa Robatjazi
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiological Sciences, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Shohada-e Hastei Blvd, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences Campus, P.O. 9617913112, Sabzevar, Iran; Vasei Radiotherapy & Oncology Center, Vasei Hospital, P.O. 9617913113, Sabzevar, Iran.
| | - Seied Rabi Mahdavi
- Department of Medical Physics, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Hemmat Exp. Way, Faculty of Medicine, P.O. 14496141525, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nahid Nafissi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Hemmat Exp. Way, Faculty of Medicine, P.O. 14496141525, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Esmail Akbari
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Shohadaye Tajrrish Hospital, Tajrish Sq., P.O. 19996 14414, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alhamada H, Simon S, Philippson C, Vandekerkhove C, Jourani Y, Pauly N, Dubus A, Reynaert N. Shielding disk position in intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT): A Monte Carlo study. Phys Med 2018; 51:1-6. [PMID: 30278980 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In IOERT breast treatments, a shielding disk is frequently used to protect the underlying healthy structures. The disk is usually composed of two materials, a low-Z material intended to be oriented towards the beam and a high-Z material. As tissues are repositioned around the shield before treatment, the disk is no longer visible and its correct alignment with respect to the beam is guaranteed. This paper studies the dosimetric characteristics of four possible clinical positioning scenarios of the shielding disk. A new alignment method for the shielding disk in the beam is introduced. Finally, it suggests a new design for the shielding disk. METHODS As the first step, the IOERT machine "Mobetron 1000" was modeled by using Monte Carlo simulation, tuning the MC model until an excellent match with the measured PDDs and profiles was achieved. Four possible shielding disk positioning scenarios were considered, determining the dosimetric impact. Furthermore, in our center, to prevent beam misalignment, we have developed a shielding disk equipped with guiding rods. Having ascertained a correct alignment between the disk and the beam, we can propose a new internal design of the shielding disk that can improve the dose distribution with a better coverage of the treated area. RESULTS All MC simulations were performed with a 12 MeV beam, the maximum energy of Mobetron 1000 and a 5.5 cm diameter flat tip applicator, this applicator being the most clinically used. The simulations were compared with measurements performed in a water phantom and showed good results within 2.2% of root mean square difference (RMSD). The misplacement positions of the shielding disk have dosimetric impacts in the treatment volume and a small translation could have a significant influence on healthy tissues. The D-scenario is the worst which could happens when the shielding disk is flipped upside down, giving up to 144% dose instead of 90% at the surface of the Pb/Al shielding disk. A new shielding design used, together with our alignment tool, is able to give a more homogeneous dose in the target area. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of shielding disk position can still be problematic in IOERT dosimetry. Any method that can ascertain the good alignment between the shielding disk and the beam is beneficial for the dose distribution and is a prerequisite for an optimized shield internal design that could improve the coverage of the treated area and the protection of healthy tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Husein Alhamada
- Nuclear Metrology, Ecole Polytechnique, Universite Libre de Bryxellers, Belgium.
| | - Stephane Simon
- Radiotherapy Department, Institute Jules Bordet, Belgium.
| | | | | | - Younes Jourani
- Radiotherapy Department, Institute Jules Bordet, Belgium.
| | - Nicolas Pauly
- Nuclear Metrology, Ecole Polytechnique, Universite Libre de Bryxellers, Belgium.
| | - Alain Dubus
- Nuclear Metrology, Ecole Polytechnique, Universite Libre de Bryxellers, Belgium.
| | - Nick Reynaert
- Radiotherapy Department, Institute Jules Bordet, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evaluation of dosimetric properties of shielding disk used in intraoperative electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study. Appl Radiat Isot 2018; 139:107-113. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
13
|
Kamomae T, Monzen H, Kawamura M, Okudaira K, Nakaya T, Mukoyama T, Miyake Y, Ishihara Y, Itoh Y, Naganawa S. Dosimetric feasibility of using tungsten-based functional paper for flexible chest wall protectors in intraoperative electron radiotherapy for breast cancer. Phys Med Biol 2017; 63:015006. [PMID: 29083315 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa96cf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT), which is an accelerated partial breast irradiation method, has been used for early-stage breast cancer treatment. In IOERT, a protective disk is inserted behind the target volume to minimize the dose received by normal tissues. However, to use such a disk, the surgical incision must be larger than the field size because the disk is manufactured from stiff and unyielding materials. In this study, the applicability of newly developed tungsten-based functional paper (TFP) was assessed as an alternative to the existing protective disk. The radiation-shielding performance of the TFP was verified through experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Percentage depth dose curves and lateral dose profiles with and without TFPs were measured and simulated on a dedicated IOERT accelerator. The number of piled-up TFPs was changed from 1 to 40. In the experimental measurements, the relative doses at the exit plane of the TFPs for 9 MeV were 42.7%, 9.2%, 0.2%, and 0.1% with 10, 20, 30, and 40 TFPs, respectively, whereas those for 12 MeV were 63.6%, 27.1%, 8.6%, and 0.2% with 10, 20, 30, and 40 TFPs, respectively. Slight dose enhancements caused by backscatter radiation from the TFPs were observed at the entrance plane of the TFPs at both beam energies. The results of the Monte Carlo simulation indicated the same tendency as the experimental measurements. Based on the experimental and simulated results, the radiation-shielding performances of 30 TFPs for 9 MeV and 40 TFPs for 12 MeV were confirmed to be acceptable and close to those of the existing protective disk. The findings of this study suggest the feasibility of using TFPs as flexible chest wall protectors in IOERT for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
In vivo dosimetry with MOSFETs and GAFCHROMIC films during electron IORT for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation. Phys Med 2017; 44:26-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
15
|
Vidali C, Severgnini M, Urbani M, Toscano L, Perulli A, Bortul M. FMECA Application to Intraoperative Electron Beam Radiotherapy Procedure As a Quality Method to Prevent and Reduce Patient's Risk in Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2017; 4:138. [PMID: 28894737 PMCID: PMC5581388 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Failure Mode Effects and Criticalities Analysis (FMECA) represents a prospective method for risk assessment in complex medical practices. Our objective was to describe the application of FMECA approach to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT), delivered using a mobile linear accelerator, for the treatment of early breast cancer as an anticipated boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary Working Group, including several different professional profiles, was created before the beginning of clinical practice in 2012, with the purpose of writing the Flow Chart and applying the FMECA methodology to IOERT procedure. Several criticalities were identified a priori in the different steps of the procedure and a list of all potential failure modes (FMs) was drafted and ranked using the risk priority number (RPN) scoring system, based on the product of three parameters: severity, occurrence, and detectability (score between 1 and 5). The actions aimed at reducing the risk were then defined by the Working Group and the risk analysis was repeated in 2014 and in 2016, in order to assess the improvement achieved. RESULTS Fifty-one FMs were identified, which represented the issues prospectively investigated according to the FMECA methodology. Considering a set threshold of 30, the evaluated RPNs show that 33 out of 51 FMs are critical; 6 are included in the moderate risk class (RPN: 31-40); 16 in the intermediate risk class (RPN: 41-50), and 11 in the high risk class (RPN: >50). DISCUSSION The most critical steps concerned the surgical procedure and IOERT set-up. The introduction of the corrective actions into the clinical practice achieved the reduction of the RPNs in the re-analysis of the FMECA worksheet after 2 and 4 years, respectively. CONCLUSION FMECA proved to be a useful tool for prospective evaluation of potential failures in IOERT and contributed to optimize patient safety and to improve risk management culture among all the professionals of the Working Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Mara Severgnini
- Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Monica Urbani
- Department of Surgery, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Licia Toscano
- Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alfredo Perulli
- Department of Medical Direction, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Marina Bortul
- Department of Surgery, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Literature was reviewed to assess the physical aspects governing the present and emerging technologies used in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). Three major technologies were identified: treatment with electrons, treatment with external generators of kV X-rays and electronic brachytherapy. Although also used in IORT, literature on brachytherapy with radioactive sources is not systematically reviewed since an extensive own body of specialized literature and reviews exists in this field. A comparison with radioactive sources is made in the use of balloon catheters for partial breast irradiation where these are applied in almost an identical applicator technique as used with kV X-ray sources. The physical constraints of adaption of the dose distribution to the extended target in breast IORT are compared. Concerning further physical issues, the literature on radiation protection, commissioning, calibration, quality assurance (QA) and in-vivo dosimetry of the three technologies was reviewed. Several issues were found in the calibration and the use of dosimetry detectors and phantoms for low energy X-rays which require further investigation. The uncertainties in the different steps of dose determination were estimated, leading to an estimated total uncertainty of around 10-15% for IORT procedures. The dose inhomogeneity caused by the prescription of electrons at 90% and by the steep dose gradient of kV X-rays causes additional deviations from prescription dose which must be considered in the assessment of dose response in IORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank W Hensley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- , Present address: Birkenweg 35, 69221, Dossenheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Costa F, Sarmento S, Gomes D, Magalhães H, Arrais R, Moreira G, Cruz MF, Silva JP, Santos L, Sousa O. In vivo dosimetry using Gafchromic films during pelvic intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT). Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160193. [PMID: 27188847 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize in vivo dose distributions during pelvic intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) for rectal cancer and to assess the alterations introduced by irregular irradiation surfaces in the presence of bevelled applicators. METHODS In vivo measurements were performed with Gafchromic films during 32 IOERT procedures. 1 film per procedure was used for the first 20 procedures. The methodology was then optimized for the remaining 12 procedures by using a set of 3 films. Both the average dose and two-dimensional dose distributions for each film were determined. Phantom measurements were performed for comparison. RESULTS For flat and concave surfaces, the doses measured in vivo agree with expected values. For concave surfaces with step-like irregularities, measured doses tend to be higher than expected doses. Results obtained with three films per procedure show a large variability along the irradiated surface, with important differences from expected profiles. These results are consistent with the presence of surface hotspots, such as those observed in phantoms in the presence of step-like irregularities, as well as fluid build-up. CONCLUSION Clinical dose distributions in the IOERT of rectal cancer are often different from the references used for prescription. Further studies are necessary to assess the impact of these differences on treatment outcomes. In vivo measurements are important, but need to be accompanied by accurate imaging of positioning and irradiated surfaces. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE These results confirm that surface irregularities occur frequently in rectal cancer IOERT and have a measurable effect on the dose distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Costa
- 1 Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Sandra Sarmento
- 1 Medical Physics, Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,2 Medical Physics Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Dora Gomes
- 3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Helena Magalhães
- 3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Rosário Arrais
- 3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Graciete Moreira
- 4 UCA, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria Fátima Cruz
- 4 UCA, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - José Pedro Silva
- 5 Surgical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Lúcio Santos
- 5 Surgical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.,6 Experimental Pathology and Therapeutics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Olga Sousa
- 3 Radiation Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
López-Tarjuelo J, Morillo-Macías V, Bouché-Babiloni A, Boldó-Roda E, Lozoya-Albacar R, Ferrer-Albiach C. Implementation of an intraoperative electron radiotherapy in vivo dosimetry program. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:41. [PMID: 26980076 PMCID: PMC4793509 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0621-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) is a highly selective radiotherapy technique which aims to treat restricted anatomic volumes during oncological surgery and is now the subject of intense re-evaluation. In vivo dosimetry has been recommended for IOERT and has been identified as a risk-reduction intervention in the context of an IOERT risk analysis. Despite reports of fruitful experiences, information about in vivo dosimetry in intraoperative radiotherapy is somewhat scarce. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to report our experience in developing a program of in vivo dosimetry for IOERT, from both multidisciplinary and practical approaches, in a consistent patient series. We also report several current weaknesses. METHODS Reinforced TN-502RDM-H mobile metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) and Gafchromic MD-55-2 films were used as a redundant in vivo treatment verification system with an Elekta Precise fixed linear accelerator for calibrations and treatments. In vivo dosimetry was performed in 45 patients in cases involving primary tumors or relapses. The most frequent primary tumors were breast (37 %) and colorectal (29 %), and local recurrences among relapses was 83 %. We made 50 attempts to measure with MOSFETs and 48 attempts to measure with films in the treatment zones. The surgical team placed both detectors with supervision from the radiation oncologist and following their instructions. RESULTS The program was considered an overall success by the different professionals involved. The absorbed doses measured with MOSFETs and films were 93.8 ± 6.7 % and 97.9 ± 9.0 % (mean ± SD) respectively using a scale in which 90 % is the prescribed dose and 100 % is the maximum absorbed dose delivered by the beam. However, in 10 % of cases we experienced dosimetric problems due to detector misalignment, a situation which might be avoided with additional checks. The useful MOSFET lifetime length and the film sterilization procedure should also be controlled. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to establish an in vivo dosimetry program for a wide set of locations treated with IOERT using a multidisciplinary approach according to the skills of the professionals present and the detectors used; oncological surgeons' commitment is key to success in this context. Films are more unstable and show higher uncertainty than MOSFETs but are cheaper and are useful and convenient if real-time treatment monitoring is not necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan López-Tarjuelo
- Servicio de Radiofísica y Protección Radiológica, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Avda. Dr. Clará, nº 19, Castellón de la Plana, 12004, Castellón, Spain.
| | - Virginia Morillo-Macías
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
- Unitat predepartamental de Medicina, Facultat de Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Jaume I, Avda. Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n, Castellón de la Plana, 12071, Castellón, Spain
| | - Ana Bouché-Babiloni
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Enrique Boldó-Roda
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica, Servicio de Cirugía, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Rafael Lozoya-Albacar
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica, Servicio de Cirugía, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer-Albiach
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, C/ Grecia 31, Castellón de la Plana, 12006, Castellón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Assessment of clinically relevant dose distributions in pelvic IOERT using Gafchromic EBT3 films. Phys Med 2015; 31:692-701. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Revised: 05/06/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|